WP 8: Real Case Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

WP 8: Real Case Studies

Description:

WP 8: Real Case Studies. www.agreement-technologies.org. WP8: Real Case Studies ... Uri Shamir, President, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics(IUGG) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: agreementt
Category:
Tags: case | geodesy | real | studies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WP 8: Real Case Studies


1
WP 8 Real Case Studies
www.agreement-technologies.org
2
WP8 Real Case Studies (Leader Vicent Botti
UPV)
CSIC URJ UPV Total
WP8 Real Case Studies (Leader Vicent Botti UPV) WP8 Real Case Studies (Leader Vicent Botti UPV) 57 84 36 204
Task 8.1. eProcurement Demonstrator (Leader Juan Antonio Rodriguez) 45 6 78
Task 8.2 mWater Demonstrator (Leader V.Botti) 6 6 36 48
Task 8.3 mHealth demonstrator (Leader Holger Billhardt) 6 72 78
3
WP8 Real Case Studies
  • Goal
  • Test beds for the research results and algorithms
    developed in the theoretical work packages.
  • Central to this work package shall be the common
    methodology and tools produced in WP6.
  • Method
  • develop all demonstrators as evolutionary
    prototypes
  • develop the demonstrators through several
    iterations
  • involve the Demonstration Advisory Boards as
    reviewers.
  • Guides
  • (i) to help team members to join the developers
    team or show the demonstrator at any time
  • (ii) ease technology transfer (from the software
    development and commercial perspectives).
  • We defend that this strategy is compulsory if we
    intend to exploit our demonstrators as part of
    our technology transfer strategy

Requirements
Design
Implementation
Review
4
Schedule
5
Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar jar_at_iiia.csic.es
Task 8.3 eProcurement demonstrator WP8 Real
case studies AT-kickoff meeting Barcelona,
February 4-5, 2008
www.agreement-technologies.org
6
eProcurement demonstrator
Overview
  • Motivation and goals
  • Proposed scenario
  • Why agreement technologies?
  • Planning

7
Motivation
  • The organisational structure of enterprises is
    changing
  • Increment of outsourced activity
  • From monolithic to collaborative structures that
    tend to reduce their size

8
Chinese Motorbike Industry
  • Small companies collaborate and self-organise
  • They meet in online places and coffee shops
  • A self-organising system of design and production

8
9
Motivation
  • Business partners are moving from the roles of
    suppliers, manufacturers, and customers to the
    role of collaborators
  • In this environment, the choice of the best
    business partners is critical

10
Goals
  • Companies are in need for
  • Support to swiftly create business collaborations
    that allow them to readily respond to chaning
    market needs
  • Tools that allow them to quickly react to
    exceptions so that their goals can still be
    achieved.

11
Proposed scenario
  • Supply chain automation

12
Why agreement technologies?
  • Negotiation
  • Supply chain formation and reconfiguration
    require agreements among self-interested partners
  • Trust
  • Fundamental to achieve robust supply chains that
    prevent failures
  • Norms and organisations
  • The result of agreements take the shape of norms
    or organisations

13
eProcurement Advisory Board
  • Javier Aróstegui, Director General of iSOCO,
    S.A., and President of the B2B Committee of the
    Asociación Española de Comercio Electrónico
  • Mariano Tristán, Procurement Manager at Lilly
    Group
  • Xavier Salrà, Consulting Manager for the Public
    Sector at Hewlett-Packard
  • Rafel Bernadas, ITC Coordinator, Economy and
    Finance Departament, Generalitat de Catalunya

14
V.Botti
Task 8.2 mWater Demonstrator
www.agreement-technologies.org
15
Task 8.2 mWater Demonstrator
Motivation. The mWater demonstrator addresses
scenarios where there are conflicts over
different basin waters, in many cases, caused by
potential or actual water scarcity.
Objectives. The mWater demonstrator has the
goal of providing an efficient allocation of
water resources based on a system of voluntary
trade in water, which brings potentially large
benefits to all parties involved.
16
Why agreement technologies?
  • Politic Level
  • Behavior Simulation
  • Evaluation of different estrategies
  • Agreement (Decision) Support System?
  • Norms, Organizations, Trust, Negotiation
  • Water distribution management
  • Water flow negotiation
  • Time Schedule
  • Cost
  • Water Flow Management System?
  • Norms, Organizations, Trust, Negotiation

17
mWater Advisory Board
  • Joaquín Andreu Álvarez, Technical Director of the
    Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar.
  • Emeritus Professor Uri Shamir, President,
    International Union of Geodesy and
    Geophysics(IUGG), Stephen and Nancy Grand Water
    Research Institute, Technion - Israel Institute
    of Technology.
  • Luís Garrote de Marco, Catedrático de
    Universidad. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil
    Hidráulica y Energética. Universidad Politécnica
    de Madrid.
  • Manuel Echeberría, subdirector general de
    programación técnica y científica, Centro de
    Estudio y experimentación de obras públicas.

