To Admit or Not to Admit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

To Admit or Not to Admit

Description:

Publication MO-06-40-HPMP June 2006. This material was prepared by Primaris, the ... diaphoresis; pain increases with minimal exertion; pain relieved w/rest & NTG; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: catheri117
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: To Admit or Not to Admit


1
To Admit or Not to Admit
2
The Decision Seems Easy
Admit as Inpatient
Treat as Outpatient
3
But Its Much More Complicated
Office Follow-up
Specialty Clinic Follow-up
Treat as Outpatient
Outpatient Procedure
SNF Follow-up
Diagnostic Testing
Observation
4
Patient Status Options
Admit as Inpatient
Outpatient Observation
Outpatient Procedure and/or Followup
5
Effects of Unnecessary Admissions
  • Costs Medicare the largest proportion of
    erroneous payments
  • One-day stay admissions are target area for
    potential payment errors in MO
  • OIG has taken notice

6
Why It Matters
  • Majority of error payment amount (1.6B) may be
    attributed to lack of medical necessity
  • Nearly 80 of all admission denials were short
    stays (1-3 days)
  • MOs net error payment FY2005 estimated at 47M
    majority of which may be attributable to
    unnecessary IP admissions

7
Why It Matters
  • Why does it matter to the patient?
  • Why does it matter to the hospital?
  • Why does it matter to the physician?

8
Admit as Inpatient
  • Treatment longer than 24 hours expected
  • Outpatient treatment has not been effective
  • Inpatient-only procedure necessary
  • Continuous monitoring necessary

9
Inpatient Admission Considerations
  • Severity of presenting signs and symptoms
  • Predictability of the clinical course
  • Existence of comorbid conditions which may
    negatively impact course
  • Potential for complications
  • Services required upon presentation
  • Diagnostic procedures available

10
Inpatient Admission Documentation
  • Inpatient admission order with date and time
  • Clinical documentation supporting medical
    necessity
  • No back-dating is allowed

11
What are Observation Services?
  • Services furnished by a hospital including
  • use of bed
  • periodic monitoring by staff
  • requires physician order
  • Reasonable and necessary
  • evaluate outpatient condition
  • determine inpatient admission need

12
Why Observation Services?
  • Determines need for inpatient admission
  • Rapid response to treatment is expected
  • Patient has unusually prolonged recovery period
    following an OP procedure

13
Points of Entry for Outpatient Observation
  • Admission from emergency department
  • Direct admission
  • Outpatient department(s)

14
Observation Documentation
  • Observation admission order with date and time
  • Assessment of patient risk to determine benefit
    from observation care
  • Timed and signed admission notes, progress notes
    and discharge notes

15
Observation Services Not Covered
  • Services not reasonable or necessary for
    diagnosis or treatment of patient
  • Services provided for convenience of patient,
    family or physician
  • Services covered under Part A
  • Services that are part of another Part B service
  • Standing orders for observation after OP surgery
  • Custodial care

16
Condition Code 44 Policy
  • Medicare payment policy that allows inpatient
    admission change to outpatient when
  • Change in status made prior to discharge
  • The hospital has not submitted Medicare claim for
    inpatient admission
  • Physician concurs with decision to change status
  • Physicians concurrence is documented in medical
    record

17
Chest Pain
  • Process of elimination to determine chest pain is
    not cardiac in origin based on
  • Symptoms
  • ECG
  • Enzymes
  • Possible early stress testing

18
Chest Pain Evaluation
  • New onset symptoms may be consistent with
    ischemic heart disease but not associated with
    ECG changes or convincing evidence of unstable
    ischemic heart disease at rest or with minimal
    exertion
  • Known CAD but symptoms do not suggest true
    worsening
  • Observation beneficial because etiology of
    symptoms is unclear

19
Chest Pain Case Study 1
  • 84-year-old female, PMHCABG, presented to ED
    with intermittent chest pain x1 wk which
    increases on deep inspiration Initial enzymes
    ECG unremarkable pain resolved prior to
    admission
  • Patient admitted with atypical pain in setting of
    prior CABG Planserial ECGs enzymes
  • Admission to observation status appropriate

20
Chest Pain Case Study 2
  • 63-year-old female, PMHCAD with prior MI 1990s,
    HTN, CVA presented to ED with chest pain, sharp,
    retrosternal, dyspnea diaphoresis pain
    increases with minimal exertion pain relieved
    w/rest NTG pain recurred several times in ED
    SBP gt100
  • Initial impressionunstable angina, r/o MI

21
Chest Pain Case Study 2 (contd)
  • Initial enzymes WNL, ECGnon-specific ST- T
    changes admitted to telemetry unit for r/o MI
    protocol stress perfusion w/dipyridamole, which
    showed anterior wall ischemia
  • New onset angina in setting of prior MI IP
    admission appropriate

22
Syncope Collapse Case Study 3
  • 70-year-old female presented to the ED knees
    gave out I fell to floorhit back of head
    denies LOC, dizziness, lightheadedness, chest
    pain, N/V PMHDM vital signs WNL w/no
    findings on exam BS189 Enzymes nl ECG WNL
    head CT negative

23
Syncope Collapse Case Study 3 (contd)
  • Questionable pre-syncope of unknown etiology
    admit to monitor for arrhythmias or other neuro
    signs
  • Admission to observation status appropriate

24
Syncope Collapse Case Study 4
  • 65-year-old male came to ED with 3 syncopal
    episodes each lasting several seconds, occurring
    over 18-hr period HP unremarkable
    ECGbradycardia of 54bpm 18 sec pause
    ECHOWNL
  • Appropriate IP admission for pacemaker insertion
    and postprocedure monitoring

25
Dehydration Case Study 5
  • 92-year-old female presented to the ED with
    weakness x2 days difficulty getting in out of
    bed no fever, dizziness, nausea, vomiting,
    diarrhea PMHHTN, dementia, recent tx for UTI
    Sodium132 decreased oral intake HR gt100
    postural SBP drop gt30
  • Tx planBP meds held IVFs 100/hr po antibiotics

26
Dehydration Case Study 5 (contd)
  • Meets severity of illness (InterQual
    endocrine/metabolic) but doesnt meet intensity
    of service
  • Per PR review---documentation indicates status of
    dehydration could reasonably be expected to
    improve within 24-hour period overnight
    monitoring in observation status appropriate.

27
Observation or Inpatient?
Hospitalization required?
Yes
24 hours adequate to evaluate, treat or respond?
No
No
Inpatient
Yes
No acute hospital care
Observation
28
References
  • Federal Register, Nov. 10, 2005
  • Medicare Claims Processing Manual
  • Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
  • Mutual of Omaha
  • InterQual admission screening criteria
  • HPMP Compliance Workbook
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com