Title: Defamation
1Defamation
- Presented By
- Kevin K. Chase Joseph P. Menello
2History Lesson!
- Verbal defamation was treated as a criminal or
quasi-criminal offense. - The composition of scurrilous songs and gross
noisy public affronts were punished by death.
3History Lesson!
- In later Roman law, verbal defamation was dealt
with in two ways - Statements made in a public manner - the truth
of the statements was no justification for the
unnecessarily public and insulting manner in
which they had been made. - Statements made in private - the offense lay in
the imputation itself, not in the manner of its
publication truth (or even belief in the truth)
was defense, for no man had a right to demand
legal protection for a false reputation.
4Elements
- Defamatory Language
- Of or concerning the plaintiff
- Must be a publication
- Must establish that there has been damage to the
reputation of the plaintiff
5Statute of Limitations
6What is Defamatory Language?
- Language that adversely affects someones
reputation by impeaching the individuals
honesty, integrity, virtue, or sanity. - Who can be defamed?
- Individuals (only living people)
- Corporations or other business entities
7Fact v. Opinion
- Statements of fact can always be actionable
- Statements of opinion only actionable if they
appear to be based on facts that are defamatory
8Of or Concerning the Plaintiff
- Plaintiff must prove that a reasonable person
would have understood that the statement was
about the plaintiff - Can be proven by extrinsic facts called
colloquium.
9Group Defamation
- Statement about all members of small group
- EACH member has case
- Statement about all members of large group
- NO member has case
10Publication
- Communication to a third party
- Third party understood the statement
- Can be intentional or negligent
- Only intent to publish is required
- Does not matter if publisher did not think
statement was defamatory - Each repetition of statement new publication
11Single Publication Rule
- All copies of same newspaper, magazine, book,
etc. are treated as a single publication - Publication deemed to occur when final product
released for sale - For SOL purposes
12Methods of Publication
- Times have certainly changed!
- The past - newspaper, magazine, radio, television
- The present email, blogs, webpages, instant
messages - The more methods of communication, the larger the
audience, the bigger the potential for
publication and damages
13Damages
- Typically, general damages to reputation not
presumed, and must prove special damages - General damages are presumed if defamation per se
(four categories) - Injury to business or profession
- Loathsome disease
- Crime involving moral turpitude
- Unchastity of a Woman
14Damage to Reputation
- General Damages vs. Special Damages
- General Damages
- Presumed by law if case elements proven
- Meant to compensate plaintiff for general injury
to their reputation (embarrassment, hurt
feelings, etc.) - Special Damages
- Plaintiff must prove a pecuniary loss (lost job,
lost customers, etc.)
15Libel vs. Slander
- Libel defamatory statement that is written down
or recorded in some other permanent form
(scripted material broadcast on a T.V. show) - Slander typically defined as spoken defamation
16Defamation per se
- ONLY when considered alone and without innuendo
- Charge a person with an infamous crime, or tend
to subject one to hatred, distress, ridicule,
contempt or disgrace, or tend to injure ones
business or profession - Impute conduct, characteristics or a conditions
which is not compatible with the proper exercise
of ones lawful business, trade, profession or
office
17Question of Law
- The determination of whether a statement is
defamatory per se is a matter of law - Not by extremes
- As the common mind would naturally understand
them
18Malice Requirement
- Public Officials - must prove malice
- Public Figures - must prove malice
19What Constitutes Malice?
- Actual knowledge that statement false
- Reckless disregard as to statements truth or
falsity - Plaintiff must prove the defendant had serious
doubts at to truthfulness of the publication.
20Private Individuals
- Do not need to prove malice
- Public Concern exception
- Private person must prove fault
- Presumed and punitive damages limited
- Damages limited to actual injury
- Presumed or punitive damages allowed if malice
proven - If matter of purely private concern, no
Constitutional limitations at all
21Defenses to Defamation
- Consent
- Truth
- Absolute Privilege
- Judicial proceedings
- Legislative Proceedings
- Executive Proceedings
- Compelled Broadcast or Publication
- Spouse communications
22Substantial Truth Doctrine
- A statement does not have to be perfectly
accurate if the gist or the sting of the
statement is true.
23Different Effects Test
- Not considered false unless it would have a
different effect on the mind of the reader from
that which the pleaded truth would have produced.
24Qualified Privilege
- Reports of Public Proceedings
- Public Interest
- Interest of Publisher
- Interest of Recipient
- Common Interest of Publisher and Recipient
25Mitigating Factors
- No Actual Malice
- Retraction
- Anger
26False Light/Invasion of Privacy
- Must be highly offensive to a reasonable person
- Defendant must have acted either knowingly or in
reckless disregard as to the falsity of the
publicized material and the false light in which
it would be placed - Privacy right must be invaded
- Must be separate statement from defamation to
state separate cause of action
27Sticks and Stones Example
- Customer in convenience store
- Buying lottery tickets
- Avid lottery player - 50 - 100 per day
- 1996 1998 played lottery once per day
- Went hog wild playing lottery beginning in 1996
- Well known to store
28Alleged Statements by Clerk
- I want to know where youre getting all this
money to buy lottery tickets with everyday. You
must have a business on the side. - Plaintiff informed clerk of prior winnings
- Are you a professional gambler? You have to be
a professional gambler to win this type of money.
29Allegations
- Customers in store understood the statements to
mean Plaintiff was a drug dealer or was engaged
in some illegal activity - Damage to his reputation in the community and
emotional distress
30Evaluation
- Are these defamatory statements?
- Defamation per se?
- Publication?
- Privileges?
- What are the damages?
- Summary Judgment?
- How would a jury react to statements?
31Evidence
- No proof of publication No witnesses who
overheard statement - No proof of damages No affect on his activities
- No malice
- Had to look beyond the statements - innuendo
- Defense verdict!
32Plaintiffs Statement to Judge at Hearing
- Judge, sticks and stones may break my bones, but
names will never hurt me! - (Isnt that the point?)
33It All May Be True, But . . .
- Bankruptcy case
- Court order against corporate defendant
- Referred to corporate defendant as Straub or
Straub Entities - Family (Straub) were shareholders
- Plaintiff (Straub) is CEO/President
34Allegations
- Press release on Order referred to corporate
defendant as Straub - CEO/President claims he was defamed because Order
incorrectly referred to party as Straub when he
was not a party - Falsely found in contempt and ordered to pay fine
35Why Does He NOT Prevail?
- Substantially true taken as a whole
- He is President/CEO
- He and his family are the sole shareholders
- He exercised absolute control
- Was found in contempt and ordered to perform
community service - Judicial Proceeding Privilege
- No proof of actual or special damages
- Case Dismissed!
36Evaluation of Defamation Claims
- Is the statement actionable?
- Motion to Dismiss
- Motion for Summary Judgment
- Does a Privilege Apply?
- Are damages assumed? Per se?
- What are the damages?
- Reputation
- Business/Personal
- Are there mitigating factors?
37Avoiding Defamation Claims
- Think before you speak, write or type
- Understand your audience
- Consider the manner in which you communicate
- Control your emotions
- Apologize/Retract
38Thank you and please feel free to contact us with
any questions.