Title: The Rose Review and its research base
1(No Transcript)
2The Rose Review and its research base
3Aspect 1 of the remitWhat best practice should
be expected in the teaching of early reading and
synthetic phonics?
4Report draws on
- Research on the teaching of reading
- Written evidence and oral accounts of effective
practice - Papers submitted by respondents to the Education
and Skills - Committee report
- HMI survey
- Ofsted reports and data
- Visits by the review team
- Early findings from the PNS Early Reading
Development Pilot - Responses to the Review
5Four recommendations re Aspect 1
- The forthcoming EYFS and the renewed Primary
National Strategy Framework for teaching literacy
should provide, as a priority, clear guidance on
developing childrens speaking and listening
skills - High quality, systematic phonics work as defined
by the review should be taught discretely. The
knowledge, skills and understanding that
constitute high quality phonic work should be
taught as the prime approach in learning to
decode (to read) and encode (to write/spell)
print.
6Four recommendations re Aspect 1
- Phonic work should be set within a broad and rich
language curriculum that takes full account of
developing the four interdependent strands of
language speaking, listening, reading and
writing and enlarging childrens stock of words. - The Primary National Strategy should continue to
exemplify quality first teaching, showing how
robust assessment of childrens learning secures
progression in phonic work and how literacy is
developed across the curriculum from the
Foundation Stage onwards.
7Two controversial issues
- The recommendation (in the annex to the review)
that reliance on the Searchlights model of
reading should give way to the principles
embodied in the Simple View of reading. - The recommendation that systematic phonics
teaching should conform to the major principles
implemented in what has become known as
synthetic phonics
8The Simple View of Reading
9The Simple View of Reading
10The Simple View of Reading
We must first only teach children to recognise
words. Once they are fluent word readers we can
encourage them to understand what they read
11The Simple View of Reading
Good language comprehension, poor word
recognition
Good word recognition, good language comprehension
Poor word recognition, poor language comprehension
Good word recognition, poor language comprehension
12Four predictions from the Simple View 1
- Different skills and knowledge will contribute to
performance in each dimension - Oakhill, Cain Bryant (2003)
- Muter, Hulme, Snowling Stevenson (2004)
13Four predictions from the Simple View 2
- Factor analysis of data sets on different
measures of reading will reveal more than one
underlying factor. - Pazzaglia, Cornoldi and Tressoldi (1993)
- Cornoldi Fattori, 1979
- Nation and Snowling (1997
14Four predictions from the Simple View 3
- Dissociations in performance across the two
dimensions -
- Good word recognition / impaired comprehension
- Grigorenko, Klin Volmar, 2003 (review) Bishop
Adams, 1990 Snowling Frith, 1986
Pennington, Johnson Welch, 1987 Jackson,
Donaldson Cleland, 1988 Stothard Hulme, 1992
. - Good language comprehension / impaired word
recognition - Spooner, Baddeley Gathercole (2004)
- Catts, Adlof Weismer (2006)
15Four predictions from the Simple View 4
- Different use of context by skilled and less
skilled readers - Less skilled readers rely more on context to aid
word recognition - Briggs Underwood, 1986 Nation Snowling,
1998 Perfetti, 1985 Pring Snowling, 1986
Schwantes, 1985, 1991 Stanovich, West Feeman,
1981 -
- Skilled readers use context to aid comprehension
- Baker Brown, 1984 Nation Snowling, 1998
Stanovich Cunningham, 1991
16The Simple View is only the beginning
- Need to understand the complex processes involved
in skilled word recognition and its development
if we are going to enable children to read the
words on the page - Need to understand the even more complex
processes involved in language comprehension and
how language comprehension can be developed in
children if we are going to enable children to
understand what they read.
17Situating phonics within the Simple View
- Phonic knowledge is essential to developing word
recognition skills - Phonics teaching therefore is concerned with the
word recognition dimension of reading - What do we know about skilled word recognition
about the processes involved in reading and
understanding the words on the page? - What do we know about how these processes
develop? - What is the role of phonic knowledge (and hence,
phonics teaching) in their development?
