Optimizing Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimizing Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes

Description:

Facultative heterotrophic-use carbon for the formation of new biomass ... Facultative Heterotrophic Metabolism (Anoxic) ---Bacteria--- Energy. Synthesis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:533
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: jbr558
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimizing Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes


1
Optimizing Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes
Jeanette A. Brown, P.E., DEE Executive Director
SWPCA CSWEA April 4 2006
2
Presentation
  • Review of Theory
  • Nitrification
  • Denitrification
  • Characteristics of bioreactors
  • Aerated
  • Un-aerated
  • Nitrification Optimization
  • Denitrification Optimization
  • Problems and Troubleshooting

3
Nitrification
  • Oxidation of ammonia nitrogen to nitrite nitrogen
    by nitrosamonas group
  • NH4 O2 2H NO2-
  • Oxidation of nitrite nitrogen by nitrobactor
    group
  • NO2- O2 NO3-

4
Denitrification
  • Using methanol as carbon source
  • 6 NO3- 5 CH3OH N2 5 CO2
  • 7 H2O 6 OH-
  • Using an endogenous carbon source
  • C5H7NO2 4.6 NO3- 2.8 N2 5 CO2
    1.2 H2O 4.6 OH-

5
Characteristics of Bioreactors
6
Aerated Bioreactor
O2 Pollutants Microorganisms
RAS (microorganisms)
WAS
7
Characteristics of an Aerated Bioreactor
  • Aerobic
  • Microorganisms
  • Heterotrophic-use carbon for the formation of new
    biomass
  • Autotrophic-derive cell carbon from carbon
    dioxide
  • Requires net input of energy
  • More energy for synthesis than heterotrophs
  • Lower cell yields and growth rates

8
Aerobic, Heterotrophic Metabolism
9
Aerobic, Autotrophic Metabolism
Nutrients
C5H7 O2N (New Cells)
CO2
Synthesis
---Bacteria---
Energy
NO2- NO3 -
NH3-N
O2
10
Un-aerated Bioreactor (Anoxic Zone)
Nitrate Recycle
Primary Effluent
Anoxic
Aerobic
RAS
WAS
11
Characteristics of an Un-aerated Bioreactor
  • Anoxic
  • Microorganisms
  • Facultative heterotrophic-use carbon for the
    formation of new biomass
  • Use nitrate/nitrite instead of oxygen
  • Oxygen is preferred

12
Facultative Heterotrophic Metabolism (Anoxic)
Nutrients
C5H7 O2N (New Cells)
Synthesis
Organic Compounds
---Bacteria---
Energy
N2 CO2 H2 O
13
Chemotrophs
  • Organisms that derive their energy from chemical
    reactions
  • May be heterotrophic or autotrophic
  • Energy-production is through oxidation-reduction
    reactions
  • Involves the transfer of electrons from an
    electron donor to an electron acceptor
  • Electron donor is oxidized
  • Electron acceptor is reduced
  • Can be either organic or inorganic compounds

14
Chemotrophs
  • The metabolic process consists of the separate
    yet simultaneously occurring reactions-synthesis
    and respiration.
  • Synthesis uses a portion of the waste matter
    (food) to produce new cells.

15
Chemotrophs
  • Respiration is the coupled release of energy
    through the conversion of food material to lower
    energy-containing compounds-CO2, H2O, and
    oxidized forms of nitrogen.
  • The precise nature of the products formed depends
    on process design, reaction time, temperature,
    and process loading.

16
Chemotrophs
  • The synthesis of new cells is reversible because
    the cells can also use their own protoplasm as
    food to provide the energy needed to maintain
    life. This is known as endogenous respiration.
  • Maintenance energy requirements exist independent
    of the presence of substrate outside the cell.

17
Chemotrophs
  • When endogenous respiration predominates, the
    growth of the microorganisms does not cease, but
    is exceeded by cellular degradation.
  • This results in a net decrease in the mass of
    microbial cells. The extended aeration process is
    one example of a process variation that can
    successfully operate in endogenous respiration.

