Title: Refusal of Medical Assistance
1Refusal of Medical Assistance
- Lynn K. Wittwer, MD, MPD
- Clark County EMS
2Refusal of Medical Assistance
- Informed Consent
- Refusal of Care
- Case Review
- Elements of Informed Consent
- Matrix of Transport Decisions
- Patient Restraint
- Non-Transport of Patients
- General Guidelines
- Clark County Protocols
- Other Refusal Issues
- EMS No-CPR
- POLST
3Informed Consent
- Informed Consent
- Integral to the concept of informed refusal
- Protects the medical decision making autonomy of
the individual - Allows for information exchange between patient
and provider to help individual make educated
health care decisions - History
- 1982 - Making Health Care Decisions (Presidents
Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in
Medicine) - shared decision making would be the ideal for
patient-professional relationships that a sound
doctrine of informed consent should support.
4Informed Consent
- History even earlier (cont.)
- 1914 Justice Cardoza Every human being of
adult years and sound mind has a right to
determine what shall be done with his own body. - 1960 Natanson v. Kline physicians are
obligated to disclose and explain in simple
language, the risks and complications of a
procedure.
5Informed Consent
- History (cont.)
- 1972 Cobbs v. Grant The patients right of self
decision is the measure of the physicians duty to
reveal. - Physician is obligated to provide all information
necessary to allow patient to make informed
decision.
6Dilemma
- Patient unable to make informed decision and
refusing care and/or transport
7Refusal of Care
- Competence vs. capacity
- Competence 3 step legal test determined by
judge in court of law - Can individual retain and comprehend relevant
information? - Can individual believe information?
- Can individual use information to make a choice?
8Refusal of Care
- Competence vs. capacity (cont.)
- Capacity Can be established by medical provider
- Presumptive determination of competence
- If a patient refuses and evidence exists
indicating an impairment of the patients
capacities, it is appropriate to conclude the
patient may be found incompetent in a court of
law. - Impairment may be determined by
- Patients own actions
- Information from caregivers and/or relatives
9Refusal of Care
- Establishing capacity
- Does the patient understand the nature of his
medical condition and the potential consequences
of refusing treatment and/or transport? - Assessment of decision making capacity
- Absence of deficits in
- Cognition
- Judgment
- Understanding
- Choice
- Expression of choice
- Stability
10- The EMS provider must realize the patients
decision making capacity must be scrutinized, not
the ultimate decision regarding health care - If deemed to posses capacity, the patients
wishes regarding health care must be honored.
11Refusal of Care
- Disagreement with provider does itself constitute
lack of capacity - Lane v. Candura Court ruling supporting patient
right to determine treatment - Patient refusing treatment despite physician
advice - Court ruled the irrationality of the decision did
not justify a conclusion of incompetence.
12Elements of Informed Consent
- ACDC
- Autonomous decision
- Capable individual
- Disclosure of adequate information by provider
- Comprehension of the information by individual
13Elements of Informed Consent
- Determining comprehension
- Sliding Scale standard
- The more serious the risk posed by the patients
decision the more stringent the standard of
comprehension (capacity) required. - Refusal of EMS transport to hospital typically
considered high risk.
14Matrix of Transport Decisions
15Matrix of Transport Decisions
- Patient Refuses EMS Disagrees
- True refusal of medical assistance
- Key issue is EMS advises of need for tx/trnx and
patient refuses despite understanding risks - Patient Wishes Transport EMS Disagrees
- Significant EMS liability
- Impossible to justify failure to tx/trnx if
patient has adverse outcome.
16Matrix of Transport Decisions
- Patient Refuses EMS Agrees
- Example MVA where patient did not call
- Patient and EMS agree that no illness/injury (and
therefore risk) exist. - Does not apply if patient care is initiated
- Taking of vitals
- Provision of diagnosis
- Reassurance patient is OK
17Patient Restraint
- Issues Patient Refusal and Restraint
- False Imprisonment
- Restraint without proper justification or
authority - Intentional and unjustifiable detention of an
individual without his consent - Assault and Battery
- Assault
- Unlawfully placing an individual in apprehension
of immediate body harm without consent - Battery
- Unlawfully touching an individual without consent
18Patient Restraint
- Issues Patient Refusal and Restraint (cont.)
