Chief of Naval Operations

1
Chief of Naval Operations

• CFFC NAVAL ORDNANCE ENTERPRISE(NOE) MEETING
• Yorktown, Virginia
• 23 24 August 2005
• Ray Rowland
• N411E1
• Ordnance Maintenance Policy and Resources
• [phone]

2
CFT 2 Outline

• OPNAV STAFF ALIGNMENT
• N4/N7 WEAPONS TRANSFER
• OPNAV N411
• OPNAV N411E
• POM-08
• IRCA/ISCP PROCESS
• OIS/FOS-M//OPOM/AWIS/NWIMS/NALCOMIS
• NOMP
• ACQUISTION MAINTENACE
• OPNAV/NAVSEA/NAVAIR/NOLSC/CFFC/NOE/ NMC/FLEET
  INTERFACE

3
OPNAV Staff Alignment

• We are restructuring the Navy Headquarters staff
  to become an organization with a better grip on
  those warfighting requirements, and that will
  make us a more combat-effective Navy.
• I want a greater emphasis on the output of that
  process. My view is that the warfighting
  requirement side has been shortchanging us on the
  output end in the past, and this has had an
  effect on fleet readiness. We are going to try it
  another way."
• -- Admiral Vern Clark, CNO

• Requirements sponsors established
• N7 established as DCNO for Warfare Requirements
  and Programs
• N4 becomes readiness requirements sponsor
• N1 becomes manpower personnel requirements
  sponsor
• N00T established as DCNO for Education Training
  requirements
• N8 continues Navy-wide perspective independent
  analysis
• Streamlined Board of Directors (BOD) decision
  forum(s)

3
3
4
Weapon Maintenance Resources Transfer

• In Feb 2004, ordnance maintenance funding (OM,N)
  was transferred from N75/76/77/78 to N41.
• These OM,N lines fund life cycle support, depot
  maintenance, Integrated Logistics Support (ILS),
  and Quality Evaluation (QE) programs for surface,
  subsurface, and aviation weapons, systems, and
  launching equipment.
• Resource Sponsor for following Program Managers
• 1D1D - Tomahawk Surface Harpoon
  (PMA-280/281/282)
• 1D4D - Airborne Weapons and Targets
  (PMA-201/208/242/259)
• 1D4D Surface/Subsurface Weapons
  (PMS-340/404/495, PEO-IWS)
• 1D4D QE SE procurement (NOSSA)
• N41 also took over responsibility for the
  OPNAVINST 8000.16B NOMMP manual (formerly N781)

5
N411 Organizational Chart
232 Years Naval Ordnance Experience
317 Years Total Military Civil Service
6
N411E Resourced Accounts
7
N411E Responsibilities

• CNO focal point for conventional ordnance
  maintenance management policy and maintenance
  information management systems.
• CNO Naval Ordnance Management Program (NOMP)
• Resource sponsor for NAVAIR and NAVSEA weapon
  maintenance programs and the Ordnance Programs
  Optimization Model (OPOM)
• Assessment sponsor for NAVAIR and NAVSEA weapon
  procurement and maintenance programs.
• Review all Weapons Targets Naval Training
  System Plans (NTSP), Weapon System Planning
  Documents (WSPD) Program Planning Documents
  (PPD)
• Curriculum Sponsor AOOCP/AO A Schools with HQMC
• Co-Chair with Fleet AOOCP/AO A Human
  Performance Readiness Reviews (HPRR) in support
  of N00T

8
N411E Current Issues

• NOMP
• Integrate maritime weapon maintenance program
  policies into the OPNAVINST 8000.16
• OPOM
• Complete Ordnance Programs Optimization Model
  (OPOM) implementation for aviation weapons
  programs, including Tomahawk, and begin
  integration of maritime weapon programs into OPOM
• POM08 IRCA
• Begin planning and tasking for POM08 Integrated
  Readiness Capability Assessment

9
IRCA ISCP

• Integrated Readiness Capability Assessment
• Assesses Current Readiness (Weapon Maintenance)
• Done in coordination with Fleet (CFFC/CNAF N4s,
  HQMC, ASL,APW)
• Measured against FRP, GNFPP, GWOT, SSC
• Integrated Strategic Capability Plan
• Assesses Future Readiness (Weapon Research,
  Development, Procurement)
• Done in coordination with OPNAV N70 CFFC N8
• Measured against NNOR (with acceptable risk)
• Supports DPG scenarios, Sea Power 21

I recommend that OPNAV N4 be the sole arbitrator
of OM,N issues!


VADM K. J. COSGRIFF

CFFC Program
review PR-07 SPP Fleet Input ltr 7000 Ser N00/056
23 May 05
10
PR07 IRCA Key Issue

• FY07 Aviation Weapons Maintenance Shortfall
• N4 inherited large funding gap in FY07 (56M)
• Caused by PBD-736 (FY04) which increased funding
  to severely under-funded maintenance programs -
  all years except FY07
• Mitigation options to include
• Stop support for some legacy systems
• AIM-9M, AIM-7, TOW, Maverick, Hellfire, Harpoon
• Suspend all depot maintenance and QE programs
• Spread risk to non-aviation programs
• Recent PBD-751753 offsets increase delta to 63M
• CFFC and CNAF involved recognize severity of
  problem
• May cross-level with other current readiness
  accounts (i.e., FHP)
• NAVAIR Determined 40M minimum required in FY07
  to maintain a viable maintenance program.

