History: AD Artillery Transformation Negative PY Growth

1
History AD Artillery TransformationNegative PY
Growth

• 22 Dec 2004 66 PYs Harvested by VCDS
• 15 Sept 2005 101 PYs Harvested by CLS to fuel
  Army Transformation
• 01 April 2007 Addition of 46 PYs to form 5
  ASCCs
• 01 April 2007 44 PYs Harvested from Arty School

2
SO WHATAD Arty
Bty HQs FSCC BCs Party FOO/FAC Parties
1st LoO
UAVSTA
LocSTA
2nd LoO
Bty HQs FSCC BCs Party FOO/FAC Parties
Strategic Reserve
3
PY Risk/Investment Analysis (based on 43 PY
investment)
4
4 Air Defence Regt as of 1 Apr 08

• Apr 08 Expansion
• Bde and BG ASCCs

GBAD
Wksp
GBAD
BG ASCC
GBAD
BG ASCC
BG ASCC
GBAD
GBAD
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
GBAD
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
GBAD
5
4 Air Defence Regt as of 1 Apr 09 Build (14PYs)
GBAD
Wksp
GBAD
BG ASCC
GBAD
BG ASCC
BG ASCC
GBAD
GBAD
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
GBAD
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
Bde ASCC
GBAD

• Apr 09 Expansion
• Complete Build of BG ASCCs 14 PYs
• Build Sigs into Regt 14 Army PYs
• - 14 PYs needed for FY 09 Expansion
• - 14 Army Pys needed for FY 09 Expansion

6
Summary of AD Gaps Post FY 09

• 7th 9th BG ASCCs (5)
• 3rd GBAD Tp (12)
• CSS Tp of GBAD Bty (8)
• SIGs (0) if built in 09

Note Theses figures are a ROM and not all
inclusive
7
Build 1 - Force 2011
LCDP
Build 2 3

• Position LF for success Year 2 of a 5 year
  build
• Step 1 Reg F Field Force Optimization analysis
  
• 7 Sep 07 AC approved Build 1 Position
  (rebalance)
• - Transform Cold War structure
• - Make difficult choices
• - Re-prioritize CF Expansion investment
• Expeditionary FG Output used as the foundation
  for conducting Fd Force FG Base analysis
• - Sustainable capacities determined (Major LoO,
  Surge LoO, and Spike LoO
• - Threshold / Risk analysis conducted by all
  Corps / Branches

• Build 2 Force 2016 - Align
• - Capability/Effects Integration
• - JIMP Enabled
• - Optimization of the Foundation Army
• - Land Warfare COE
• - Build War Winning capabilities
• Build 3 Force 2021 Transform
• - Land ops capabilities integrated with Maritime
  and Air capabilities
• - Integrated JIMP Formations
• - Integrated BG Structures
• - Integrated Sp Structures

Build 1
Existing Reg F Fd Force Demands
Projected Res F Field Force Demands

• Depiction of the LF Long Term CD Plan
• 3X Build transition Build 1 - Position Build 2
  - Align Build 3 - Transform
• Illustrates transition over time through
  Capability Objectives articulated in the LCDP
• Builds 2 3 Capability Objectives are
  conceptual, Build 1 (Force 2011) is informed by
  Lessons Learned, Experimentation but restricted
  by resource constraints
• Synchronization with a new Defence Strategy
  could require changes to Land FG Output and
  potentially Land FG structures

• Increase Reserve Force manning by 3000 in the
  next 4X years
• Increase reserve Force manning by a further 2000
  in the next 9X years

X9
X3
Pioneers
X9
Assault
LRPRS
X4
GS
STA
IO / IA
Projected Foundation Army Demands

• Uncommitted CLS flexibility to affect change for
  the remainder of Build 1
• - 220 PYs
• - 7B

EW
XX
X4
X
LFDTS
Revised FG Output
ASC
X4
X
(Army part of ASIC)
ASG
New Enduring Demands
Internal to LF
External to LF
CBRN
JTF II
CSOR
Close Obsn
ASF
HUMINT
8
Build 1 - Force 2011
LCDP
Build 2 3

