Title: Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates
1Issues regarding the use of hybrid coordinates
- Rainer Bleck
- NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- August 2007
2 - Principal design element of isopycnal models
Depth and (potential) density trade places as
dependent / independent variables - - same number of unknowns, same number of
(prognostic) equations, but very different
numerical properties - Driving force for isopycnal model development
genetic diversity
3 - Main benefits
- - explicit PV and potential enstrophy
conservation - - reduction of numerically induced diapycnal
mixing during advection diffusion - Main pitfalls
- - degeneracy in unstratified water column
- - 2-term horizontal PGF is error-prone in
steeply inclined layers (reduction to 1 term
possible at the price of approximating state
eqn.) - - layer outcropping (gt "massless" layers)
- - strongly varying layer thickness requires
sophisticated advection schemes
4Grid degeneracy is main reason for introducing
hybrid vertical coordinate "Hybrid" means
different things to different people - linear
combination of 2 or more conventional coordinate
s (examples zsigma, zrho, zrhosigma) -
ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) coordinate
ALE maximizes size of isopycnic subdomain.
5ALE Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian coordinate
- Original concept (Hirt et al., 1974) maintain
Lagrangian character of coordinate but re-grid
intermittently to keep grid points from fusing. - In RUC and HYCOM, we apply ALE in the vertical
only and re-grid for 2 reasons (1) to maintain
minimum layer thickness (2) to nudge an
entropy-related thermo- dynamic variable
toward a prescribed layer-specific target
value by importing water from above or
below. - Process (2) renders the grid quasi-isentropic
6MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
7 Montevideo
south
Vertical section through HYCOM solution. Heavy
black lines coordinate surfaces. Shaded
contours potential density
8Continuity equation in generalized (s)
coordinates
(zero in fixed grids)
(zero in material coord.)
(known)
9Present approach
- One-dimensional .. scheme is not allowed to look
sideways. - Present routine (hybgen) restores target
densities exclusively by entraining water from
neighboring layers - Regridding is based on density profile. T S
are subsequently remapped by 1st or 2nd order
vertical advection scheme (PCM,PLM,PPM). - Minimum layer thickness criteria have evolved
over time to reduce shortcomings in vertical grid
layout.
101
Absorb near-massless layers on sea floor in
lowest substantial layer
Is lowest mass-containing layer too light?
no
Split into 2 sub-layers, one matching the target
density and one matching the density of the layer
above. Absorb upper sub-layer in layer above.
Maintain constant depth of top layer
Loop through remaining layers (top-down) to
restore target density
yes
Is lower intfc of layer k too close to surface?
Density of layer k different from target?
Too light
Too dense
Entrain water from layer k-1
Cant because intfc too close to srfc?
Transfer mass from k to k-1
No problem
Is lower intfc of layer k too close to srfc?
no
yes
Entrain water from layer k1
11Pressure force problems in HYCOM
- In idealized isopycnic models that disregard
separate effects of T and S on compressibility,
the pressure gradient is a single-term expression
(involving M Fpa). - Thermobaricity adds a second term to the pressure
gradient expression. The added term can become
large in steeply inclined coordinate layers. - The magnitude of the added term depends on an
arbitrarily chosen reference T/S profile. - The choice of reference profile affects the
modeled circulation.
12How most non-Cartesian models compute horizontal
pressure gradients
hydrostatic reduction
u
hydrostatic reduction
s1
s2
s3
s4
x1
x2
13Janjic 1 interprets the familiar pressure
gradient error in terrain-following (sigma)
coordinate models as resulting from violating the
requirement
a const over slab bounded by (x1,x2),
(p1,p2)
The same problem arises in HYCOM if isopycnic T/S
gradients occur in steeply inclined coordinate
layers.
1 Janjic, Z, 1977 Pressure gradient force and
advection scheme used for forecasting with steep
and small scale topography. Contrib. Atm. Phys.,
50, 186-199.
14More precise computation of horizontal pressure
gradients
u
s1
s2
hydrostatic integration
hydrostatic integration
s3
s4
x1
x2
15Finite volume approach
16The T/S/r conundrum in isopycnic-coordinate models
- T,S,rpot are materially conserved in adiabatic
flow. - The three variables are related rpot rpot(T,S)
and T,S are of similar importance. - Due to numerical errors and nonlinearities in the
equation of state, T,S advection is unlikely to
conserve rpot . - This is extremely inconvenient in models using
rpot as independent variable.
17l -0.13 psu/deg
l -0.26 psu/deg
Linearized spiciness c S l T
18r/spiciness advection works well, but T/S
advection may ultimately be the better strategy
due to its formal conservation properties
19Laplacian interface smoothing
Issue generation of negative layer thickness
values during interface smoothing
Biharmonic interface smoothing
20x
Laplacian interface smoothing
p
Biharmonic interface smoothing
21present 3-step procedure
- Convert interface pressure tendencies into layer
thickness tendencies - Construct preliminary bolus fluxes assuming
each neighbor point contributes 25 to thickness
tendency - Limit bolus fluxes, using FCT technology, so as
to avoid creating negative thicknesses
When computing 4th derivatives, do not use points
resting on elevated bottom topography
22Vertical T/S mixing in isopycnic subdomain
- Present approach KPP mixes T S grid generator
then restores target density - Suggested alternative use McDougall-Dewar
algorithm originally developed for MICOM. It
mixes T S (like KPP) but deduces layer
thickness change required to keep density on
target.
23r1
z
r2
r3
Perched water masses
24- The pinching off of layers by protruding bottom
features inhibits draining of dense water
generated in slope regions. - Opening small gaps in pinched-off near-bottom
layers has detrimental long-term effects on the
circulation not yet fully understood.
25Remarks
- Sloping coordinate layers create problems not
seen in z-coordinate models - According to Spiegel Veronis (1960), it is OK
to assess buoyancy effects on the basis of
potential (as opposed to in-situ) density. - In fact, present methods to compute PGF in
isopycnic models do not work if layers are filled
with water of in-situ density. Virtual potential
density (Sun et al. 1999) works, sort of. - More accurate methods (finite-volume based,
Shchepetkin McWilliams 2003) for computing PGF
may alleviate this problem, opening the door to
the use of an unapproximated state eqn.
26Remarks (cont.)
- Rendering of ENSO in coupled models has been
found to benefit from the presence of isopycnic
coordinate layers near the surface (Sun Bleck,
2006). - Present philosophy in ALE models therefore has
been to expand the isopycnic sub-domain by - making the constant-thickness remnants of
outcropped layers as thin as possible - avoiding introduction of layers that by virtue of
their low target density always default to
constant thickness. - The above strategy yields ridiculously degenerate
grid layouts at high-latitudes - Potential remedy spread out high-lat layers by
assigning large minimum thickness values to
densest coordinate layers (S.Sun, pers. comm.).
27 Nino3 in GISS/HYCOM and
Observed Sensitivity to vertical discretizations
and mixed layer schemes
28MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
29MICOMs hybrid coordinate cousin HYCOM
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 1
c o o r -
d i n a t e
l a y e r 2
c o o r d i n a t e l a y e r 3
equator
Pole
Pole
30Remarks (cont.)
- The road to layer modeling heaven is littered
with discarded barotropic-baroclinic
mode-splitting schemes. - We are learning, so this issue should be off the
table soon.