Title: Dissertation Chair: Dr' Darwin Nelson
1A CROSS-CULTURAL INVESTIGATION OF ACADEMIC
LEADERS EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND LEADERSHIP
EFFECTIVENESS IN TAIWAN AND THE UNITED STATES
July 9th, 2007
A Dissertation Defense by Hui-Wen Tang (Vivian)
Dissertation Chair Dr. Darwin Nelson Committee
Members Dr. Gary Low Dr. Michelle
Stallone-Brown Dr. Mark Walsh
Dr. Rebecca Davis
2Presentation Outline
- Literature Review
- Methodology
- Data Analysis
- Conclusion
Introduction Purpose of the Study
Significance of the Study
3 Introduction Purpose of the Study
- To give evidence that relationships may exist
between individuals emotional intelligence and
effective leadership in educational institutions. - To explore how and to what extent EI accounts for
effective leadership in both cultures. - To discern if there are noteworthy differences
that might be explained by cultural differences.
4 Introduction Significance of the Study
- Knowledge regarding exactly how EI relates to
leadership may lead to significant advances in
leadership training, educational human resource
development and the ability to select potentially
effective leaders in different cultures. - The present study may serve as a preliminary
basis for future research to further identify and
pinpoint competencies necessary to improve the
training of academic leaders assigned to work
cross-culturally.
5Presentation Outline
- Methodology
- Data Analysis
- Conclusion
Introduction Purpose of the Study
Significance of the Study
Literature Review Models of Leadership
Models of Emotional Intelligence
Transformational Leadership EI
6Literature Review Models of Leadership
- Trait- and Behavior-Based Model
- Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
- Chinese Paternalistic Leadership
- Boehnke (2003) suggested that the
transformational leadership style will
universally help leaders work more effectively
with people to reach their needs and create
exceptional performance.
7Literature Review Models of EI
- Ability-Based Model a theoretical connection
between emotions and cognition. (Mayer Salovey,
1997) - Mixed or Trait-based Model incorporates both
ability factors and personality traits (Bar-On,
1997). - Nelson and Lows Emotional Learning System
- A Skill-Based Model
- Emotional intelligence is a learned ability to
identify experience, understand, and express
human emotions - in healthy and productive ways.
- A psychologically sound
yet - practically comprehensible
- emotional intelligence
measure.
8Literature Review Transformational Leadership
EI
- Emotional intelligence is positively associated
with transformational leadership i.e., idealized
influence, inspirational motivation, and
contingent reward (Barling et al., 2000).
9Presentation Outline
Introduction
Literature Review Models of Leadership
Models of Emotional Intelligence
Transformational Leadership EI
Methodology Instrumentation
Research Design
Population Sample
10Methodology Instrumentation
- Leadership Practice InventorySelf
- LPI contains thirty statements six statements
for measuring each of the five key practices of
exemplary leaders on an original version of
five-point Likert scale (Kouzes Postner, 1997).
- The Emotional Skills Assessment Process
- ESAP is a self-assessment instrument containing
213 items providing scale measures of ten EI
skills and three problem indicators. (Low
Nelson, 1999, 2003)
Backward translation proofreading were used to
identify and correct errors in the forward
translation (Stansfield, 2003).
11Methodology Research Design
- The selection of quantitative method aimed at
developing generalization that would contribute
to leadership theory, and to explain, understand
and better predict emotional intelligence as a
set of competencies for effective leadership in
the two different cultures. - Comparative and correlational research designs
were used to determine whether significant
differences existed between cultures and to study
the relationships between - or among variables in the two
different cultures. -
12Methodology Population Sample
- A convenience sampling strategy was used. The
population of this study included academic
leaders at all levels of schooling. The American
sample was in the Southern Texas, California,
Iowa, Florida and New Jersey of the USA. The
Taiwanese sample was educational leaders in
northern, middle and southern Taiwan. - Sample size of 50 from each culture
- was based on the recommendation
- from Gall, Gall and Borg (2003)
- for correlational
research, minimum sample size 30.
