Title: Vegetation
1Vegetation
2Mayer "Nature has put itself the problem of how
to catch in flight light streaming to the Earth
and to store the most elusive of all powers in
rigid form. The plants take in one form of power,
light and produce another power, chemical
difference."
3The Leaf
4Chloroplasts
sieve effect
5Chlorophyll
6Carotenes
7Light Harvesting Complex II
- Chlorophyll A green Chlorophyll B orange
Carotene red Structural proteins yellow
8Antennae Complex
Wavelength of max absorption
Energy Gradient
light
shorter
High
Carotenoids
?
Chlorophyll b
650 nm
670 nm
Chlorophyll a
longer
low
P 680 Chl a
Reaction Center
9Photosynthesis
10Photosynthesis
The Cornerstone of Life on this planet!
11(No Transcript)
12Vegetation Spectra
13(No Transcript)
14Pigment Absorption
Chlorophyll
b
Absorption Spectra
of Chlorophyll
a
and
b
Chlorophyll
a
Absorption Efficiency
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
a.
v
iolet
b
lue
g
reen
y
ellow
red
Wavelength,
m
m
Phycocyanin
Phycoerythrin
Absorption Efficiency
b
-carotene
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
v
iolet
b
lue
g
reen
y
ellow
red
b.
Wavelength,
m
m
15Cell Wall Constituents
16Protein Constituents
17Cellular Water
18Leaf Biochemistry
- Leaf biochemistry
- pigments chlorophyll a and b, a-carotene, and
xanthophyll - absorb in blue ( red for chlorophyll)
- Absorbed radiation converted into
- heat energy, flourescence, or carbohydrates
through photosynthesis
Stored carbon!
19Chlorophyll and Carbon Assimilation
The big picture
Potential Carbon Assimilation
This is important
Amount of Chlorophyll
(Concentration x phytomass)
20Chlorophyll Concentration
Reduced absorption due to decreasing chlorophyll
concentration
21Chlorophyll Concentrations
Red or blue wavlength radiance,reflectance
chlorophyll concentration
22What about estimating Phytomass?
First lets define phytomass leaf area x leaf
mass per unit area (m2 x kg/m2 kg) Then lets
introduce some surrogates for phytomass Leaf
area Index (LAI)- one sided leaf area per unit
ground area Leaf area density (LAD) leaf area
per unit volume
Why use area instead of mass? Because estimating
the leaf mass per unit area using remote sensing
is very difficult. (How thick and heavy are the
leaves?) Estimating area is more straight forward
(remember areal mixtures)
23Estimating Phytomass Additive Reflectance
24Leaf Area Estimation
Most leaf area
25Vegetation Indices
Both red and NIR bands carry complementary
information. How can we use that info and reduce
noise introduced by other sources?
NIR 75 Red 32 NIR/R 2.34
NIR 119 Red 49 NIR/R 2.38
Shaded area
26Vegetation Indices
- Vegetation indices (VI) are combinations of
spectral measurements in different wavelengths as
recorded by a radiometric sensor. They aid in the
analysis of multispectral image information by
shrinking multidimensional data into a single
value. Huete (1994) defined vegetation indices
as - dimensonless, radiometric measures usually
involving a ratio and/or linear combination of
the red and near-infrared (NIR) portions of the
spectrum. VI s may be computed from digital
counts, at satellite radiances, apparent
reflectances, land-leaving radiances, or surface
reflectances and require no additional ancillary
information other than the measurements
themselvesWhat VI s specifically measure remains
unclear. They serve as indicators of relative
growth and/or vigor of green vegetation, and are
diagnostic of various biophysical vegetation
parameters.
27Vegetation Indices
- Vegetation indices (VIs) can be broken up into
two basic categories - Ratio based indices VIs based on the ratio of
two or more radiance, reflectance, or DN values
(or linear combinations thereof). - Difference indices VIs based on the
difference between the spectral response of
vegetation and the soil background.
