Guidelines Compliance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Guidelines Compliance

Description:

... Rick Kern. Impact Analysis Jim Creech. Reanalysis Meredith Farrar-Owens. Compliance Angela Kepus. Revisions Jody Fridley. Miscellaneous Rick Kern ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: VCSC1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guidelines Compliance


1
Guidelines Compliance
  • FY2002 - Update

2
Guidelines Worksheets Received(N8,690)
3
Trial Type
4
GENERAL COMPLIANCE
5
General Compliance
6
Recommended vs. Actual Disposition
Actual
Recommended
7
Durational Compliance
8
CIRCUIT COMPLIANCE
9
Compliance by Circuit
10
Compliance by Circuit
Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, Caroline, Hanover,
etc. (71)
Chesterfield, Colonial Heights (72)
Buchanan, Dickenson, Tazewell, Russell (66)
Bristol, Washington, Smyth (71)
11
Compliance by Circuit
12
Compliance by Circuit
Charlottesville, Madison, Culpeper, Fluvanna,
etc. (85)
Radford, Bland, Pulaski, Carroll, etc. (90)
Portsmouth (85)
Chesapeake (89)
13
OFFENSE COMPLIANCE
14
Compliance By Offense
  • Traffic Worksheet
  • DWI 3rd 4th (87 Compliance)
  • Habitual Offender (98 Compliance)
  • Larceny Fraud Worksheets
  • Historically, compliance gt 80

15
GUIDELINES CHANGES FY02
16
2ND Degree Murder Felony Homicide
  • Section C Base Midpoint Increased from 133 to 205
    months
  • for offenders with no prior violent felony
    convictions
  • (27 non-jury cases)
  • Compliance 63
  • Mitigation 26
  • Aggravation 11

PREVIOUS 53 Compliance 12 Mitigation 35
Aggravation
17
Child Abuse/Neglect
  • Section B Always Recommends Incarceration 1 day
    to 6 months
  • when Victim Injury is scored
  • (28 cases)
  • Compliance 78
  • Mitigation 11
  • Aggravation 11

PREVIOUS 56 Compliance 4 Mitigation 40
Aggravation
18
Preliminary
FY02 SEX OFFENSES
19
Rape Offense Compliance
30.9
64.7
20
FY02 Preliminary Rape Offense Compliance (n139)
Level 1 2 Level 2 16 Level 3
26 No Level 56
50 of All Rape OffendersRisk Level 1, 2, or
3 17 of judges in these cases sentenced within
the adjusted high
Adjusted High 12 cases
COMPLIANCE 65
MITIGATION
  • Level 1, 2, or 3 Mitigation Departure Reasons
  • Alt Sanction to Incarceration (29)
  • Weak Evidence/Witness Refused to Testify (13)
  • Emotional Problems (13)
  • Victim Willing Participant (8)
  • Victim Request (8)
  • Jury Sentence (8)

21
Sexual Assault Offense Compliance
20.1
65.6
22
FY02 Preliminary Sexual Assault Compliance
(n273)
Level 1 0 Level 2 20 Level 3
26 No Level 54
37 of All Sexual Assault OffendersRisk Level 1,
2, or 3 14 of judges in these cases sentenced
within adjusted high
Adjusted High 14 cases
COMPLIANCE 66
MITIGATION
  • Level 1, 2, or 3 Mitigation Departure Reasons
  • No Reason Cited (15)
  • Good Rehabilitation Potential (12)
  • Victim Willing Participant (8)
  • Plea Agreement (8)
  • Guidelines Recommendation Too Harsh (8)
  • Jury Sentence (8)

23
Sexual Assault Offenses
FY00 Recommendation All sexual assault offenders
with Risk Level 1, 2, or 3 to be recommended for
a prison sentence 9 of Sexual Assault offenders
affected (25 cases)
Prior to Risk Assessment These offenders would
have been recommended for Probation/Incarceration
up to 6 months
24
Rape Sex Assault Offenses in ComplianceDistanc
e from Midpoint
62 of all prison cases Within 20 months of
midpoint
3 of Level 1, 2, or 3 At Midpoint
53 of Level 1, 2, or 3 Below Midpoint
44 of Level 1, 2, or 3 Above Midpoint
Prison cases only
25
DEPARTURE REASONS
26
Mitigating Reasons
27
Aggravating Reasons
28
JURY SENTENCING
29
Jury Cases
30
Jury Compliance
31
Jury Sentence Modifications
32
Sex Offense Cases
31 cases for analysis All bench trials or guilty
pleas
33
Sex Offender Risk Cases
18 cases (58 of sex offense cases) Level 1, 2,
or 3
  • 72.2 Compliance Risk Cases Only
  • 27.8 Mitigation
  • Mitigating Reasons
  • Plea Agreement
  • Offender may lose his job
  • Victim culpability
  • Offender crime free since offense
  • Offender will participate in treatment

34
Sentencing In Range
  • Jail Prison Cases Only
  • Effective sentence
  • Within recommended range

35
Sentencing In Range
  • Jail Prison Cases Only
  • Effective sentence
  • Within recommended range

63 below midpoint
36
Sentencing In Range
  • Jail Prison Cases Only
  • Effective sentence
  • Within recommended range

18 at midpoint
37
Sentencing In Range
  • Jail Prison Cases Only
  • Effective sentence
  • Within recommended range

19 above midpoint
38
Sentencing In Range
  • Jail Prison Cases Only
  • Effective sentence
  • Within recommended range
  • 56
  • 1 day to 19 mos
  • Below midpoint

39
(No Transcript)
40
March 25, 2002
  • Minutes Judge Stewart
  • General Assembly Rick Kern
  • Impact Analysis Jim Creech
  • Reanalysis Meredith Farrar-Owens
  • Compliance Angela Kepus
  • Revisions Jody Fridley
  • Miscellaneous Rick Kern
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com