Defamation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Defamation

Description:

Verbal defamation was treated as a criminal or quasi-criminal offense. ... Plaintiff must prove a pecuniary loss (lost job, lost customers, etc.) Libel vs. Slander ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: jmen9

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defamation


1
Defamation
  • Presented By
  • Kevin K. Chase Joseph P. Menello

2
History Lesson!
  • Verbal defamation was treated as a criminal or
    quasi-criminal offense.
  • The composition of scurrilous songs and gross
    noisy public affronts were punished by death.

3
History Lesson!
  • In later Roman law, verbal defamation was dealt
    with in two ways
  • Statements made in a public manner - the truth
    of the statements was no justification for the
    unnecessarily public and insulting manner in
    which they had been made.
  • Statements made in private - the offense lay in
    the imputation itself, not in the manner of its
    publication truth (or even belief in the truth)
    was defense, for no man had a right to demand
    legal protection for a false reputation.

4
Elements
  • Defamatory Language
  • Of or concerning the plaintiff
  • Must be a publication
  • Must establish that there has been damage to the
    reputation of the plaintiff

5
Statute of Limitations
  • 2 Years From Publication

6
What is Defamatory Language?
  • Language that adversely affects someones
    reputation by impeaching the individuals
    honesty, integrity, virtue, or sanity.
  • Who can be defamed?
  • Individuals (only living people)
  • Corporations or other business entities

7
Fact v. Opinion
  • Statements of fact can always be actionable
  • Statements of opinion only actionable if they
    appear to be based on facts that are defamatory

8
Of or Concerning the Plaintiff
  • Plaintiff must prove that a reasonable person
    would have understood that the statement was
    about the plaintiff
  • Can be proven by extrinsic facts called
    colloquium.

9
Group Defamation
  • Statement about all members of small group
  • EACH member has case
  • Statement about all members of large group
  • NO member has case

10
Publication
  • Communication to a third party
  • Third party understood the statement
  • Can be intentional or negligent
  • Only intent to publish is required
  • Does not matter if publisher did not think
    statement was defamatory
  • Each repetition of statement new publication

11
Single Publication Rule
  • All copies of same newspaper, magazine, book,
    etc. are treated as a single publication
  • Publication deemed to occur when final product
    released for sale
  • For SOL purposes

12
Methods of Publication
  • Times have certainly changed!
  • The past - newspaper, magazine, radio, television
  • The present email, blogs, webpages, instant
    messages
  • The more methods of communication, the larger the
    audience, the bigger the potential for
    publication and damages

13
Damages
  • Typically, general damages to reputation not
    presumed, and must prove special damages
  • General damages are presumed if defamation per se
    (four categories)
  • Injury to business or profession
  • Loathsome disease
  • Crime involving moral turpitude
  • Unchastity of a Woman

14
Damage to Reputation
  • General Damages vs. Special Damages
  • General Damages
  • Presumed by law if case elements proven
  • Meant to compensate plaintiff for general injury
    to their reputation (embarrassment, hurt
    feelings, etc.)
  • Special Damages
  • Plaintiff must prove a pecuniary loss (lost job,
    lost customers, etc.)

15
Libel vs. Slander
  • Libel defamatory statement that is written down
    or recorded in some other permanent form
    (scripted material broadcast on a T.V. show)
  • Slander typically defined as spoken defamation

16
Defamation per se
  • ONLY when considered alone and without innuendo
  • Charge a person with an infamous crime, or tend
    to subject one to hatred, distress, ridicule,
    contempt or disgrace, or tend to injure ones
    business or profession
  • Impute conduct, characteristics or a conditions
    which is not compatible with the proper exercise
    of ones lawful business, trade, profession or
    office

17
Question of Law
  • The determination of whether a statement is
    defamatory per se is a matter of law
  • Not by extremes
  • As the common mind would naturally understand
    them

18
Malice Requirement
  • Public Officials - must prove malice
  • Public Figures - must prove malice

19
What Constitutes Malice?
  • Actual knowledge that statement false
  • Reckless disregard as to statements truth or
    falsity
  • Plaintiff must prove the defendant had serious
    doubts at to truthfulness of the publication.