28 Common Ratio Indices
Simple Ratio Index (SR) NIR/R
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)
29(No Transcript)
30Common Difference Indices
Perpendicular Vegetation Index (PVI) for a single
soil background
Where Rsoil and NIRsoil are the red and NIR
reflecatance/radiance for the soil background.
31Common Difference Indices (continued)
Or the PVI for a multiple soil background
Where a and b are the slope and intercept
respectively of the universal soil line for the
area
32Typical Vegetation Index Response
But what about other objects within the field of
view (FOV) of the sensor other than vegetation?
33Leaf area Density
34Composite Canopy Reflectance
100 veg. Cover 1 leaf layer LAI 1
0 veg. Cover LAI 0
1 m2 of leaf area
pixel
50 veg. Cover 2 leaf layers LAI 1
33 veg. cover 3 leaf layers LAI 1
Are the reflectances for these 3 pixels the same?
35Composite Canopy Reflectance
This region of the curve is dominated by a change
in percent vegetation cover
100 vegetation cover
In this region, there is complete vegetion cover
and differences are due to increasing canopy
density-Additive Reflectance (multiple scattering)
36Determining Vine Canopy Density in a Wine Grape
Vineyard A Case Study
- Can Vine Canopy Density Be Remotely Determined?
- Single vine scale canopy density manipulation
experiment field spectroscopy techniques.
37Case Study 1 Field Spectroscopy
38Case Study 2 Canopy Density Manipulation
Experiment
- 6 canopy density treatments
- 4 single vine replications
- 2 spectrometer configurations
Spectrometer configuration above the target
canopy (shaded area). Circles represent the field
of view (FOV) of the optic at each configuration.
39Case Study 3 Canopy Thinning
40Case Study 4 Composite Canopy Spectra by Density
Class
41Case Study 5 Red and NIR Reflectance by Canopy
Density
42Case Study 6 Ratio Vegetation Index by Canopy
Density
43Leaf area Density
44(No Transcript)
45Case Study 9 Shadow Spectra by Density Class
46Case Study 10 Shadow Red and NIR reflectance by
Canopy Density
47Case Study 11 Shadow SR by Canopy Density
48Case Study 11 Can Vine Canopy Density Be
Remotely Determined?
Yes but. (the plot thickens)
49Case Study 12 How do the scene components change
over time?
50Case Study 13 Due to the discontinuous nature of
grapevine canopies, scene reflectance is dynamic!
It changes over the course of a day.
- It is dependent on
- Vine canopy characteristics
- Solar geometry (position of the sun)
- row orientation
- Field of view of the sensor (image resolution)
51Case Study 14 How variable is the spectral
signature?
52Case Study 15What are the limitations of using
this?
Question Why is the reflectance and VI values
varying over the course of the Day? Answer
Because the suns position is changing resulting
in different proportions of shadow and sunlit
soil within the FOV of the sensor.
53Case Study 16
X (sin ?- ?) (tan ? h)w
54Case Study 17Geometric Optical Model
55Case Study 18
56Case Study 19
57Bi-directional Reflectance Distribution Function
(BRDF)
Review These Equations assume Isotropic incident
and isotropic reflected radiation
58Bi-directional Reflectance Distribution Function
(BRDF)
Light reflecting off of a surface is rarely
isotropic. Most surfaces exhibit anisotropic
reflectance (reflectance amount varies with
direction).
59BRDF
Li(?i,?i,?)
Lr(?i,?i , ? ?r,?r)
BRDF Lr(?i,?, ? ?r,?r)/ Li(?i,?i, ?)
60BRDF
sensor
Forward scatter direction
Back scatter direction
61BRDF
Backscatter direction
Forward scatter direction
62BRDF
Backscatter direction
Forward scatter direction
63BRDF
Backscatter direction
Forward scatter direction
64BRDF a Goniometer
65BRDF
hot spot
Backscatter direction
Forward scatter direction
66BRDF
67(No Transcript)