My Experience of Writing the Comprehensive Exam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

My Experience of Writing the Comprehensive Exam

Description:

Research Apprenticeship Course Meeting for Dr. Jacob’s Doctoral Students Wednesday, 8 October 2014, 2:30 – 3:30 p.m. (EDT) Room 4321 Wesley W. Posvar Hall University of Pittsburgh – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Slides: 16
Provided by: leejeiwei
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: My Experience of Writing the Comprehensive Exam


1
My Experience of Writing the Comprehensive Exam
  • Che-Wei Lee
  • PhD Student
  • Social and Comparative Analysis in Education
    Program
  • CHL138_at_pitt.edu

Research Apprenticeship Course Meeting for Dr.
Jacobs Doctoral Students Wednesday, 8 October
2014, 230 330 p.m. (EDT) Room 4321 Wesley W.
Posvar Hall University of Pittsburgh
2
Preamble
  • My personal experience might differ from yours
  • Qualitative study on faculty, using ethnographic
    methods
  • Find something that works for you

3
Comprehensive Exams
  • A necessary, meaningful, and helpful process to
    demonstrate your comprehensive knowledge of your
    research topic
  • Proof that you are ready for scholarly dialogue
    in your specific area
  • Committee members validate your professional
    knowledge and competence.
  • Goals
  • Train you to become an expert in your topic
  • Find a knowledge gap around which to orient your
    dissertation research

4
Lessons Learned
  1. Know yourself
  2. Make relevant to your dissertation topic
  3. Adhere to the rules
  4. Choose manageable questions that fill a gap in
    the research
  5. Content-expert learning
  6. Build ideas from the literature, your previous
    research, and your experience
  7. Read the journals in your field regularly
  8. Read efficiently (Screen or paper? Notes or
    annotated bibliography?)
  9. Find partners or mentors for meaningful dialogue
  10. Create a clear framework and avoid plagiarism
  11. Learn and use EndNote (or similar)
  12. Use tables and figures, as appropriate
  13. Become an expert
  14. Know when to stop reading and start writing!

5
In Hindsight
  • Efficiently and accurately identify the seminal
    works in your field
  • But how?
  • Engage in scholarly conversations with senior
    colleagues and mentors
  • Review reference books
  • Snowball literature search

6
Helpful Questions for Doing a Literature Review
  • When facing a large amount of information
  • Who were cited most in your field?
  • What were the relatively popular topics in recent
    years?
  • Which articles were highly cited in relevant
    journals?
  • Trends in research topics?
  • What are the prospects and needs in the current
    literature?
  • ? Bibliometrics

7
Definition of Content Expert
  • Credentialed in a specific area
  • Decides what knowledge will be taught (Morre
    and Shattuck 1996, 8)
  • Helps shape the field
  • Other terms Subject-matter expert (SME), domain
    expert
  • Source Morre, Michael G., and Kay Shattuck.
    1996. Distance Education A Systems View.
    Belmont, CA Wadsworth.

8
Content-Expert Learning Model
Special Interest Group (SIG)
  • Direct and Indirect Effects
  • Standardizing
  • Institutionalizing
  • Socializing to academic disciplines

The I, with my inquires
Figure 1. Content-Expert Learning Model Source
Created by the Author
9
The Structure of a 15-Page Paper
  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Recommendations for Dissertation Research
  • The length for each section depends on your
    research topic, methodology, scope, and focus.

10
Search Strategy and Process
  • Refer to previous reviews, if any, in your field.
  • Electronic Search
  • Databases, e.g., ERIC, EBSCOhost, Academic Search
    Premier, PsycINFO, etc.
  • Limit search to a specific period
  • Identify keywords
  • Manual Search
  • Search journals excluded from databases but
    widely cited by scholars
  • Snowball Literature Search
  • Snowball from other articles references

11
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  • Include
  • Peer-reviewed empirical articles in academic
    journals
  • Exclude
  • Non-empirical papers
  • Conceptual/theoretical papers
  • Book reviews
  • Conference papers
  • Editorials
  • Non-peer-reviewed papers

12
Coding the Sources
  • I input the following information on the first
    page of my source. The sources are arranged in
    e.g., the publication date order.
  • Paper Question No. 2
  • Type Empirical
  • Relevance High
  • Theme Persistence
  • Section Result
  • Note Refer to the relevant section good for
    shaping my dissertation research questions

13
Helpful References
  • Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M.
    Williams. 2008. The Craft of Research. 3rd ed.
    Chicago University of Chicago Press.
  • Galvan, Jose L. 2013. Writing Literature Reviews
    A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral
    Sciences. 5th ed. Glendale, CA Pyrczak
    Publishing.
  • Harris, Robert A. 2011. Using Sources
    Effectively. 3rd ed. Glendale, CA Pyrczak
    Publishing.
  • Hart, Chris. 1998. Doing a Literature Review
    Releasing the Social Science Research
    Imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
  • Hart, Chris. 1998. Doing a Literature Search A
    Comprehensive Guide for the Social Sciences.
    Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
  • Machi, Lawrence A., and Brenda T. McEvoy. 2012.
    The Literature Review Six Steps to Success. 2nd
    ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin.
  • Ridley, Diana. 2012. The Literature Review A
    Step-by-Step Guide for Students. 2nd ed. Thousand
    Oaks, CA Sage.

14
Useful Writing Samples
  • Jacob, W. James, Jennifer Crandall, Jason Hilton,
    and Laura Northrop. 2011. Emerging Theories in
    Comparative, International, and Development
    Education. In Beyond the Comparative Advancing
    Theory and Its Application to Practice, edited by
    John C. Weidman and W. James Jacob, 6991.
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands Sense.
  • Lee, Moosung, and Tom Friedrich. 2011. Citation
    Network Analysis of Comparative Education Texts
    A Methodological Consideration for Micro Social
    Cartography. In Beyond the Comparative
    Advancing Theory and Its Application to Practice,
    edited by John C. Weidman and W. James Jacob,
    11344. Rotterdam, The Netherlands Sense.
  • Rust, Val D., Aminata Soumaré, Octavio Pescador,
    and Megumi Shibuya. 1999. Research Strategies in
    Comparative Education. Comparative Education
    Review 43 (1) 86109.

15
Other Helpful Resources
  • Journal Review of Educational Research
  • Course ADMPS 3001 Disciplined Inquiry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com