Title: Recent discoveries and projects in Amateur Variable Star Astronomy
1Recent discoveries and projects in Amateur
Variable Star Astronomy
- Chris Allen
- Strawberry Fields Observatory
- Färjestaden
2Contents
- Some recent amateur discoveries
- Some pro-am projects
- The way ahead- visual or CCD?
3AAVSO / BAAVSS Meeting Cambridge April 2008
4Recent discoveries and projects
- Tagos object in Cassiopeia- a suspected
gravitational microlensing event - Gregr Duszanowiczs supernova discoveries
- The OJ 287 project- observations of a
supermassive binary black hole - Arto Oksanens discovery of the gamma ray burst
afterglow GR071010B - Surveys of cataclysmic variables (CVs) in the
Hamburg Quasar Survey and Sloan Digital Sky
Survey (SDSS) - Remote observing
5Tagos object in Cassiopeia (2006)
6Tagos object- a relatively close microlensing
event
- magnitude
- spectral changes
7Possible explanation
- (adapted from S T 2008 July)
Star GSC 3656-1328
Massive object
Gravity focuses stars light viewed from the Earth
8OJ 287-pro am project to observe a binary black
hole
9OJ 287- a binary black hole
10OJ 287 Light curve (courtesy Gary Poyner)
11Arto Oksanens gamma ray burst afterglow
- Detection of optical transient (afterglow) of
GRB071010B only 17 minutes after detection by the
Swift satellite
(www.ursa.fi)
12Surveys of Cataclysmic Variables
- CVs novae, dwarf novae,nova-like variables etc
- CVs are all interacting binary systems involving
a white dwarf and a main sequence / red giant
companion - Project to observe fainter CVs detected in
Hamburg Quasar Survey, Sloan Digital Sky Survey
etc - Determine type of CV (eg polar, U Gem etc)
- Watch for outbursts (visual)
- Detailed analysis of lightcurve from CCD data
13CV surveys- pro-am cooperation
- Professionals supervise projects, outline goals,
select objects - Amateurs have the telescopes and the time (?) to
collect the data
14Remote observing of variable stars
- Bradford Robotic Telescope
- Remote Astronomical Society instruments in New
Mexico, Australia and Israel
15The future of amateur variable star astronomy
- In an age of CCD cameras, image processing and
digital sky surveys, is there still a place for
the visual observer?
16CCD imaging
- Pros
- Accuracy to 0.01 magnitude possible using
filters - Permanent record
- Preferred by professional astronomers
- Cons
- Expense of equipment (CCD camera equatorial
mountimage processing software - Steep learning curve
- Time consuming- one or two objects per night
analysis of data in real-time is difficult - Bright objects (mag 9-10 saturate pixels on CCD
chip)
17Visual observing
- Pros
- Relatively easy
- Can be made with inexpensive equipment eg
binoculars - Experienced observers can observe 50-100 stars
per night - Data analysis quick and simple
- Good for brighter variables as bright stars
saturate pixels on CCD chips - Cons
- Accuracy only 0.1 magnitude for experienced
observers - No permanent record of observation
18Conclusion Visual or CCD?
- Visual observations still have a very useful role
to play - Visual and CCD observers can complement each
other - Visual observers can monitor brighter stars and
check for outbursts - CCD observers can monitor stars in quiesence and
do time-series photometry to build detailed
lightcurves