Cattle Outlook - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Cattle Outlook

Description:

Cattle Outlook – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: jamesmin
Category:
Tags: cattle | outlook

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cattle Outlook


1
Cattle Outlook
  • James Mintert, Ph.D.
  • Professor Extension State Leader
  • Department of Agricultural Economics
  • Kansas State University
  • www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing
  • jmintert_at_ksu.edu

Presented at Industry Outlook Conference
Chicago, IL October 17, 2006
2
A Shrinking IndustryResponding to a Lack of
Profitability
Current inventory is about 26 smaller than in
1975
3
Rising Productivity Is Partially Responsible
4
But Weaker Demand Was Key Beef Demand 1980-1998
5
Measuring Changes In Beef Demand1998-2004
Demand in 04 Was Up About 25 from 1998 Level
6
Measuring Changes In Beef Demand1998-2005
Beef Demand During All of 05 Decreased About
4 But Demand in 05 Was Still Up About 21 from
1998 Level
7
2nd Quarter Demand Index Fell About 10 Below A
Year Ago
8
Beef Demand ShiftersWhats been taking place
recently?
  • Low carb diet effect has worn off
  • Consumers disposable income growth slowing
  • Expect more domestic demand weakness
  • How do we turn this around?

9
Increases in Beef Industry Concentration
10
Cattle Feeding Concentration Increasing
  • 1975
  • 7 Major Feeding States
  • 56,221 feedlots marketed 15 million cattle
  • Average marketings/feedlot 267 head
  • Feedlots gt 1,000 hd. (1,221 lots) marketed 74 of
    cattle
  • Source USDA, Cattle On Feed 7 states AZ, CA,
    CO, IA, KS, NE, TX

11
Fewer But Larger Cattle Feeders
  • 1995
  • 7 Major Feeding States
  • 23,472 feedlots marketed 20.2 million cattle
  • Average marketings/feedlot 858 head
  • Feedlots gt1000 hd. (1,584 lots) marketed 93 of
    cattle
  • Source USDA, Cattle On Feed 7 states AZ, CA,
    CO, IA, KS, NE, TX

12
Even Fewer But Larger Cattle Feeders
  • 2004
  • 7 Major Feeding States
  • 14,932 feedlots marketed 20.4 million cattle
  • Average marketings/feedlot 1,369 head
  • Feedlots gt1000 hd. (1,632 lots) marketed 95 of
    cattle
  • Source USDA, Cattle On Feed 7 states AZ, CA,
    CO, IA, KS, NE, TX

13
Largest Cattle Feeding Firms, 2005
  • Rank Firm of Lots 1-Time Cap.
  • (head)
  • 1 5 Rivers Ranch 10 811,000
  • 2 Cactus 10 520,000
  • 3 Cargill 4 300,000
  • 4 Friona 4 275,000
  • 5 AzTx 4 232,000

Source Cattle Buyers Weekly
14
Which Size Category Is Gaining Market Share?
15
Why Is Feedlot Concentration Increasing?
  • Lower costs for larger firms
  • Why?
  • Larger firms in better position to utilize
  • Technology
  • Management skills
  • Labor management
  • Financial management
  • Marketing management
  • Implication Small medium size feeders operate
    at a cost disadvantage

16
Beef Packing SectorConcentration Increased
Dramatically
  • 4-Firm Concentration Ratio (CR4) increased from
    41 to 78 during 80s
  • Transition to large plant sizes was dramatic
  • 1972
  • 70 of all slaughter in plants handling less than
    250,000 hd/year
  • 35 of all slaughter in plants handling less than
    100,000 hd/year
  • 1992
  • 70 of all slaughter in plants handling over
    500,000 hd/year
  • 4 of slaughter in plants handling less than
    100,000 hd/year

Source McDonald Ollinger, 2005
17
Large Packing Plants Have Lower Costs
  • Eliminating wage differentials across plant sizes
    provided incentive to build large packing plants
  • Large plants paid higher wages in 60s 70s
  • 1960-1972
  • Plant size 1 -wages 9 than mid-size plant
  • 1982
  • Plant size 1 -wages 6 than mid-size plant
  • 1992
  • Plant size 1 -no change in wages

Source McDonald Ollinger, 2005
18
What Motivated Shift to Large Plants in 1980s?
  • Change in packing plant labor costs facilitated
    shift to larger plants in the Plains
  • 1978, 45 of meat product workforce was unionized
  • Union workers wages 29 gt non-union workers
  • 1987, just 21 of workforce unionized
  • In 1960s 1970s, meatpacking wages 14 to
    18 gt than manufacturing wages
  • 2002, meatpacking wages were 25 below
    manufacturing wages

