Publication strategies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Publication strategies

Description:

Publication strategies. Thomas Suddendorf. Post PhD. Postdoctoral fellow. Lectureship ... Take opportunities to work on projects that present themselves, but. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: psyc121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Publication strategies


1
Publication strategies
  • Thomas Suddendorf

2
Post PhD
  • Postdoctoral fellow
  • Lectureship
  • Score board
  • Publication record
  • Impact
  • Grants
  • Awards
  • Service teaching

3
The big question
  • What time effort to spend on what projects?
  • Foremost DO GOOD RESEARCH
  • Publications merely report that work
  • Learn to run projects in parallel
  • Take opportunities to work on projects that
    present themselves, but..
  • Focus on what you are passionate about
  • Carefully develop coherent research program

4
Publications types
  • Empirical articles
  • Theories
  • Reviews
  • Book Chapters
  • Other
  • Commentaries
  • Book reviews
  • Conference proceedings
  • etc

5
Quality vs Quantity
  • Articles impact
  • Check Web of Science
  • ISI Web of Knowledge citation index
  • Much SS research never gets cited
  • Waste of time effort
  • Good work should lead others to learn something
    and cite your contribution
  • Know your journals
  • Impact Factors
  • Web of Science citation reports
  • Psychology Tier 1,2,3, 4
  • http//www.psy.uq.edu.au/noticeboard/index.html?Ca
    tId1
  • Special considerations
  • Special issues, invited commentaries etc.

6
Publication Strategies
  • Major publications
  • Top generalist journals such as
    Science or Nature (IF gt 25)
  • Tier 1 highest impact journals in
    your specific field (IFgt2)
  • Review vs empirical journals
  • What gets published there
  • definite set of experiments
  • major review
  • new theory
  • Make sure you get one of these early
  • Aim high, but re-evaluate your paper
  • Be persistent, keep improving (learn from
    reviewers comments) resubmitting
  • but dont let it distract you entirely from

7
Quantity
  • Bread butter
  • Tier 2-3 (IF0.5-2), basic experiments
  • Produce a regular quantity of good quality
    research
  • Aim for 2-3 per year
  • Consider building up different collaborative
    research programs
  • Tier 4 (IFlt0.5)
  • High quantity of low impact work may mark you as
    productive, but
  • Generally avoid, unless work is aimed at specific
    audience or is invited
  • but sometimes

8
Book Chapters
  • Can be a good recognition
  • Different Tiers (1,2,3,4) for publishers
  • http//www.psy.uq.edu.au/noticeboard/index.html?Ca
    tId1
  • Consider editor, distribution, audience
  • Allows you to expand and even speculate more than
    an article does
  • However, often they are rather pointless
  • Repetition of previously published ideas
  • The stuff I could not get into a decent journal
  • Not compulsory reading for your peers
  • Very long time to publication
  • Avoid books that are written for writers rather
    than readers (a la Who is who)

9
More quantity
  • Conferences
  • Regularly present your work at major
    international meetings
  • Proceedings are no substitute to peer reviewed
    journal articles.
  • Abstracts that repeatedly appear in conference
    proceedings, but do not make it into a journal,
    may indicate something
  • Other non-refereed publications
  • book reviews,
  • commentaries,
  • letters etc.

10
Outlet summary
  • Aim to get some high impact (Tier 1 papers) for
    your best work!
  • Regularly produce solid work (Tier 2-3)
  • Re-evaluate your articles and carefully choose
    where to send it next
  • Consider other ways of publishing to increase
    output
  • Chapters, book reviews, commentaries
  • Find a balance between the extremes of
  • Few high impact publications versus
  • Many low impact publications

11
Authorship
  • Collaborations are good, but
  • Single authored papers are better
  • Shows that you can do it.
  • Two author papers can be similarly strong
  • both will be spelled out in citations
  • Multiple authors
  • Safer and easier to get out
  • Tit for tat often ensures higher number of papers
    for large research groups, but
  • DEST points are proportional to number of authors
  • E.g., with 5 co-authors, you receive 1/6th of a
    publication credit and Peers will see it
    similarly
  • First author tends to get the credit (Smith et
    al., 2006)
  • But, sometimes the last author does too
  • Big names will be recognized and readers may
    attribute creative part to that person
  • Consistently publishing with the same group of
    people will make it difficult to determine what
    your contribution has been and if you can pull it
    off by yourself

12
Authorship
  • Be conscious about your pattern of authorship
  • Try to find a balance (i.e., single authored,
    first authored collaborations, and different
    multi-authored papers)
  • Be generous and people will be generous to you
  • Get an early start at single authored papers
  • Again, consider reviews and book reviews

13
Other
  • Identify and apply for grants
  • Identify and apply for awards
  • Be a good departmental citizen
  • But be careful with your limited time
  • Focus on what you are passionate about, what you
    are interested in, and what you want to become a
    world expert on
  • You have to drive your research career yourself
    so have some fun
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com