Title: HUMAN ERROR
1HUMAN ERROR
- Nantida Wisawayodhin M Sc. M.Erg.S.
Module Cognition and Information
Processing Course Human Centered Design
(HCD) SOAD, KMUTT
2OVERVIEW
- Introduction
- Human error
- Error types
- Cognitive stages and error type
- Level of performance and human error
- Failure mode
- Error forms and schemata
- GEMS
- Error detection and correction
- Active vs. Latent errors
- Practical based on an air crash documentary
3INTRODUCTION
What is human error? Have you made any errors
today?
4INTRODUCTION
- Whats wrong with this picture?
5INTRODUCTION
Alexander Pope An Essay on Criticism, 1711
6INTRODUCTION
- We make errors far less frequently than making
correct actions, but when they occurs, the
consequences can be disastrous.
7INTRODUCTION
- Chernobyl disaster in 1986
- The explosion of a reactor of a nuclear power
station in former Russia releasing radioactive
material into the atmosphere immediately costing
over 30 lives (and countless thousands during
clean-ups), contaminated over 400 square miles
around the plant. - Twenty years on it still has far reaching effects
on the environment and health of the whole of
Western Europe and the Scandinavia.
8INTRODUCTION
- The Herald of Free Enterprise in 1987
- A roll-on/roll-off passenger and freight ferry
that left Zeebrugge, Belgium en route to Dover,
England with her bow door open and capsized 20
minutes later costing nearly 200 lives and
numerous injures.
9INTRODUCTION
- Bhopal in 1984
- A leakage of around 43,000 kilograms of an
extremely toxic chemical, methyl isocyanate, from
a small pesticide plant in the central India city
of Bhopal that killed at least 2,500 people and
injured more than 200,000.
10INTRODUCTION
- Can we be error-free?
- The simple answer is no
- As long as human is still the decision maker and
the problem solver, it is not possible to totally
eradicate errors
11INTRODUCTION
- But we can try to reduce the occurrence of human
error by trying to understand what human error
is, the types of error, how it occurs and why it
occurs.
12HUMAN ERROR
- Influencing factors in error production
13HUMAN ERROR
- What is human error?
- An error is a departure from the intended path
and the desired goal - In order to get to a desired goal, one must have
an intention - To have an intention, one must be aware of the
situation and pay attention to it - Human error, intention and attention are in
separable - An action without intention cannot produce a
human error
14INTENTION AND HUMAN ERROR
- What is an intention?
- An expression of the end-state (goal) to be
attained - An indication of the means (plan) by which it is
to be achieved - Components of an intention
- A desired goal
- Sub-goals
- A formulation of a plan
- Action execution
15INTENTION AND HUMAN ERROR
- Example making a cup of coffee
- A desired goal a cup of coffee
- Sub-goals 1) boil water 2) put coffee in cup
3) pour boiled water in cup 4) add milk and
sugar and 5) stir - A formulation of a plan retaining memory on how
to achieve the sub-goals - Action execution physically make a cup of coffee
Error could occur anywhere along this path
16INTENTION, ATTENTION AND ERROR
Mistakes
(Absent mindedness)
Slips Lapses
Intended path
Deviation from intended path
17INTENTION AND HUMAN ERROR
- Examples of error
- Forming sub-goals
- Have an incorrect understanding (incorrect
knowledge) of the situation and therefore, set an
incorrect sub-goal - Formulating a plan
- Having set an appropriate goal, one could apply a
wrong rule (procedural knowledge IF(situation),
THEN(situation/action) rules) in order to achieve
the goal. - Action execution
- Error at this level is when one forgets what
he/she is intended to do (memory failure) or
executes the wrong action due to attentional
failure.