Source McDonald Ollinger, 2005
19
Have Packing Industry Changes Been Good or Bad?
  • Meat packing labor productivity increased
  • Index of output per hour rose 80 from 1970 to
    1998
  • 1970 -1998, inflation adjusted spread between
    live and wholesale beef prices declined 57
  • Technology productivity improvements
  • reduced farm-wholesale price spread by 0.23/cwt.
  • boosted live cattle prices 1.75/cwt.

Source Marsh Brester, 2001
20
Have Packing Industry Changes Been Good or Bad?
  • Shift toward larger plant sizes reduced costs
    dramatically
  • Industry Weighted Average Processing Costs
  • Year Per Head Cost (1992)
  • 1977 131.42
  • 1992 96.58
  • 1997 90.65
  • 2002 85.09

Source McDonald Ollinger, 2005
21
International Trade Outlook
22
U.S. Was A Net Exporter From 1981-2003
23
Top 5 Importers Accounted for 91 of U.S. Exports
U.S. needs to recapture these markets to regain
s and volume
24
Cattle Imports from Canada Are Increasing But
Remain Well Below 2002s Record Level
Jan-July 2006 imports 32 below 2002s and 21
below 2001s
25
Beef Imports From Canada Decline
26
Result U.S. Imports Falling Below 2005s
27
Where Are We Headed?
  • Trade
  • U.S. strength is in high quality beef products
  • Other countries may have comparative advantage in
    cow-calf production
  • Exports to Pacific Rim increasing in 07
  • Regaining market share will take several years
  • Market access is key
  • Consumer incomes in importing countries are key
    to long-run growth in exports

28
Long, Slow Road to Export Recovery
29
Export Recovery Means Net Beef Imports in 2007
Could Be 1/2 2004s
30
Supply Side in the U.S.
31
Mid-Year Inventory Was Above 2005s, And
32
Strong Profitability Encouraging Expansion, But
33
Poor Pasture Conditions Could Be Holding Back
Expansion
Livestock Marketing Information Center Data
Source USDA/NASS
34
U.S. Beef Cow Slaughter Up 17 vs. 2005
35
But Producers Have Been Holding Back Heifers
36
Slaughter Is Expected To Rise Modestly
37
Large On Feed Inventory
38
Drought Pushing Light Weight Placements Up
39
Weights Will Remain Heavy
40
And Beef Production Will Rise Cyclically
41
Sharp Price Recovery from Summer Lows
42
Prices Will Be Near Record High Again in 06
43
Futures Are Pretty Optimistic For Spring
44
Quarterly Slaughter Steer Price Projections
  • Qtr.Yr USDA LMIC KSU
  • Q4.06 86-90 87-89 86-89
  • Q1.07 84-90 87-90 88-91
  • Q2.07 84-90 86-90 88-91
  • Q3.07 81-87 80-84 82-87
  • WASDE

45
Despite Feedlot Losses, Feeders Remain Optimistic
46
But Higher Corn Prices Lead To Lower Bids for
Feeders
47
Feeders In 05 Averaged A Record High of
112/cwt.Prices in 06 Could Wind Up Near 05s
Average
48
Rising Corn Prices Pushing Prices Lower
49
Near Record High Calf Prices Again In 06Cycle
Peak in 05 06
50
Ethanol, Corn Prices, Cattle
51
3 Largest Corn Crops On Record
52
But Corn Usage Has Been Growing Rapidly
53
Ethanol Usage Growing Rapidly
54
U.S. Will Need More Corn AcresHow Do We Get Them?
55
It Will Take Higher Prices To Push Acreage Higher
Average Prices Will Be Higher and Frequency of
Price Spikes Could Increase
56
Where Are Corn Prices Headed?Higher Corn Prices
Spell Trouble for Livestock Producers
Ethanol?
57
Quarterly 700-800 Lb. Steer Price Projections
  • Qtr.Yr USDA LMIC KSU
  • Q4.06 108-112 113-115 105-109
  • Q1.07 105-111 110-113 102-106
  • Q2.07 103-109 106-110 103-107
  • Q3.07 100-106 108-114 103-107
  • Livestock, Dairy Poultry Outlook

58
www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing
59
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com