Long term Consequences of Cancer Treatment in Adults - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Long term Consequences of Cancer Treatment in Adults

Description:

To understand the range of long term consequences of cancer treatment ... Radiotherapy post surgical resection of an ethmoid tumor has resulted in wound dehiscence. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: shaunco1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Long term Consequences of Cancer Treatment in Adults


1
Long term Consequences of Cancer Treatment in
Adults
  • Shaun Costello

2
Learning Objectives
  • To understand the range of long term consequences
    of cancer treatment
  • To understand the mechanisms by which treatment
    may induce side effects at distant points post
    treatment
  • To understand how long terms side effects can be
    mitigated

3
Consequences
  • Direct toxicity of drugs / radiation
  • Idiopathic reactions to drugs / radiation
  • Collateral damage due to radiation
  • Genetic susceptibilities
  • Psychological consequences (Breast cancer)
  • Second tumours
  • Surgical alterations

4
Consequences
  • The long term effects of cancer treatment often
    take many years to become evident
  • Children and young adults are increasingly being
    treated successfully for malignancy
  • Clinicians managing the complications of
    treatment are usually not those clinicians
    responsible for the initial therapy

5
Frequency of Complications
  • Largely unknown
  • Several longitudinal studies of Breast Cancer
    and Hodgkin's disease 0.1 4 depending on
    modalities and drugs used
  • Chemotherapy distant organ damage and second
    tumours often haematological
  • Radiotherapy local organ damage second tumours
    often solid
  • Effects of radiotherapy can be additive or
    synergistic with chemotherapy Breast cancer vs.
    lymphoma (Stanford experience)
  • Multiple courses of radiotherapy are additive as
    regards risk of second malignancy non stochastic
    effect
  • The effect of multiple courses of chemotherapy is
    unknown

6
Psychological consequences
  • Change in body image
  • Visual changes
  • Changes in sexuality
  • Post traumatic stress
  • Loss of function

7
Mechanisms of Damage
  • Surgical resection
  • Failure or effect of prosthetics
  • Free radicals radiotherapy, chemotherapy
  • Arteritis obliterans, osteoradionecrosis
  • Genetic lack of specific repair enzymes
  • Genetic lack of specific enzymes involved in drug
    metabolism
  • Immune balance changes

8
Central Nervous System
  • Central nervous system can be subject to a number
    of drug toxicities commonly causing dementing
    syndromes and ataxia. Methotrxate and Vinca
    alkloids. Acute confusional states can also occur
  • Often there is a synergistic effect with
    radiotherapy
  • Commonly the long term effects of radiation are
    seen in clinical practice.

9
Central Nervous System Radiation effects
  • Global dementing syndromes are uncommon,
    radiation related injury tends to be specific to
    the area treated.
  • Patients treated with whole brain radiation can
    develop global injury but this is much less
    common than was thought. Usually large fraction
    sizes are responsible leading to a relative
    overdose.
  • Common clinical scenario is re presentation of a
    patient some years after treatment with a space
    occupying mass which is contrast enhancing on MRI
    scan. Frequently diagnosed as recurrent tumour.
    Symptoms are often progressive. and treated with
    palliative intent or further surgery.

10
Central Nervous System Radiation effects
  • MRI spectroscopy and PET scan reveal diagnosis
  • Treatment corticosteroids or surgery.
  • Development of cateracts is common but not often
    symptomatic and degeneration of the optic tracts
    is rare but well recognised.
  • Cranial nerve damage to II, IV, V, VII, VIII can
    occur up to two years post XRT

11
Hormonal side effects
  • Early menopause secondary to chemotherapy or
    radiotherapy is common and well understood
  • Late ovarian failure is less well recognised
  • Late pituitary and thyroid dysfunction is
    systematically overlooked, esp in radiotherapy
    for head and neck cancer lead time of 10 years av
  • Anti androgens and anti oestrogen's increasingly
    used lead to osteoporosis

12
Oral Pain
  • Dental
  • - root exposure
  • - caries
  • - dentures
  • - orthodontic appliances
  • Soft tissue
  • -chronic mucositis and sub mucous
    fibrosis
  • Bone
  • - osteomyelitis
  • - osteoradionecrosis

13
Oral Complications
  • Xerostomia - radiotherapy
  • Damage to the salivary glands leading to loss of
    acinar cells and loss of reflex stimulation due
    to lack of wetting agents causing lack reflex
    secretion from the salivary glands
  • Prevention Amifostine / IMRT / fluoride trays/
    dental care
  • Complications anorexia, weight loss, dental
    caries, sub mucosal fibrosis, osteo-radionecrosis

14
Osteoradionecrosis
  • Osteo-radionecrosis - radiotherapy
  • non healing acellular avascular bone. Often
    present for years before leading to the
    development of complications.
  • Presents as a minor area of infection, typically
    a small erythematous ulcer. Minimal to moderate
    pain and dental mobility. Progresses to extra
    oral and intra oral fistulas through which
    sequestrae of bone are extruded.

