Title: Keynes and the Evolution of Macroeconomics
1Keynes and the Evolution of Macroeconomics
2 I believe myself to be writing a book on
economic theory which will largely
revolutionize not, I suppose, at once but
in the course of the next ten years the way
the world thinks about economic problems.
-- John Maynard Keynes (1935)
3- The Great Depression
- and the Keynesian View
4Macroeconomics Prior to the Great Depression
- Says Law (named for a nineteenth-century French
economist J. B. Say) - Says Law supply creates its own demand.
5Macroeconomics Prior to the Great Depression
- Classical economists believed that markets would
adjust quickly and direct the economy toward full
employment. The huge decline in output, prolonged
unemployment, and lengthy duration of the Great
Depression undermined the classical view and
provided the foundation for Keynesian economics.
6Keynesian Explanation of the Great Depression
- Keynes argued that wages and prices were
highly inflexible, particularly in a downward
direction. Thus, he did not think changes in
prices and interest rates would direct the
economy back to full employment.
7Keynesian Explanation of the Great Depression
- Keynesian View of spending and output
- Keynes argued that spending induced business
firms to supply goods services. - Hence, if total spending fell, then firms would
respond by cutting back production. Less spending
would lead to less output.
8- The Basic Keynesian Model
9The Basic Keynesian Model
- In the Keynesian model
- as income expands, consumption increases, but by
a lesser amount than the increase in income, - both planned investment and government
expenditures are independent of income, and, - planned net exports decline as income increases.
PlannedNetExports
10Planned consumption(trillions of )
45º line
12
9
6
3
45º
Real disposable income(trillions of dollars)
3
6
9
12
Aggregate Consumption Function
11Income and Net Exports
Total output(real GDP in trillions)
Planned exports(trillions)
Planned imports(trillions)
Planned net exports (trillions)
9.4
1.00
0.20
9.7
1.05
0.15
10.0
1.10
0.10
10.3
1.15
0.05
10.6
1.20
0.00
- Because exports are determined by income abroad,
they are constant at 1.2 trillion. - Imports increase as domestic income expands.
- Thus, planned net exports fall as domestic income
increases.
12 13Keynesian Equilibrium
- According to the Keynesian viewpoint, equilibrium
occurs when
- When this is the case
- businesses are able to sell the total amount of
goods services that they produce, and, - there are no unexpected changes in inventories,
so, - producers have no reason to either expand or
contract their output during the next period.
14Keynesian Equilibrium
- Keynesian equilibrium can occur at less than the
full employment output level. - When it does, the high rate of unemployment will
persist into the future. - Aggregate demand is key to the Keynesian
macroeconomic model. - Keynes believed that weak aggregate demand was
the cause of the Great Depression.
15Planned aggregateexpenditures
Planned consumption
PlannedNet Exports
Tendencyof output
Planned investment plusgovernment expenditures
Total Output(real GDP)
9.4
9.70
7.1
0.20
2.4
Expand
9.7
9.85
7.3
0.15
2.4
Expand
10.0
10.00
7.5
0.10
2.4
Equilibrium
10.3
10.15
7.7
2.4
Contract
0.05
10.6
10.30
7.9
2.4
Contract
0.00
16Aggregate Expenditures
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
Equilibrium(AE GDP)
10.0
5.0
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
5.0
10.0
- Aggregate expenditures will be equal to total
output for all points along the 45 line from
the origin. - The 45 line maps out potential equilibrium
levels of output for the Keynesian model.
17Keynesian Equilibrium
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
Equilibrium(AE GDP)
9.85
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
9.7
- At output levels below 10.0 trillion (for
example 9.7) AE is above the 45 line
expenditures exceed output and thus businesses
sell more than they currently produce,
diminishing inventories. expand output.
18Keynesian Equilibrium
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
Equilibrium(AE GDP)
10.15
9.85
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
10.3
9.7
- At output levels above 10.0 trillion (for
example 10.3) AE is below the 45 line output
exceeds expenditures and thus businesses sell
less than they currently produce, increasing
inventories. Businesses reduce output.
19Keynesian Equilibrium
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
Equilibrium(AE GDP)
10.15
10.00
9.85
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
10.3
9.7
10.0
- Keynesian equilibrium exists where planned
expenditures just equal actual output. Here that
point is at 10.0 trillion.
- Full-employment for this example exists at 10.3
trillion. In the Keynesian model, macroeconomic
equilibrium does not necessarily coincide with
full-employment.
20Keynesian Equilibrium
AE GDP
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
AE1
10.3
10.0
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
10.0
10.3
- If equilibrium is less than its capacity, only an
increase in expenditures (shift AE) can lead to
full employment output.
- If consumers, investors, governments, or
foreigners spend more and thereby shift AE to
AE2, output would reach its full employment
potential.
