Title: Risk Factor Identification
1Risk Factor Identification
2Risk Factors
- Repetition
- Force
- Forceful Exertion
- Direct Mechanical Pressure
- Vibration
- Posture
- Awkward Posture
- Static Posture
- Environmental Stressors
3Repetition
The Repetitiveness is classified as
When the body part is
idle most of the time
Very Low
frequently pausing, waiting for equipment
Low
in steady motion
Medium
in rapid motion
High
in constant rapid motion, difficult to keep up.
Very High
4Low Repetition
- Greater than 30 seconds per cycle
- OR
- Less than 1000 parts per shift
- OR
- A fundamental cycle time that is less than
- 50 of the total cycle time
5High Repetition
- Less than 30 seconds per cycle
- OR
- Greater than 1000 parts per shift
- OR
- A fundamental cycle time exceeds 50
- of the total cycle time
6What is Repetitive ? (continued)
Body Part
Repetitions Per Minute
Shoulder
More than 2 1/2
Upper Arm/Elbow
More than 10
Forearm/Wrist
More than 10
Finger
More than 200
Kilbom, A. 1994. Int. J of Ind. Erg. 1459-86
7Repetition
8Risk FactorRepetition
9Repetition
Packets unstapled and counted7,000-9,000 pages
counted per day by hand
10Repetition
11Forceful Exertion
The force exerted by the body to perform an
action. The higher the force, the greater the
potential to develop injuries.
12Forceful Exertion
13Forceful Exertion
14Forceful Exertion
15Direct Mechanical Pressure
The force exerted by the environment (tools,
tables, guarding, protective equipment, etc.) on
the body.
16Direct Mechanical Pressure
17Direct Mechanical Pressure
18Direct Mechanical Pressure
19Direct Mechanical Pressure
20Direct Mechanical Pressure
21Direct Mechanical Pressure-Vibration
22Vibration
generally 40 - 300 Hz are a concern
generally lt 40 Hz are a concern
Is this well designed tool?
23Hand/Arm Vibration
- Exposure to vibration from hand held power tools
- Vibration appears to contribute to nearly all
chronic nerve and tendon disorders of the upper
extremity - Vibration exposure may accelerate the onset of
CTDs various tissues and joints are subject to
different frequencies - Vibrations may require the hand to exert greater
grip force - The onset of disorders appears to be decisively
frequency dependent
24Direct Mechanical Pressure-Vibration
25Direct Mechanical Pressure-Vibration
26Awkward PostureTrue Neutral
27Awkward PostureNeck
28Awkward PostureSit/Stand Neutral
29Awkward Posture Non-Neutral Sit/Stand
30Risk Factor Awkward Posture Hands-Fingers
31Awkward PostureWrist
32Awkward Posture Wrist
33Awkward PostureElbow
34Awkward Postures
Pronation
Supination
Flexion
35Awkward Postures
Hyperextension
Flexion
Abduction
36Elbow elevation/rotation
37Awkward PostureElbow
38Awkward Posture Elbow
39Awkward PostureShoulder
40Awkward Posture Shoulder
41Awkward Posture Back/Trunk - Bending
42Awkward Posture Back/Trunk - Bending
43Awkward Posture Back/Trunk-Reaching
44Awkward Posture Back/Trunk-Twisting
45Awkward Posture Back/Trunk-Overhead
46Awkward PostureLegs/Lower Body
47Awkward Posture Legs/Lower Body
48Static Posture
The muscles and other tissues of the body utilize
reserve energy and oxygen when a person performs
a task. Once depleted, the recovery time
increases exponentially with the level of use.
49Static Posture
50Static Posture
Resting
Dynamic
Static
blood flow supplied
blood flow needed
blood flow supplied
blood flow needed
blood flow needed
blood flow supplied
51Static Posture
52Static Posture
53Environmental Stressors - Cold
54Cold Temperatures
55Environmental Stressors - Heat
56Environmental Stressors - Light
57Combined Risk Factors
58Risk Factor Synergy
Force Frequency
37X
OF POPULAT I ON
6X
4X
1X
Source Silverstein, et al., 1986
59Individual Risk Factors
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Endocrinological disorders
- Diabetes mellitus
- Acute Trauma
- Bruises, burns, lacerations
- Vitamin B-6 deficiency
- high doses are toxic
- Wrist size
- Gender
- Pregnancy
- Oral contraceptives
- Weight
- Previous trauma or surgery
- Gynecological surgery
- Oophorectomy (ovariectomy), hysterectomy
60Historical / TrendAnalysis
Records Analyses help identify prioritize jobs
to evaluate.