13Presentation Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology Instrumentation
Research Design
Population Sample
Data Analysis Participants Characteristics
Research
Questions Findings
Conclusion
14Data Analysis Participants Characteristics
- Valid data a total of 50 out of possible 70
academic leaders in Taiwan a total of 52 out of
possible 66 academic leaders in the United States
- 2 out of the 52 data received from the American
participants were invalid. - The total valid response rate was 73.5.
Return Rate
15Data Analysis Participants Characteristics
(cont)
- Chi square analysis was used in the study to
solve possible problems caused by lacking
sampling comparability or sampling bias resulting
from using convenience sampling strategies (Gall
et al., 2003) .
? ? ? ? ?
?
?
16Data Analysis Participants Characteristics
(cont)
- Results of Chi square analyses showed that the
two comparison samples were not significantly
different from each other on a majority of
demographic variables except years of teaching
experience. ( p ? .01) - Equitability of samples from populations of the
two cultures on demographic variables was
verified.
17Data Analysis Research Questions 1-3 (cont)
H03.11
H01
H02
H03.1-10
18Data Analysis Research Question 1
- What is the relationship between overall
emotional intelligence and specific areas of
leadership practices (challenging the process,
inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to
act, modeling the way, and encouraging the heart)
in both cultures?
19Data Analysis Research Question 1 (cont)
20Findings Summary of Research Question 1 Results
- Taiwanese participants overall EI was found to
be positively correlated in a statistically
significant manner with all the five areas
leadership practices. - American participants were found to have
statistically significant positive relationship
between overall EI and three areas of leadership
practices - Modeling the Way, Enabling Others to Act
Encouraging the Hearts. - American participant overall EI
was not - correlated with
- Challenging the Process
- Inspiring a shared Vision.
21Data Analysis Research Question 2
- What is the relationship between specific areas
of emotional intelligence (assertion, comfort,
empathy, decision making, leadership, drive
strength, time management, commitment ethic, self
esteem, stress management, aggression, deference,
and change orientation) and academic leaders
perceptions of leadership effectiveness in both
cultures?
22Data Analysis Research Questions 1-3 (cont)
H03.11
H01
H02
H03.1-10
23Data Analysis Research Question2
24Findings Summary of Research Question 2 Results
- The sample of US academic leaders who performed
more effective as leaders tended to perform
better in almost all skill areas of emotional
intelligence except Empathy and Drive Strength
no significant correlations were found between
overall LPI and any of the three problem EI
areas. - The Taiwanese academic leaders who performed more
effective as leaders tended to perform better in
all areas of emotional intelligence except Stress
Management. Change Orientation was negatively
correlated with Taiwanese academic leaders
overall LPI in this study.
25Data Analysis Research Question 3
- What is the relationship between specific areas
of emotional intelligence and specific areas of
leadership practices in both cultures? - H03.11 There is no statistically significant
relationship between academic leaders overall
leadership effectiveness as measured by Kouzes
and Posners Leadership Practices Inventory-Self
and overall emotional intelligence as measured by
Nelson and Lows ESAP in the two comparison
cultures.
26Data Analysis Research Questions 1-3 (cont)
H03.11
H01
H02
H03.1-10
27?
?
?
?
Data Analysis Research Question 3
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
28Findings Summary of Research Question 3 Results
(The United States)
- For the sample of academic leaders in the United
States, as their self esteem increased, all areas
of their leadership effectiveness increased
except the area of Challenging the Process. - EI skill areas of Assertion, Commitment Ethic and
Stress Management were significantly linked to
three of the leadership components Modeling the
Way, Enabling Others to Act and Encouraging the
Heart. - Two EI skill areas that had no connection with
any of the leadership components were Empathy and
Drive Strength. - The less they were having problems with Change
Orientation, the more they were able to
Challenging the Process.
