Title: ENERGY STAR Criteria for CFLs Partner
1ENERGY STAR Criteria for CFLs Partner
Stakeholder Meeting
- U.S. Department of EnergyApril 29, 2003
Washington, D.C. - Richard Karney, U.S. Department of EnergyRon
Lewis, U.S. Department of Energy
2Mission of the ENERGY STAR CFL Criteria
- To provide specific parameters and direction to
produce high quality, highly efficient CFLs for
residential applications that are steps above the
norm.
3Why Revise the ENERGY STAR Criteria for CFLs Now?
- Reason 1
- With the CFL qualified product list growing by
leaps and bounds, the time is right to raise the
bar
4Growth of ENERGY STAR Qualified CFLs
5Why Revise the ENERGY STAR Criteria for CFLs Now?
- Reason 2
- ENERGY STAR wants to continue to drive the market
to offer the highest quality products keep the
integrity of the what the label stands for - Reason 3
- Through the required qualification testing and
3rd party testing by PEARL, we are still finding
issues with some CFLs meeting lumen maintenance
and interim life time tests at 40 of life and
rated lifetime.
6ENERGY STAR CFL Program and PEARL Testing
- PEARL testing provides clear picture to verify
qualified CFLs in the marketplace are continuing
to meet the ENERGY STAR Criteria requirements. - Cycle 1 ENERGY STAR used the PEARL data as a
litmus test follow-up with partners that had
poor results and encouraged product improvements
to rectify problems. - Cycle 2 Products tested against the original and
current ENERGY STAR Specifications (included
1,000-hour lumen maintenance rapid cycle stress
test). - ENERGY STAR sent a letter to all partners to
provide clear message program would act on poor
PEARL results - Sent letters to specific partners that had poor
test results and strongly encouraged them to
voluntarily de-list their product 3 were
unqualified and other partners submitted
verification that the products issues were
rectified.
7ENERGY STAR CFL Program and PEARL Testing,
continued
- Cycle 3 and Beyond
- For Cycle 3, ENERGY STAR is contacting partners
who had products tested to review the results and
again, are encouraging partners to voluntarily
remove poor performing products from carrying the
ENERGY STAR logo. - Partners who have products with extensive
criteria failures, especially for the 40 lumen
maintenance requirement, will be contacted and
informed their product will be immediately
removed from the CFL qualified product list.
8History of the ENERGY STAR CFL Specification
- Program and Specification was established in 1999
- Initial Specification established the baseline
for efficiency testing criteria since there is no
federal regulation covering CFLs - Most important data collected was
- Efficacy (lumens/watt)
- Lumen Maintenance at 40 of the models rated
life - Average Rated Lifetime Test
- Partners were given an 18-month grace period
from their initial qualification date to complete
these two tests
9History of the ENERGY STAR CFL Criteria Revision
Process
- In March 2001, ENERGY STAR held a
partner/stakeholder meeting to discuss upgrading
the Specification - Topics discussed were
- lumen equivalency
- Efficacy
- Early failures on lumen maintenance and average
rated life tests - Protocol for de-listing a qualified model
- Based on the meeting and partner comments, the
Criteria was updated and was put into effect in
October 2001
10Important Additions to the 2001 Criteria Version
- Required Testing Requirements
- Rapid Cycle Stress Test
- Must meet 5 out of 6 cycles
- provides early warning for early life time
failure - 1,000 Hour Lumen Maintenance Test
- Must meet or exceed 90 lumen maintenance at
1,000 hours - Provides early warning for lumen maintenance
issues - Interim Lifetime Testing
- Must have at least 8 out of 10 samples burning at
40 of rated life 3 or more failures result in
immediate unqualification
11ENERGY STAR Qualified CFLs Current Criteria
Development Process
- Criteria Development from December 2002 to today
- Ongoing process DOE is open to all partners
views and thoughts on how to make the program
better. - Partner and stakeholder comments and thoughts
were collected throughout the period. - Criteria revisions include other comments and
suggestions that were received in addition to the
official comments that were submitted.