Injury/Illness Production Personnel Employer/Empl
oyee Records Records Records Survey OSHA
log 300 Seasonal Trends Turn-over Rate Symptoms
survey Incidence Rate Quality Control Absenteeism
Early reporting mechanism Prevalence Rate Model
Changes Grievances Suggestion award
program First-aid logs Bottlenecks Accident
Invest. Material Flow Workers Comp. Plant
Layout
61Ergonomic Job Analysis
- Ergonomic job analysis identifies the workers
exposure to ergonomic risk factors in problematic
jobs by allowing the evaluator to analyze a job.
62Ergonomic Job Analysis Methods
- Task Analysis
- Checklists
- Video Taping
- Analysis Tools/Guidelines (ex. NIOSH, OSU/BWC,
Snook, Job Strain Index, RULA) - Interviews
- Symptom Surveys
63Ergonomic Job Analysis Benefits
- Formal comparison between job task and human
capabilities - Uncovers deficiencies easily overlooked and
prompts us to ask more questions about the job
and why it is done a certain way. - Provides detailed documentation
64Task Analysis
- An outline or set of instructions for sequenced
actions to accomplish a task - Also known as Work, Job, or Methods Analysis
- Objective To identify work methods by individual
components and evaluate for risk factors.
65Task Analysis - Benefits
- Formal comparison between task demands and human
capabilities - Uncovers deficiencies easily overlooked, and
prompts us to ask more questions about the job.
(Why?) - Provides detailed documentation for
re-evaluation, training, and comparison to other
jobs
66Task AnalysisMajor Steps
- Designate the job to study
- Collect Data (observe, videotape, interview)
- Data Representation
- Documentation on Forms
- Identify risk factors
- Control Measure Formulation
67Checklists
- Shorthand tools that help to collect and
organize, as well as, quantify risk factor data. - Checklists are rarely if ever valid pass/fail
measurement devices. - They are best used as comparative gauges.
68Checklists
Checklists are designed to pinpoint 1) how far
a particular job is from perfect and 2)
what components of the job are available for
improvement.
69Checklists
Checklists run the spectrum from very detailed to
concise, one-page.
70Checklists
Very Detailed - Specific questions that rate a
task by the total number of yes answers
Minimum training required - Industry
specific
71Checklists
One Page - Measure severity of specifically
defined risk factors. Can be used on any
and all tasks in the facility - Detailed
training required.
72BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form
73Identical or Similar Motions
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
74Keying
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
75Grip More than 10 pound load
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
76Pinch More than 2 pounds
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
77Neck Twist / Bend
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
78Shoulder Elbow above mid-torso
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
79Forearm Rapid Rotation
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
80Wrist Bend/Deviate
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
81Fingers Forceful Gripping
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
82Extended arm reaches
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
83Reaching Overhead
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
84Reaching Behind Torso
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
85Hard Objects Pressed into skin
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
86Using Palm as a Hammer
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
87Vibration
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
88Mild Forward or Lateral Bending
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
89Severe Forward Bending
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
90Backward Bending
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
91Twisting
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
92Prolonged Sitting without adequate support
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
93Standing Stationary
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
94Kneeling / Squatting
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
95Ankle Extension
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
96Hard Objects Press into skin
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
97Using Knee as a Hammer
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
98Vibration
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
99Push / Pull
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
100Manual Material Handling
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
101Lighting
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
102Cold Temperature
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Examples
103Class Exercise
BWC Risk Factor Assessment Form Exercise
104QEC
105Back posture (A1-A3)
Standing Sitting Twisting
QEC Instructions
106Back posture (A1-A3)
- Moderately flexed or twisted
Standing Sitting Twisting
QEC Instructions
107Back posture (A1-A3)
- Excessively flexed or twisted
Standing Sitting Twisting
QEC Instructions
108Back movement (B1-B5)
- For manual material handling tasks, assess B1-B3.
