Chapter 4, Part 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 4, Part 3

Description:

Individuals compare their job inputs and outcomes ... distributive justice or the perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of ... Distributive Justice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: nancyl86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 4, Part 3


1
Chapter 4, Part 3
  • Motivating Self and Others

2
Responses to the Reward System
  • Equity Theory
  • Fair Process

3
Equity Theory
  • Individuals compare their job inputs and outcomes
    with those of others and then respond so as to
    eliminate any inequities.
  • Equity theory recognizes that individuals are
    concerned not only with the absolute amount of
    rewards for their efforts, but also with the
    relationship of this amount to what others
    receive.
  • Historically, equity theory focused on
  • distributive justice or the perceived fairness of
    the amount and allocation of rewards among
    individuals.
  • however, equity should also consider procedural
    justice or the perceived fairness of the process
    used to determine the distribution of rewards.

4
Exhibit 4-9Equity Theory
Perception due to being underrewarded
O/IA lt O/IB
O/IA O/IB
Equity
Inequity due to being overrewarded
O/IA gt O/IB
5
Responses to Inequity
  • Change Inputs
  • Change Outcomes
  • Adjust Perceptions of Self
  • Adjust Perceptions of Others
  • Choose a Different Referent
  • Leave the Field

6
Equity Theory Propositions
  • Given payment by time, overrewarded employees
    will produce more than will equitably paid
    employees.
  • Given payment by quantity of production,
    overrewarded employees will produce fewer, but
    higher-quality, units than will equitably paid
    employees.
  • Given payment by time, underrewarded employees
    will produce less or poorer quality of output.
  • Given payment by quantity of production,
    underrewarded employees will produce a large
    number of low-quality units in comparison with
    equitably paid employees.

7
Fair Process
  • Distributive Justice
  • Perceived fairness of the amount and allocation
    of rewards among individuals
  • Procedural Justice
  • Perceived fairness of the process used to
    determine the distribution of rewards
  • Interactional Justice
  • The quality of the interpersonal treatment
    received from another

8
Exhibit 4-10Management Reward Follies
We hope for Teamwork and collaboration Innovative
thinking and risk taking Development of people
skills Employee involvement and empowerment High
achievement Long-term growth Commitment to total
quality Candor
9
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
  • Allocating extrinsic rewards for behaviour that
    had been previously intrinsically rewarded tends
    to decrease the overall level of motivation.

10
Abolishing Rewards
  • Alfie Kohn suggests that organizations should
    focus less on rewards, more on creating
    motivating environments
  • Abolish incentives
  • Re-evaluate evaluation
  • Create conditions for authentic motivation
  • Collaboration
  • Content
  • Choice

11
What to Evaluate
  • Individual task outcomes
  • Behaviours
  • Traits

12
Who Evaluates?
  • Immediate supervisor
  • Peers
  • Self-evaluation
  • Immediate subordinates
  • Comprehensive approach 360-degree evaluations

13
Exhibit 4-11 360-Degree Evaluation
14
Methods of Performance Evaluation
  • Written essays
  • A narrative describing an employees strengths,
    weaknesses, past performance, potential, and
    suggestions for improvement
  • Critical incidents
  • Evaluating those behaviours that are key in
    making the difference between executing a job
    effectively and executing it ineffectively
  • Graphic rating scales
  • An evaluation method where the evaluator rates
    performance factors on an incremental scale
  • Behaviourally anchored ratings scales (BARS)
  • An evaluation where actual job-related behaviours
    are rated along a continuum
  • Multiperson comparisons
  • group employees placed into particular
    classifications, such as quartiles
  • individual rank-order employees from best to
    worst
  • paired compare each employee with every other
    employee, and then assign summary ranking

15
Potential Problems
  • Single criterion errors
  • Recency errors
  • Leniency/strictness errors
  • Halo errors
  • Similarity errors
  • Low differentiation errors
  • Forcing information to match non-performance
    criteria

16
Improvements
  • Use multiple criteria
  • Emphasize behaviours rather than traits
  • Document performance behaviours in a diary
  • Use multiple evaluators
  • Evaluate selectively
  • Train evaluators
  • Provide employees with due process

17
Why Organizations Fail at Performance Appraisal
  • Time consuming
  • Difficult to establish, communicate expectations
  • Don't do it often enough (usually annually)
  • Fail to consider the dynamic aspects of the job
  • Hard to define levels of performance
  • No rewards for being skilled at performance
    appraisal

18
Summary
  • Need Theories
  • Be aware that individuals differ in their levels
    and types of needs
  • Goal Setting Theory
  • Clear and difficult goals lead to higher levels
    of employee productivity.
  • Expectancy Theory
  • Offers a relatively powerful explanation of
    employee productivity, absenteeism, and turnover.
  • Equity Theory
  • Strongest when predicting absence and turnover
    behaviours.
  • Weakest when predicting differences in employee
    productivity.
  • Cognitive Evaluation Theory
  • When you give extrinsic rewards for behaviour
    that had been previously intrinsically rewarded
    this can result in a decrease in the overall
    level of motivation.

19
Implications
  • Recognize Individual Differences
  • Employees have different needs.
  • Dont treat them all alike.
  • Spend the time necessary to understand whats
    important to each employee.
  • Use Goals and Feedback
  • Allow Employees to Participate in Decisions That
    Affect Them
  • Link Rewards to Performance
  • Employees must perceive a clear linkage.
  • Check the System for Equity

20
Exhibit 4-12 Compensation of Canadas Five
Best-Paid CEOs (1998)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com