29Findings Summary of Research Question 3 Results
(Taiwan)
- For the sample of Taiwanese academic leaders, the
more emotionally intelligent they were, the more
they would focus on encouraging the hearts of
followers (Encouraging the Heart), motivating
people to carry out missions (Enabling Others to
Act), and setting an example for their followers
in order to gain respects and commitments
(Modeling the Way). - The more aggressive they were, the more they were
able to communicate a unity of purpose for the
organization (Inspiring a Shared Vision). - If the Taiwanese academic leaders were less
indirect, self-inhibiting and ineffectual for
accurate expression of thoughts in their
communication style (Deference), they would be
more able to encourage the heart of followers and
challenge the norms. - The more they were able to seek positive changes
in their lives and careers, the more they were
effective in leading by setting a good example
for subordinates (Modeling the Way).
30Findings Summary of Research Question 3 Results
(cont)
- For the samples of academic leaders in both
cultures, as their overall EI and overall EI
skill areas increased, their overall leadership
effectiveness increased.
31Data Analysis Research Questions 4-8 (cont)
H04
H05
32Data Analysis Research Questions 4 5
- Is there a statistically significant difference
between the Taiwanese and the U.S. academic
leaders total ESAP score? - Is there a statistically significant difference
between the Taiwanese and the U.S. academic
leaders total LPI scores?
33Summary of Research Question 4 Result No
significant difference was found with regard to
overall EI between academic leaders from the two
cultures.
34Summary of Research Question 5 ResultThe result
suggested that American participants, on average,
perceived themselves as more effective leaders (M
126.3, SD 10.07) than their Taiwanese
counterparts (M 120.2, SD 11.22 F(1, 98)
7.967, p .006).
35Data Analysis Research Questions 4-8 (cont)
H04
H06
H07
H05
36Data Analysis Research Questions 6 7
- Is there a statistically significant difference
between the Taiwanese and the U.S. academic
leaders scores on each of the ten emotional
intelligence skills (assertion, comfort, empathy,
decision making, leadership, drive strength, time
management, commitment ethic, self esteem, stress
management)? - Is there a statistically significant difference
between the Taiwanese and the U.S. academic
leaders scores on each of the three problem
indicators of emotional intelligence (aggression,
deference, and change orientation) and total
scores of problem indicators?
37Data Analysis Research Question 6
38Summary of Research Question 6 Results
- American academic leaders in the study, on
average, scored significantly higher on EI skill
areas of Assertion, Decision Making and Time
Management than their Taiwanese counterparts. - Taiwanese academic leaders in the study, on
average, scored significantly higher on EI skill
areas of Comfort and Commitment Ethic than
American academic leaders. - No significant differences were found with regard
to total EI skills, EI skill areas of Empathy,
Leadership, Drive Strength, Self Esteem, and
Stress Management.
39Data Analysis Research Question 7
40Summary of Research Question 7 Results
- Taiwanese academic leaders in the study, on
average, scored significantly higher on EI
problem indicators of Aggression and Deference
than academic leaders in the United States. - Moreover, academic leaders in Taiwan, on average,
scored significantly higher on total score of
Problem Indicators than their American
counterparts.
41Data Analysis Research Questions 4-8 (cont)
H04
H06
H07
H05
H08
42Data Analysis Research Question 8
- Is there a statistically significant difference
between the Taiwanese and the U.S. academic
leaders scores on each of the five LPI
components (challenging the process, inspiring a
shared vision, enabling others to act, modeling
the way, and encouraging the heart)?
43Data Analysis Research Question 8
44Summary of Research Question 8 Results
- Taiwanese academic leaders in the study, on
average, scored significantly higher on the
component of Modeling the Way than academic
leaders in the United States. - American academic leaders in this study, on
average, scored significantly higher on LPI
components of Inspiring a Shared Vision and
Challenging the Process than their Taiwanese
counterparts. - No significant differences were found with regard
to Enabling Others to Act Encouraging the
Hearts.
