PlayWright Online Training | PlayWright Training in Bangalore

1
Playwright Automation vs. Cypress Automation
www.visualpath.in
91-7032290546
2
What is Playwright?

• Developed by Microsoft for end-to-end browser
  testing.
• Supports multiple browsers Chromium, Firefox,
  WebKit.
• Works with multiple programming languages
  JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, C.
• Supports headless and headed modes for efficient
  automation.
• Ideal for complex applications needing
  cross-browser compatibility.Design

3
What is Cypress?

• Developed for front-end JavaScript testing.
• Focused on single-browser (Chromium-based)
  testing.
• Works only with JavaScript/TypeScript.
• Provides real-time reloading and debugging.
• Simple setup but limited cross-browser support.

4
Performance Comparison

• Playwright Faster execution due to
  parallelization better browser control.
• Cypress Slower due to browser limitations and
  single-thread execution.
• Memory Usage Playwright is more efficient in
  handling multiple tabs.

5
Ease of Use Setup

• Playwright Faster execution due to
  parallelization better browser control.
• Cypress Slower due to browser limitations and
  single-thread execution.
• Memory Usage Playwright is more efficient in
  handling multiple tabs.

6
Ease of Use Setup

• Playwright Requires configuration but supports
  multiple workflows.
• Cypress Simple setup but limited in
  functionality.
• Playwright allows testing on multiple
  environments easily.

7
Best Use Cases

• Playwright is best for
• Cross-browser testing.
• Multi-tab/multi-context scenarios.
• API and network request testing.
• Cypress is best for
• Quick JavaScript-based UI testing.
• Real-time debugging.
• Single-page applications (SPA).

8
Real-World Implementation Examples

• Playwright Use Cases
• Cross-browser testing in e-commerce platforms.
• Multi-tab session handling for banking
  applications.
• API testing in SaaS applications.
• Cypress Use Cases
• Quick UI regression testing in single-page
  applications (SPA).
• Testing dynamic front-end applications in React,
  Angular, or Vue.js.

9
Challenges and Limitations

• Playwright Challenges
• Steeper learning curve.
• More setup/configuration required.
• Limited community support compared to Cypress.
• Cypress Challenges
• Does not support multiple browser tabs or
  multiple domains.
• Limited cross-browser and mobile testing.
• Slower test execution due to single-threaded
  architecture.

10
Future of Playwright Cypress

• Playwright Roadmap
• Expanding mobile testing capabilities.
• Improved integrations with CI/CD tools.
• AI-driven test automation.
• Cypress Roadmap
• Improving multi-browser support.
• Enhancing component testing for front-end
  frameworks.
• Better handling of flaky tests.

11
Final Verdict Which One to Choose?

• Choose Playwright if
• You need cross-browser testing.
• You require multi-tab and API automation.
• You prefer parallel execution and speed.
• Choose Cypress if
• You focus on quick and easy JavaScript-based
  testing.
• You are testing a single-page web application
  (SPA).
• You want fast debugging and real-time reloading.

12
For More Information About PlayWright Automation
Training Address- Flat no 205, 2nd Floor,
Nilgiri Block, Aditya Enclave, Ameerpet,
Hyderabad-16 Ph. No 91- 7032290546
Visit www.visualpath.in E-Mail
online_at_visualpath.in
13
THANK YOU
www.visualpath.in