12Current Criteria Review
- Ron Lewis
- U.S. Department of Energy
13ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for CFLs
Partner Commitments Page 1
- Opening Statement
- The following are the terms of the ENERGY STAR
Partnership Agreement as it pertains to the
manufacturing and/or distributing of ENERGY STAR
qualified CFLs. - Bullet 3
- Qualify, or private label at least one ENERGY
STAR qualified CFL model within one year of
activating the CFL portion of the agreement.
When PARTNER qualifies the product, it must meet
the criteria in effect at that time - Bullet 4
- Once the PARTNER submits its first qualified
model to ENERGY STAR, the PARTNERs company name
will be listed as an ENERGY STAR PARTNER
(http//www.energystar.gov)
14ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for CFLs
Partner Commitments Page 1
- Bullet 9 - Shipment Data
- Provide to DOE, on a bi-annual basis, unit
shipment data or other market indicators to
assist in determining the market penetration of
ENERGY STAR CFLs. Specifically, PARTNER must
submit the total number of ENERGY STAR qualified
CFLs shipped (in units by model) or an equivalent
measurement as agreed to in advance by DOE and
PARTNER. PARTNER is also encouraged to provide
ENERGY STAR qualified unit shipment data
segmented by meaningful product characteristics
(e.g. bulb type/style) total unit shipments for
each model in its product line, and percent of
total unit shipments that qualify as ENERGY STAR.
- The data for each half of the calendar year
should be submitted to DOE, preferably in
electronic format, no later than March 31st (for
second half of the year) and July 31st (for
first half of the year), and may be provided
directly from the PARTNER or through a third
party. The data will be used by DOE only for
program evaluation purposes and will be closely
controlled. If requested under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), DOE will argue that the
data is exempt. Any information used will be
masked by DOE so as to protect the
confidentiality of the PARTNER
15ENERGY STAR Eligibility CriteriaEnergy-Efficiency
Specification Page 3
- Current Criteria 8/9/01
- Scope This ENERGY STAR CFL specification covers
the requirements for self-ballasted, screw-based
CFLs and lamp systems, comprising - A. Single-based, bare compact fluorescent lamps
with integral electronic ballasts - B. Circle and square lamps with a maximum
diameter of 9 inches or a maximum side length of
8 inches and having electronic ballast adapters
that are tested and packaged with the lamp - C. Single based compact fluorescent lamps with
integral electronic ballasts and which have a
translucent cover over the bare fluorescent tube.
The cover may be globe, bullet, pear or other
shape D. Single based compact fluorescent lamps
with integral electronic ballasts and which have
a reflector that may be open or enclosed. The
lamp shall be primarily intended to replace wide
beam incandescent reflector lamps. - Draft Criteria 4/15/03Scope This ENERGY
STAR CFL Criteria covers the requirements for
self-ballasted, screw-based CFL and lamp systems,
including - A. Medium-based, compact fluorescent lamps with
integral electronic ballasts - B. Circline lamps with a maximum diameter of 9
inches and square lamps, with a maximum side
length of 8 inches with medium base electronic
ballasts that are tested and packaged with the
lamp. - C. Medium-based compact fluorescent lamps with
integral electronic ballasts, which have a
translucent cover over the bare fluorescent tube.
The cover may be globe, bullet, pear, torpedo, or
any other shape. - D. Medium-based compact fluorescent lamps with
integral electronic ballasts, which have a
reflector that may be open or enclosed. The lamp
shall be primarily intended to replace wide beam
incandescent reflector lamps.
16ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaReference
Standards Page 4
17ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
EFFICACY LEVELSEfficacy Levels in 3/15/03 draft
remain the same as current criteria.
18ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
19ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
- 1,000-HOUR LUMEN MAINTENANCE
20ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
- CORRELATED COLOR TEMPERATURE
21ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
- LUMEN MAINTENANCE AT 40 OF RATED LIFE
22ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPhotometric
Requirements Page 5
23ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaElectrical
Requirements Page 6
4/15/03 Draft Text Per ANSI/IEEE C62.41,
Category A, 7 strikesNote one failure to meet
7 strikes will result in test failure and
therefore, failure to meet the Criteria. Sample
SizeA minimum of five (5) lamps tested in the
base up position unless the product is labeled as
a position-restricted by the manufacturer. If
position restricted, test lamps in specified
position Must be unique sample for this test
only. Laboratory RequirementUse NVLAP or A2LA4
accredited labs.
Current Specification Text Per ANSI/IEEE C62.41,
Category A, 7 strikes Sample SizeA minimum of
five (5) lamps tested in the base up position
unless the product is labeled as a
position-restricted by the manufacturer. If
position restricted, test lamps in specified
position. Must be unique sample for this test
only. Laboratory RequirementUse NVLAP or A2LA4
accredited labs or manufacturer may self test and
self certify.
24ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
Current Specification TextAt least 12 months
from date ofpurchase, and an 800 number, or
address for consumer complaint resolution.
25ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
- LABELING/PRODUCT PACKAGING INFORMATION
26ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
- CFL/INCANDESCENT EQUIVLANCY9
27ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
- CFL/INCANDESCENT EQUIVLANCY9
- 9 If displaying an incandescent equivalence for
commonly used A-shaped bulbs, the CFLs initial
luminous flux must meet the following levels.
The table shows typical luminous flux for
A-shaped, soft white, incandescent bulbs. Based
on research conducted by NLPIP, luminous flux
varies considerably among bulbs. The table below
is intended to aid in consumer choice and in no
way supercedes or replaces any requirement for
product performance contained in this
specification. - If the luminous flux falls outside of the range,
either do not display an incandescent equivalence
or display the lower incandescent wattage
equivalence. - IF displaying an incandescent equivalent for
Globe, Reflector, or Decorative type bulbs, the
initial luminous flux for both the CFL and the
appropriate Globe, Reflector, or Decorative
incandescent bulb must be displayed side by side
in a comparison panel, along with the wattage
ratings for both the CFL and incandescent bulb.
28ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
- CFL/INCANDESCENT EQUIVALANCY TABLE
29ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
30ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
31ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLifetime
Performance Requirements Page 7
- AVERAGE RATED LAMP LIFE TEST
32ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaCertification
Page 8
- Current Specification Text
Manufacturers shall certify that ENERGY STAR
qualified compact fluorescent lamps and lamp
systems sold using the ENERGY STAR label
have1) Been tested and third party listed to
UL Standard 1993 by a Nationally Recognized
Testing Laboratory (NRTL) accredited by
Occupational, Safety, and Health Administration
(OSHA),2) Met the manufacturers declared
performance criteria,3) Meet or exceed the
minimum performance criteria contained in this
ENERGY STAR specification for the characteristics
shown above.
4/15/03 Draft TextManufacturers shall certify
that ENERGY STAR qualified compact fluorescent
lamps sold using the ENERGY STAR label have1)
Been tested and third party listed to UL Standard
1993 for Self-Ballasted Lamps and Lamp Adapters
by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory
(NRTL) accredited by Occupational, Safety, and
Health Administration (OSHA),2) Meet the
manufacturers declared performance and use
criteria that is found on the packaging,3) Meet
or exceed the minimum performance criteria
contained in this ENERGY STAR Specification for
the characteristics shown above.
33ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaQualification
Process Page 8-9
Current Specification TextAlternative 1 Full
Qualification. Manufacturer may submit, up
front, all data indicating that a new or
previously tested, listed, or labeled model meets
the specification.Alternative 2 Early Labeling.
This alternative requires three testing stages,
Initial, Interim, and Full qualification, but
allows the manufacturer to label the model after
pre-qualification testing results have been
verified.