20
Private Individuals
  • Do not need to prove malice
  • Public Concern exception
  • Private person must prove fault
  • Presumed and punitive damages limited
  • Damages limited to actual injury
  • Presumed or punitive damages allowed if malice
    proven
  • If matter of purely private concern, no
    Constitutional limitations at all

21
Defenses to Defamation
  • Consent
  • Truth
  • Absolute Privilege
  • Judicial proceedings
  • Legislative Proceedings
  • Executive Proceedings
  • Compelled Broadcast or Publication
  • Spouse communications

22
Substantial Truth Doctrine
  • A statement does not have to be perfectly
    accurate if the gist or the sting of the
    statement is true.

23
Different Effects Test
  • Not considered false unless it would have a
    different effect on the mind of the reader from
    that which the pleaded truth would have produced.

24
Qualified Privilege
  • Reports of Public Proceedings
  • Public Interest
  • Interest of Publisher
  • Interest of Recipient
  • Common Interest of Publisher and Recipient

25
Mitigating Factors
  • No Actual Malice
  • Retraction
  • Anger

26
False Light/Invasion of Privacy
  • Must be highly offensive to a reasonable person
  • Defendant must have acted either knowingly or in
    reckless disregard as to the falsity of the
    publicized material and the false light in which
    it would be placed
  • Privacy right must be invaded
  • Must be separate statement from defamation to
    state separate cause of action

27
Sticks and Stones Example
  • Customer in convenience store
  • Buying lottery tickets
  • Avid lottery player - 50 - 100 per day
  • 1996 1998 played lottery once per day
  • Went hog wild playing lottery beginning in 1996
  • Well known to store

28
Alleged Statements by Clerk
  • I want to know where youre getting all this
    money to buy lottery tickets with everyday. You
    must have a business on the side.
  • Plaintiff informed clerk of prior winnings
  • Are you a professional gambler? You have to be
    a professional gambler to win this type of money.

29
Allegations
  • Customers in store understood the statements to
    mean Plaintiff was a drug dealer or was engaged
    in some illegal activity
  • Damage to his reputation in the community and
    emotional distress

30
Evaluation
  • Are these defamatory statements?
  • Defamation per se?
  • Publication?
  • Privileges?
  • What are the damages?
  • Summary Judgment?
  • How would a jury react to statements?

31
Evidence
  • No proof of publication No witnesses who
    overheard statement
  • No proof of damages No affect on his activities
  • No malice
  • Had to look beyond the statements - innuendo
  • Defense verdict!

32
Plaintiffs Statement to Judge at Hearing
  • Judge, sticks and stones may break my bones, but
    names will never hurt me!
  • (Isnt that the point?)

33
It All May Be True, But . . .
  • Bankruptcy case
  • Court order against corporate defendant
  • Referred to corporate defendant as Straub or
    Straub Entities
  • Family (Straub) were shareholders
  • Plaintiff (Straub) is CEO/President

34
Allegations
  • Press release on Order referred to corporate
    defendant as Straub
  • CEO/President claims he was defamed because Order
    incorrectly referred to party as Straub when he
    was not a party
  • Falsely found in contempt and ordered to pay fine

35
Why Does He NOT Prevail?
  • Substantially true taken as a whole
  • He is President/CEO
  • He and his family are the sole shareholders
  • He exercised absolute control
  • Was found in contempt and ordered to perform
    community service
  • Judicial Proceeding Privilege
  • No proof of actual or special damages
  • Case Dismissed!

36
Evaluation of Defamation Claims
  • Is the statement actionable?
  • Motion to Dismiss
  • Motion for Summary Judgment
  • Does a Privilege Apply?
  • Are damages assumed? Per se?
  • What are the damages?
  • Reputation
  • Business/Personal
  • Are there mitigating factors?

37
Avoiding Defamation Claims
  • Think before you speak, write or type
  • Understand your audience
  • Consider the manner in which you communicate
  • Control your emotions
  • Apologize/Retract

38
Thank you and please feel free to contact us with
any questions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)