This refers to how often the person needs to
bend, rotate his/her back when performing the
task. Several back movements may happen within
one task cycle. - For tasks other then manual handling, such as
sedentary work or repetitive tasks performed in
standing or seated position, ignore B1-B3 and
assess B4-B5.
QEC Instructions
109Shoulder/arm posture (C1-C3)
- Assessment should be made when the shoulder/arm
is most heavily loaded during work, but not
necessarily at the same time as the back is
assessed.
QEC Instructions
110Shoulder/arm movement (D1-D3)
- Infrequent if there is no regular motion
pattern. - Frequent if there is a regular motion pattern
with some short pauses. - Very frequent if there is a regular continuous
motion pattern during work.
QEC Instructions
111Wrist/hand posture (E1-E2)
Almost neutral lt 15 degrees
Deviated gt 15 degrees
QEC Instructions
112Wrist/hand movement (F1-F3)
- This refers to the movement of the wrist/hand and
forearm, excluding the movement of the fingers.
QEC Instructions
113Neck movement (G1-G3)
- The neck can be considered to be excessively
bent or twisted if it is bent or twisted at an
obvious angle (or more than 20?) relative to the
torso.
QEC Instructions
114QEC Exercise
QEC Instructions
115Task Analysis
- An outline or set of instructions for sequenced
actions to accomplish a task - Also known as Work, Job, or Methods Analysis
- Objective To identify work methods by individual
components and evaluate for risk factors.
116Video Taping Techniques
- The basics
- name of company and location of taping
- date of taping
- videographers name
- either name the task being recorded during taping
or keep track on paper. -
117Video Taping Techniques
- Taping
- Take a full body shot of the employee. Include
the surface on which the employee is standing or
seated. - If several employees are performing the same
task, tape at least three employees. - Tape the worst case, best case, and the
average situations. - Following the long shot, zoom in to focus on the
area or function of greatest concern, if known. - Video tape the employee from all sides, if
possible (front, back, both sides)
118Video Taping Techniques
- Taping Duration
- Videotape each task long enough to show what is
being evaluated. - Important to tape at least one cycle.
- For cycle times less than 30 seconds, tape 10
cycles. - For cycles greater than 30 seconds, tape at least
one cycle.
1191991 NIOSH Lifting Model
Variables H horizontal location from
midpoint between ankles to the center of
the load at origin of lift (inches) V vertical
location of the hands at the beginning of lift
measured from floor to hands (inches) D
vertical travel distance from origin to
destination (inches) F average frequency of
lift (lifts/minute) A angle of asymmetry -
angular measure of how far the object is
displaced from the front of the workers body
at the beginning of the lift (degrees)
D
A
V
H
1201991 NIOSH Lifting Model
Calculations, where LC load constant 51
lbs HM horizontal multiplier 10/H VM
vertical multiplier 1- (0.0075 V-30 ) DM
distance multiplier 0.82 (1.8/D) AM
asymmetry multiplier 1 - (0.0032 x A) FM
frequency multiplier FROM TABLE CM coupling
multiplier FROM TABLE
therefore RWL Recommended Weight Limit
(LC)(HM)(VM)(DM)(AM)(FM)(CM) (the amount
of weight that nearly all healthy workers could
lift for up to 8 hours without an increased risk
for developing low back pain)
LI lifting index Load Weight/RWL
1.0ltLIlt3.0 changes should be considered - some
workers may be at risk LI gt3.0
changes may be needed immediately- nearly all
workers appear to be at
increased risk
1211991 NIOSH Lifting
The 1991 equation does not apply for any task
that includes lifting/lowering
- with one hand
- for gt 8 hours
- while seated kneeling
- in a restricted work space
- unstable objects
- while carrying, pushing, or pulling
- with wheelbarrows or shovels
- with high speed motion(faster than 30in/sec
- with unreasonable foot/floor coupling (lt0.4 cof)
- in an unfavorable environment ( temp lt66 or gt79
F)
122(No Transcript)
123Maximum acceptable forces for the 90th Percentile
(Snook and Ciriello, 1991) Pushing Limits
Hand Height Push Distance Frequency Initial Force Sustained Force
Male Waist 25 1push/30 min. 55 lbs. 33 lbs.