• Build 2 Force 2016 - Align
• - Capability/Effects Integration
• - JIMP Enabled
• - Optimization of the Foundation Army
• - Land Warfare COE
• - Build War Winning capabilities
• Build 3 Force 2021 Transform
• - Land ops capabilities integrated with Maritime
  and Air capabilities
• - Integrated JIMP Formations
• - Integrated BG Structures
• - Integrated Sp Structures

• Position LF for success Year 2 of a 5 year
  build
• Step 1 Reg F Field Force Optimization analysis
  
• 7 Sep 07 AC approved Build 1 Position
  (rebalance)
• - Transform Cold War structure
• - Make difficult choices
• - Re-prioritize CF Expansion investment
• Expeditionary FG Output used as the foundation
  for conducting Fd Force FG Base analysis
• - Sustainable capacities determined (Major LoO,
  Surge LoO, and Spike LoO
• - Threshold / Risk analysis conducted by all
  Corps / Branches

Build 1
Existing Reg F Fd Force Demands
Projected Res F Field Force Demands

• Depiction of the LF Long Term CD Plan
• 3X Build transition Build 1 - Position Build 2
  - Align Build 3 - Transform
• Illustrates transition over time through
  Capability Objectives articulated in the LCDP
• Builds 2 3 Capability Objectives are
  conceptual, Build 1 (Force 2011) is informed by
  Lessons Learned, Experimentation but restricted
  by resource constraints
• Synchronization with a new Defence Strategy
  could require changes to Land FG Output and
  potentially Land FG structures

• Increase Reserve Force manning by 3000 in the
  next 4X years
• Increase reserve Force manning by a further 2000
  in the next 9X years

X9
X3
Pioneers
X9
Assault
LRPRS
X4
GS
STA
IO / IA
Projected Foundation Army Demands

• Uncommitted CLS flexibility to affect change for
  the remainder of Build 1
• - 220 PYs
• - 7B

EW
XX
X4
X
LFDTS
Revised FG Output
ASC
X4
X
(Army part of ASIC)
ASG
New Enduring Demands
Internal to LF
External to LF
CBRN
JTF II
CSOR
Close Obsn
ASF
HUMINT
9
Whats newlots
10
Arty Transformation Intermediate Obj 2010Fd Arty
2010 BUILD based on alloc of - FD (100Pys).
- Factors M777s MRR Rkts Plan Balanced
Growth across all capabilities Build remaining
elms of 3rd gun tp and reinforce Gun
Dets
11
Arty Transformation Intermediate Obj 2010AD Arty
2010 BUILD based on alloc of AD (25 PYs).
Factors Incoming future capabilities Plan
Balanced Growth / Complete Build of BG ASCCs and
3rd Tp
12
Campaign Plan
2008 Short-Term Objectives
2010 Mid-term Objectives
2012 Mid-term Objectives
2014 Long-term Objectives
Define AMD
ACT GAP
Sustain ADATS
1
3
Disengage from TUAV
Man MMR who?
2
2b
Disengage MUAV
Man SUAV
2a
Man SUAV (GCS only) who?
Build to Rule of 9s
TAC GPS
Sustain
Build 10 FAC/FOO
2
1
Army Experimental BG
GUN BTYS
Transition to FIFC
Digitize the Force LIFD / FOO-FAC
Modernization
5
5
4
4a
3
LRPRS (up to 17)
LWTH (25 more)
2 leased guns arr
Reinforce STA FAC SME capability Sp FD work
MMR and Rockets
Sustain
2
3
4
Train MUAV SUAV
Train MMR
13
AIMExamine the 2011 Arty Tx plan with a view to
determining the best FG structure in view of
incoming capabilities and FEC
14
Assumptions

• No PY growth for incoming capabilities
• CLS wants an AD ACT Capability
• The CLS rule of 9 is the guiding principle
• Res Force FG capability not to exceed 15

15
FACTORS

• Migrate select capabilities to Res
• Nature of future conflicts (MIC / COIN)
• Residual GBAD capability
• CLS approved force structure
• Ability of structure to react to
  change/sustainability
• New UOR Capabilities LCMR, HALO, SUAV
• Incoming capabilities
• Med Rge Radar
• Rockets
• Time expiring capabilities
• Unit manning pressures