- 4/15/03 Draft TextManufacturers can submit
their CFL for ENERGY STAR qualification by the
following 2-step procedure - Initial Qualification (submission of all tests up
to 40 of rated life)- Full Qualification
(submission of completed average rated lamp life
test)
34ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaPrivate
Labeling Products Page 9
35ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLabeling
Product Packaging Review Page 9
36ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaLabeling
Product Packaging Review Page 9
4/15/03 Draft Text Packaging Addition Commercial
packaging of products - Qualified CFL products
that will be bulk packaged for commercial sales
must submit a package proof for the container
that the qualified products will be shipped in
and that clearly displays all of the required
criteria to fulfill the packaging requirements
for ENERGY STAR. Note Those partners found
distributing qualified CFL products in
unidentified packaging or white boxes will be
contacted immediately and may immediately have
that specific model unqualified from the program.
37ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaQuality
Assurance/Retirement of Products Page 10
38ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaQuality
Assurance/Retirement of Products Page 10
- CLARIFICATIONS FROM 12/12/02 VERSION
- Should a product be unqualified, or de-listed,
the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer must
cease use of the ENERGY STAR logo on the models
packaging, products web site, and other
marketing materials. Partners found with
unqualified product out in the market still
identified as ENERGY STAR will receive a logo use
violation letter and may face the possible
termination of the partners Partnership
Agreement. - Removed When a product is unqualified, the
partner has a 60-day grace period from the date
of notice to complete any utility or Regional
Energy-Efficiency Program Sponsor (REPS) rebate
program, or begin to phase out the specific model
from any utility or REPS rebate if special deal
promotion will run longer than 60 days. The
partner is responsible for resolving any
resulting issues with retailers and REPS after
this 60-day grace period has ended. - ? Result No grace period means once a model is
identified as unqualified, then it is
unqualified, no questions asked.
39ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaQuality
Assurance/Retirement of Products Page 10
- ADDITION FROM 12/12/02 VERSION
- Retirement/Discontinuation of Products Partners
who are discontinuing or retiring a model need to
submit to their ENERGY STAR account
representative a formal letter stating the
specific date this model will be out of the
marketplace so it can be identified on the
qualified product list as unqualified, since it
will no longer be available.
40ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaEffective
Date Page 10
Current Specification Text The effective date
for the Energy Star Program Requirements for CFLs
is October 1, 2001, and replaces all previous
versions. At this time, manufacturers that
qualified products that meet the former
specification must submit average rated life and
lumen maintenance data by their 18-month due date
or by July 1, 2002 (whichever date comes first)
in order to remain qualified. Manufacturers that
have received full Energy Star qualification
prior to October 1, 2001, will be considered in
compliance with the new Specification and
therefore, do not need to submit any new testing
data.
- 4/15/03 Draft Text
- The effective date for the ENERGY STAR Program
Requirements for CFLs will be determined at a
later date and replaces all previous versions.
On TBD, those partners who qualified products
based on the older version of the CFL Criteria
and have outstanding test data still due will be
required to continue testing based on issued due
dates they received in their initial
qualification letter. Any partner who fails to
submit test data according to their due dates for
specific model(s) will have their products
immediately removed from the qualified product
list for failure to complete the full
qualification process. - At this time, partners who have products that
have met full qualification under the former
Criteria and received a full qualification from
ENERGY STAR will remain qualified.
41ENERGY STAR CFL Eligibility CriteriaEffective
Date Page 10
- Suggested Timing of new Criteria Roll-out
- Official Comments due to DOE by May 16th
- DOE Review of comments through May 31st
- 3rd and final draft criteria distributed on June
2nd - Effective Date October 1, 2003
- Models still in process of testing would follow
older criteria version complete their
submission process - Other thoughts?
42ENERGY STAR CFL CriteriaNext Steps
- Overview of the topics discussed during this
meeting will be developed and distributed to all
partners for their use - Any official partner and stakeholder comments can
be submitted to DOE by May 31th to - Richard Karney, Richard.karney_at_ee.doe.gov
- Ron Lewis, Ronald.lewis_at_ee.doe.gov
- Susan Gardner, sgardner_at_drintl.com
- After review of this meetings discussion and
official comments, the 3rd draft criteria
distributed the first week of June - DOE may follow-up with specific partners and/or
stakeholders if further clarification or
additional information is needed to finalize part
of the version of the criteria