18Skilled word recognition two major processing
models
- The dual route cascade model
- The triangle model
- Two sets of processes involved
- Phonological recoding processes
- Orthographic- semantic processes
19Dual route cascade and triangle models
20Developing word recognition skills
- Predictors of success
- Phonological awareness
- - especially phoneme awareness
- Letter knowledge
- - both letter name and letter sound knowledge
- Understanding the alphabetic principle
- Training studies
- Training in phoneme awareness plus letter-sounds
results in better word reading skills - Bradley Bryant (1983) Blachman, Ball, Black
Tangel (1994) Byrne Fielding-Barnsley (1991,
1993, 1995) Cunningham (1990) Hatcher, Hulme
Ellis (1994) McGuiness, McGuiness Donohue
(1995)
21Knowledge and application of phonic rules
facilitates development of phonological recoding
processes
22Knowledge and application of phonic rules also
facilitates development of orthographic/semantic
processes
23Knowledge and application of phonic rules also
facilitates development of orthographic/semantic
processes
Two views Share self-teaching
hypothesis Ehri partial alphabetic phase
24Self-teaching hypothesis
- If children can apply their phonic knowledge to
read unfamiliar words, they will build a store of
spelling patterns of familiar words linked to
their meanings more quickly, because
left-to-right decoding of each grapheme forces
attention sequentially on to each letter of the
unfamiliar word, increasing likelihood that child
will remember it accurately. - Evidence consistent with this hypothesis
- Bowey Miller (2007)
- Bowey Muller (2005)
- Cunningham, Perry, Stanovich Share (2002)
- Kyte Johnson (2006)
- Nation, Angell Castles (2007)
- Share (1999)
25Partial alphabetic phase
rain
orthography
r n
phonology
/reI n/
drops of water falling from the sky
26Evidence consistent with Ehris hypothesis
- Storage of boundary letters
- Dixon, Stuart, Masterson (2002)
- Savage, Stuart, Hill (2001)
- Stuart. Coltheart, (1988).
- National Reading Panel findings
- Systematic phonics programs significantly more
effective than non-systematic or no phonics
programs - Systematic phonics programs significantly more
effective when given in kindergarten or first
grade - Systematic phonics programs led to better reading
comprehension in younger children
27Does systematic entail synthetic?
- NRP report distinguished synthetic, large
unit and miscellaneous systematic phonics
programs. - Synthetic as defined in Rose Review
- mean effect size d .45
- Large unit onset-rime, phonograms, spelling
patterns - mean effect size d .34
- Miscellaneous programs that did not fit either
of above categories - mean effect size d .27
- No significant difference in mean effect size of
different types of program
28Rose Review, p.15, para 31.
- Research, inspection and leading edge work of
settings and schools may inform best practice.
However, findings from different research
programmes are sometimes contradictory or
inconclusive, and often call for further studies
to test tentative findings. While robust research
findings must not be ignored, developers of
national strategies, much less schools and
settings, cannot always wait for the results of
long-term research studies. They must take
decisions, based on as much firm evidence as is
available from a range of sources at the time,
especially from replicable and sustainable best
practice
29What is analytic phonics?
- As defined by Johnston Watson
- Analytic phonics teaching starts at the whole
word level. Typically, children are taught one
letter sound per week, and are shown a series of
alliterative pictures and words which start with
that sound e.g. car, cat, candle, cake, castle,
caterpillar. When the 26 initial letter sounds
have been taught in this way, children are
introduced to middle sounds e.g. cat, bag, rag
etc., and final sounds, e.g. nap, cup, pip etc. - But
- Also frequently understood as, or confused with,
large unit (onset-rime, analogy) phonics - And
- Much of the opposition to the Rose Review
recommendation that systematic phonics teaching
should adopt the principles and practices of
synthetic phonics comes from advocates of
large-unit, onset-rime phonics
30Why onset-rime phonics?
- Claim that English is more consistent at the
onset-rime than the grapheme-phoneme level - Consistency leads to swifter mastery of word
reading skills
31Why onset-rime phonics?
- The argument that onset-rime phonics teaching
should lead to faster acquisition of word reading
skills depends crucially on the following issues - That English is indeed impossibly inconsistent at
the level of GPCs - That there is indeed increased consistency of
pronunciation in rime units than in GPCs - That children have sufficient repeated experience
of rime units to notice and use this increased
consistency
32GPC consistency in English
- Following an analysis of all the English
monosyllables in the MRC database, Coltheart
estimates that over 75 of these can be correctly
decoded by application of GPC rules i.e.
English monosyllables are not particularly
inconsistent. - But, how many GPC rules are needed to decode
English words?
