Title: Lecture 5' An Overview of Solid Phase Organic Synthesis
1Lecture 5. An Overview of Solid Phase Organic
Synthesis
- Outline
- Solid Phase Synthesis
- An Overview of Solid Supports
- Linkers
- Parallel Synthesis and Split-Pool Synthesis
- Characterization and Analysis
- Encoding
- Solid Phase Reagent Scavenger Resins
Young-Kwon Kim Ryan Spoering Gojko Lalic
2Why Use Solid Phase Synthesis?
- Purification of compounds bound to the solid
support from those in solution is accomplished by
simple filtration - This allows the use of a large excess of
reagents, improving the efficiency of many
transformations - The solid support can be used to compartmentalize
library members, permitting the use of split-pool
synthesis
3Synthesis of Functionalized Polystyrene Resin
- Polymerization of styrene can be conducted with
functionalized monomers - Alternatively, polystyrene can be functionalized
4Effects of Crosslinking
- Cross-Linking imparts mechanical stability and
improved diffusion and swelling properties to the
resin
Without cross-linking, each polymer chain can
dissolve under thermodynamically favored
conditions Cross-linking can induce some
sites of permanent entanglement maintaining
structural integrity
5Swelling of Polymer by Solvent
Shrunken state
Swollen state Permeable to solvent and reagent
6Common Solid Support Resins
- Cross-Linked Polystyrene
- Swells in methylene chloride, toluene but cannot
swell in methanol, water - Tolerant of a wide rangeof reaction conditions
- Polyamide resin (Sheppards resin)
- Developed for peptide chemistry
7Common Solid Support Resins
- Polystyrene-Poly(ethylene glycol) graft
(TentaGel) - Swells in a wider variety of solvents (e.g.
water, methanol) - Usually shows lower loading and is less robust
under mechanical stress than crosslinked PS resin
- Controlled pore glass
- Used for automated DNA synthesis
- Diffusion occurs through the rigid pore structure
- Reaction happens only at solvated surface
- Lower loading
8Practical Considerations in Choosing a Solid
Support
- Mode of attachment and cleavage of materials from
the resin (linker) - Compatibility of the chemistry planned for the
library synthesis - The amount of material desired (loading level)
- Size - affects efficiency of diffusion within the
polymer (reaction rates!)
90 ?m (TentaGel) 0.75 mmol/ g 350 pmol/ bead Ca.
180 ng/ bead
200 ?m (PS) 1.05 mmol/ g 4 nmol/ bead Ca. 2 ?g/
bead
500 ?m (PS) 1.05 mmol/ g 60 nmol/ bead Ca. 30
?g/ bead
Diffusion Efficiency
9Linkers Introduction
- A linker covalently connects molecules to the
solid support, and should provide a means for
their chemical attachment and cleavage - Stability of the linker affects the scope of the
chemistry that can be employed in the library
synthesis - Many linkers are adapted from protecting group
chemistry
Synthetic Steps
X
Attachment
Resin
Linker
Molecule
Resin
Linker
Cleavage
Molecule
Resin
Linker
Molecule
10Alkylsilyl Linker - Fluoride Labile
- Mild cleavage conditions compatible with various
functional groups - Designed for attachment through an alcohol
- Compatibile with strong anionic, cationic,
oxidative, and reductive conditions
Ellman J. et al. JOC, 1997, 62, 6102. Foley MA
et al. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 312.
11Acid Labile Linkers
- Many historically important resins (Merrifield,
Wang, Sasrin, Sieber, Rink resins) have linkers
that are cleaved under acidic conditions - Acidic conditions were intended to prevent
racemization of amino acids during solid phase
peptide synthesis
X H, Wang linker X OMe, Sasrin
linker Sieber linker
12Nucleophile Labile Linkers
- Kaiser Oxime linker
- Advantage Introduction of diversity in cleavage
step - Difficulty Often too reactive for common
nucleophilic reaction conditions
13Safety-catch linker
- Kenners sulfonamide linker
- A safety-catch linker can solve the reactivity
problem with a two step cleavage - 1) An activation step that is orthogonal to
common functional groups - 2) Cleavage of the activated linker under mild
conditions
Ellman J. et al. JACS, 1996, 118, 3055.
14Traceless Linkers
- This type of linker creates a C-C or a C-H bond
at the site of cleavage - C-H bond generation Si-Ge linker (protonolysis
or radical reduction) - C-C bond generation
Ellman J. et al. JOC, 1995, 60, 6006.
Nicolaou KC et al. ACIEE, 1997, 36, 2097.
15Photo-labile linker
- Photolytic conditions can be very mild and
selective - Dimerization of the support-bound nitroso
by-product sometimes hampers further cleavage - Aryl nitro group is incompatible with some
organometallic chemistry
Krafft GA et al. JACS, 1988, 110, 301.
16Parallel Library Synthesis
- Optimization of 12 reactions provides 9 compounds
- The library members are spatially separated, so
this technique can be used for solution as well
as solid phase synthesis
diversification reaction
diversification reaction
divide
17Split-pool Synthesis
- Optimization of 6 reactions leads to 9 compounds
- Each library member must be compartmentalized
(each compound on its own bead) to allow pooling
of the library
split
pool and split
diversification reaction
diversification reaction
18An Example of Split-Pool Synthesis
split
pool
diversification reaction
Ellman, J. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
3306.
