Title: 2'2 Important points when presenting a research project
12.2 Important points when presenting a research
project
- There are a number of different texts, research
papers, workshops, training materials etc. with
different scientific levels.
2Who is the audience, who should the text
be directed to?
- Descriptive, popular, political, etc.
- Present a central point for a specific audience.
3Form, dependent upon journal or publisher.
- Consult closely the journal, or the publisher
firm of intention. - Some journal allow only short articles, while in
they are quite long in others. Some have maximum
number of words be ware! - What is the structure of the paper (recall last
lecture)? Look for intro, methods, study area,
results etc., what are and how are the different
headlines stated?
4- Instruction to authors for reports in the journal
of Science (up to 2500 words or 3 journal
pages) present important new research results of
broad significance. Reports should include an
abstract, an introductory paragraph, up to 4
figures or tables, and a maximum of 30
references. Materials and Methods should usually
be included in supporting online material, which
should also include information needed to support
the paper's conclusions. - Â Instructions to authors in Current Anthropology
Major articles with commentaries those that
receive the CA treatment must make theoretical
or methodological interventions into current
controversies within anthropology, broadly
construed. Most major papers are 14,000 words or
fewer in length and must be accompanied by
abstracts of a maximum of 200 words. Reports
present research findings of theoretical
significance to anthropology, and this
significance must be made clear in the text.
Reports are usually about 5000 words in length,
including references.
5Form, dependent upon journal or publisher.
- Bold text, italic texts, capital letters, small
capitals? - Are there several figures or no figures, and what
about tables? - Do the journal allow footnotes? Footnotes are
common in social science, but uncommon in natural
science. - Be aware of references, how are they written it
seems each journal has its own form.
6What about inter-disciplinarity, how to present
the data?
- The best way to undertake interdisciplinary
research is through collaboration between
researchers with different disciplinary
backgrounds (McNeill and GarcÃa-Godos). - The first author and then his/hers discipline
will normally make the highest imprint on the
article. - An inter-disciplinary article (based on authors
from different disciplines) is considerate of the
point of view from those disciplines.
7-Being able to illuminate an area from different
perspectives. -The possibility of getting
feedback and inputs from other disciplines ensure
the right methodology. - A resettler communitys
harvest of Xate.. within the Maya Biosphere
Reserve in Guatemala, an example of an
interdisciplinary article.
8Language in different disciplines
Population ? Human population / plant population
/ animal population. Sustainable, diameter at
breast height, age structure of stands, idea of
meaning, functionalism, externalities,
opportunity cost. Each discipline uses its own
specific language and vocabulary to express
9Number of authors
- Different author traditions in different
disciplines. - It is in natural sciences common to include a
person as a co-author if the person has
contributed in any way. - It is important that you as a co-author is
completely confident in the data. - !Note the number of authors in the articles of
different disciplines in the compendium.
10- To critically read a research article from start
to finish! - Always ask you self, what was the purpose or
reason for conducting this study? - Try to answer a question about the general
procedure, this tests your basic understanding of
what the research that was performed.
11An example, a research project Poverty has been
a major barrier to a healthy lifestyle.
- The abstract
- The elderly have chronic health problems
attributed to obesity. - Research suggests that exercise can reduce the
risk of some health problems. - The hypothesis of the study that older African
American women living above the poverty level
will practice more health promoting behaviours as
measured by the Health-Promoting Lifestyle
profile (HPLP) than women living below the
poverty level.
12The method, including the instruments and
procedure.
- What were good aspects of the design? Could there
be aspects of bias in the design? - What were questionable aspects of the design?
- What factors other than the projects might have
resulted in positive attitudes.
13Results
- Try to evaluate the results!
- Are the presented results supported by the study?
- Do the results answer the purpose of the study?
- Important part of interpreting the results - Do
tables and figures present the results in a
comprehendible way? - Are some results missing, are results
confounding? - Look for speculation only!
14Results, the example
- Results lacking, would have been informative!
- What percentage of those above poverty level had
been graduated from college and high school. - A large percentage were married or widowed, but
we dont know their economic level. - Those below the poverty level had a large range
of scores, along with greater variability. - Although not reported, the two means are
significantly different. -
15Discussion
- Finally you will evaluate the experimentors
discussion of the results in terms of the extent
to which the conclusion is justified, can be
generalized and has limitations. - Statements are they justified?
- Look out for statements of which there is no good
arguments based on own results. - Or statements where references are lacking.
16- A statement of fact should be followed by
references. - Ex. Stige et al. 2006. Global climate change is
no longer a hypothesis (IPC 2001). - Danielsen and Heegaard 1993. Within a few years
most of lowland dipterocarp forests in Eastern
Indonesia are likely to be cleared for plantation
and agriculture. - Speculation ?
- - Look for value laden words
-
17Discussion
- Is there an argument going on with regard to the
subject? - Must be accounted for.
- Ex. Peres et al. 2003. Despite early warnings
that the exploitation of this wild seed crop
might not be sustainable ( Huber 1910), it has
generally been argued that current seed
collection intensities may have little impact on
the demography of natural populations (Vivana et
al. 1998, Zuidena and Boot 2002).
18Discussion / conclusion, the example
- The conclusion is inappropriate!
- Health-promoting behaviors were not observed.,
they were reported. - we dont know the extent to which test items
accurately reflect behavior. - we dont know the accuracy of the self-reports
- Note that score might have been higher if all
forms of exercise, not just recreational were
reported.
19Conclusion
- What did the author conclude?
- Are the conclusions justified?
20Conclusion, the example
- This is misleading, because it implies that
exercise is a main factor that accounts for the
difference in HPLP between the two groups. - Thus if groups were matched on all non-poverty
level variables and were tested by a naive (with
respect to the purpose of the study) individual,
it would be possible to reach a valid conclusion.