Mass Wasting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Mass Wasting

Description:

septic tanks in hillside home developments after soils. become waterlogged. Mass Wasting ... trees, and human-created objects (i.e. houses, cars, fences,etc) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:350
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: johnw133
Category:
Tags: mass | wasting

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mass Wasting


1
Mass Wasting
  • A/Prof John Worden
  • DEC
  • University of Sth Queensland

2
Mass Wasting
  • Mass Wasting refers to the down slope Movement
    of soil, rock and unconsolidated materials in
    response to Gravity.
  • Not a response to normal erosive agents of water,
    wind and ice
  • Strength of gravity gt the strength of slope
    materials (i.e., resistance to deformation)
  • Material or mass moves down slope at variable
    velocities ranging from very slow to catastrophic
    and is generically referred to as a Landslide
  • Mass moves as either falls, slides, flows and
    creep
  • Triggered by heavy rains, floods, earthquakes,
    etc
  • In USA alone, between 25-50 deaths and from
    US1-2 billion in property damage each year
  • An engineers role to minimise these losses during
    construction and land development.

3
Mass Wasting
  • A natural consequence of weathering and rock
    fragmentation
  • Very important in hilly to mountainous terrains
  • Can scar mountainsides and produce debris on
    valley floors that may dam streams and obliterate
    highways, etc.
  • The recent Threbo, NSW disaster is an prime
    example.
  • What factors influence mass wasting? There are
    three
  • Nature of slope materials
  • Amount of contained water and
  • The steepness of slopes or their instability.
  • The last two factors are impacted by human
    activity such as excavations for buildings and
    highways. All reduce resistance to movement.

4
Mass Wasting
  • Nature of Slope Materials
  • Highly variable and dependent on local geology
  • Massive granite slopes most stable , more so than
    foliated metamorphic schist slopes,
    unconsolidated sediment slopes are least stable.
  • Loose dry fine sand has a repose angle of 35?,
    while for angular pebbles this is 45. Any
    steeper angles will collapse to the repose angle.
  • Thus the angle of repose varies with size and
    shape of particles
  • The amount of moisture between particles controls
    surface tension which acts to bind particles
    together and increase the angle of repose.
  • Consolidated materials form steeper and less
    regular slopes due to cohesion. Over-steepening
    denuding slopes of vegetation lessens cohesion
    ? instability.

5
Mass Wasting
  • Water Content
  • When ground becomes saturated with water, it is
    lubricated and internal friction (cohesion) is
    lowered so that particles can easily slide past
    one another.
  • Should consolidated materials absorb large
    amounts of water, pore water pressures may rise
    sufficiently to separate grains producing fluid
    flow.
  • If slope soils are stripped of vegetation and no
    longer bound by root systems, they are subject to
    water invasion and may become unstable.
  • The net outcome is an unstable slope that will
    tend toself correct back to a stable repose
    angle by mass wasting.
  • Frequent culprit is poorly designed drainage from
    septic tanks in hillside home developments after
    soils become waterlogged.

6
Mass Wasting
  • Steepness of Slopes
  • Slope stability depends on weathering and
    fragmentation of rocks.
  • Shales in arid areas of Australia tend to weather
    and fragment into small pieces that mantle the
    bedrock. The resultant slope angle of the bedrock
    closely resembles that of loose coarse sand (?
    40). With time these slopes become unstable and
    experience slides.
  • Hard cemented Sandstones in contrast, break into
    large blocks with steep bare bedrock slopes above
    mantled broken rock slopes beneath.
  • Structures in the bedrock influence slope
    stability and the bedrocks capacity to absorb
    water.
  • Typical examples include bedding and fractures.

7
Mass Wasting
  • Triggers for Mass Movement
  • If the right combination of materials, moisture
    content and steepened slopes exists, a slide or
    flow is inevitable. Only the trigger is missing!
  • Heavy rainstorms may trigger the unstable slope,
    or badly designed runoff water disposal systems
    can have the same effect (i.e. Threbo).
  • Frequently vibrations like those produced by
    earthquakes, can convert water-saturated sandy
    layers in clay to slurries by liquefaction. Large
    blocks are then free to slide downslope.
  • Often slopes are gradually oversteepened either
    by natural causes or by human intervention.
    These eventually suffer sudden collapse.

8
Mass Wasting
  • Classification of Mass Wasting
  • Geologists classify mass movements using three
    parameters
  • Nature of Material- (Rock or Unconsolidated
    Material).
  • Type of Movement- (falling, sliding or flowing).
  • Velocity- ( from cm/yr to many kilometers/ hr).
  • Falling denotes freefall
  • Sliding occurs when the bulk of the material
    moves as a single unit
  • Flowing refers to material that moves as a
    fluid
  • Movements must be reconstructed from the
    deposited debris after an event.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Mass Wasting
  • Rockslides
  • Masses of bedrock moving as a single unit, and
  • where rocks slide freely down slope along bedding
    planes or joint planes.
  • Generate Talus slopes at the base of the
    rockslide.
  • Rock Avalanche
  • Large masses of rocky material (many ?500,000 m3)
    that flow down hill at velocities of tens to
    hundreds of kilometers/hour.
  • Often triggered by earthquakes.
  • Among the most destructive mass movements.
  • Resemble snow avalanches.

