Quantitative Stock Selection Strategies Based on Momentum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Quantitative Stock Selection Strategies Based on Momentum

Description:

Quantitative Stock Selection Strategies Based on Momentum. Presented by: ICARUS MANAGEMENT GROUP ... Determine which securities to overweight and underweight in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ianen
Learn more at: https://people.duke.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quantitative Stock Selection Strategies Based on Momentum


1
Quantitative Stock Selection Strategies Based on
Momentum
  • Presented by
  • ICARUS MANAGEMENT GROUP
  • Krista Deitemeyer Scott Dieckhaus Ian Enverga
    Jeremy Hamblin

February 27, 2006
2
Outline
  • Strategy Overview
  • Factor Analysis
  • Conclusion

3
Strategy OverviewWhy Momentum?
  • Momentum strategy can help satisfy many client
    and portfolio objectives
  • Determine which securities to overweight and
    underweight in an existing benchmark
  • Use it for a long-short strategy
  • Many people in the industry dispute the validity
    of such strategies
  • Test those pundits

4
Strategy OverviewUniverse Definition
  • US common stock
  • Market capitalization between 500 million and 1
    billion (scaled for time)

Hypothesis
These firms may have greater price inefficiencies
than those that have a larger market
capitalization
5
Factor AnalysisFactors Examined
  • Factor 1 (1m avg volume 1m price change) /
    3m avg volume
  • Factor 2 Price / 3m avg price
  • Factor 3 Price / 1m avg price
  • Factor 4 1m avg price / 1y avg price
  • Factor 5 1m avg price / 3m avg price
  • Factor 6 1m avg price / 6m avg price
  • Factor 7 3m avg price / 6m avg price
  • Factor 8 12m net sales / Year ago 12m net
    sales
  • Factor 9 (Price - 1m avg price) / 1m avg price

6
Factor AnalysisAverage Monthly Returns
  • A look a the average returns of the top and
    bottom fractiles of each factor shows that four
    of the factors are the most promising

7
Factor AnalysisBenchmark Outperformance
  • Two factors had performed well when analyzing
    of benchmark outperformance

8
Factor AnalysisCumulative Returns In Sample
  • The cumulative returns for a long/short strategy
    show that Factor 4 outperforms the rest

Factor 4
9
Factor AnalysisFactor 4 Average Fractile
Returns
  • Factor 4 1m average price / 1y average price
  • Average In-Sample monthly returns for each
    fractile shows strong linear relationship

10
Factor AnalysisFactor 4 - Yearly Returns Heat
Map
  • Heat map indicates a long/short strategy would be
    profitable every year, except the first out of
    sample year

11
Factor AnalysisFactor 4 Cumulative Returns
  • In-sample returns show a huge return in 1999
  • Out-of-sample returns are somewhat inconclusive

Out of Sample
In Sample
12
ConclusionFactor 4
  • Pros
  • Profitable strategy both in-sample and
    out-of-sample
  • Cons
  • Monthly turnover of around 80 means trading
    costs are very high
  • Significant outperformance during 1999 skews
    results
  • Recommendation
  • Improve on Strategy before implementation

13
ConclusionMomentum Strategies
  • Profitable opportunities do exist but trading
    cost issues need to be overcome
  • Further Exploration
  • Layer a predictive model for up or down markets,
    then implement the strategies that would perform
    the best based on the prediction
  • Look at different universes (e.g. Large cap, all
    stocks, emerging markets)
  • Optimize fractile size and rebalancing periods

14
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com