Title: Construction and Engineering
1Construction and Engineering The Roll-Up Rage
AftermathConstruction and Engineering Industry
Reporter - August 2004
- Introduction to the Brereton Construction and
Engineering Industry Reporter - The Brereton Industry Reporter is a quarterly
journal designed to assist management and
investors in the construction and engineering
trades. The journal attempts to address and
explain current and anticipated market
influences, investor sentiment and the valuation
implications of the economic environment
including private company acquisition activity.
By introducing quarterly data and highlighting
critical market issues, we hope that the Brereton
Industry Reporter can help management and
investors gain effective insight into the
valuation and organization of their business. - Table of Contents
- I. Executive SummaryII. Specialty
Contractors An Overview of the Independents - III. Public Sector Growth OpportunitiesIV.
Mergers and Acquisition ReviewV. Public
Company Review - Executive Summary
- In the present era of competition and technology
driven business, companies are increasingly
leveraging collaboration as a strategic tool for
business growth. To succeed as any type of
contractor in this low margin and high volume
environment, you need to continuously design and
build sophisticated products to beat the
competition. This demands working across
enterprise boundaries with speed, accuracy,
innovation, and efficiency. - Among the many trends confronting the
construction and engineering industries, several
issues and challenges have emerged as key
determinants of success. In this issue we will
focus on the specialty contractor market and
opportunities for growth through public sector
work.
Specialty Contractors An Overview of the
Independents In boom of the late 90s, the
consolidation frenzy among specialty contractors
had reached a peak. Companies focused in the
specialty trades, including electrical,
mechanical, masonry, concrete, utility, roofing,
asbestos and many other sub-sectors, were
targeted for acquisition as part of a wave of
consolidations or roll-ups that swept the
industry in 1998 alone, for example, over 300
specialty contractors were acquired. Roll-ups
were driven by, among other things, market
fragmentation, the availability of debt equity
capital and the opportunity for valuation
arbitrage (purchasing targets at multiples lower
than the acquirers). The ensuing five years
have brought a number of changes to the companies
that drove the roll-up strategy, to the other
companies in the sector and to the end-markets in
which the companies perform their services.
Engineering News-Records October 2003 survey of
the contracting industry indicates that this
market generated revenues in 2002 of
approximately 48.4 billion, down from 2001
revenues of 54.9 billion and up from 1998s
37.9 billion. The decline from 2001 to 2002
resulted from a slowdown in overall business
capital expenditures, stemming from the general
economic contraction as well as specific events
such as the September 11th attacks and the
build-up to the Iraq war. In addition, companies
with undercapitalized or overleveraged balance
sheets were significantly impacted as the bonding
market contracted drastically.(Continued on Page
2)
Construction and Engineering MA Deal Volume
We would like to invite your insight on these or
other industry related topics. Our contact
information is on the back cover.
Source Capital IQ MA Database. Deals between
10 and 250 million.2004 Estimated from 125
deals as of 7/31/04.
Page 1
2Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
Specialty Contractors An Overview of the
Independents (Continued) Again, using ENR
Magazines classifications, building represents
the bulk of activity, while the specialty markets
are evenly distributed. Market Analysis Sp
ecialties While all of the trades have
been impacted by the U.S. economic contraction,
some end-markets declined more precipitously than
others.
- MA in the Specialty Contractor Market
- Today, buyers and sellers of specialty
contractors approach MA differently than they
did five years ago. In particular - Few, if any, companies believe that a quick
roll-up to go-public strategy is feasible - While 12 EC companies went public from 1997 to
2000, no EC company has gone public since 2000 - Private equity funds investing in the sector
appear to be purchasing companies with reasonable
amounts of leverage and pursuing a more patient
buy and hold strategy once theyve acquired the
companies - Buyers are focused on expanding into particular
geographies or end-markets, not just acquiring
loosely related companies for the sake of growth.
Particularly favored sub-sectors include - Advanced technology Education Healthcare
Homeland security Water/wastewater expertise - Few companies in todays market are taking on
significant amounts of leverage - In many industries, lenders are increasingly
raising the multiples at which they are willing
to lend against EBITDA - In the contracting space, however, the lack of a
significant asset base and the uncertainty of the
percent of completion method of accounting cause
many lenders to avoid the space or to cap the
amount of leverage any company can carry - The median leverage of the specialty contractor
tracked in this article is 2.2x Debt/EBITDA,
which conforms favorably with the overall market - Companies are acquiring larger, fewer targets
rather than a large volume of small companies - The transaction costs of accomplishing multiple
acquisitions (including the time and expense
involved in finding targets, conducting due
diligence, executing the transaction documents
and paying the professional fees) and the
difficulties of the blocking and tackling of
integration and establishing a cohesive
management structure raise significant hurdles to
acquiring many companies as part of one
transaction - Conclusion
- Companies throughout the contracting sector
always struggle with finding the means to grow
consistently through organic growth alone. For
these companies, mergers acquisitions have
provided an alternative, faster means of
achieving their revenue and value growth
strategies but these transactions almost always
involve a higher level of risk. MA in the
specialty contractor sector, in particular, has
been associated since the late 1990s with
roll-ups, leverage, difficult end-markets and
unfulfilled promise. However, in 2004, improving
economic conditions, smarter acquisition
strategies and stronger balance sheets indicate
that MA in the specialty contractor service is
worth considering.