18HUMAN ERROR
- Therefore human error is
- All occasions in which a planned sequence of
mental or physical activities fails to achieve
its intended outcome, and when these failures
cannot be attributed to the intervention of some
chance agency. - (Reason, 1990)
19HUMAN ERROR TYPES
- Slips errors result from some failure in the
execution stage of an action sequence, regardless
of whether or not the plan which guided them was
adequate to achieve its objective - accidentally pressed the Delete button when
intended to press the Backspace button on the
keyboard - Lapses errors result from some failure in the
storage stage of an action sequence, regardless
of whether or not the plan which guided them was
adequate to achieve its objective - want some orange juice, walk to the fridge, open
it and then forgot what you actually open the
fridge for - Mistakes deficiencies or failures in the
judgemental and/or inferential processes involved
in the selection of an objective or in the
specification of the means to achieve it,
irrespective of whether or not the actions
directed by this decision-scheme run according to
plan - Bhopal - repressurising the pesticide tank having
failed to achieve it on the previous attempt
resulting in leakage of toxic chemical into the
atmosphere without checking for cause of failure
20HUMAN ERROR TYPES
Norman summarized the distinction between
mistakes and slips/lapses as If the intention
is not appropriate, this is a mistake. If the
action is not what was intended, this is a
slip. (Norman, 1983)
21COGNITIVE STAGES AND ERROR TYPES
22COGNITIVE STAGES AND ERROR TYPE
23THREE LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE
- Rasmussen (1984) SRB model
- Describes human performance as having three
levels of complexity - The application of each level is determined by
the levels of familiarity with the environment or
task - Basic level of complexity skill-based
performance - Medium level of complexity rule-based
performance - High level of complexity knowledge-based
performance
24THREE LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE
- SRK model
- Skill-based (SB) performance
- Sensorimotor performance take place without
conscious control as smooth, automated, and
highly integrated patterns of behaviour - Based on patterns stored in long-term memory
- Example cycling, musical performance,
touch-typing
25THREE LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE
- SRK model
- Rule-based (RB) performance
- Consists of a goal-oriented sequence of
subroutines in a familiar work situation (rules) - Subroutines based on stored rules formed from
previous experiences - Very often, the goal is not explicitly
formulated, but is found implicitly in the
situation releasing the stored rules - Example car driving, aircraft control,
mathematical problem solving
26THREE LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE
- SRK model
- Knowledge-based (KB) performance
- Relies upon a feedback control and a "mental
model" of the system in question - Used only when the stock of stored
problem-solving routines is exhausted - Slow, sequential, laborious and resource-limited
conscious processing - Process setting local goals, initiating actions
to achieve them, observing the extent to which
the actions are successful and then modifying
them to minimize the discrepancy between the
presented position and the desired state.
27LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE AND ERROR TYPE
28MEMORY AND ERROR TYPES
29KNOWLEDGE-BASED MISTAKES
- Occur in decision making stage
- Incorrect plans of action are arrived at because
of a failure to understand the situation
(incorrect knowledge) - Make use of declarative knowledge
- Put heavy demands on attentional resources and
the central executive - Often involves in fault diagnosis,
troubleshooting and reasoning in a novel
situation - Example medical diagnosis of a rare disease,
reading of new cosmos pictures
30RULE-BASED MISTAKES
- Occur in the decision making stage
- Occur when the situation is familiar because they
have encountered similar situations in the past - Make use of existing (IF(situation),
THEN(situation/action)) rules in the procedural
knowledge - Example IF the patient has fever, runny nose
and sneeze a lot, THEN the patient has influenza - Mistakes occur when the IF part of the rule
invoked do not match the actual situation - Example Braking hard is an appropriate rule on a
normal road, but would be dangerous on a slippery
or icy road
31SKILL-BASED LAPSES
- Occur as a result of memory failure at the
execution stage - What we often called forgetfulness
- Omission of action from a familiar sequence of
actions - Often due to interruption of thought resulting in
momentary attentional failure - Occur frequently in maintenance and installation
procedures - Example Forgetting to remove the last page from
the photocopier machine Forget to tighten a
screw during a maintenance session
32SKIL-BASED SLIPS
- Occur in the response execution stage
- The right intention and plan is formed, but
incorrectly carried out - Sometimes termed a commission error
- Involve in a routine and fairly automatic task in
a familiar setting - Require minimum attentional resource and central
executive - Can be due to either inattention or overattention
33MODEL OF UNSAFE ACT
A deliberate action to break social rules. Not
included in our discussion
34EXERCISE
- 2 groups of 3
- Identify the error type of each of the error
presented on the piece of paper - Provide the reason why you choose that error type
- 10 minutes
35BREAK
36FAILURE MODE AT EACH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
37FAILURE MODE AT SB LEVEL
- Inattention
- Capture errors
- attention momentarily redirected to internal
preoccupation or external distractor at a time
that it is needed to set the action along the
currently intended pathway - Activation of incorrect but stronger schema due
to shared attributes - the current action departs from the norm
- Interruption by the occurrence of external events
- Answer the phone in the middle of thinking
forgot the train of thought
38FAILURE MODE AT SB LEVEL
- Inattention continue
- Time delay between the formulation of intention
and the action - Perceptual confusion mistaking a similar object
to be the target object - Entangling of two active schemata
- Overattention
- When attention is paid to the task at hand at an
inappropriate time resulting in the disruption to
the smooth running of an automated task - Example Become aware of hand movements during
touch typing
39FAILURE MODE AT RB LEVEL
- Strong-but-wrong rule from first impression
- Explain away of countersigns (information against
the activation of a particular rule) and
mistaking non-signs (irrelevant information to
the decision) as signs (information that satisfy
the activation of that rules) - Information overload
- Rule strength strong (often used and successful)
rules need less increase in activation level to
be activated
40FAILURE MODE AT KB LEVEL
- Insufficient knowledge or expertise (incorrect
mental models) - Working memory overload
- Out of sight out of mind
- Confirmation bias
- Fail to consider all the alternatives
- Biased reviewing
- Overconfidence
- Experts tend to be confident in the correctness
of their knowledge
41ERROR FORM AND SCHEMA
- Varied forms due the nature of how we store our
knowledge in the long-term memory and the
external situations the errors occur in - How schemata are activated also plays a role in
the varied and unpredictable nature of the forms
of error
42SCHEMA ACTIVATION SIMILARITY MATCHING
- The matching of the attributes within the
schemata and the relevant information in the
external world and the current intention. - Types of information used to create the matching
are called specific activators because they
activate specific schemata which contain them. - The schema which is activated and brought into
consciousness tends to be appropriate to the
situation.
