Title: Management Control and Strategic Performance Measurement
1Management Control andStrategic Performance
Measurement
Chapter Seventeen
2Learning Objectives
- Identify the objectives of management control
- Identify the types of management control systems
- Define strategic performance measurement and show
how centralized, decentralized, and team-oriented
organizations can apply it - Explain the objectives and applications of
strategic performance measurement in three common
strategic business units (SBUs) cost SBUs,
revenue SBUs, and profit SBUs
3Learning Objectives (continued)
- Explain the role of the balanced scorecard (BSC)
in strategic performance measurement - Explain the role of strategic performance
measurement in service firms and not-for-profit
organizations
4Performance Evaluation and Control
- Performance evaluation is the process by which
managers at all levels gain information about the
performance of tasks within the firm and judge
that performance against preestablished criteria
as set out in budgets, plans, and goals - Top management, middle management, and
operating-level personnel should be evaluated - Management control refers to the evaluation by
upper-level managers of the performance of
mid-level managers
5Performance Evaluation and Control (continued)
- Operational control means the evaluation of
operating-level employees by mid-level managers - Management control focuses on higher-level
managers and long-term strategic issues (a
broader objective), while operational control
focuses on detailed short-term performance - Operational control is a management-by-exception
approach while management control is more
consistent with the management-by-objectives
approach
6Performance Evaluation and Control (continued)
Chief Executive
Financial Management
Management Control
Operations Management
Marketing Management
Plant A
Plant B
Region B
Region A
Operational Control
Employee1
Employee2
Employee3
Employee 4
7Management-by-Objectives
- In a management-by-objectives (MBO) approach, top
management assigns a set of responsibilities to
each mid-level manager depending on the
functional area involved and the scope of
authority of the mid-level manager - Areas of responsibility are often called
strategic business units (SBUs) - An SBU consists of a well-defined set of
controllable operating activities over which the
SBU manager is responsible
8Management Control Objectives
- Motivate managers to exert a high level of effort
to achieve the goals set by top management - Provide the right incentive for managers to make
decisions consistent with the goals set by top
management (that is, to align managers efforts
with the desired strategic goals) - Determine fairly the rewards earned by managers
for their efforts and skill and the effectiveness
of their decision making
9Achieving Management Control Objectives
- A common mechanism for achieving these multiple
objectives is to develop an employment contract
between the manager and top management - A contract promotes goal congruence the contract
specifies the managers desired behaviors and the
compensation to be awarded for achieving specific
outcomes by using these behaviors - Contracts can be written or unwritten, explicit
or implied
10Employment Contracts
- An economic model, the principal-agent model, is
a prototype that contains the key elements that a
contract must have to achieve the desired
objectives - There are two important aspects of management
performance that affect the contracting
relationship, uncertainty and lack of
observability - Managers operate in an environment that is
influenced by factors beyond the managers
control there is some degree of uncertainty
11Employment Contracts (continued)
- Many efforts and decisions made by the manager
are not observable to top management, and the
manager often possesses information not
accessible to top management - Because of uncertainty and the lack of
observability, three principles should be
followed in the preparation of an employment
contract - Separate the performance of the manager from the
performance of the SBU
12Employment Contracts (continued)
- Exclude known uncontrollable factors from the
contract - Risk-adverse managers make decisions to avoid
risk when top management might prefer choices
that involve some risk. It is therefore necessary
to separate the value of the outcome from the
positive or negative weight associated with the
risk due to uncertainty. - Management control systems should be designed to
reduce the negative effects of risk preferences
13The Principal-Agent Model
Outcome of managers decision and effort
Manager
14Designing Management Control Systems
- There are four questions management must ask
when developing a management control system - Who is interested in evaluating the
organizations performance (owners, directors,
creditors, employees, etc.)? - What is being evaluated (an individual, team, or
SBU)? - When is the performance evaluation to be
conducted, and should it be based on the master
budget (resource inputs ex ante) or the flexible
budget (outputs of the managers effortex post)? - Should the system by formal or informal?