We would like to invite your insight on these or
other industry related topics. Our contact
information is on the back cover.
Page 2
3Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
Public Sector Growth Opportunities Many
engineering and construction companies have
actively diversified into less cyclical
businesses to decrease exposure to under
performing industries and create more even
revenue streams. Many markets once rife with
activity, such as industrial, commercial and
power, have recently stalled for various reasons.
Construction firms have instead begun to favor
more stable sources of growth, namely the federal
services market and work associated with federal
regulatory changes. Growth drivers for public
sector projects include growing populations,
aging infrastructure, increased public funding,
environmental regulations, privatization of
infrastructure and homeland security. In this
section we will provide an overview of the
federal services market and reasons for its
growing prominence in the revenue mix of
contractor companies. The Federal Services
Market Despite the widely known federal budget
deficit issues, the federal services market,
consisting of projects for the federal government
and agencies and state local governments, is
one of the most robust sectors today for the
construction industry. The annual budget for
public sector work is about 200 billion, 25 of
the 800 billion domestic construction
industry. In 2003 and 2004, increased federal
spending on defense and homeland security has
generated the most revenue growth. Forecasts
indicate that these budgets will continue to grow
over the next few years. The public sector has
historically been one of the most stable clients,
but recent increases in the spending of these
departments have led to the rapidly growing
government portion of construction companies'
businesses. The Department of Defense ("DoD")
and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS")
are expected to continue spending at record
levels fueled by residual effects from the Iraq
war, opportunities to outsource federal jobs to
civilians, and continued concerns about homeland
safety. The Department of Energy ("DoE") will
also be a significant contributor of funds to the
industry.
- Agency WorkDoD contracts include the building of
missile sites, outsourcing of base operations,
maintenance of space facilities and building
nuclear and biological detection and protection
systems. The DoD's forecasted 2004 budget is
about 380 billion. - DHS contracts include the review of
transportation infrastructure, review of
emergency response centers, building facilities
for natural disasters, and FEMA work for disaster
recovery. The DHS 2003 budget was 33.4 billion,
with an additional 6.7 billion in supplemental
funding recently approved. The department's 2004
spending levels are forecasted to increase to
approximately 41 billion.
We would like to invite your insight on these or
other industry related topics. Our contact
information is on the back cover.
Page 3
4Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
- Public Sector Growth Opportunities (Continued)
- Federal Outsourcing (Continued)
- The Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act
(FAIR) of 1998 states government intention to
outsource an additional 125,000 non-DoD and DoD
civil service jobs by end of 2004 and a total of
850,000 over the next 8-10 years. - The proposed Defense Transformation Act for the
21st Century of 2003, authorizing the use of
civilians for non-combat military jobs, could
convert another 320,000 military positions. - The Environment
- Regulatory provisions also generate significant
opportunities in the environmental and water
sectors - The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has
mandated the compliance of sulfur levels in
diesel by mid-2006, with more stringent standards
to come by 2010. - Sulfer compliance represents a 17 billion market
opportunity for CE companies, according to
estimates from the National Petroleum Council. - Although the latest information is not yet
available, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, the two
largest U.S. refiners, expected their clean fuels
capital expenditures to more than double in 2003
over 2002. Their total clean fuels investment is
projected to reach 4.5 billion in total. - New Maximum Achievable Control Technology
("MACT") standards set the emissions levels for
specific sources of pollution, such as oil
refineries, chemical plants and steel mills. - The EPA has issued more than 50 MACT standards
over the past 13 years. In August 2003, 13 new
MACT standards were issued for iron and steel
foundries, combustion turbines, metal parts and
products, and coating companies. - Estimated annual costs (excluding initial
capital costs) are 350 million. These EPA
estimates tend to be much lower than reality. - Transportation
- Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
("TEA-21") authorizes the federal surface
transportation programs for highways, highway
safety and transit. - This infrastructure project will provide 218
billion of funding. - Between 1998 and 2003, 170 billon of these
funds were utilized for highway and transit state
matching funds.
