2'2 Important points when presenting a research project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

2'2 Important points when presenting a research project

Description:

Reports should include an abstract, an introductory paragraph, up to 4 figures ... researchers with different disciplinary backgrounds (McNeill and Garc a-Godos) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: ingr57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2'2 Important points when presenting a research project


1
2.2 Important points when presenting a research
project
  • There are a number of different texts, research
    papers, workshops, training materials etc. with
    different scientific levels.

2
Who is the audience, who should the text
be directed to?
  • Descriptive, popular, political, etc.
  • Present a central point for a specific audience.

3
Form, dependent upon journal or publisher.
  • Consult closely the journal, or the publisher
    firm of intention.
  • Some journal allow only short articles, while in
    they are quite long in others. Some have maximum
    number of words be ware!
  • What is the structure of the paper (recall last
    lecture)? Look for intro, methods, study area,
    results etc., what are and how are the different
    headlines stated?

4
  • Instruction to authors for reports in the journal
    of Science (up to 2500 words or 3 journal
    pages) present important new research results of
    broad significance. Reports should include an
    abstract, an introductory paragraph, up to 4
    figures or tables, and a maximum of 30
    references. Materials and Methods should usually
    be included in supporting online material, which
    should also include information needed to support
    the paper's conclusions.
  •  Instructions to authors in Current Anthropology
    Major articles with commentaries those that
    receive the CA treatment must make theoretical
    or methodological interventions into current
    controversies within anthropology, broadly
    construed. Most major papers are 14,000 words or
    fewer in length and must be accompanied by
    abstracts of a maximum of 200 words. Reports
    present research findings of theoretical
    significance to anthropology, and this
    significance must be made clear in the text.
    Reports are usually about 5000 words in length,
    including references.

5
Form, dependent upon journal or publisher.
  • Bold text, italic texts, capital letters, small
    capitals?
  • Are there several figures or no figures, and what
    about tables?
  • Do the journal allow footnotes? Footnotes are
    common in social science, but uncommon in natural
    science.
  • Be aware of references, how are they written it
    seems each journal has its own form.

6
What about inter-disciplinarity, how to present
the data?
  • The best way to undertake interdisciplinary
    research is through collaboration between
    researchers with different disciplinary
    backgrounds (McNeill and García-Godos).
  • The first author and then his/hers discipline
    will normally make the highest imprint on the
    article.
  • An inter-disciplinary article (based on authors
    from different disciplines) is considerate of the
    point of view from those disciplines.

7
-Being able to illuminate an area from different
perspectives. -The possibility of getting
feedback and inputs from other disciplines ensure
the right methodology. - A resettler communitys
harvest of Xate.. within the Maya Biosphere
Reserve in Guatemala, an example of an
interdisciplinary article.
8
Language in different disciplines
Population ? Human population / plant population
/ animal population. Sustainable, diameter at
breast height, age structure of stands, idea of
meaning, functionalism, externalities,
opportunity cost. Each discipline uses its own
specific language and vocabulary to express
9
Number of authors
  • Different author traditions in different
    disciplines.
  • It is in natural sciences common to include a
    person as a co-author if the person has
    contributed in any way.
  • It is important that you as a co-author is
    completely confident in the data.
  • !Note the number of authors in the articles of
    different disciplines in the compendium.

10
  • To critically read a research article from start
    to finish!
  • Always ask you self, what was the purpose or
    reason for conducting this study?
  • Try to answer a question about the general
    procedure, this tests your basic understanding of
    what the research that was performed.

11
An example, a research project Poverty has been
a major barrier to a healthy lifestyle.
  • The abstract
  • The elderly have chronic health problems
    attributed to obesity.
  • Research suggests that exercise can reduce the
    risk of some health problems.
  • The hypothesis of the study that older African
    American women living above the poverty level
    will practice more health promoting behaviours as
    measured by the Health-Promoting Lifestyle
    profile (HPLP) than women living below the
    poverty level.

12
The method, including the instruments and
procedure.
  • What were good aspects of the design? Could there
    be aspects of bias in the design?
  • What were questionable aspects of the design?
  • What factors other than the projects might have
    resulted in positive attitudes.

13
Results
  • Try to evaluate the results!
  • Are the presented results supported by the study?
  • Do the results answer the purpose of the study?
  • Important part of interpreting the results - Do
    tables and figures present the results in a
    comprehendible way?
  • Are some results missing, are results
    confounding?
  • Look for speculation only!

14
Results, the example
  • Results lacking, would have been informative!
  • What percentage of those above poverty level had
    been graduated from college and high school.
  • A large percentage were married or widowed, but
    we dont know their economic level.
  • Those below the poverty level had a large range
    of scores, along with greater variability.
  • Although not reported, the two means are
    significantly different.

15
Discussion
  • Finally you will evaluate the experimentors
    discussion of the results in terms of the extent
    to which the conclusion is justified, can be
    generalized and has limitations.
  • Statements are they justified?
  • Look out for statements of which there is no good
    arguments based on own results.
  • Or statements where references are lacking.

16
  • A statement of fact should be followed by
    references.
  • Ex. Stige et al. 2006. Global climate change is
    no longer a hypothesis (IPC 2001).
  • Danielsen and Heegaard 1993. Within a few years
    most of lowland dipterocarp forests in Eastern
    Indonesia are likely to be cleared for plantation
    and agriculture.
  • Speculation ?
  • - Look for value laden words

17
Discussion
  • Is there an argument going on with regard to the
    subject?
  • Must be accounted for.
  • Ex. Peres et al. 2003. Despite early warnings
    that the exploitation of this wild seed crop
    might not be sustainable ( Huber 1910), it has
    generally been argued that current seed
    collection intensities may have little impact on
    the demography of natural populations (Vivana et
    al. 1998, Zuidena and Boot 2002).

18
Discussion / conclusion, the example
  • The conclusion is inappropriate!
  • Health-promoting behaviors were not observed.,
    they were reported.
  • we dont know the extent to which test items
    accurately reflect behavior.
  • we dont know the accuracy of the self-reports
  • Note that score might have been higher if all
    forms of exercise, not just recreational were
    reported.

19
Conclusion
  • What did the author conclude?
  • Are the conclusions justified?

20
Conclusion, the example
  • This is misleading, because it implies that
    exercise is a main factor that accounts for the
    difference in HPLP between the two groups.
  • Thus if groups were matched on all non-poverty
    level variables and were tested by a naive (with
    respect to the purpose of the study) individual,
    it would be possible to reach a valid conclusion.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com