Title: POL 303 Academic Professor / tutorialrank.com
1POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
For more course Tutorials
www.tutorialrank.com
2POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review
ASHFORD POL 303 Entire Course
POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review POL 303
Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and Federalism POL 303
Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty POL 303 Week 2 DQ
2 Freedom of Expression POL 303 Week 2 Teaching
Intelligent Design in the Public Schools POL
303 Week 3 DQ 1 Equal Protection and Gender
Discrimination POL 303 Week 3 DQ 2
Constitutional Issues Related to Same-gender
Marriage POL 303 Week 3 Research Paper Draft
POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review Political
Science - General Political Science Judicial
Review. Respond to this 2-part question in your
initial post a. What is the Supreme Court's
justification for its claim to the power of
judicial review in the American system of
government? Fully explain Chief Justice
Marshalls rationale in Marbury v. Madison.
3POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty
POL 303 Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and Federalism
POL 303 Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty Political
Science - General Political Science Religious
Liberty. Respond to this 3-part question in your
initial post Explain the Supreme Court's
reasons, in Edwards v. Aguillard (the majority
opinion by Justice Brennan), for holding that a
law mandating the teaching of creationism in
public schools violates the Constitutions ban on
establishment of religion.
POL 303 Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and
Federalism Political Science - General Political
Science Congress and Federalism. Respond to this
2-part question in your initial post a. What
is the Supreme Court's justification for
recognizing broad and expansive national power in
Congress to address what some view as "local"
problems? Fully explain the Courts rationale in
McCulloch v. Maryland (by Marshall, C.J.) and the
different rationales of various Justices in the
2012 Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) cases.
4POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 2 Teaching Intelligent Design in
the Public Schools
POL 303 Week 2 DQ 2 Freedom of Expression
POL 303 Week 2 Teaching Intelligent Design in
the Public Schools Political Science - General
Political Science Teaching Intelligent Design
in the Public Schools. Write your paper about a
hypothetical proposal that is before the elected
school board for the public schools in your city.
The proposal stirs deep controversy in the
community. Opponents claim that it would violate
the Constitutions prohibition against a
establishment of religion
POL 303 Week 2 DQ 2 Freedom of
Expression Political Science - General Political
Science DQ 2 Freedom of Expression. In 2010 the
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, held that
certain government restrictions on corporate
funding of independent political broadcasts in
candidate elections were unconstitutional
(Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission).
This controversial decision has been greeted with
calls to overturn it by amending the
Constitution. Respond to this 3-part question in
your initial post
5POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Issues Related
to Same-gender Marriage
POL 303 Week 3 DQ 1 Equal Protection and Gender
Discrimination
POL 303 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Issues Related
to Same-gender Marriage Political Science -
General Political Science Constitutional Issues
Related to Same-gender Marriage. In 2012 the
Armed Services Committee of the House of
Representatives adopted, by a party-line vote, an
amendment to the military defense budget for 2013
that would prohibit same-gender marriage
ceremonies in base chapels serving members of the
U.S. Armed Forces. If this amendment is enacted
into law, it will change current Defense
Department policy that allows use of chapels for
religious marriage ceremonies on
sexual-orientation neutral basis.
POL 303 Week 3 DQ 1 Equal Protection and Gender
Discrimination Political Science - General
Political Science Equal Protection and Gender
Discrimination. In recent years opportunities for
women in the U.S. military have been expanding.
But 200,000 jobs may remain closed to women for a
variety of reasons. Recently two female Army
Reserve officers sued the government for
excluding them from formal assignment to
specific Army combat units and other positions
solely because of their gender (Sampson, 2012).
6POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 4 DQ 1 Suspicion-less Strip Searches
POL 303 Week 3 Research Paper Draft
POL 303 Week 4 DQ 1 Suspicion-less Strip
Searches Political Science - General Political
Science Suspicion-less Strip Searches. In 2012
the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the
constitutionality of routine (without probable
cause) strip searches of persons arrested and
detained, even briefly, in a jail (Florence v.
Board of Chosen Freeholders of the Country of
Burlington). Respond to this 3-part question in
your initial post Explain the rationale of the
Supreme Court's decision in Florence (the
majority opinion by Justice Kennedy). Explain
the rationale of Justice Breyers dissenting
opinion.
POL 303 Week 3 Research Paper Draft Political
Science - General Political Science Research
Paper Draft. This is an opportunity to submit a
draft or outline of the Research Paper for review
and feedback from your instructor. Read the
instructions for the Week Five Research Paper and
create an outline for the structure of the paper.
For information regarding writing an outline,
reference to the Ashford Writing Center within
the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation
toolbar.
7POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 5 DQ 1 Eminent Domain
POL 303 Week 4 DQ 2 Cruel and Unusual Punishment
POL 303 Week 5 DQ 1 Eminent Domain Political
Science - General Political Science Eminent
Domain. In 2005 the Supreme Court, in a 5-4
decision, upheld the constitutionality of a city
taking private property, while paying the owner
just compensation, and selling it to a private
developer as part of a plan to stimulate the
city's weak economy (Kelo v. City of New London).
Respond to this 3-part question in your initial
post Explain the rationale of the Supreme
Court's decision in Kelo (the majority opinion by
Justice Stevens). Explain the rationale of
Justice OConnors dissenting opinion.
POL 303 Week 4 DQ 2 Cruel and Unusual
Punishment Political Science - General Political
Science Cruel and Unusual Punishment. During the
last decade, the Supreme Court has applied the
8th Amendments prohibition against cruel and
unusual punishments against some of the harsher
sentencing policies implemented by various
states. Three cases dealing with juvenile
offenders Roper v. Simmons (2005), Graham v.
Florida (2010), and Miller v. Alabama (2012)
illustrate this moderating trend. An underlying
rationale of these decisions disproportionality
contrasts with rationales guiding the Courts
earlier (pre- 2002) interpretations of the 8th
Amendment (see Davis, 2008).
8POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
POL 303 Week 5 Final Paper
POL 303 Week 5 DQ 2 Right to Bear Arms
POL 303 Week 5 Final Paper Political Science -
General Political Science Focus of the Research
Paper In this essay you will research a case that
is actively pending before the Supreme Court of
the United States (not yet decided by the Court
when you submit your essay at the end of Week
Five). It must be a case that raises significant
issues involving the interpretation of the
Constitution. The thesis of your essay will be a
statement of the decision, regarding these
issues, which the Court should make, according to
your research and analysis of the constitutional
principles, Court precedents, facts of the case,
and other relevant information.
POL 303 Week 5 DQ 2 Right to Bear Arms Political
Science - General Political Science Right to Bear
Arms. In 2010 the Supreme Courts novel and
controversial interpretation of the 2nd Amendment
greatly limited governments power to restrict
gun possession. The case McDonald v. Chicago
sparked widespread debate across the political
and legal community, some of which is expressed
in the articles you read for this discussion.
Read the summary of McDonaldv.Chicago, then
choose and read two articles pertaining to the
McDonald v Chicago case from the Recommended
Resources for POL303 PDF file located in your
online classroom.
9POL 303 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK
For more course Tutorials
www.tutorialrank.com