Title: Guidelines Compliance
1Guidelines Compliance
2Guidelines Worksheets Received(N8,690)
3Trial Type
4GENERAL COMPLIANCE
5General Compliance
6Recommended vs. Actual Disposition
Actual
Recommended
7Durational Compliance
8CIRCUIT COMPLIANCE
9Compliance by Circuit
10Compliance by Circuit
Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, Caroline, Hanover,
etc. (71)
Chesterfield, Colonial Heights (72)
Buchanan, Dickenson, Tazewell, Russell (66)
Bristol, Washington, Smyth (71)
11Compliance by Circuit
12Compliance by Circuit
Charlottesville, Madison, Culpeper, Fluvanna,
etc. (85)
Radford, Bland, Pulaski, Carroll, etc. (90)
Portsmouth (85)
Chesapeake (89)
13OFFENSE COMPLIANCE
14Compliance By Offense
- Traffic Worksheet
- DWI 3rd 4th (87 Compliance)
- Habitual Offender (98 Compliance)
- Larceny Fraud Worksheets
- Historically, compliance gt 80
15GUIDELINES CHANGES FY02
162ND Degree Murder Felony Homicide
- Section C Base Midpoint Increased from 133 to 205
months - for offenders with no prior violent felony
convictions - (27 non-jury cases)
- Compliance 63
- Mitigation 26
- Aggravation 11
PREVIOUS 53 Compliance 12 Mitigation 35
Aggravation
17Child Abuse/Neglect
- Section B Always Recommends Incarceration 1 day
to 6 months - when Victim Injury is scored
- (28 cases)
- Compliance 78
- Mitigation 11
- Aggravation 11
PREVIOUS 56 Compliance 4 Mitigation 40
Aggravation
18Preliminary
FY02 SEX OFFENSES
19Rape Offense Compliance
30.9
64.7
20FY02 Preliminary Rape Offense Compliance (n139)
Level 1 2 Level 2 16 Level 3
26 No Level 56
50 of All Rape OffendersRisk Level 1, 2, or
3 17 of judges in these cases sentenced within
the adjusted high
Adjusted High 12 cases
COMPLIANCE 65
MITIGATION
- Level 1, 2, or 3 Mitigation Departure Reasons
- Alt Sanction to Incarceration (29)
- Weak Evidence/Witness Refused to Testify (13)
- Emotional Problems (13)
- Victim Willing Participant (8)
- Victim Request (8)
- Jury Sentence (8)
21Sexual Assault Offense Compliance
20.1
65.6
22FY02 Preliminary Sexual Assault Compliance
(n273)
Level 1 0 Level 2 20 Level 3
26 No Level 54
37 of All Sexual Assault OffendersRisk Level 1,
2, or 3 14 of judges in these cases sentenced
within adjusted high
Adjusted High 14 cases
COMPLIANCE 66
MITIGATION
- Level 1, 2, or 3 Mitigation Departure Reasons
- No Reason Cited (15)
- Good Rehabilitation Potential (12)
- Victim Willing Participant (8)
- Plea Agreement (8)
- Guidelines Recommendation Too Harsh (8)
- Jury Sentence (8)
23Sexual Assault Offenses
FY00 Recommendation All sexual assault offenders
with Risk Level 1, 2, or 3 to be recommended for
a prison sentence 9 of Sexual Assault offenders
affected (25 cases)
Prior to Risk Assessment These offenders would
have been recommended for Probation/Incarceration
up to 6 months
24Rape Sex Assault Offenses in ComplianceDistanc
e from Midpoint
62 of all prison cases Within 20 months of
midpoint
3 of Level 1, 2, or 3 At Midpoint
53 of Level 1, 2, or 3 Below Midpoint
44 of Level 1, 2, or 3 Above Midpoint
Prison cases only
25DEPARTURE REASONS
26Mitigating Reasons
27Aggravating Reasons
28JURY SENTENCING
29Jury Cases
30Jury Compliance
31Jury Sentence Modifications
32Sex Offense Cases
31 cases for analysis All bench trials or guilty
pleas
33Sex Offender Risk Cases
18 cases (58 of sex offense cases) Level 1, 2,
or 3
- 72.2 Compliance Risk Cases Only
- 27.8 Mitigation
- Mitigating Reasons
- Plea Agreement
- Offender may lose his job
- Victim culpability
- Offender crime free since offense
- Offender will participate in treatment
34Sentencing In Range
- Jail Prison Cases Only
- Effective sentence
- Within recommended range
35Sentencing In Range
- Jail Prison Cases Only
- Effective sentence
- Within recommended range
63 below midpoint
36Sentencing In Range
- Jail Prison Cases Only
- Effective sentence
- Within recommended range
18 at midpoint
37Sentencing In Range
- Jail Prison Cases Only
- Effective sentence
- Within recommended range
19 above midpoint
38Sentencing In Range
- Jail Prison Cases Only
- Effective sentence
- Within recommended range
- 56
- 1 day to 19 mos
- Below midpoint
39(No Transcript)
40March 25, 2002
- General Assembly Rick Kern
- Impact Analysis Jim Creech
- Reanalysis Meredith Farrar-Owens