43SCHEMA ACTIVATION FREQUENCY GAMBLING
- When there are inadequate numbers of specific
activators in the external environment leading to
the increase in activation level of many
schemata. - In this situation the general activators are
relied on heavily to select a schema for the
situation. - The general activators include recency and
frequency of activation
44OBSEVABLE ERRORS
List of observable error behaviour
45Reasons GEMS model
Transition from one level of performance to the
next and the error mechanisms operating at all
three levels of performance
46Switching between levels
- SB RB level
- Attentional checks result in a detection of a
deviation from the planned-for condition - Attempt to apply a rule to correct the situation.
- If the corrective rules are easily found and
successfully applied, performance is returned to
the SB level - RB KB level
- When the problem solver realise that none of the
RB solutions available is adequate to solve the
problem - Repeated cycles between KB and RB levels as
various possibilities are explored - KB SB level
- When an adequate solution is found.
- A formulation of a new plan of action requiring
the execution of a fresh set of SB routine
47ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION RATE
- Performance at each level
- SB and RB performance happen far more frequently
than KB performance - But opportunity for errors in the KB level of
performance is a lot higher - Proportion of errors out of all errors studied
(based on three studies) - SB errors 60.7
- RB errors 27.1
- KB errors 11.3
- Detection rate
- SB 86.1
- RB 73.2
- KB 70.5
- Correction rate
- SB twice as high as those for RB errors (almost
all detected are corrected) - RB three times as high as those for KB errors
- KB poor record of error correction
48LATENT vs. ACTIVE FAILURS
- Active failures
- Associated with the direct interaction between
the user and the product or system - Effects are felt almost immediately
- So far we have been considering the different
types and forms of active failures - Latent failures
- Adverse consequences that lie formant within the
system for a long time, only becoming evident in
combination with other factors - Activities removed in time and space from the
direct control interface - Incorrect installation, faulty maintenance, bad
management decision - Designers role in system failure
- Often designers contribution to accidents or
incidents are as latent failures as a result of
poor design
49Swiss cheese model illustrating the complex
interaction between latent and active failures
50REFERENCES
- Norman, D.A. 1988. The Design of Everyday
Things. New York Basic Books - Reason, J. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge
University Press. - Wickens and Holland. 2000. Engineering Psychology
and Human Performance. Chapter 12
51Any Questions?
52CASE STUDY
- National Geographic Air Crash Investigation
Seconds from Disaster - A reconstruction of an air crash over Kegworth
meters away from the M1 motorway and 900 meters
short of the runway in June 1989 by the National
Geographic. The airplane broke into 3 pieces from
the crash with 47 losses of lives. - This is a example of the contribution of latent
failure over active failure and the effect of
interface design on human error. - This video also gives a good introduction to the
next class on mental workload and situation
awareness.
53PRACTICAL
- An essay answering the following questions
- What are the latent and active failures that
contribute to the accident? - Specify design related issues as illustrated by
the VDO clip and how these changes in the design
affect the pilots performance. - What do you think could be learnt from this
accident that could prevent a similar accident
from occurring (give suggestions on what could be
done at mechanical design stage, interface design
stage and training stage and how the suggestions
might improve the situation)?