11
Mass Wasting
  • Rockfalls
  • Newly detached individual blocks and masses are
    released into free fall from cliffs, overhangs or
    very steep mountainsides.
  • Cohesion is weakened by weathering along joints,
    or even the water freeze/thaw cycle.
  • Fallen blocks accumulate at the base of the slope
    as Talus deposits.
  • Talus deposits may be matched to rock units
    above them and build up over long periods of
    time.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Mass Wasting
  • Unconsolidated Mass Movements
  • Often termed Debris and includes soil, bedrock
    fragments, trees, and human-created objects (i.e.
    houses, cars, fences,etc).
  • Most unconsolidated mass movements slower than
    rock movements.
  • Many flow like very viscous fluids (i.e. honey).
  • Generally slower velocities result from lower
    slope angles over which they move.
  • Slowest movement is Creep.

14
Mass Wasting
  • CREEP
  • Downhill movement of soil or debris at 1-10
    mm/yr.
  • Controlled by soil type climate steepness of
    slope and density of vegetation..
  • Very slow deformation of Regolith
  • Upper layers move faster than lower layers
  • Causes trees, telephone poles and fences to lean
    or move downslope
  • Mass of creeping soil may break poorly-supported
    retaining walls, structures and foundations.

15
Mass Wasting
  • Solifluction
  • Restricted to cold regions where water in surface
    layers alternatively freezes and thaws
  • When water thaws in surface layers they become
    saturated waterlogged
  • As there is no deep drainage (due to frozen
    deeper soil layers), soil oozes downslope
    carrying every thing with it.
  • Earthflow
  • Fluid movements of relatively fine-grained
    materials such as soils, and clay.

16
Mass Wasting
  • Debris Flows
  • Fluid mass movements of rock fragments supported
    by a muddy matrix.
  • Tend to move more quickly than earthflows
  • Occasionally may exceed 100km/hr.
  • Slumps
  • A slow slide of unconsolidated material that
    moves as a single unit.
  • Usually slumps slip along a basal plane that has
    the shape of a concave upwards surface.
  • May occur with multiple consecutive slip
    surfaces.
  • A common natural feature of the Range escarpment
    which can be readily induced by
    poorly-conceived human activities.

17
(No Transcript)
18
Mass Wasting
  • Mudflow
  • Flowing masses of material mostly finer than sand
    that contain large amounts of water.
  • Dry cracked mud absorbs water, internal friction
    decreases and mass of mud loses its resistance to
    movement and flows.
  • Flows with velocities of several km/hr.
  • Most common in hilly and semiarid regions
  • Tend to travel down upper valley slopes and merge
    on valley floors
  • Occur after infrequent prolonged heavy rainfall
  • Can carry large boulders, trees, etc.
  • Cause heavy losses of human lives.

19
Mass Wasting
  • Debris Slide
  • Have higher velocities than slumps
  • Rock and soil materials move largely as a single
    unit along planes of weakness such as a
    waterlogged clay zone towards the base of the
    debris.
  • During the slide event, sections of the slide may
    behave as a chaotic flow
  • As it moves downslope, it may transform into
    mostly a flow traveling in a fluid manner.

20
Mass Wasting
  • Debris Avalanche
  • Fast downhill movements of soil and rock in humid
    mountainous regions.
  • Velocities reflect high water content and steep
    slopes
  • Recorded velocities of 200-435km/hr known..
  • Where unstable slopes exist and frequent
    earthquakes occur, mass movements need to be
    predicted.
  • These flows remove everything in their paths
  • A close association with volcano slopes in humid
    regions
  • Mt St Helens in USA generated a debris avalanche
    that moved down the north flank of the volcano
    at 200km/hr.
  • Great loss of human lives, property and
    infrastructure result.

21
Mass Wasting
  • Summary
  • The vast bulk of mass wasting is natural.
  • Human activities may trigger landslides in
    vulnerable areas, such as when we change natural
    slopes.
  • At Vaiont, Italy, Engineers constructed a
    concrete dam (265 m high) in a steep-walled
    valley of limestone and shale.
  • On October 9, 1963, a debris slide of 240 million
    m3 (2km x1.6 km x 150 m thick) plunged into the
    deep impounded waters behind the dam.creating a
    huge spillover. A 70 m high flood wave killed
    3000 people down stream..
  • Mass movement danger had been flagged by
  • A small rock slide in 1960
  • Ancient slide scar on the valley walls above the
    dam
  • Inherent weakness of cracked and deformed
    outcropping limestone and shale reservoir walls.
  • While the landslide was natural, consequences
    could have been much less severe.

22
Mass Wasting
  • We cannot prevent most natural mass movements,
    but we can minimize our losses through careful
    control of construction and land development.
  • Careful engineering can keep water from making
    material more unstable.
  • In areas that are extremely prone to mass
    movements, development may have to be restricted.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com