Female Waist 25 1push/30 min. 42 lbs. 20 lbs.
Male Shoulder 25 1push/30 min. 48 lbs. 35 lbs.
Female Shoulder 25 1push/30 min. 42 lbs. 20 lbs.
Male Waist 7 1push/30 min. 62 lbs. 42 lbs.
Female Waist 7 1push/30 min. 46 lbs. 24 lbs.
Male Shoulder 7 1push/30 min. 57 lbs. 40 lbs.
Female Shoulder 7 1push/30 min. 46 lbs. 26 lbs.
124Liberty Mutual Tables for Pulling(Snooks Tables)
125(No Transcript)
126Manual pulling of cart
Push force 30.2 lbs.
49from floor to hands
127Snooks Table
1st Scenario 2nd Scenario 3rd Scenario
Percent Capable 90 female 90 female 90 female
Handle Height 53.1 inches 35.0 inches 53.1 inches
Pushing Distance 200 feet 200 feet 200 feet
Frequency of Push 1 push/ 8 hr. 1 push/8 hr. 1 push/ 5 min.
Initial Force 33 lbs 35 lbs 29 lbs
Sustained Force 13 lbs 13 lbs 9 lbs
128- The purpose for this assessment is to compare
- lifting parameters for loading PC equipment
- from a cart to a car trunk
- from the cart to the back seat of a car and
- from the cart to the back of a van
What is the MOST stressful lifting task/scenario?
Should the organization buy a new van?
129Scenario 1 Lift box from cart to car trunk
CLI 5.6 Object Wt. Object Wt. Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Asymmetry Asymmetry
1991 Guide 1991 Guide 1981 Guide 1981 Guide (lbs) (lbs) Origin Origin Destination Destination (degrees) (degrees)
RWL LI AL MPL L (avg) L (max) H V H V Orig Dest
10.5 5.6 11.2 33.7 44.0 59.0 33.0 10.0 34.0 29.0 0 10
Additional model parameters Duration of task
1.0 hour Frequency of lifting task 0
lifts/min. Coupling Poor
130Scenario 2 Lift box from cart to back seat
CLI 6.8 Object Wt. Object Wt. Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Asymmetry Asymmetry
1991 Guide 1991 Guide 1981 Guide 1981 Guide (lbs) (lbs) Origin Origin Destination Destination (degrees) (degrees)
RWL LI AL MPL L (avg) L (max) H V H V Orig Dest
8.6 6.8 10.9 32.8 44.0 59.0 33.0 10.0 38.0 32.0 0 60
Additional model parameters Duration of task
1.0 hour Frequency of lifting task 0
lifts/min. Coupling Poor
131Scenario 3 Lift box from cart to van trunk
CLI 5.8 Object Wt. Object Wt. Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Asymmetry Asymmetry
1991 Guide 1991 Guide 1981 Guide 1981 Guide (lbs) (lbs) Origin Origin Destination Destination (degrees) (degrees)
RWL LI AL MPL L (avg) L (max) H V H V Orig Dest
10.2 5.8 10.7 32.2 44.0 59.0 33.0 10.0 30.0 35.0 0 10
Additional model parameters Duration of task
1.0 hour Frequency of lifting task 0
lifts/min. Coupling Poor
132Discussion
- This task is considered hazardous and only
engineering - controls are recommended.
- The calculated values are conservative multiple
loading - (lifting more than one box per lift), increase
in frequency, - lifting for move than one hour, and any
greater asymmetry - associated with the lift, will only increase
these calculated - values.
- The worst case scenario is lifting from cart to
backseat of - car.
- Lifting to the car trunk or the trunk of a van,
appears to - provide similar exposure for injury.