33GPC rules in English
- Gontijo et al, (2003)
- Analysed word tokens in Celex database.
- Identified195 unique graphemes in English.
- 461 GPC rules allow correct pronunciation of all
words in the database. - 103 of these 195 graphemes have a single
pronunciation i.e. 53 of English graphemes are
always pronounced in the same way. - A further 64 of the 195 (33) have one
pronunciation that is overwhelmingly more
frequent than any of the alternatives. - There are 28 graphemes for which this is not the
case. - That is, most of the irregularity in English is
carried by 28 of the 195 graphemes (14).
34Rime consistency in English
- Treiman, Mullenix, Bijeljac-Babic
Richmond-Welty (1995) - More consistency in English orthography if words
are analysed into onsets and rimes. Final
consonant of rime helps to determine vowel
pronunciation. - Claim is based in analysis of only 1329
monosyllabic CVC words in the Merriam-Webster
Pocket Dictionary (a US dictionary for adults). - Ziegler Goswami (2006)
- 3000 most frequent monosyllables in English
contain 600 different rime patterns. - Vousden (in press)
- 7,197 monosyllables from CELEX database
- 16 onsets inconsistent
- 18 rimes inconsistent
35Productivity of rime units
- Stuart, Masterson, Dixon Gray (2003).
- Database of vocabulary in books read by children
in KS1 - Monosyllables in 300 most frequent words
contained 89 different rimes - 54 (61) appeared once only
- 26 (29) appeared twice only
- 9 (10) appeared from 3-5 times
- Replicated this in in extended version of
database - Interactive and available on
- http//www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/cpwd
36Relative productivity of words, rime units and
GPCs
- Vousden (in press)
- Knowledge of 100 most frequent multisyllabic
words ? 56.7 of text is readable. - Knowledge of even a large number of rime mappings
alone will only allow about 3 of all text to be
read - i.e. need to learn onsets too, which are GPCs
- 312 GPCs recorded in 7195 monosyllables in CELEX
database 72 (23) graphemes were inconsistent. - Knowledge of 50 GPCs allows 47.7 of
monosyllables to be read. - Concludes
- as vocabulary increases more text can be read by
GPC mappings than by either whole word or onset
and rime mappings
37Research base of the Rose Review
- Recommendation for systematic teaching of GPCs
based in - Research evidence that such teaching is at least
as effective as any other method of systematic
phonics teaching - Mean effect sizes in NRP report
- synthetic phonics d 0.45
- large unit phonics d 0.34
38Research base of the Rose Review
- Recommendation for systematic teaching of GPCs
based in - Observations of current successful phonics
teaching in UK schools - systematic teaching of GPC rules, and phoneme
segmentation and blending - teachers understood systematic phonics
teaching as - systematic teaching of GPC rules, and phoneme
segmentation and blending
39Systematic teaching at GPC level
- Directly provides children with knowledge and
skills known to be used by skilled readers - GPCs
- Phoneme blending skills
- Develops phoneme awareness in children
- provides physical representation for the
abstraction that is the phoneme - Phoneme awareness is the best and longest lasting
predictor of word reading skill
40Areas of clear agreement between Rose Review and
NRP report
- Developing word recognition skills is a
time-limited task that depends on phonic
knowledge and skill from the start - Available evidence suggests that systematic
phonics instruction should extend from
kindergarten to 2nd grade (2-137) - GPCs should be taught systematically
- It is clear that the major letter-sound
correspondences, including short and long vowels
and digraphs, need to be taught (2-136)
41Areas of clear agreement between Rose Review and
NRP report
- Need for teacher education
- Practitioners and teachers need to be brought
up-to-date with research into the development of
word recognition skills (38-125) and with
research into reading comprehension (39-126) - Teachers must themselves be educated about how
to evaluate different programs and to determine
which are based on strong evidence and how they
can most effectively use these programs in their
own classrooms (2-136)
42Areas of clear agreement between Rose Review and
NRP report
- Need for rich experience of language
- The findings of this review argue strongly for
the inclusion of a vigorous programme of phonic
work to be securely embedded within a broad and
rich language curriculum (16-35) - phonics instruction is never a total reading
program. In 1st grade, teachers can provide
controlled vocabulary texts that allow students
to practice decoding, and they can also read
quality literature to students to build a sense
of story and develop vocabulary and
comprehension (2-136)