Title: Endemic Mycoses In Immune Compromised Patients
1Endemic Mycoses In Immune Compromised Patients
EORTC-MSG Definitions II
Carol A. Kauffman, M.D. Professor of Internal
Medicine University of Michigan Chief,
Infectious Diseases Section VA Ann Arbor
Healthcare System Ann Arbor USA
2ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Organisms
- ? Histoplasma capsulatum
- ? Blastomyces dermatitidis
- ? Coccioides immitis
- ? Sporothrix schenckii
- ? Paracoccidioides brasiliensis
- ? Penicillium marneffei
3ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- True pathogens cause disease in healthy host,
more severe disease in immune compromised host - Restricted niches so geography (both past and
present) of crucial importance - Both new infection and reactivation can occur
with most endemic mycoses
4(No Transcript)
5ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Diagnosis of proven infection with endemic
- mycoses is relatively easy
- ? Do not colonize humans
- ? Never a lab contaminant
- Diagnosis of proven infection with endemic
- mycoses can be difficult
- ? Growth in culture can be slow and tedious
- ? Non-culture methods decrease reliance on
cultures
6ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Proven Infection Requires the Following
- Affected site, temporally related, typical Sx
- ? () culture or
- ? () histopathologic or direct microscopic
- evidence for characteristic organisms
- () blood culture
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Proven Infection Requires the Following
- Disseminated histoplasmosis
- ? EIA () for histo Ag in urine, serum, CSF
- ? () blood or bone marrow smear
- Disseminated coccidioidomycosis
- ? 4-fold rise in serum Ab for cocci
- ? CSF Ab () for cocci
12Urine
100
95
90
(75/79)
82
81
80
80
(14/17)
(26/32)
(8/10)
70
60
Sensitivity ()
50
40
34
30
(22/65)
20
14
10
(2/14)
0
AIDS
Acute
Sub-acute
Chronic
IS
NIS
Disseminated Pulmonary
13 New 2nd Gen Assay
14ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- There are Caveats re Criteria for Proven D.
- Dx of histoplasmosis by histopathology
- requires expertise in mycopathology C.
- glabrata Leishmania look similar, but
- tissue reaction different
- Serology and antigen EIA must be done by lab
- with expertise in fungal diagnostics
15ENDEMIC MYCOSES IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Probable and Possible Infection Categories
- Do not apply to endemic mycoses
- Any () growth or microscopy is proven
- infection
- ? Do not colonize humans
- ? Never a lab contaminant
- Empiric Rx not common clinical practice
16CRYPTOCOCCOSIS IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Proven Infection Requires the Following
- Normally sterile site, signs/symptoms infection
- ? () culture or
- ? () histopathologic or direct microscopic
- evidence for encapsulated budding
yeasts or - () blood culture or
- () CSF cryptococcal antigen
-
17CRYPTOCOCCOSIS IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Probable Infection Requires the Following
- Meet at least 1 criterion from 3 categories
- 1 host 1 clinical 1 microbiologic
- ? sputum, BAL, bronchial brush
- () culture or direct microscopy
- ? () cryptococcal antigen in serum
- (false include T. asahii, R.
mucilaginosa, RF) -
18CRYPTOCOCCOSIS IN IMMUNE COMPROMISED PATIENTS
- Probable Infection Uncommon with Crypto
- Pt. with pneumonia, () BAL, no lung Bx
- Pt. with pneumonia, no BAL, () serum Ag
- Pt. with CNS D., no LP, () serum Ag
- Possible Infection Does Not Apply to Crypto
- Will always have to meet at least one micro
- criterion to consider cryptococcosis
-