45Presentation Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Data Analysis Participants Characteristics
Research
Questions Findings
Conclusion Limitations
Implications for Practices
Recommendations for Further
Study
46Conclusion Analysis of Data Summary
47Conclusion Analysis of Data Summary (cont)
48Conclusion Analysis of Data Summary (cont)
49Conclusion Analysis of Data Summary (cont)
50Conclusion Analysis of Data Summary (cont)
- The Pearson Product correlations analyses of
overall EI and overall leadership effectiveness
in both cultures imply that emotional
intelligence would be a underlying competency of
leadership practices for the samples of academic
leaders in Taiwan and the United States. - Differences in participants self-perceptions of
leadership practices and EI between the two
comparison cultures would be suggestive of a
cultural-specific interpretation.
51Conclusion Limitations
- 1. The selection of a convenience sampling
strategy the relatively small sample size - cultural stereotyping results
- limited the generalizability of results.
- 2. Self-reported data translations of
instruments - systematic biases
- response bias
52Conclusion Limitations (cont)
- 3. Culturally inherited thinking patterns and
world views are factors influencing response
styles to questionnaires (Harzing, 2006 Chun,
Campbell Yoo, 1974). - 4. In Lack of cultural validated measures.
53Implications for Practices
- The inclusion of emotional intelligence training
in leadership development program may be
significantly beneficial for academic leaders in
Taiwan and the United States. - Knowing that cultural differences do play a role
in the relationship between leadership practices
and emotional intelligence can also help
leadership recruitment and selections in
different cultural contexts, as well as
leadership selections for cross-cultural
assignments and leading in culturally diverse
communities.
54Implications for Practices (cont)
- Research has linked international education to
higher education educational leadership (Walsh,
2002 Blackmore, 2005) and emotional intelligence
as predictor of leadership success in global
assignments (Gabel, Dolan Cerdin, 2005).
Emotional intelligence may be incorporated into
the internationalized curriculum for future
leaders in the business sector as well as in
educational settings.
55Recommendations for Future Research
- The comparisons of self and other ratings on
emotional intelligence and leadership practices
will provide a deeper and objective understanding
of correlations of emotional competencies and
leadership effectiveness. - The development of cross-culturally validated
measurements of leadership performance and
emotional intelligence.
56Recommendations for Future Research (cont)
- The conceptual research model and hypotheses
provided in this study may serve as a framework
for future cross-cultural leadership studies on
relationships between differentiated leadership
criteria and other value-based or practice-based
measures, such as personality traits, cognitive
ability, organizational success, team work
outcomes, etc. - The comparison of emotional competencies and
leadership styles in relation to gender role
norms across cultures.
57Recommendations for Future Research (cont)
- To examine the impact of emotional intelligence
on leadership practices with larger samples of
academic leaders from multiple levels of school
settings in order to extend the present study
generalizability of results. - Longitudinal studies on leaders emotional
intelligence over time in different cultural
contexts.
58Recommendations for Future Research (cont)
- Additional inquiries into why response styles
differ from culture to culture would help find
solutions to eliminate response bias in
cross-cultural research. - Rather than attempting to find remedies for
response bias resulting from poor translations,
researchers should investigate the best possible
ways to avoid them by providing theoretically and
empirically sound translation procedures.
59(No Transcript)
60Selected Bibliography on Leadership EI-2
61Selected Bibliography on Leadership EI-3
62Selected Bibliography on Leadership EI-4
63Selected Bibliography on Leadership EI-5
64Chinese learning as the substance Western
learning as the function.
- Walker, K.B. (2003). Emotional intelligence
within the A/E/C industry A step toward
effective collaboration. Masters thesis,
retrieved on October. 5, 2005 from
http//scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-061
12003-144336 - Weinberger, L. A. (2003). An examination of the
relationship between emotional intelligence,
leadership style and perceived leadership
effectiveness. University of Minnesota.
????
--Chang Chih-tung (1837-1909)--