15Types of Management Control Systems
16Strategic Performance Measurement
- Strategic performance measurement is a system
used by top management to evaluate SBU managers - Before designing strategic performance
measurement systems, top managers determine when
delegation of responsibility is desirable - A firm is decentralized if it has chosen to
delegate a significant amount of responsibility
to SBU managers - A centralized firm reserves much of the
decision-making at the top-management level
17Strategic Performance Measurement (continued)
- Centralized firms provide more control and the
expertise of top management can be effectively
utilized - Decentralized firms are able to make more timely
decisions at the operational level top
management lacks the necessary local knowledge - Decentralized firms are often more motivating for
employees, are an excellent environment for
training future top-level managers, and are a
better basis for performance evaluations
18Types of SBUs
- Cost SBUs are a firms production or support
departments that are charged with the
responsibility of providing the best quality
product or service at the lowest cost (examples
a plants assembly department, data-processing
department, and its shipping and receiving
department) - Revenue SBUs focus on the selling function and
are defined either by product line or by
geographic area - When an SBU both generates revenues and incurs
the major portion of the cost for producing these
revenues, it is considered a profit SBU - Investment SBUs include assets employed by the
SBU as well as profits in the performance
evaluation
19Types of SBUs (continued)
- The choice of a profit, cost, or revenue SBU
depends on the nature of the production and
selling environment in the firm - Products that have little need for coordination
between the manufacturing and selling functions
are good candidates for cost and revenue SBUs - For products that require close coordination
between these functions, profit SBUs would be the
preferred option
20Cost SBUs
- Direct manufacturing and manufacturing support
departments are often evaluated as cost SBUs
since these managers have significant direct
control over costs but little control over
revenues or decision-making for investment in
facilities - Several strategic issues arise when implementing
cost SBUs - Cost shifting occurs when a department replaces
its controllable costs with noncontrollable costs
(e.g., variable costs to fixed costs)
21Cost SBUs (continued)
- Many performance-measurement systems focus
excessively on short-term cost figures,
neglecting long-term strategic issues - The majority of SBUs have some amount of
budgetary slack, which is the difference between
budgeted and expected performance - Budgetary slack can be good as it reduces risk
aversion, but too much slack can result in
reduced employee effort and (as indicated in
Chapter 8) can complicate the planning process
22Two Methods of Implementing Cost SBUs in
Production and Support Departments
23Implementing Cost SBUs in General and
Administrative Departments
- These departments have the same two methods to
choose from, but the proper choice may change
over time - For example, if cost reduction is a key
objective, the HR department might be treated as
an engineered-cost SBU - Later, it might be changed to a
discretionary-cost SBU to motivate managers to
focus on the achievement of long-term goals
24Implementing Cost SBUs in General
Administrative Departments
Total Cost
Engineered Cost
4,800 3,600 2,400 1,200
Cost behavior in administrative support SBUs
is often a step cost
100 200 300 400
Cost Driver (number of applications)
25 Cost SBUMiscellaneous Considerations for
Performance Reporting
- Many firms are choosing to outsource
manufacturing, customer service, engineering, and
other services - When using a cost SBU, how should the firm
allocate the jointly incurred costs of service
departments to the departments using the service? - An allocation method should be chosen based on
its ability to motivate managers, encourage goal
congruence, and provide a basis for fair
evaluation of managements performance
26 Cost SBUsImplementation Considerations
(continued)
- Dual allocation is a useful guide in choosing a
cost allocation method - Dual allocation is a cost-allocation method that
separates fixed and variable costs variable
costs are directly traced to user departments,
and fixed costs are allocated on some logical
basis - Indirect costs could be traced to cost SBUs using
activity-based costing (ABC)
27Revenue SBUs
- Management commonly uses revenue drivers in
evaluating the performance of revenue SBUs - Revenue drivers in manufacturing firms are the
factors that affect sales volume, such as price
changes, promotions, discounts, customer service,
changes in product features, delivery dates, and
other value-added factors - Revenue drivers in service firms focus on the
quality of the service
28Marketing Departments
- Marketing departments can be either a revenue or
a cost SBU - The revenue SBU responsibility stems from the
fact that the marketing department manages the
revenue-generating process and produces revenue
reports for evaluation - This department can also be a cost SBU as it
incurs two types of costs, order-getting
(advertising and promotion) and order-filling
(warehousing, packing, and shipping) costs
29Profit SBUs
- The profit managers goal is to earn profits
- Three strategic issues cause firms to choose
profit SBUs rather than cost or revenue SBUs - Profit SBUs provide the incentive for the desired
coordination among marketing, production, and
support functions - Profit SBUs motivate managers to consider their
product as market able to outside customers - Profit SBUs motivate managers to develop new ways
to earn a profit from their products and services
30Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and SBUs
Cost Leadership
Sales
Manufacturing Plant
Warehouse
Revenue SBU
Cost SBU
Sales
Manufacturing Plant
Differentiation
Profit SBU
Profit SBU
31Contribution Income Statement
- A common form of profit SBU evaluation tool is
the contribution income statement, which is based
on the contribution margin developed for each
profit SBU and for each relevant group of profit
SBUs - Detail of the statement varies based on
managements needs - Contribution by SBU (CSBU) measures all costs
traceable to, and therefore controllable by, the
individual SBU, including traceable fixed costs
32Controllable and Noncontrollable Fixed Costs
- Fixed costs can be either controllable or
noncontrollable from the perspective of each
profit SBU - Controllable fixed costs are fixed costs that the
profit SBU manager can influence in approximately
a year or less, such as advertising, data