21Keynesian Equilibrium
AE GDP
Planned aggregate expenditures(trillions of )
AE2
AE1
10.3
10.0
45º
Output(Real GDP -- trillions of )
10.0
10.3
- Once full employment is reached, further
increases in AE, such as to AE3, lead only to
higher prices nominal output expands along the
black segment of AE (those points beyond the full
employment output level at 10.3 trillion) while
real output does not.
22 23The Multiplier
- The Multiplier The view that a change in
autonomous expenditures (e.g. investment) leads
to an even larger change in aggregate income. - An increase in spending by one party increases
the income of others. Thus, growth in spending
can expand output by a multiple of the original
increase. - The multiplier is the number by which the initial
change in spending is multiplied to obtain the
total amplified increase in income. - The size of the multiplier increases with the
marginal propensity to consume (MPC).
24A Higher MPC Means a Larger Multiplier
Size of multiplier
MPC
9/10
10.0
4/5
5.0
3/4
4.0
2/3
3.0
1/2
2.0
1/3
1.5
25Real-World Significance of The Multiplier
- In evaluating the importance of the multiplier,
one should remember - taxes and spending on imports will dampen the
size of the multiplier - it takes time for the multiplier to work and,
- the amplified effect on real output will be valid
only when the additional spending brings idle
resources into production without price changes.
26- The Keynesian View within
- the AD/AS Framework
27Keynesian Equilibrium within the AD/AS Framework
- When output is less than full-employment, the
primary impact of an increase in aggregate demand
will be an increase in output. - When output is at or beyond the full- employment
level, the primary impact of an increase in
demand will be higher prices.
28Keynesian Aggregate Supply Curve
LRAS
PriceLevel
P1
YF
- The Keynesian model implies a 90, angle-shaped
SRAS curve that is flat for outputs less than
potential GDP YF due to downward wage and
price inflexibility.
- This flat range is referred to as the Keynesian
range. Output here is entirely dependent on the
level of aggregate demand.
29Keynesian Aggregate Supply Curve
LRAS
SRAS
PriceLevel
Keynesian range
P1
YF
- The Keynesian model implies that real output
rates beyond full employment are unattainable. - Both the SRAS and LRAS curves are vertical at
full employment potential output.
30AD/AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model Polar
Case
LRAS
SRAS
PriceLevel
P2
P1
YF
Y1
- Above are the polar implications of the Keynesian
model.
31AD/AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model Polar
Case
LRAS
SRAS
PriceLevel
P3
e2
P2
P1
e1
AD2
AD1
YF
Y1
- Increases in demand beyond AD2 (like from AD2 to
AD3) lead to the higher price level P3, but real
output remains constant.
32AD/AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model
Relaxed Case
LRAS
PriceLevel
SRAS
P1
YF
- This Keynesian model relaxes the assumptions
regarding complete short-run price and output
inflexibility beyond YF.
- An unanticipated increase in AD with output below
capacity leads mainly to increases in output
(e.g. from AD1 to AD2).
33AD/AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model
Relaxed Case
LRAS
PriceLevel
SRAS
P3
P2
P1
e2
e1
AD2
AD1
YF
Y1
Y3
- An unanticipated increase in AD with output at or
beyond capacity leads mainly to increases in
price level (e.g. from AD2 to AD3).
34- Evolution of
- Modern Macroeconomics
35The Evolution of Modern Macroeconomics
- Major insights of Keynesian Economics
- Market forces may fail to restore full employment
quickly. During a serious recession, excess
capacity and pessimism about the future are
likely to slow the adjustment process. - The responsiveness of aggregate supply to changes
in demand will be directly related to the
availability of unemployed resources. - Fluctuations in aggregate demand are an important
source of business instability. - Modern macroeconomics is a hybrid reflecting
elements of both classical and Keynesian analysis
as well as some insights drawn from other areas
of economics.
36Questions for Thought
1. What is the multiplier principle? What
determines the size of the multiplier? Does the
multiplier principle make it more or less
difficult to stabilize the economy? Explain.
2. The multiplier principle indicates that if
businesses increase their investment expenditures
by 5 billion, real GDP will increase by a.
more than 5 billion if the economy was
initially operating well below capacity. b.
more than 5 billion if the economy was
initially operating at full employment capacity.
37Questions for Thought
3. According to the Keynesian view, market
economies are relatively unstable because of a.
errors on the part of policymakers. b.
instability in the rate of private investment.
c. fluctuations in the real rate of interest.
4. (a) Widespread acceptance of the Keynesian
aggregate expenditure (AE) model took
place during and immediately following the
Great Depression. Explain why. (b) The AE model
declined in popularity when many economies
experienced both high rates of
unemployment and inflation during the
1970s. Was this surprising?
38Questions for Thought
5. The proponents of government subsidies for
sports stadiums often argue that they generate
multiplier effects that expand local employment
and output. Is this view correct? Who is helped
and who is hurt by these subsidies?