18
Holger Billhardt holger.billhardt_at_urjc.es
Task 8.3 mHealth demonstrator WP8 Real case
studies AT-kickoff meeting Barcelona, February
4-5, 2008
www.agreement-technologies.org
19
mHealth demonstrator
Overview
  • Introduction Aims and scope
  • Proposed scenario
  • Why agreement technologies?
  • Planning

20
Introduction
  • WP8 Real case studies
  • Objectives
  • Test beds for the research results and algorithms
    developed in the theoretical work packages
  • Apply the common methodology and the tools
    produced in WP6 (Tool suite).
  • Based on the software architecture and the
    Multiagent system platform developed in WP7
  • Methodology
  • Evolutionary prototypes through several
    iterations
  • Demonstration Advisory board
  • Expected outcome
  • Usable software (technology transfer)
  • Programmers and demonstrators guide

21
Introduction
  • mHealth demonstrator
  • Medical emergency assistance for people on the
    move
  • Motivation
  • Requires on-the-fly agreements among
    heterogeneous organizations
  • Practical relevance
  • Bias towards health applications
  • Added value for tourist services

22
Proposed Scenario
  1. Alice and Bob are tourists from Germany. They
    carry a PDA, already equipped with the mHealth
    agent suite. Suddenly, Alice is seriously
    suffering from pain in the upper part of her body
    which is unknown to her.
  1. After activation of the PDA, Alice uses the
    device to quickly find the nearest hospital next
    to them. The agent on the PDA also supplies them
    with information on how to get there.
  1. The physician may require some data from Alice
    medical record. Bob contacts Alice home
    hospital, directly or through some Emergency
    Medical Assistance service (EMA), in order to
    obtain the data.
  1. The physician is not sure about the diagnosis and
    wants to obtain a second opinion. He accesses a
    second opinion service by forwarding all
    information available so far.
  1. The second opinion service provider asks some
    details to the local physician. They all come to
    the conclusion that Alice needs an urgent
    surgical operation. The hospital doesnt have the
    required equipment, so they decide to transfer
    Alice to another hospital in Spain.
  1. Bob contacts Alice health insurance company to
    inform them about the proposed treatment and to
    ask for the corresponding authorization.
  1. The hospital agent contacts other hospitals in
    the area in order to find a suitable hospital for
    Alice treatment. Furthermore, it passes Alice
    medical data to the new hospital and arranges her
    transfer with a local ambulance company.
  1. Finally, Alice is transferred and operated. After
    two weeks of recovery Alice uses her PDA to send
    a Thank you to all the people involved with her
    medical case .

23
Why agreement technologies?
  • Semantics
  • Ad-hoc communication between different
    organizations
  • Heterogeneous representation
  • languages for data and services
  • Heterogeneous descriptions of
  • services and data

E.g. medical record data exchange
24
Why agreement technologies?
  • Argumentation and negotiation
  • Requires agreements among
  • independent organizations

E.g. find a hospital for a Alice treatment
25
Why agreement technologies?
  • Trust
  • Health is a trust sensitive domain

E.g. ask for a second opinion
26
Why agreement technologies?
  • Norms and Organizations
  • To define the relationships among participating
    organizations
  • Efficient teamwork among participants
  • Agreement planning

E.g. arrange Alice transfer to
another hospital
27
Planning
  • First steps
  • To define the concrete application scenario
  • Basically in cooperation with Fuenlabrada Public
    Hospital
  • Comments/questions
  • The envisioned international scenario is
    interesting but difficult to implement
  • Maybe we should concentrate on a smaller rather
    local scenario
  • Closer to real world
  • Higher possibility for technology transfer
    (commercial perspective)
  • Team
  • Holger Billhardt (Leader)
  • PhD student
  • URJC team
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com