processing, and management consulting expenses - Noncontrollable fixed costs are those that are
not controllable within a years time, such as
depreciation and taxes
33Profit SBU Performance Evaluation
- Subtracting controllable fixed costs from the
contribution margin results in the SBUs
controllable margin - The contribution margin income statement can also
be used to help determine whether a profit SBU
should be dropped or retained - One complication in the preparation of this
statement is that some costs that are not
traceable at a detailed level are traceable at a
higher level
34Contribution Income Statement Example
This statement shows the operating results for
Machine Tools, Inc. (MTI) as a whole
35Contribution Income Statement Example (continued)
This statement shows the operating results by
division
36Contribution Income Statement Example (continued)
This statement shows the operating results by
product for Division B
37Variable vs. Full Costing
- The use of the contribution income statement is
often called variable costing because it
separates variable and fixed costs - Full costing is the conventional costing system
that includes fixed manufacturing cost as part of
product cost - Full costing, also called absorption costing,
is required by GAAP for financial reporting and
by the IRS for computing taxable income - Full costing satisfies the matching principle
while variable costing meets the three objectives
of management control systems
38Variable Costing
- There is an additional reason for using variable
costing - Although net income determined using full costing
is affected by changes in inventory levels, net
income using variable costing is not affected - This is because under variable costing, fixed
manufacturing costs are treated as period costs,
not product (inventoriable) costs - The following example compares the two costing
methods over two periods, one with increasing
inventory and the other with decreasing inventory
39Variable vs. Full Costing Example
Inventory increased by 40
Inventory decreased by 40
4000 100 units 40 fixed unit cost
40Variable vs. Full Costing Example (continued)
41Variable vs. Full Costing Example (continued)
Difference in Beginning Inventory2,800 - 1,200
1,600
Difference in Income2,300 - 3,900 1,600
42Variable vs. Full Costing Summary Analysis
- Full (absorption) costing net income exceeds
variable costing net income (by the amount of
fixed cost in the inventory change) when
inventory increases, and variable costing net
income is higher than full-costing net income
when inventory decreases - Variable costing is not affected by the change in
inventory because all fixed costs are deducted
from income in the period in which they occur
fixed costs are not included in inventory so that
changes in inventory levels do not affect net
income
43Strategic Performance Measurement and the
Balanced Scorecard (BSC)
- The BSC measures SBU performance in four key
perspectives - Customer satisfaction
- Financial performance
- Internal business processes
- Learning and innovation
- Cost, revenue, and profit SBUs focus on the
financial dimension
44The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Performance
Evaluations
- There are several implementation issues when
using the BSC in performance evaluations - Measures are difficult to compare across SBUs
- Validation of the links between measures that are
assumed to improve performance throughout the
strategy map is required - Managers must provide information on the
strategic linkages in the strategy map
45The BSC and Performance Evaluations (continued)
- Many large firms have installed enterprise
resource planning systems (ERPs) to collect BSC
information, but firms lacking such a system may
have trouble collecting the necessary data - The nonfinancial information used in the BSC is
not subject to control or audit and may be
unreliable or inaccurate - Nonfinancial information is often prepared on a
weekly or daily basis while performance reviews
are generally conducted quarterly or annually - Concern arises related to the timeliness and
reliability of nonfinancial data prepared by
external sources
46The Strategy Map
- The strategy map uses the BSC to describe the
firms strategy in detail by using
cause-and-effect diagrams
Financial
Goals Earnings, sales, growth
Goals Customer satisfaction, better staff
response to customer needs
Customer
Goals Staff apply their competencies and
strategic awareness
Operations
Goals Staff competencies, strategy awareness
Learning and Innovation
47Managements Control in Service Firms and
Not-for-Profit Organizations
- Service firms and not-for-profit organizations
commonly use cost (most common) SBUs and profit
SBUs - Cost SBUs are used when the managers critical
mission is to control costs - Profit SBUs are preferred when the department
manager must manage both costs and revenues, or
alternatively (in a not-for-profit), manage costs
without exceeding budgeted revenues
48Chapter Summary
- There are formal, informal, team, and individual
management control systems - The objectives of management control are to
- Motivate managers to exert a high level of effort
to achieve the goals set by top management - Provide the right incentive for managers to make
decisions consistent with the goals set by top
management (i.e., to align managers efforts with
the desired strategic goals) - Determine fairly the rewards earned by managers
for their efforts and skill and the effectiveness
of their decision making
49Chapter Summary (continued)
- Strategic performance measurement is a system
used by top management to evaluate SBU managers - Before designing strategic performance
measurement systems, top managers determine when
delegation of responsibility is desirable - A firm is decentralized if it has chosen to
delegate a significant amount of responsibility
to SBU managers - A centralized firm reserves much of the decision
making at the top management level
50Chapter Summary (continued)
- There are four types of SBUs
- Cost SBUs are a firms production or support SBUs
that provide the best quality product or service
at the lowest cost, such as a plants assembly
department, data processing department, and
shipping and receiving department - Revenue SBUs focus on the selling function and
are defined either by product line or by
geographic area - When an SBU both generates revenues and incurs
the major portion of the cost for producing these
revenues, it is a profit SBU - Investment SBUs include assets employed by the
SBU as well as profits in the performance
evaluation
51Chapter Summary (continued)
- The BSC measures SBU performance in four key
perspectives - Customer satisfaction
- Financial performance
- Internal business processes
- Learning and innovation