19An Example of Split-Pool Synthesis
split
diversification reaction
20Overview of the Entire Split-Pool Library
Ellman, J. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
3306.
21Example of the Efficiency of the Split-pool
Strategy
- Optimization of 154 reactions affords 105
amplification in the number of compounds
Schreiber SL et al. JACS, 1998, 120, 8565.
22Structural Characterization Direct Methods
- Off-bead Analysis
- Cleavage, then use of analytical techniques used
in TOS (e.g. LC, MS, NMR) - Requires high sensitivity and high throughput
format - Example LC-UV/ MS
23Structural Characterization Direct Methods
- On-bead Analysis I
- Can be used to monitor the progress of a reaction
- MAS-NMR ( Magic angle spinning NMR ) is necessary
due to polymer - Magic angle rotor (left), rotor
spinning at the magic angle (right) - MAS- NMR spectrum (600 MHz)
24Structural Characterization Direct Methods
- On-bead Analysis II
- Example Single-bead FT-IR microspectrometry
- Can be used to monitor the progress of a reaction
Beads in IR cell
Wavelength (cm-1)
25Structural Characterization Indirect Methods
- Deconvolution
- Screen as a mixture ofcompounds then
re-synthesize and re-assaypossible
candidatesin active pools - Drawbacks
- Interference byunwanted propertiesof other
compounds(e.g. cytotoxicity) - Possible synergisticinteraction of
multiplecompounds - Sub-library synthesisis cumbersome
26Encoding
- Encoding should provide a fast and simple way to
identify the structure of all library members - Classification
- Spatial encoding position of the compound
provides the information about its structure
(possible only in parallel synthesis) - Graphical encoding bar codes or other graphical
tags are displayed on the solid support used in
the library synthesis - Chemical encoding every reaction used in the
library synthesis is recorded on the solid
support by the chemical attachment of a tag - binary coding (presence or absence of a tag) or
polymer based (polypeptide, DNA) - Spectrometric encoding using a spectrometric
technique (NMR, MS, Fluorescence microscopy, NMR
etc.) to read tags directly from the solid
support - Electronic encoding radio frequency memory chip
attached to the solid support records and emits
coded information
A. C. Czarnik Current. Opp. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1,
60
27Encoding in Split-pool Synthesis
- Optimization of 6 reactions leads to 9 compounds
- Each library member must be isolated on its own
bead to allow pooling of the library
How do you know what compound is on a given bead
after a pool step?
split
pool and split
diversification reaction
diversification reaction
28Chemical Encoding in Split-Pool Synthesis
- Every diversification reaction is followed by a
tagging reaction in which a tag(s) that codes for
a particular transformation is covalently
attached to the solid support
29Decoding
- Every bead has tags that provide information,
once cleaved, about the chemical history of that
bead - Conditions for cleavage of compound and tags have
to be orthogonal
compound cleavage
tag cleavage
small molecule
30Binary Chemical Coding
11
10
011
110
101
111
1
Building blocks
00
01
001
010
100
Binary (base 2) codon
0
Tags
2 digit codon 22 4 max
3 digit
1 digit
11
110
1
n binary tags code for 2n building blocks
31Another Example
10
011
0
11
10
011
110
101
111
1
Building Blocks
0
00
01
001
010
100
Tags
32Halogenated Aromatics As Tags
- Small amount of tag can be reliable detected
(0.5-1 pmol/bead) using easily automated electron
capture GC in the mixture of tags based on
different retention times - Inert under most reaction conditions
W. C. Still et al. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4723
33Attachment and Cleavage of Tags
- Tags are attached using rhodium carbene-insertion
chemistry and can be cleaved using (NH4)Ce(NO3)6
(CAN)
34Binary Chemical Encoding of a Peptide Library
- A library of decapeptides was synthesized and
screened for binding to 9E10 mAb. - 7 Amino acids were used at each position (S, I,
K, L, Q, E, D) - Every amino acid was assigned a 3 digit binary
codon (001S, 010I, 011K, 100L, 101Q, 110E,
111D) where 1presence of a tag and 0absence - For each step in the library synthesis there are
3 tags designated nX (total of 18 tags for a
library of 117,649 members, maximum encodable is
218 262,144)
EQKLISEEDL known to bind 9E10
110 101 011 100 010 001 identified as the best
binder
W.C. Still et al. PNAS 1993, 90, 10923
35Solid Phase Reagent and Scavenger Resins
- Attaching reagents to the solid phase instead of
substrates provides similar advantages - Ease of purification allows the use of excess
reagents - Excess reagents can be removed by use of a solid
phase-bound scavenger that reacts with or binds
the excess reagent
Reagent
Reagent
Filter
Starting Material
Clean Product
Product
Excess Reagent
Scavenger
1)
Reagent
Clean Product
Starting Material
Product
2) Filter
Scavenger
Reagent
36An Example of Solid Phase Reagents and Scavengers
- An extremely efficient three step reductive
amination and triflation is accomplished by the
use of solid phase reagents and scavengers
Ley SV et al. J. Chem. Soc. Perkins. Trans. I
1999, 63, 6625.