Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates

Description:

... layer thickness requires sophisticated advection schemes ... T & S are subsequently 'remapped' by 1st or 2nd order vertical advection scheme (PCM,PLM,PPM) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: nocSo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates


1
Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates
  • Rainer Bleck
  • NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies
  • August 2007

2
  • Principal design element of isopycnal models
    Depth and (potential) density trade places as
    dependent / independent variables
  • - same number of unknowns, same number of
    (prognostic) equations, but very different
    numerical properties
  • Driving force for isopycnal model development
    genetic diversity

3
  • Main benefits
  • - explicit PV and potential enstrophy
    conservation
  • - reduction of numerically induced diapycnal
    mixing during advection diffusion
  • Main pitfalls
  • - degeneracy in unstratified water column
  • - 2-term horizontal PGF is error-prone in
    steeply inclined layers (reduction to 1 term
    possible at the price of approximating state
    eqn.)
  • - layer outcropping (gt "massless" layers)
  • - strongly varying layer thickness requires
    sophisticated advection schemes

4
Grid degeneracy is main reason for introducing
hybrid vertical coordinate "Hybrid" means
different things to different people - linear
combination of 2 or more conventional coordinate
s (examples zsigma, zrho, zrhosigma) -
ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) coordinate
ALE maximizes size of isopycnic subdomain.
5
ALE Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian coordinate
  • Original concept (Hirt et al., 1974) maintain
    Lagrangian character of coordinate but re-grid
    intermittently to keep grid points from fusing.
  • In RUC and HYCOM, we apply ALE in the vertical
    only and re-grid for 2 reasons (1) to maintain
    minimum layer thickness (2) to nudge an
    entropy-related thermo- dynamic variable
    toward a prescribed layer-specific target
    value by importing water from above or
    below.
  • Process (2) renders the grid quasi-isentropic

6
MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
7
Montevideo
south
Vertical section through HYCOM solution. Heavy
black lines coordinate surfaces. Shaded
contours potential density
8
Continuity equation in generalized (s)
coordinates
(zero in fixed grids)
(zero in material coord.)
(known)
9
Present approach
  • One-dimensional .. scheme is not allowed to look
    sideways.
  • Present routine (hybgen) restores target
    densities exclusively by entraining water from
    neighboring layers
  • Regridding is based on density profile. T S
    are subsequently remapped by 1st or 2nd order
    vertical advection scheme (PCM,PLM,PPM).
  • Minimum layer thickness criteria have evolved
    over time to reduce shortcomings in vertical grid
    layout.

10
1
Absorb near-massless layers on sea floor in
lowest substantial layer
Is lowest mass-containing layer too light?
no
Split into 2 sub-layers, one matching the target
density and one matching the density of the layer
above. Absorb upper sub-layer in layer above.
Maintain constant depth of top layer
Loop through remaining layers (top-down) to
restore target density
yes
Is lower intfc of layer k too close to surface?
Density of layer k different from target?
Too light
Too dense
Entrain water from layer k-1
Cant because intfc too close to srfc?
Transfer mass from k to k-1
No problem
Is lower intfc of layer k too close to srfc?
no
yes
Entrain water from layer k1
11
Pressure force problems in HYCOM
  • In idealized isopycnic models that disregard
    separate effects of T and S on compressibility,
    the pressure gradient is a single-term expression
    (involving M Fpa).
  • Thermobaricity adds a second term to the pressure
    gradient expression. The added term can become
    large in steeply inclined coordinate layers.
  • The magnitude of the added term depends on an
    arbitrarily chosen reference T/S profile.
  • The choice of reference profile affects the
    modeled circulation.