15
Osteo-radionecrosis Therapy
                                  View "The
Adjunctive role of HBOT in the treatment of lower
extremity wounds in patients with diabetes" Diab
Spect 10(2) 1997118-23   Go To scientific
abstracts supporting the use of HBOT in selected
wounds   
Conditons commonly treated with HBOT
OsteoradionecrosisSoft tissue radionecrosisDiabe
tic UlcerationOsteomyelitisPreservation of skin
grafts and flaps Osteoradionecrosis
View the following information validating HBOT
Visit the UHMS indications site   Download
British Medical Journal (BMJ) review of HBOT 1998
Vol 137 p1140-3      Visit our Carbon Monoxide
Resource Page
Before and after 20 consecutive treatments with
HBOT at 2 ata. The mandable is now ready for the
plate to be removed and a rotation flap
constructed.   GO TO scientific abstracts
supporting the use of HBOT in Osteoradionecrosis S
oft tissue radionecrosis
Radiotherapy post surgical resection of an
ethmoid tumor has resulted in wound dehiscence.
20 treatments of HBOT at 2ata has allowed a
rotation flap to take. Selected problem wounds
including diabetic ulceration
  • Osteo-radionecrosis is progressive. Treatment
    involves resection of involved bone and
    hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

16
Pulmonary Complications - radiotherapy
  • Mechanism radiation Damage to type I
    pneumocytes and capillary endothelium.
  • Replacement takes place by re-differentiation of
    type II pneumocytes and endothelial repopulation.
  • Loss of clonogenicity leads to areas of leaking
    capillaries and reduced compliance and gas
    transfer. This can occur after several weeks and
    some months after radiation. If it becomes
    chronic fibrosis and respiratory failure can
    occur
  • At least 10 of the lung needs to be irradiated
    above 20Gy. Formulae vs Clinical testing

17
Radiation Pneumonitis
  • Clinical picture radiation pnemonitis,
    dyspnoea, cough, pyrexia (uncommon)
  • Ground glass opacification, haziness in the
    irradiated area progressing to consolidation and
    fibrosis. Confined to the radiation portal
  • 2-3 months post XRT
  • Precipitating factors concomitant chemotherapy,
    previous radiation, and withdrawal of steroids
  • Treatment Pnemonitis corticosteroids, fibrosis
    supportive measures
  • Radiation induced BOOP, occurs with low doses
    outside the radiation portal and can occur on the
    contra lateral side. Responds rapidly to
    steroids. Idiosyncratic effect of radiation.

18
Pulmonary Complications - chemotherapy
  • Mechanisms are largely with the exception of
    bleomycin unknown.
  • Production of reactive oxygen metabolites,
    including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide,
    and hydroxyl radicals, primarily from activated
    neutrophils.
  • Bleomycin induces reactive oxygen radicals by
    forming a complex with Fe3
  • Chemotherapeutic drugs can affect the balance of
    the local immune system
  • Bleomycin and cyclophosphamide produce substances
    that can inactivate the antiprotease system,
    enhancing the effects of proteolytic enzymes on
    the lung.
  • Bleomycin also causes profound effects on the
    fibrinolytic system, altering the
  • balance between fibrin deposition and
    fibrinolysis on the alveolar surface, leading to
    fibrin deposition
  • One of the potential determinants of bleomycin
    toxicity is the cytoplasmic cysteine proteinase
    bleomycin hydrolase, which is the major enzyme
    responsible for metabolizing bleomycin to a non
    toxic molecule. Genetic deficiencies of this
    enzyme are responsible for the idiosyncratic
    responses sometimes seen

19
Pulmonary complications chemotherapy
  • Clinical picture is very similar to that of
    radiation pnemonitis reflecting a common pathway
    with similar pathological findings
  • Rarely acute bronchospasm can occur with the
    administration of vinca alkaloids and taxanes
  • Progression to fibrosis can take many years
    especially in the case of cyclophosphamide and
    carmustine
  • Chest x-ray often shows a diffuse
    reticulo-nodular pattern, in the case of
    bleomycin toxicity these nodules can grow and
    progress to cavitation with hypersensitivity
    reactions hilar shadowing can occur and in the
    case of methotrexate and procarbazine hilar
    lymphadenopathy can be seen.