133Discussion
- It is recommended that the vertical origin be
elevated closer to 30 inches. This would have the
following impact (used van data). -
CLI 4.4 Object Wt. Object Wt. Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Asymmetry Asymmetry
1991 Guide 1991 Guide 1981 Guide 1981 Guide (lbs) (lbs) Origin Origin Destination Destination (degrees) (degrees)
RWL LI AL MPL L (avg) L (max) H V H V Orig Dest
13.5 4.4 16.4 49.1 44.0 59.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 0 10
Additional model parameters Duration of task
1.0 hour Frequency of lifting task 0
lifts/min. Coupling Poor
- Providing a higher unloading height would
require an adjustable cart. -
www.tollydolly.com
134Discussion
- The horizontal distances cannot be reduced, due
to - box dimensions.
- Using two employees instead of one to make
these - computer deliveries is suggested based on the
- significant difference of the calculated AL
and MPL - values compared to the actual weight(s)
lifted. - Providing handles on the boxes will improve the
LI - and RWL, however, both values will remain
greater - than recommended by the 1991 model.
- Loading to the van is the only option that may
allow - the employee to slide the box from an
adjustable cart - into the trunk. Sliding motions are 4-5 times
less - stressful than lifting tasks.
- Consider a lift gate for the van to allow
adjustability in work - height.
135Municipality
- Situation
- Heavy lifting of manhole covers, sewer grates and
equipment create loads on the spine, increasing
risk of injury. - Heavy jackhammers create loads on the spine, and
expose operators to hand and arm vibration.
136Primary work tasks
- Essential function is to install, maintain,
repair and service water distribution and sewage
facilities. Other tasks include - Excavating / backfilling trenches and culverts
- Installing, repairing and replacing water and
sewer mains - Joining and caulking pipelines
- Repairing valves and hydrants
- Drilling / installing taps in mains
- Performing street repairs through use of land
plats, maps and diagrams.
137Municipality Job modifications
138Municipality Job modifications
139Municipality Job modifications
- Lightweight / low-vibration jackhammers
140Municipality
- Results
- Incidence rate, lost days rate, and restricted
days rate decreased. - 1 person can now perform some tasks that
previously required 2 people and with less risk.
141(No Transcript)
142(No Transcript)
143(No Transcript)
144Stock Room
One case of paper weighs 52 lbs
145NIOSH Model
CLI 15.3 Object Wt. Object Wt. Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Hand Location (inches) Asymmetry Asymmetry Freq
Task 1991 Guide 1991 Guide 1981 Guide 1981 Guide (lbs) (lbs) Origin Origin Destination Destination (degrees) (degrees) (/min)
No. RWL LI AL MPL L (avg) L (max) H V H V Orig Dest F
1 8.4 6.2 8.3 25.0 52.0 52.0 29.0 50.0 29.0 10.0 15 30 5.0
2 9.6 5.4 10.3 30.9 52.0 52.0 29.0 40.0 29.0 20.0 15 30 5.0
3 11.4 4.5 12.4 37.2 52.0 52.0 29.0 30.0 29.0 30.0 15 30 5.0
4 9.6 5.4 9.5 28.5 52.0 52.0 29.0 20.0 29.0 40.0 15 30 5.0
5 8.9 5.9 8.4 25.3 52.0 52.0 29.0 10.0 29.0 30.0 15 30 5.0
Additional model input With duration based on
less than 1 hour per day With coupling considered
poor
146Solution
This task is considered hazardous and only
engineering controls are recommended.
147Pushing of cart
Push force 23-75lbs.
Handle height 46 (from floor to hands)
148Snooks Table
PULL/PUSH TWO HANDED Scenario 1 PUSH Scenario 2 PUSH Scenario 3 PUSH
Gender Male Male Female
Height of hands while performing work 37inches 57 inches 53 inches
Percentage of population capable of performing the push 90 90 90
Distance of push 25 feet 25 feet 25feet
Frequency of push 1 push every 30 minutes 1 push every 30 minutes 1 push every 30 minutes
Maximum Acceptable INITIAL force 55 lbs 48 lbs 42 lbs
Maximum Acceptable SUSTAINED force 13 lbs 35 lbs 20 lbs
149Possible Solutions
- Modify the wheels- larger diameter
- Reduce the weight of a loaded/full cart
- Purchase an electric cart
- Ensure stacked cart height does not interfere
with visual tasks