- Public Sector MA OpportunitiesBecause entering
a new industry segment through organic growth
takes time and may lead to unanticipated results,
Construction and Engineering firms have been
using acquisitions as a means of expanding their
presence in or accessing the public sector and
other public sector activity. Because of the
continued difference in margins (as illustrated
below), publicly held government service (GS)
companies have typically traded at higher
multiples than their open market (OM)
counterparts. In 2003, the median margin for OM
firms was around 3.6, while the median margin
for GS firms was closer to 9.4. From a
transaction multiples perspective, in 2003, the
median EV/EBITDA multiple for GS firms has
increased to 8.9x and the multiple for OM firms
has decreased to 7.4x. - Conclusions
Note GS companies include Affiliated Comp
Services, American Management Systems, Anteon
International, Bearingpoint CACI International,
CDI Corp., Computer, Sciences Corp., DigitalNet
Holdings, Dynamics Research, Electronic Data
Systems, GTSI Corp., Halifax Corp., Keane Inc.,
ManTech International, Maximus Inc., MTC
Technologies, PEC Solutions, Perot Systems, SI
International, SRA International, Tier
Technologies, Titan Corp., Tyler Technologies and
VSE Corp.
We would like to invite your insight on these or
other industry related topics. Our contact
information is on the back cover.
Page 3
5Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
Merger and Acquisitions Review The worldwide
construction and engineering market rebounded in
2003 and early 2004, as the general economy
experienced a broad-based recovery. As seen on
page one, 2003 and the first half of 2004 has
been a very active time for construction and
engineering firms in terms of mergers and
acquisitions (MA) activity. However, it should
be noted that while there are more deals getting
done, they are generally smaller
transactions. Factors Affecting
Activity There are several factors that may
assist in the resurgence of deal activity within
the sector. Some of these factors
include Rebounding Credit Market The credit
markets remain tight, but they appear to have
bottomed out, as average total debt/EBITDA
leverage ratios in transactions rose to 4.0x in
2003. Acquisition financing continues to be
predominantly through asset-backed loans as a
majority of the debt component, however recently
lenders are showing increasing support for cash
flow lending, which should help stimulate deal
activity.
Increased Activity from Private Equity
Groups Despite a decline in fundraising in 2003,
analysts confirm that there is no shortage of
capital in the hands of private equity groups,
who still have an estimated 100 billion, raised
during the golden fundraising years of 19982001,
to invest. In fact, the abundance of uncommitted
capital has become an issue for private equity
firms, many of which are behind their forecast
investment pace. As a result, they are scrambling
to make investments in quality companies.
Private Equity Groups are actively looking for
attractive construction and engineering companies
with stable cash flows to invest in. This is
exemplified by the recent barrage of deal
activity. Increase in Offer
Multiples Not only have the number of
middle-market deals increased, but offer
multiples have risen as well. In 2003, the
International Mergers and Acquisition Partners
(IMAP) reported a jump of over 20 in EBIT
multiples.
- Multiples of Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
(EBIT) were used in the comparisons above. EBIT
was calculated using trailing 12 months earnings
before interest and taxes, adjusted for
non-recurring expenses and discretionary owner
distributions including compensation in excess of
market rates. Seller notes, etc., were discounted
present values.
Source Loan Pricing Corporation (A Reuters
Company)Transaction gt100 millionBorrower
Revenues gt500 million
Page 5
6Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
Merger and Acquisitions Review (Continued) Recent
activity reflects the strong interest from both
strategic and financial buyers. It should be
noted that in the last twelve months, publicly
traded construction and engineering firms have
seen an approximate 20 increase in valuation,
providing a more effective acquisition
currency.
Page 6
7Construction and Engineering Industry Reporter
- August 2004
Public Company Review While public company
performance does not always translate perfectly
into private company, middle-market trends, we
have found it to be a useful reference for
general trends. This page used the following
public entities as a guide
Page 6
8 Brereton and Company is a boutique investment
bank dedicated to maximizing the value and
liquidity of closely held businesses.
- Strategic and Financial advisors to businesses
seeking value Maximization - Hands-on attention from experienced senior
dealmakers who stay with your deal to closing - Founded in 1995 drawing from prior investment
banking experience - Empathetic professionals who have acquired,
operated and divested businesses for their own
account - Broad industry experience in middle market
Mergers Acquisitions - Strategic planning framework for evaluation of
financial alternatives - Structured timelines and processes for multiple
bidder-based value maximization
Attention
Expertise
Process
- If you are
- Undercapitalized and experiencing explosive
demand for your product - Facing a difficult transition after many years at
the helm - Unsure about how to best maximize the value of
your business for your heirs - Ready to harvest your business investment to
diversify your net worth - Please give us a call. Our initial discussions
and analysis are strictly confidential and
complimentary. -
Brereton and Company, Inc.1075 N. Tenth Street,
Suite 110San Jose, CA 95112www.brereton.net
Brandt Brereton, Managing Director E-Mail
brereton_at_brereton.netTelephone (408) 938-9255
Facsimile (408) 938-9259
Member International Network of Mergers and
Acquisitions Partners (www.imap.com)
Page 8