20
Pulmonary complications chemotherapy
  • In some cases even those with pathological
    conformation of fibrosis the chest x ray can be
    normal and a high resolution CT is required to
    make the diagnosis
  • Management avoidance occasional reports of
    corticosteroids being effective

21
Cardiac Complications
  • Chemotherapeutic agents can cause a number of
    cardiac abnormalities, majority are acute
    arrhythmia or decompensation. Doxorubicin can
    cause late cardiac decompensation which is
    resistant to therapy occurs many years after
    completion of treatment. Presenting a insidious
    progressive cardiomyopathy cardiac failure and
    sudden death. This mechanism is thought to be
    mediated by free radical production within the
    myocardium.
  • Amifostine can be used as a cardio protector
  • Radiation was for many years thought to be benign
    as regards cardiac toxicity. However a range of
    trials show excess late cardiac deaths in those
    women treated for left sided breast cancer.
    Pathology shows fibrosis and atrophy of myocytes.
    However the most striking finding is accelerated
    coronary heart disease. With significant stenoses
    occurring 1 2 years after the completion of
    treatment.
  • This complication has all but been eliminated by
    modern planning and treatment methods

22
Gonadal Dysfunction
  • Not in it self a late complication of treatment.
  • Oocytes are exquisitely sensitive to the effects
    of chemotherapy and radiation.
  • Treatment can cause a premature menopause in many
    women
  • Some patients achieve the menopause apparently
    after treatment has finished as the depleted
    stores of immature oocytes run out.
  • The menopause carries with it its own issues
    however often overlooked is the loss of
    reproductive capacity in young adults.
  • Egg harvesting and in vitro fertilisation can be
    used to overcome this problem.
  • Male gonadal dysfunction is unusual as is
    permanent infertility, most apparently infertile
    men will regain fertility after a lag time of up
    to 2 years. Late sterility and testosterone
    depletion can occur 5 10 years after therapy to
    the testes. Often seen in seminoma patients.
    Characterised by loss of secondary sexual
    characteristics and impotence. Treatment is by
    hormone replacement to restore potency and avoid
    osteoporosis.

23
Carcinogenesis
  • Most of the data to assess the relative risk of
    treatments derives from clinical trial data bases
    or cancer registries maintained by the larger
    cancer treatment centres
  • Often despite the increased relative risk of
    development of a cancer due to treatment the
    absolute risk remains small as may of the cancers
    that are likely to be induced are uncommon within
    the population

24
Carcinogenesis - radiotherapy
  • Much of the evidence comes from Bomb data from
    Japan, Workplace accidents, therapeutic and
    diagnostic exposures
  • Most cancers with the exception of CLL have been
    described after exposure
  • The thyroid , female breast and bone marrow
    appear to be the most likely targets
  • The risk of haematological malignancy occurs
    after a few years post treatment and peaks some 5
    9 years post treatment
  • For solid tumours a lag phase of 5 10 years is
    required for tumour induction, peaking at around
    30 years and falling off there after.
  • Risk of second primary tumour follows a bell
    shaped curve
  • Risk factors for the development of a
    haematological tumour include total dose, dose
    rate and volume of marrow exposed
  • Risk factors for solid tumours include young age
    of exposure, dose to threshold, site irradiated
    (thyroid and breast)
  • Radiation acts synergistically with chemotherapy
    and smoking to cause second malignancy
  • Patients with DNA repair deficiency syndrome ATA
    and RB are at increased risk

25
Carcinogenesis - Chemotherapy
  • Haematological malignancies AML CML and ALL not
    CLL
  • AML gt ALL gt CML
  • Much more potent than XRT in inducing
    haematological malignancy
  • Many drugs which are carcinogenic in vitro have
    not been shown to be so in vivo
  • Two classes of drugs are recognised as having
    significant potential
  • Alkylating agents (1- 2 years peaks 5 10
    years).
  • Topoisomerase II inhibitors (epipodophylotoxins,
    doxorubicin) (peak at 2-3 years)
  • The relative risks of different compounds is not
    clear. Alkylating agent carry the most risk but
    the relative risks of the remainder is not clear.
  • The risk of the development of solid tumours is
    not known. The lead time to induction may be
    longer than the current periods of observation
    seen in most databases. Exception is
    cyclophosphamide which is known to cause bladder
    cancer

