Environmental Ethics Elliot - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Ethics Elliot

Description:

Ecological holism. Human-Centered. Environmental Ethics ... Ecological Holism. Biosphere and large ecosystems are morally considerable ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: bobk90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Ethics Elliot


1
Environmental EthicsElliot
  • Disputes over resource exploitation often focus
    on empirical facts. For example, mining in an
    area might
  • Reduce species diversity
  • Provide jobs
  • Pollute rivers
  • Provide society with material goods

2
Background to Empirical Disputes
  • Empirical arguments presuppose some other
    background principles
  • Providing jobs can count as an argument for
    mining only under certain background assumptions
  • Polluting rivers can count as an argument
    against mining only under certain background
    assumptions

3
Background Elements
  • Desires
  • Preferences
  • Aims
  • Goals
  • Principles
  • Moral views

4
Perspectives on Environmental Ethics
  • Human-centered
  • Animal-centered
  • Life-centered
  • Everything-centered
  • Ecological holism

5
Human-Centered Environmental Ethics
  • Example Evaluate environmental policies only on
    effects on humansa human-centered utilitarian
    outlook
  • Mining would reduce future recreational
    opportunities.
  • Mining would provide nice jewelry.
  • Non-human individual animals and species do not
    count

6
Animal-CenteredEnvironmental Ethics
  • Humans and non-human animals, both as individuals
    and as species, are morally considerable
  • May possible rank species differently
  • May bring qualitative differences into
    consideration, e.g., intelligence

7
Life-CenteredEnvironmental Ethics
  • Plants are morally considerable
  • Perhaps also the ecosystem and biosphere are
    morally considerable
  • Complexity may distinguish ranks

8
Rights for Rocks?
  • Everything is morally considerable
  • Neither life, nor intelligence, is necessary to
    qualify for moral consideration
  • Ranks are possible
  • Example Breaking rocks is morally objectionable
    in itself, but may be permissible to serve some
    higher moral interest.

9
Ecological Holism
  • Biosphere and large ecosystems are morally
    considerable
  • Individuals and species are not morally
    considerable by themselves

10
Justification
  • Human-centered ethics focus on human
  • Interests
  • Capacities, e.g., rational thought
  • Intrinsic qualities, e.g., complexity, beauty
  • But other beings possess these same features in
    different ways
  • Suggests a drift beyond the human-centered

11
Beyond Human-Centered Ethics
  • Find a determinant of moral-considerability in a
    human-centered ethic, then show that a rigorous
    application of the principle also applies to
    animals
  • Show that human-centered ethics ignores a feature
    of animals that really is morally considerable

12
Is Naturalness Morally Considerable?
  • Thought experiment A mining operation destroys a
    mountain, but the mining company replaces the
    mountain with a perfect replica of the original
    Assume there is no life on the mountain.
  • Is there still a loss?
  • Does it raise a moral question?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com