Chapter 9 Spur Gear Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 9 Spur Gear Design

Description:

As Pd increases, # teeth increases and gear train runs smoother and quiter and ... This problem solved after third iteration using Excel ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:7680
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: jac3150
Category:
Tags: chapter | design | gear | spur

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 9 Spur Gear Design


1
Chapter 9 Spur Gear Design
Pinion
Gear
2
Lecture Steps
  • Quick review, gear geometry (Chapter 8)
  • Transmitted loads (overhead)
  • Review bending stress, bending stress number, St,
    allowable bending stress number, Sat and adjusted
    allowable bending stress number, Sat.
  • Review contact stress number, Sc, allowable
    contact stress number, Sac and adjusted allowable
    contact stress number Sac.
  • Overview gear design steps.
  • Example(s) gear design!!

handout
3
Quick review
Bending Stress No
Required Allowable Bending Stress No
Contact Stress No
Required Allowable Contact Stress No
4
Steps for Gear Drive Design
  • From design requirements, identify speed of
    pinion, nP, desired output speed of gear, nG, and
    power to be transmitted, P.
  • Choose type of material for the gears (steel,
    cast iron, bronze, etc.)
  • Determine overload factor, Ko, using table 9-5
  • Calculated Pdes KoP and calculate a trial value
    for the diametral pitch, Pd (for steel use Figure
    9-27). Note diametral pitch must be a standard
    size (see Table 8-2).
  • Note, as Pd decreases, tooth size increases thus
    bringing down St and Sc. But.. As Pd increases,
    teeth increases and gear train runs smoother
    and quiter and the drive gets smaller as well!

5
Steps for Gear Drive Design
  • Specify Np and NG to meet VR requirement.
    Calculate center distance, D, OD to make sure
    there arent any interference issues.
  • Specify face width using recommended range 8/Pd
    lt F lt 16/Pd.
  • Remember, increasing face width reduces St and Sc
    but consider alignment factor. Face width is
    normally less than 2X Dp.
  • Compute transmitted load, Wt, pitch line speed,
    vt, quality number, Qv, and other factors
    required for calculating bending stress and
    contact stress.
  • Calculate St and required Sat. Does material in
    2 meet Sat ? No then select new material or
    define new geometry (step 4). If yes, continue
    to 9.
  • Calculate Sc and required Sac. Does material in
    2 meet Sac? No then select new material to
    meet Sac and Sat or define new geometry (step 4).
    If yes, continue to 10.
  • Summarize design

6
(No Transcript)
7
Problem 9.61 A gear pair is to be a part of
the drive for a milling machine requiring 20 hp
with the pinion speed at 550 rpm and the gear
speed to be between 180 and 190 rpm.
Given Driven Milling Machine Power 20
hp Pinion Speed 550 rpm Output Speed 180 -190
rpm 185 rpm Continuous Use 30,000 hours
Find Compact Gear Design
8
Solution
Design Power Assume Light Shock Driver and
Moderate Shock Driven Ko 1.75 (Table 9-5, page
389) PDesign (Ko)(PInput)
(1.75)(20hp) 35hp
9
Trial Size Pick Sizes
Pd 5 T/in Dp 4.80 in DG 14.2 in Np 24
teeth NG 71 teeth
Check physical size!!
10
Center Distance
Pitch Line Speed
Tangential Load
Note Use Input Power Here as Ko is applied
Later!
Face Width
11
Assumptions
Design Decisions Quality Number, Qv 6 (Table
9-2, Page 378) Steel Pinion Steel Gear
More precision, higher quality number!
Cp 2300 (Table 9-9, Page 400)
Softer material, more relative deformation,
therefore contact area increases and stress
decreases
12
Geometry Factors
Pinion JP .36 Gear JG .415 Figure 9-17,
Page 387
13
Geometry Factors Cont
Page 402
I .108
14
Load Distribution Factor
Equation 9-16, Page 390 Equation is solved on
next slide
Page
15
Load Distribution Factor Cont
Size Factor
Page 389
ks 1.0 since Pd 5
16
Rim Thickness Factor
Page
For this problem, specify a solid gear blank KB
1.00
KB 1.00 for mB 1.2 or larger
17
Rim Thickness Factor Cont
We are assuming a solid gear blank for this
problem, but if not then use
Min Rim Thickness (1.2)(.45 in) .54 in
Min back-up ratio
18
Safety Factor
SF 1.25 (Mid-Range)
Hardness Ratio CH 1.00 for early trials until
materials have been specified. Then adjust CH if
significant
differences exist in the hardness of the pinion
and the gear.
Reliability
Page 396
KR 1.5 (for 1 in 10,000 failures)
19
Dynamic Factor Kv
Page 393
20
Dynamic Factor Cont Kv
Qv comes from Figure 9-21 Kv can be calculated
like in above equations or taken from Figure
9-21. Equations are more accurate.
21
Design Life
Ncp (60)(L)(n)(q) L 30,000 hours from Table
9-7 n 550 rpm q 1 contacts Ncp (60)(30,000
hours)(550 rpm)(1 contact) 9.9x108 cycles
NcG (60)(30,000 hours)( 185.92 rpm)(1 contact)
3.34656x108 cycles
22
Stress Cycle Factors
Page 395
23
Stress Cycle Factors Cont
Page 403
24
Bending Stress Numbers
Pinion
Gear
25
Required Bending Stress Allowable
26
Contact Stress Number
27
Required Contact Stress Allowable
Pinion
Gear
28
Hardness Numbers BENDING (Grade 1)
Page 379
Pinion Bending
Satp 34,324.5 psi HB 270
Gear Bending
These stresses are OK
SatG 28,741.9 psi HB 215
Go to appendix A3 or A4 and spec out material
that meets this hardness requirement! Example
AISI 1040, Temper at 900 F
29
Hardness Numbers CONTACT (Grade 1)
Page 380
Pinion Contact
Sacp 261,178 psi
Gear Contact
These Stresses are WAY too HIGH! Values are off
table!
SacG 245,609 psi
30
Summary of Problem
Contact stresses are too High. Must iterate
until stress are low enough until a usable
material can be found.
NOTE Contact Stress generally controls. If
material cannot be found for bending, contact
stress is too high! Iterate! Decrease Pd and
increase F Excel is a GREAT tool to use for
these Iterations. This problem solved after
third iteration using Excel
31
Guidelines for Adjustments in Successive
Iterations.
  • Decreasing the numerical value of the diametral
    pitch results in larger teeth and generally lower
    stresses. Also, the lower value of the pitch
    usually means a larger face width, which
    decreases stress and increases surface
    durability.
  • Increase the diameter of the pinion decreases the
    transmitted load, generally lowers the stresses
    and improves surface durability.
  • Increase the face width lowers the stress and
    improves surface durability but less impact than
    either the pitch or pitch diameter.
  • Gears with more and smaller teeth tend to run
    more smoothly and quietly than gears with fewer
    and larger teeth.
  • Standard values of diametral pitch should be used
    for ease of manufacture and lower cost (See table
    8-2).
  • Use high alloy steels with high surface hardness
    results in the most compact system but the cost
    is higher.
  • Use gears with high quality number, Qv adds
    cost but lowers load distribution factor, Km.
  • The number of teeth in the pinion should be as
    small as possible to make the system compact.
    But the possibility of interference is greater
    with fewer teeth. Check Table 8-6 to ensure no
    interference will occur.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com