26
Second cancers Hodgkin's disease
  • 62 excess malignancies per 10,000 person years
    observation
  • Treatment induced leukaemia's
  • The risk after radiotherapy is small
  • Most of the risk is conferred by the use of
    chemotherapy especially alkylating agents
  • Move to use of ABVD
  • 10 fold increase in the risk of leukaemia (95
    fold AML)
  • 3 fold risk of solid tumours (Non Hodgkin's
    lymphoma)
  • Combined treatment with radiation lung,
    melanoma, stomach, bone and connective tissue.
    Lung cancers related to smoking
  • Increased risk of thyroid and breast cancer
    especially in those treated with radiation before
    age 30 (12 and 4 fold respectively)

27
Relative Risk post HD 9618 pts / 3 studies
28
Relative Risk vs Age post HD 1253 pts
29
Second cancers Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma
  • Much less well studied than Hodgkin's disease
  • Association of excess cases of AML and bladder
    cancer probably related to cyclophosphamide use
  • Solid tumours related to TBI
  • As for Hodgkin's disease the time lag for solid
    tumours can be 10 15 years and 2 5 years for
    leukaemia's

30
Second cancers - Breast Cancer
  • Large numbers of women surviving breast cancer
    have received chemotherapy
  • Alkylating agents cyclophosphamide and
    doxorubicin are common agents.
  • Alkylating agents increase the risk of leukaemia
    10 fold
  • Splenectomy further increases the risk 2 fold
  • Radiation increases the risk 2 fold
  • Radiation plus chemotherapy 17 fold increase
  • 5 per 10,000 cases treated at 10 years
  • Risk is almost entirely in the pre-menopausal
    group

31
Second cancers - Breast Cancer
  • Risk is reduced by a move away from regional
    radiotherapy and towards doxorubicin containing
    regimens rather than alkylating agents. Reducing
    the dose of alkylating agent when used
  • However it must be remembered that the most
    common solid second tumour after treatment for
    breast cancer is a contra lateral breast cancer
    (1 3 patients) very small numbers of these
    tumours can be attributed to treatment.
  • Risk of contra lateral breast cancer reduced by
    tamoxifen 40, risk reduction with aromatase
    inhibitors 70
  • Radiotherapy small risk of lung cancer smokers,
    most common tumour is angiosarcoma latent period
    20 years risk increased 9.5 fold

32
Tamoxifen - risk
33
Second cancers Testicular cancer
  • 95 of germ cell cancers are cured in young men
  • Teratomas Cisplatin containing therapies
  • Seminoma Cisplatin or low dose radiotherapy
  • Significant excess morbidity from second cancer.
  • Leukaemia's secondary to chemotherapy and solid
    tumours from organs involved in the radiation
    field.
  • Actuarial risks of developing any second cancer,
    excluding contralateral testicular tumours, were
    15.7 and 22.6
  • Time lag 20 30 years

34
Ovarian Cancer
35
Paediatric cancers
  • May successful treatments for paediatric cancer
    are performed.
  • These children are at increased risk of a variety
    of malignancies 15 fold (75 in RB)
  • Treatment related and genetic often with a long
    lead time.
  • No consistent policy exists in NZ for long term
    follow up

36
Radiotherapy and Retinoblastoma
37
Miscellaneous organ damage
  • Related to specific organ damage
  • Can be induced by either chemotherapy or
    radiotherapy
  • Nephrotoxicity Cisplatin /Radiation
  • Hepatotoxicity Methotrxate / Radiation
  • Gastrointestinal damage Radiation achlorhydria,
    pancreatic insufficiency, small and large bowel
    damage, strictures of hollow organs

38
Conclusion
  • Long term side effects of cancer treatment are
    becoming more common in general medical practice
  • The lead time to side effects of radiation and
    chemotherapy extends far beyond the usual follow
    up period for the primary malignancy
  • Side effects are often misdiagnosed or not
    anticipated
  • Haematological malignancies are more common than
    solid tumours
  • Haematological tumours are more common after
    treatment with alkylating agents
  • Solid tumours are more common after treatment
    with ionising radiation
  • The lead time for haematological tumours can be
    as short as two years and as long as ten, for
    solid tumours the lead time tends to be ten to
    thirty years
  • Patients should were possible be enrolled in
    screening programmes
  • Screening and follow up is not performed in a
    systematic way and patients are excluded from
    existing screening programmes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com