Information about Economic and Financial Criminal commission(EFCC)

1
Information about Economic and Financial Criminal
commission(EFCC)
2

• The Economic and Financial Criminal
  commission(EFCC) has advised the representative
  of the Individuals Democratic Celebration (PDP),
  Olisa Metuh, to disprove the accusations of scams
  and cash washing against him rather than aiming
  to malign the assess with the aim of scuttling
  his analyze.
• The EFCC suggested that Metuhs unverified
  accusations of prejudice against Rights Okon
  Abang of the Government Great Judge, Abuja, and
  his report that they (Metuh and Rights Abang)
  were partners at the Law University do not
  represent a good floor to ask the assess to stop
  the analyze .
• EFCC is defending Metuh and Destra Financial
  commitment Restricted on a seven-count cost of
  scams and cash washing with regards to the N400
  thousand he supposedly obtained illegitimately
  from ex-National Protection Advisor (NSA) Sambo
  Dasuki and the 2 thousand he supposedly got as
  present at the last PDP nationwide conference
  where ex-President Goodluck Jonathan was
  implemented as the partys only applicant for the
  last selection.

3

• They have been on analyze in Rights Abangs court
  since Jan 15 until the legal prosecution shut its
  situation after contacting eight witnesses, who
  were cross-examined by defense attorneys.
• The EFCC, in its reverse affidavit against their
  movement for the assess to stop and another for
  everlasting adjournment until the resolution of
  their program at the Judge of Attraction for a
  stay of procedures at the Government Great Judge,
  suggested that Metuh EFCC and his organization
  were trying to scuttle the analyze.
• Lead legal prosecution attorney Sylvanus Tahir
  mentioned, in his published distribution to the
  reverse affidavit, that the accusations of
  prejudice and other statements by Metuh and Detra
  were meant to irritate the analyze as they had
  presented to the courts authority even when
  Metuh realized he was the judges schoolmate.
• All way of accusations, as mentioned by the
  offenders, was prepared up by them just to
  rationalize annoying the slowing down of
  procedures. We publish that the maneuvers and
  gadgets implemented by the offenders are nothing
  but simple postscript and genuine blackmail
  targeted at overwhelming a legal court to fall
  the situation in the guise or pretext of
  prejudice by the assess.

4

• The accusations of prejudice leveled by the
  offenders against a legal court associate merely
  to the exercise of legal abilities by a legal
  court, without any proof information or
  conditions that declare that a legal court did,
  in fact, favor one side badly, Tahiir said.
• On Metuhs report that he was the judges school
  partner, Tahir suggested that due to the pledge
  of office signed up to by a legal official, a
  assess managing situation was only needed to
  manage justice without worry or favor, regardless
  of events engaged.
• According to the defending advice Rotimi Jacobs
  (SAN) while at yesterdays listening to, he said
  Dasuki Gates rejected to come to a legal judge
  because his cause advice would be missing.