New CalEPA report and Breast Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

New CalEPA report and Breast Cancer

Description:

... and Breast Cancer ... 14 studies evaluated breast cancer risk in younger/premenopausal ... Comparison of breast cancer risk from active and passive smoke ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: IHPS7
Category:
Tags: calepa | breast | cancer | new | report

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New CalEPA report and Breast Cancer


1
New CalEPA report and Breast Cancer
http//www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/ets/finalreport/final
report.htm
2
Mammary Carcinogens in Tobacco Smoke
3
Biology
  • Tobacco smoke contains multiple fat-soluble
    compounds known to induce mammary tumors in
    rodents. (PAHs, heterocyclic amines, aromatic
    amines, and nitro-PAHs)
  • These carcinogens can be activated into
    electrophilic intermediates by enzymes active in
    the human breast epithelial cell.

4
Biology (contd)
  • Genes coding for activation/detoxification
    enzymes (e.g. NAT2, NAT1, CYP1a1, COMT, BRCA1 And
    BRCA2) have been reported to modify the
    relationship of tobacco smoke to breast cancer
    risk (although results are inconsistent).
  • Electrophilic metabolites of tobacco compounds
    bind to DNA and form DNA adducts that can be
    detected in human breast epithelial
    cells. Morabia A., Environmental and Molecular
    Mutagenesis 3989-95 2002

5
Biology (contd)
  • Genomic alterations observed in vitro after
    exposure of human breast epithelial cells to
    tobacco carcinogens resemble those in familial
    breast cancer.
  • p53 damage in some breast tumors of smokers, but
    not nonsmokers
  • Morabia A., Environmental and Molecular
    Mutagenesis 3989-95 2002

6
Problems with exposure assessment
7
Effect of Exposure Misclassification on Estimates
of Relative Risk
Relative Risk
5
8
Effect of Exposure Misclassification on Estimates
of Relative Risk
Relative Risk
5
9
Effect of Exposure Misclassification on Estimates
of Relative Risk
2
Relative Risk
5
10
Exposure misclassification
  • Biases results towards null
  • Probably reason for differences in Hirayama and
    Garfinkle study
  • Important in studies of SHS

11
SHS Breast Cancer Risk
12
SHS and Breast Cancer in Younger/Premenopausal
Women
  • 14 studies evaluated breast cancer risk in
    younger/premenopausal women strata.
  • 13/14 found elevated risks (1.1-7.1), and 7 were
    statistically significant.
  • Pooled risk estimate from meta-analysis 1.68
    (95 CI 1.31-2.15).
  • Pooled risk estimate for studies with lifetime
    exposure information from all sources 2.2 (95
    CI 1.69-2.87)
  • Some evidence of dose-response.

13
Utilizing Unexposed Referent Raises Risk
Estimate (within study comparison, Morabia et
al. 1996)
(Similar within study comparison results in
Johnson et al., 2000, Lash and Aschengrau, 1999,
and Kropp and Chang Claude, 2002)
14
Comparison of breast cancer risk from active and
passive smoke exposure in studies CalEPA
considered most informative
15
Thuns arguments
  • If active smoking does not cause breast cancer,
    how can passive smoking?
  • Active smoking does cause breast cancer
  • IARC says no effect
  • 2004 report based on meeting in 2001
  • Considered essentially the same studies as CalEPA
    1997 (which did not say SHS caused breast cancer)
  • Only considered 4 studies published between 2000
    and 2002
  • Surgeon General says no effect
  • 2004 report essentially completed in 2001
  • Considered 5 studies published after 2000
  • CalEPA considered 23 studies between 2000 and
    2005
  • Cohort studies negative

16
Evidence for breast cancer in younger women
stronger than lung cancer in 1986
  • Lung cancer 1986
  • 11/13 elevated risk
  • 5 significant
  • 1/3 cohort studies significant
  • Hirayama, Garfinkle,Gillis
  • No toxicology
  • No molecular epi
  • Breast cancer 2006
  • 13/14 elevated risk
  • 7 significant
  • 1/3 cohort studies significant
  • Hanaoka, Reynolds, Wartenberg
  • Positive toxicology
  • Molecular epi

17
Passive smoking and lung cancer
  • First study, Hirayama 1981
  • Cohort study in Japan
  • Nonsmoking women married to men who smoked
  • Few women smoked
  • Few women worked outside the home
  • Significant elevation in risk
  • ACS CPS study, Garfinkle
  • Cohort study in USA
  • Nonsignificant elevation in risk
  • Many women smoked and worked outside the home

18
(No Transcript)
19
Implications for Workplace Exposure of Waitresses
  • Highest occupational exposure to SHS 72.3
  • These women tend to get exposed at the most
    vulnerable times
  • 1.7 relative risk
  • 30 of breast cancer in younger waitresses

20
Write down this URL
  • http//www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/ets/
  • finalreport/finalreport.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com