- Abandonment
- Premature termination of the Paramedic/Patient
relationship - Failure to follow necessary steps to ensure
definitive care - Reasonable force
- Dependant on amount of force required to ensure
patient does not cause injury to himself or
others - Excessive force is EMS liability
19Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines
- Reasons for Non-Transport
- Signed Refusal for Transport
- No Patient
- DOA and other DIF
- Termination of Code 99
- No patient found at scene
- Etc.
20Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines
- Patients Refusing Care/Transport Defined
- No medical need
- Normal decision making capacity
- Voluntarily declines after being informed
- Impaired decision making capacity
- Impaired Decision Making Capacity
- Inability to understand nature of illness/injury
- Inability to understand risks or consequences of
refusing
21Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines
- Impaired Decision Making Capacity (cont.)
- Some causes of impairment
- Alcohol/drugs
- Psychiatric conditions
- Injuries (head injury, shock, etc.)
- OBS (Alzheimers, mental handicap, etc.)
- Minors (
- Language/communication barrier (incl. deafness)
22Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines
- Criteria For Informed Consent/Refusal
- Patient is given complete/accurate information
about risks for refusal and benefit of treatment - Patient is able to understand and communicate
these risks and benefits - Patient is able to make a decision consistent
with their beliefs and life goals
23Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Capable Of Making Decision No Medical Need
- Refusal form not necessary
- Document events necessitating call and criteria
for no patient/medical need
24Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Capable Of Making Decision Minor Medical Need
- Refusal form IS necessary
- Documentation shall include following
- Chief complaint
- Events prior/reason for call
- Pertinent medical history
- Description of scene (if relevant)
- Physical exam incl. vitals and impression
- Treatment provided and patient response
- Consult information
- Instructions/Information provided to
patient/family re. risks/benefits of treatment
25Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Capable of Making Decision Immediate
Care/Transport Needed - Refusal Form IS Necessary
- Efforts to convince patient to receive care
- Assistance from family, etc.
- Law enforcement, mental health professional
(CDMHP), clergy, etc. - Consult with MC is mandatory
- Explain Refusal Form
- Instructions and release of libility to the
patient - Signature of patient or legal guardian
- Signature by witness
26Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- NOT Capable Medical Care/Transport Necessary
- Refusal Form Necessary
- Efforts to convince pt. to accept care
- Assistance from family, police, CDMHP, clergy,
etc. - Consider restraint
- Chemical
- Physical
- Consult with Medical Control Mandatory
- Explain Refusal Form
- Instructions and release of liability to the
patient - Signature of patient or legal guardian
- Signature by witness
- Every reasonable effort should be made to ensure
pt. receives medical assistance - Use aforementioned documentation guidelines
27Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Completing Clark County Refusal Form
- Determine Capacity
- Document in assessment section
- Consider as prompts for documenting MIR
28Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
- Contact Medical Control
- Document MD, orders given, and other pertinent
dialogue - Indicate any instructions to patient via MC
Physician - If MC not contacted, document reason in MIR
29Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
- Document advise to patient
- Treatment eval needed
- Further harm could result without
- Transport needed
30Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
- Indicate Disposition
- Refused all
- Refused tx and/or trnx
- In Custody
- Document agency and officer
- In care of relative or friend
- Document name and relationship
- Sign and Date Form
31Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients
Refusing Care
- Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
- Explain remainder of form to patient
- Pt. sign and date release of liability
32Other Refusal Issues
- EMS No-CPR
- Directive for No CPR
- Pt. pulseless and apneic
- Born of Natural Death Act
- Allowed EMS to respect pts end of life wishes
- Limited to Prehospital Providers
- Not transportable
- Required continuous updating
- Nobody wants to wear the dead man walking bracelet
33EMS No-CPR
- Guidelines
- Perform interventions until confirmation of the
EMS-No CPR status in one of the following ways - Determine bracelet is intact and not defaced.
- Original form present.
- bedside, back of door, or refrigerator.
- patient's chart.
- If bracelet is not attached, or if it has been
defaced and no valid EMS-No CPR form is located,
the EMS-No CPR bracelet must be considered
invalid
34EMS No-CPR
- Patient Obviously Dead
- Decapitation
- Rigor Mortis
- Evisceration of heart or brain
- Decomposition
- Incineration
- Resuscitation measures shall not be initiated.