11
The Ordnance Universe

• NOMP is the policy (basis)
• for all ordnance processes
• OIS links the world of
• ordnance information
• NORIP provides
• oversight (NOE
• in the future?)

12
Ordnance Information System (OIS)
Web based, controlled global access Process
only data that changes Create data once, use
many times
CFFC/MARFOR
CNO/CMC
PORTAL
Load Plans War Plans
Single, Integrated,Distributed Portfolioof
Applications
Weapon Station
Requirements Business Rules
WEB
Program Manager
StowageTransportation
Single, Distributed,Relational Database
AcquisitionsMaintenance
Inventory Manager
Warfighter
Decision Support Tools, Portfolio Metrics, GNOPP,
JQRRProjected InventoryCourse of Action Planning
Receipts/Expenditures
Stockpile Management
13
Fleet Ordnance Support Model (FOS-M) A
Performance Requirements Generation Application
14
Ordnance Programs Optimization Model

• Performance Based Cost Model for Aviation Weapons
  Targets maintenance
• Models all logistics OM,N requirements, i.e.,
  Depot Maintenance, QE, ILS
• Air Launched Missiles (8E), Conventional Ordnance
  (2E)
• CAD/PADs,
• Guns (M61A1/A2/M197/GAU-12/M60/M240/XM218/GAU-2/16
  /17/21)
• AAE (bomb racks, launchers, rocket pods, mounts,
  DAS)
• Targets
• Tomahawk in parallel development
• Future incorporation of Surface/Subsurface
• Integrates maintenance models in existence for
  years, but not certified (8E, 2E, CAD/PAD)
• Generates multiple funding/workload scenarios
• Optimal funding to meet a stated readiness
  objective
• Optimal readiness levels for given funding
• Impacts resulting from budget swings

15
Ordnance Programs Optimization Model
NAVSEA programs in Model Starting in FY-06
PROGRAM ELEMENT AG PMA AG 1T/2T/3T AG COMPONENT
AG WPN SYSTEM
CAD/ PAD
2E
8E
READINESS REQ METRICS PRIORITIES
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
SYSTEM FUNDING ELEMENTS
GUNS
OUTPUT
OPTIMAL FUNDING LEVEL
BUDGET FACTS OF LIFE
AAE
AVAILABILITY READINESS IMPACTS
TARGETS
CORE
16
OPOM Cultural Change

• Business Process Transformation
• Budgeting for Cost-wise Readiness
• Increased Visibility into Budget Requirements and
  Allocation Process
• OM,N requirements must be task/product
  justified, no cushion
• Senior leadership accepts risk and readiness
  funded
• Program Managers manage programs to Funded level
• Unfunded tasks identified as acceptable risk,
  remain UNFUNDED

17
What it does

• Performance pricing model for Aviation Missiles,
  Ordnance, Targets, CAD/PAD, AAE, and Guns
• Models all OMN requirements for the three major
  funding areas
• Weapons System Support (ILS ISE)
• Quality Evaluation (Reliability Service Life)
• Maintenance
• Establish Readiness vs Cost or Cost vs
  Readiness budgeting relationship

18
How Does OPOM Affect You

• Fleet (CFFC) has 51 of the vote how funds are
  allocated
• OPOM provides data/metrics to Fleet so the Fleet
  can decide what and to what level programs are
  funded
• OPOM will be able to provide a yearly readiness
  rating for each weapons system through the FYDP

19
OPOM Benefits

• Better able to defend the ordnance budget
• Validity - Accredited budget for submission to
  OPNAV/FMB
• Timeliness - Budget drills less labor intensive
• Risk management - Readiness vs cost trade-offs
• Consistency of data
• Ability to forecast ordnance deficiencies in out
  years

20
OPOM Deployment

• Operational Status
• Beta Testing complete w/limited Production use as
  of 01Feb05
• Full Production target completed June 05
• Accreditation Status
• JHU-APL and N81 assessor have recommended OPOM
  accreditation
• All modules have gone through for N-8
  Accreditation
• 8E/2E/CAD/PAD/OPOM Models approved
• TOMAHAWK accreditation in process will not be
  separate but module within OPOM
• POM-08 first opportunity to influence budget
  process
• OPOM currently loaded to reflect FY05 execution
• FYDP (FY06 13) loading in progress

21
OPNAV 8000.16 NOMMP
CNO Focal Point
Fleet Ordnance Support
New

• NORIP
• JOCG / OSD
• Fleet / MarFor
• SMCA

• Resources
• Infrastructure
• NOSSA/NOLSC
• Wpn Stations

Naval Ordnance Safety
Stockpile Management

• WSESRB / DDESB
• Waivers / Exemptions
• Insensitive Munitions
• AMHAZ/ESI
• JWSTAP

• OIS
• Readiness Assessments
• Inventory Accuracy
• Stratification / Demil
• NCEA/NNOR

Ordnance Maintenance
Operational Logistics Support

• Policy
• Resources
• Depot Maint
• ILS / QE

• Crisis Response
• Distribution Protocol
• OPlan Review
• MUREP

22
Questions?