Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Today

Description:

A theory is a set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions, and ... But if we use a theory, such as Janus' Groupthink theory: Scenario. Scenario. Scenario ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: aea8
Category:
Tags: janus | today

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Today


1
Todays Agenda
  • Decide on questions from web board
  • Discuss theory and hypotheses
  • Introduce possible theories
  • Edit instructions?

2
Ques. From Web Board
  • How many passes?
  • Circle errors versus circle and correct?
  • What should we call ourselves?
  • What should we call errors?

3
Theory and Hypotheses
4
What is a theory?
  • A guide
  • A way of describing and predicting the world (if
    I do only one or the other, its not a theory)
  • a simplified explanation of reality(Watt and
    van den Berg)

5
Kerlingers classic definition
  • A theory is a set of interrelated constructs
    (concepts), definitions, and propositions that
    present a systematic view of phenomena by
    specifying relations among variables, with the
    purpose of explaining and predicting the
    phenomena.
  • From Foundations of Behavioral Research, 1986

6
Lets look at that closer
  • Lets look at the Groupthink theory handout.

7
So why do we need theory?
8
Lets say we wanted to study decision-making. So
we have all of these scenarios
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
9
And we choose to test these scenarios, to see if
the decision came out good or bad.
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
10
And we found
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
11
If we wanted to predict which decisions came out
good or bad, how could we?
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
12
Without theory
  • We cant.

13
Without a theory to guide us
  • We can describe what we found
  • But we cant PREDICT it, and being able to
    predict a phenomenon is the most valuable piece
    of a theory, because then we can try to control
    it.

14
But if we use a theory, such as Janus Groupthink
theory
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario
We can see that all of these scenarios involved
groups showing symptoms of groupthink we can
therefore predict that they made poor decisions.
15
What weve chosen to test
Teaching Vocal Repetition Visual
Indicating Partner Delay Angle
Grading Subvocalization Read three times Read backwards
Motivation Read out loud Three-step Straight-edge
Student-established Tape recorder Comparison
Teacher-established Card method
Socialized correction
Use journals
16
  • Youve already chosen which ones you think will
    work by have a hunch.
  • This is a perfectly good way to begin research,
    and thats how almost every major scientific
    discovery startswith a hunch.
  • However, hunches arent systems. So, if we have
    no guide, no theory, how can we predict what will
    work if we test more?

17
If we dont have theory, how can we predict what
else will work?
Teaching Vocal Repetition Visual
Indicating Partner Delay Angle
Grading Subvocalization Read three times Read backwards
Motivation Read out loud Three-step Straight-edge
Student-established Tape recorder Comparison
Teacher-established Card method
Socialized correction
Use journals
18
What we need is a theory (or one or two)
  • To predict which methods will work and which ones
    wont.
  • Then, we build our hypotheses, and if they are
    supported with our data.

19
  • If the hypotheses are proven correct, in the way
    that the theory predicts, then the theory is
    shown to be stronger than it was beforeit has
    more support.
  • If the hypotheses arent supported, then the
    theory becomes weaker.
  • In this way, research helps refine theories by
    supporting them or showing instances in how they
    dont work.

20
Cycle of Research and Theory-Building
People notice phenomena.
They gather information about the phenomena.
The theory is strengthened.
They build a theory which explains and predicts
it.
People use the theory to write hypotheses.
They share their theory with other people.
Are the hypotheses supported?
People conduct studies.
The theory is weakened.
The researchers may suggest modifications.
21
Tell me what it is about the methods you chose
that you think will work?
  1. Partner
  2. Subvocalization
  3. Time between
  4. Reading backwards
  5. Straight-edge/card

22
What theories might we use?
  • Information processing theory
  • Reading theory (processing words)
  • Cognitive theory

23
What are hypotheses?
  • verbal statements that specify how the
    variables, as defined by operational definitions,
    should be associated with one another if the
    theoretical linkage, is, in fact, correct(p. 45)

24
Types of Relationship
  • Nullwhich is to say no relationship
  • Covariancetwo or more variables change at the
    same time
  • Positive relationshipone goes up, the other goes
    up
  • Negative relationshipone goes up, the other goes
    down
  • Causationthis is the hardest to prove

25
Proving Causation
  • To say something caused something else you must
    have the following
  • Spatial contiguity (the events must be connected
    in the same time and space)
  • Covariance
  • Temporal ordering (the cause must come first)
  • Necessary connection (the anti-magic clause)

26
Types of Hypotheses
  • Relationship
  • Comparative
  • Directional
  • Nondirectional
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com