35EMS No-CPR
- After confirming valid EMS-No CPR
- Do Not begin resuscitation measures
- PROVIDE COMFORT CARE
- Contact patients physician or Medical Control
with questions or problems - If resuscitation already started before learning
of a valid EMS-No CPR STOP the following - Basic CPR.
- Intubation (leave tube in place, stop ppv).
- Cardiac monitoring and defibrillation.
- Administration of resuscitation medications.
- Any positive pressure ventilation (through bag
valve masks, pocket face masks, endotracheal
tubes).
36EMS No-CPR
- Comfort Care Measures
- Comfort care for the dying patient may include
- Manually open airway (do not provide ppv with a
bag valve mask, pocket mask or endotracheal
tube). - Clear airway (including stoma).
- Provide oxygen via nasal cannula at 2-4lpm
- Place patient in position of comfort
- Splint and control bleeding as necessary
- Treat pain as per protocol
- Provide emotional support to patient and family
37EMS No-CPR
- Revoking the valid DNR order.
- The following people can inform the EMS system
that the EMS-No CPR form has been revoked - The patient
- The Attending Physician.
- The legal surrogate for the patient expressing
the patient's revocation of the directive
38- Note The patient's wishes in regard to
resuscitation should always be respected.
Sometimes, however, the family may vigorously and
persistently insist on CPR even if a valid DNR
directive/order Advanced life support personnel
should continue treatment and consult medical
control
39EMS No-CPR
- Documentation
- Complete MPD approved MIR.
- State in writing
- "Patient identified as DNR by EMS-No CPR, or
Other directive. - Record Attending Physician and whether or not
contacted. - Record reason why the EMS system was activated.
- Comfort the family and bystanders when patients
have expired.
40EMS No-CPR
- Case Review
- Called by husband to 66 y/o female cc SOB
- Pt. progressively non-verbal, nods appropriately
to questioning - PMH COPD, IDDM, etc.
- valid, signed EMS No-CPR
- ETCO2 50, O2 sat 90, lung sounds slight all
fields w/ minimal excursion
41EMS No-CPR
- Case Review (cont.)
- Pt. asked Do you want us to breathe for you
- Non-verbal, shakes head No
- Indicates again she doesnt want respiratory
assistance - Upon transfer to ambulance patient becomes
obtunded, GCS 3, apneic - What are current treatment options?
42Other Refusal Issues
- Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment
(POLST) - Replaces current EMS-No CPR Code directions
- Offers same immunity as EMS No-CPR
- Translates an Advanced Directive into physician
orders. - NOTE POLST is NOT an Advance Directive and DOES
NOT replace
43POLST
- Part A
- Resuscitation
- Only applicable if pulseless and apneic
- Part B
- Medical interventions
- Comfort Measures
- Limited interventions
- O2, suction, FBAO removal
- Advanced interventions
- BVM w/ NPA/OPA
- Monitor
- Medications/IV Fluids
- Full Treatment/Resuscitation
44POLST
- Part C
- Antibiotics
- Part D
- Artificially administered fluids and nutrition
- Part E
- Signatures
- All must be present and dated
- Part F
- Patient preference
- Indicates further living will, identifies
guardian, etc. - Part G
- Review of POLST form
45POLST
- Qualified
- 18 or older
- Serious health condition
- Location of Form
- Home
- Fridge, bedside, back of door, with meds
- Health Care Setting
- Chart
- Kept with patient during transfer
46POLST
- Revocation of Form
- By PATIENT
- Verbally revoking order
- Destroying form and/or No CPR bracelet
- Physician expressing patients revocation
- Legal surrogate
47POLST
- Management
- Provide resuscitation based on patients wishes
- Provide medical intervention identified on form
- Always provide comfort care
- If In Doubt Contact Medical Control
48POLST
- Comfort Care Measures
- Open/clear airway
- No PPV
- Oxygen via nasal cannula
- Position of comfort
- Splint, control bleeding
- Pain medication prn
- Emotional support to patient and family
49POLST
- Documentation
- Complete approved MIR
- Indicate DNR by POLST, EMS-No CPR, or other
- Record pts physician
- Indicate why EMS activated?
- Document contact with
- Medical control
- Pts physician
- Medical examiner/law enforcement