12
How most non-Cartesian models compute horizontal
pressure gradients
hydrostatic reduction
u
hydrostatic reduction
s1
s2
s3
s4
x1
x2
13
Janjic 1 interprets the familiar pressure
gradient error in terrain-following (sigma)
coordinate models as resulting from violating the
requirement
a const over slab bounded by (x1,x2),
(p1,p2)
The same problem arises in HYCOM if isopycnic T/S
gradients occur in steeply inclined coordinate
layers.
1 Janjic, Z, 1977 Pressure gradient force and
advection scheme used for forecasting with steep
and small scale topography. Contrib. Atm. Phys.,
50, 186-199.
14
More precise computation of horizontal pressure
gradients
u
s1
s2
hydrostatic integration
hydrostatic integration
s3
s4
x1
x2
15
Finite volume approach
16
The T/S/r conundrum in isopycnic-coordinate models
  • T,S,rpot are materially conserved in adiabatic
    flow.
  • The three variables are related rpot rpot(T,S)
    and T,S are of similar importance.
  • Due to numerical errors and nonlinearities in the
    equation of state, T,S advection is unlikely to
    conserve rpot .
  • This is extremely inconvenient in models using
    rpot as independent variable.

17
l -0.13 psu/deg
l -0.26 psu/deg
Linearized spiciness c S l T
18
r/spiciness advection works well, but T/S
advection may ultimately be the better strategy
due to its formal conservation properties
19
Laplacian interface smoothing
Issue generation of negative layer thickness
values during interface smoothing
Biharmonic interface smoothing
20
x
Laplacian interface smoothing
p
Biharmonic interface smoothing
21
present 3-step procedure
  • Convert interface pressure tendencies into layer
    thickness tendencies
  • Construct preliminary bolus fluxes assuming
    each neighbor point contributes 25 to thickness
    tendency
  • Limit bolus fluxes, using FCT technology, so as
    to avoid creating negative thicknesses

When computing 4th derivatives, do not use points
resting on elevated bottom topography
22
Vertical T/S mixing in isopycnic subdomain
  • Present approach KPP mixes T S grid generator
    then restores target density
  • Suggested alternative use McDougall-Dewar
    algorithm originally developed for MICOM. It
    mixes T S (like KPP) but deduces layer
    thickness change required to keep density on
    target.

23
r1
z
r2
r3
Perched water masses
24
  • The pinching off of layers by protruding bottom
    features inhibits draining of dense water
    generated in slope regions.
  • Opening small gaps in pinched-off near-bottom
    layers has detrimental long-term effects on the
    circulation not yet fully understood.

25
Remarks
  • Sloping coordinate layers create problems not
    seen in z-coordinate models
  • According to Spiegel Veronis (1960), it is OK
    to assess buoyancy effects on the basis of
    potential (as opposed to in-situ) density.
  • In fact, present methods to compute PGF in
    isopycnic models do not work if layers are filled
    with water of in-situ density. Virtual potential
    density (Sun et al. 1999) works, sort of.
  • More accurate methods (finite-volume based,
    Shchepetkin McWilliams 2003) for computing PGF
    may alleviate this problem, opening the door to
    the use of an unapproximated state eqn.

26
Remarks (cont.)
  • Rendering of ENSO in coupled models has been
    found to benefit from the presence of isopycnic
    coordinate layers near the surface (Sun Bleck,
    2006).
  • Present philosophy in ALE models therefore has
    been to expand the isopycnic sub-domain by
  • making the constant-thickness remnants of
    outcropped layers as thin as possible
  • avoiding introduction of layers that by virtue of
    their low target density always default to
    constant thickness.
  • The above strategy yields ridiculously degenerate
    grid layouts at high-latitudes
  • Potential remedy spread out high-lat layers by
    assigning large minimum thickness values to
    densest coordinate layers (S.Sun, pers. comm.).

27
Nino3 in GISS/HYCOM and
Observed Sensitivity to vertical discretizations
and mixed layer schemes

28
MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
29
MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
30
Remarks (cont.)
  • The road to layer modeling heaven is littered
    with discarded barotropic-baroclinic
    mode-splitting schemes.
  • We are learning, so this issue should be off the
    table soon.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com