18
Chemotrophs
  •  The electron acceptor may be available within
    the cell during metabolism (endogenous) or it may
    be obtained from outside the cell, for example
    dissolved oxygen, (exogenous)

19
Summary Table
20
Nitrification
21
Effective Nitrification
  • Achieved by
  • Effective nitrification
  • Adequate Aerobic SRT
  • Temperature
  • Sufficient Oxygen Transfer Capacity
  • Maintain a DO of 2 mg/l at peak loadings
  • pH gt 6.5, preferably gt7
  • Accomplished by sufficient alkalinity (Effluent
    concentration at least 50 mg/l
  • No inhibitory materials

22
Nitrifier Minimum Aerobic SRT Varies with
Temperature.
23
Maintain Adequate Dissolved Oxygen
  • Oxygen Stoichiometry
  • 4.6 mg of oxygen demand per mg of NO3-N produced
  • Nitrification is inhibited by low dissolved
    oxygen
  • Ensure 2 mg/l DO throughout aerobic zone

24
Maintain pH 7.0 or Greater
  • Alkalinity Stoichiometry
  • Nitrification consumes 7.2 lbs alkalinity as
    CaCO3 per lb ammonia-N oxidized
  • Denitrification produces 3.6 lbs alkalinity as
    CaCO3 per lb nitrate-N denitrified

25
Importance of Alkalinity
  • Insufficient alkalinity
  • Causes drop in pH
  • May cause inhibition of nitrification process
  • May result in higher operating costs
  • If effluent alkalinity is less than 50 mg/l
  • Add supplemental alkalinity
  • Or improve efficiency of dentirification process

26
Alkalinity Consumption
  • Alke Alko 7.14 (NO) 3.57 NO-(NO3-- N)e
  • Where
  • NO influent nitrogen converted to oxidized
    nitrogen
  • (NO3-- N)e effluent nitrate
  • Determined from reaction stoichiometry

27
Simplified Calculation of Alkalinity Requirement
Given Plant Influent Flow 10 mgd Primary
Effluent NH3-N 28 mg/l
Alkalinity Consumed by Nitrification In
lbs/day (10) mgd x (28 mg/l) x (7.2)
x (8.34) 16,813 lbs alkalinity Flow
NH3-N conc. lbs. of alkalinity
as CaCO3 per day (mgd)
(mg/l) required per lb of
ammonia-N
nitrified
In mg/l (28 mg/l) x (7.2) 202 mg/l
alkalinity as CaCO3 consumed
28
Alkalinity Sources
  • Types of chemicals used
  • Hydrated lime
  • Quicklime
  • Soda ash
  • Caustic soda
  • Sodium bicarbonate

29
Nitrification OptimizationSummary
  • Test nitrification rate occasionally
  • Select appropriate SRT
  • Keep DO at 2 mg/l
  • Keep pH about neutral (optimal 7.5 to 8.5)
  • Provide sufficient alkalinity

30
Denitrification
31
Denitrification Stoichiometry
  • Oxygen Equivalent of NO3-N is
    2.86 mg O2/mg NO3-N. (2.86 lb oxygen demand
    satisfied / lb NO3 -N generated)
  • Alkalinity Produced Due to Consumption of Acid
    (HNO3). (3.6 mg CaCO3 produced / mg NO3 -N
    generated)

32
Effective Denitrification
  • Effective Denitrification
  • Sufficient Anoxic Volume (Anoxic SRT)
  • Sufficient Carbon
  • Sufficient mixed liquor recirculation

33
Anoxic Zone (Selector)
  • Size based on anoxic SRT
  • Typically 1 to 2 days depending on temperature
  • Must exclude dissolved oxygen
  • ML Recycle and RAS below surface
  • Reduce DO going to ML Recycle pumps

34
Denitrification is Controlled by Mixed Liquor
Recirculation.
35
Denitrification with Supplemental Carbon
Methanol or other carbon source
Primary Effluent
Nitrate Recycle
Anoxic
Aerobic
Aerobic
Anoxic
RAS
WAS
36
Supplemental Carbon
  • Methanol
  • Stoichiometry
  • 2.5 (NO3-N) 1.5 (NO2-N) 0.87 (DO)
  • Or, approximately 3 mg CH3OH/mg NO3-N
  • Requires 1 to 3 day SRT in secondary anoxic zone
    depending on temperature
  • Other carbon sources technically feasible but
    generally more expensive.

