NCRI Data Sharing Debate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

NCRI Data Sharing Debate

Description:

benefits / drawbacks of data-sharing and then initiate a floor discussion around ... UK Pub Med Central. Data sharing. Science, culture and organisation matter ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: FBr43
Category:
Tags: ncri | data | debate | med | pub | sharing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NCRI Data Sharing Debate


1
NCRI Data Sharing Debate Peter Dukes Lead MRC
Population Research Data Support Service Medical
Research Council
2
Invitation
  • To give a funders perspective on
  • benefits / drawbacks of data-sharing and then
    initiate a floor discussion around the issues
    raised.
  • on data-sharing, and the obligations that fundees
    are increasingly coming under to share their
    data.

3
Benefits
  • Assumption Datasharing is a good thing

4
Assumption Datasharing is a good thing
  • OECD
  • Publicly-funded research data are a public good
    produced in the public interest
  • Europe
  • European Bioinformatics Institute
  • Community curated databases
  • European Strategic Forum on Research
    Infrastructure
  • Data Deluge
  • Curation and Provenance
  • Interoperability
  • Multi-disciplinarity of research
  • Linking of publications to data

5
Assumption Datasharing is a good thing
  • UK Research Councils
  • NERC Data Grid
  • 9 data stewardship centres
  • ESRC Economic Social Data Service
  • UK Data Archive
  • ESRC requires datasets to be offered to UK Data
    Archive
  • MRC
  • Policy requires datasharing plans
  • Population Research Data Support Service
  • e-Science and informatics initiatives
  • CancerGrid, NeuroPsyGrid, CLEF, Votes
  • NCRI Bioinformatics initiative
  • NHS
  • Connecting for Health
  • Research Capability Programme
  • UK Pub Med Central

6
Data sharing
  • Science, culture and organisation matter

7
Science, culture organisation
  • Databases, archives, biobanks, grids
  • Funding model for sharing
  • User-led oversight
  • Performance service quality science
  • Trials, cross-sectional longitudinal
  • Investment in the cohort
  • Set up
  • Nurturing
  • Effort to collect, clean analyse
  • Performance science outputs

Community data services
PI-led population studies
8
Science, culture organisation
  • Not collected for research
  • NHS clinical management data
  • Social services data
  • Education
  • Data to support service improvement and policy
  • Connecting for Health
  • e-Health
  • Research capability programme
  • Quality service data for patient benefit
  • Care
  • research

Routine data
Researchable routine data
9
e-health related research landscape
Omics data
Patient groups
Cohorts Trials
Bio Banks
NHS Clinical Data
Demographic data
Educational Environmental Social Data
10
Population sciences perspective
  • PI-led research

11
What MRC and PIs say
Hierarchy
  • MRC Council says
  • Data sharing is the norm in the public interest
  • Researchers should submit DSP plans as part of
    grant proposals
  • We will fund preservation sharing
  • Directors PIs say
  • The idea is OK, but for many investigators
    restricted access to their data set is their
    intellectual capital
  • Not everyone can be a scavenger feeding off the
    work of others

MRC Council
Funding Boards
Unit Directors
Study PIs
Data scientists Managers
12
What Data Managers say
  • Hierarchy
  • Benefits of a Sharing Support infrastructure
  • Preventing loss of knowledge
  • Preserving the value of historic investment
  • New opportunities for collaboration
  • Discovery
  • Open up legacy assets
  • Networking spread of good practice
  • Technical enhancements
  • Automation reduced burden
  • Up to date guidance
  • No need to roll your own
  • More effective induction training
  • Greater cost effectiveness across MRC
  • Confident partnerships NHS, other RCs
  • But we need resources and support from the top

MRC Council
Funding Boards
Unit Directors
Study PIs
Data scientists Managers
13
Drawbacks
  • Little evidence of real benefits
  • New science improved health
  • More efficient informatics
  • NCRI Bioinformatics can help here
  • MRC Data Support Service - document
  • Little understanding of the real costs
  • Significant heterogeneity of needs
  • We dont know all the technical answers
  • Weak public engagement
  • Weak academic engagement
  • Complexity
  • Many initiatives stakeholder

14
End
15
Wellcome Trust
CfH RCP
MRCT
NCRI
BIOBANK
AMS
e-Science
DH NIHR
EBI
CLINICAL
GENOMIC
UKCRC
HEIs
GOVERNANCE
INVOLVE
BBSRC
PIAG NIGB
MRC POPULATION-BASED RESEARCH
FSA
ENVIRONMENT
SUS
NERC
NRES
SOCIO ECONOMIC
MoD
OSI
DEFRA
OECD
DFID
DCC
UKDA
CST
RCUK
UKDF
ONS
EPSRC
ESRC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com