37
Denitrification Optimization Summary
  • Minimize DO in anoxic zone (lt 0.2 mg/l)
  • Have 2Q to 4 Q recycle capabilities
  • Provide sufficient carbon (readily biodegradable
    COD)
  • Maximize use of secondary anoxic zones

38
Troubleshooting and Problem Solving
39
Nitrification Inhibition
  • Inhibition is defined as
  • Decrease in rate
  • Inability to convert NH3 to NO2, or NO2 to NO3
  • Indicators of Potential Inhibitors
  • Increase in effluent NH3-N concentration
  • Increase in NO2 concentration
  • Failure to nitrify at appropriate SRT
  • Decreased OUR
  • White foam
  • Increased effluent turbidity

40
Probable Nitrification Inhibitors
  • Metals
  • Cadmium
  • Lead
  • Zinc
  • Organic Chemicals
  • Benzene
  • Cyanide
  • Thiourea
  • Surfactants
  • Inhibition can be acute or chronic

41
Potential Sources of Inhibition
  • Industrial Discharges
  • Haul-in with sludge or septic
  • In-plant chemical spills
  • Incinerator scrubber return

42
Potential Solutions
  • Confirm presence
  • Use simple nitrification test procedure with
    control
  • Identify source
  • Can use test procedure for system-wide detective
    work
  • Remove source or modify treatment strategy
  • Storage
  • Side stream options
  • Main stream options

43
Solutions to Problems
  • Foam on tanks
  • Gray - brown - orange foam, viscous in nature -
    Nocardia type foam
  • Lon SRTs, trapped surface, fluctuating SRT,
    fluctuating temperature
  • Remove trapped surface, chlorinate foam
    selectively, chlorinate RAS
  • White foam - looks like soap
  • May have too low MCRT, not enough biomass in
    tank, excessive detergents

44
Solutions to Problems
  • High effluent ammonium, fluctuating effluent
    ammonium-N
  • MCRT or DO may not be adequate in the aerobic
    zone to maintain nitrification.
  • Increase MCRT.
  • Evaluate Step Feed to increase MCRT without
    increasing MLSS to clarifier.

45
Solutions to Problems
  • Fluctuating chlorine demand
  • Partial nitrification of ammonium-N to nitrite-N
    without further conversion to nitrate-N.
  • Inadequate aeration to handle high flows,
  • inadequate biomass in system to handle diurnal
    peak nitrogen loads, or
  • inadequate biomass to handle spikes in influent
    TKN (e.g. sudden septage discharges).

46
Solutions to Problems
  • Fluctuations in basin DO (with periods of low
    DO)
  • Check if sufficient blowers are operating for
    peak loads
  • Consider adding more blowers or upgrading to fine
    bubble diffusers.
  • Excessive DO at certain times of the year or
    during low flow periods
  • Look into ways of adjusting aeration based on
    time of day. e.g. install timers or an
    automated DO Control system

47
Solutions to Problems
  • Gradual increase in secondary clarifier sludge
    blanket
  • Evaluate the trend in SVI. Is SVI too high for
    the clarifier solids loading? What is the
    blanket level?
  • If SVI is high because of filaments, are they low
    DO filaments? Where are these filaments growing?
    Is the anoxic zone behaving as a low DO zone? Is
    the aerobic zone suffering from low DOs. Can it
    be corrected?
  • Initiate RAS chlorination to reduce SVI.
  • Increase sludge wasting if MCRT can be reduced.

48
Solutions to Problems
  • SVI increases during and immediately after
    periods of high flows
  • Does infiltration increase anoxic zone DO?
    Infiltration may also bring in filamentous
    bacteria.
  • Plan on a maintenance dose of RAS chlorination.

49
Solutions to Problems
  • Increase in effluent soluble organic-N - possible
    causes or Increase in effluent TKN with increase
    in ammonium-N
  • Reduction in SRT below that required for
    nitrification.
  • Sudden increase in influent TKN - septage dose,
    etc.
  • Sudden addition of inhibitor - industrial
    chemical, pesticide, preservative, etc.
  • .

50
Solutions to Problems
  • Large clumps of sludge floating to top of
    secondary clarifier
  • Denitrification in clarifier - Increase RAS flow
    rate to reduce time sludge spends in clarifier,
    increase activated sludge tank effluent DO.
  • Too high of a blanket
  • Check sludge scraper for proper operation.

51
Summary
  • Good troubleshooting and problem solving comes
    only with experience.
  • Every plant is different.
  • We never know what is coming into the plant that
    can harm the process.
  • Even under perfect process control, we can still
    have problems.
  • The more we learn, the more we need to learn.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com