NEUROMUSCULAR COUNCIL CONSENSUS STATEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

NEUROMUSCULAR COUNCIL CONSENSUS STATEMENT

Description:

... between puberty and 60 ... with generalized MG between puberty and 60 years will benefit ... in younger children with ages ranging from 1 year to puberty. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: annad8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NEUROMUSCULAR COUNCIL CONSENSUS STATEMENT


1
NEUROMUSCULAR COUNCIL CONSENSUS STATEMENT
  • THYMECTOMY FOR NONTHYMOMATOUS AUTOIMMUNE
  • MYASTHENIA GRAVIS PATIENTS

2
Introduction
3
  • Through the years many neurologists have
    favored the use of thymectomy in the management
    of patients with nonthymomatous autoimmune
    myasthenia gravis (MG). This wide acceptance is
    based largely upon case series and retrospective
    studies which have suggested that thymectomy may
    be beneficial. However, many of these studies
    have shown variable results. Moreover, the
    absence of controlled, prospective trials casts
    some doubt regarding effectiveness of the
    procedure in this group of patients. Thus, until
    the results of an ongoing international,
    prospective, single blind randomized trial
    controlling for medical therapy become available,
    the use of thymectomy in this situation remains
    controversial.

4
  • In the local medical centers where thymectomy
    is being performed, no standard guidelines in the
    selection of patients and the pre- and
    post-operative management have been created. This
    necessitates the formulation of such guidelines.

5
Objectives
6
General Objective
  • The Neuromuscular Council of the Philippine
    Neurological Association aims to improve outcomes
    for MG patients by providing the initial
    framework for decision-making for neurologists
    with regard to the patient diagnosed with
    nonthymomatous autoimmune MG who is a candidate
    for thymectomy.

7
Specific Objective
  • To develop a combined evidence- and
    consensus-based practice parameter to guide
    neurologists in managing patients diagnosed with
    nonthymomatous autoimmune myasthenia gravis who
    can be candidates for thymectomy.

8
Methodology
9
Group Composition
  • The working group is composed of the members of
    the Neuromuscular Council of the PNA.

Dr. Lina Renales Dr. Rosalia Teleg Dr.
Valmarie Estrada Dr. Darwin Dasig Dr. Emmanuel
Eduardo Dr. Alejandro Diaz Dr. Raymond
Rosales Dr. Jose Paciano Reyes Dr. Ludwig
Damian Dr. Marita Dantes
10
Consensus Process
  • The initial draft of the consensus statement
    was a synthesis of the survey, identification of
    the key clinical issues, output of literature
    search using Medline and the local registry and
    academic deliberation by the working group over
    the identified key issues. Deliberation included
    appraisal of the literature in terms of validity
    and applicability, preparation of evidence-based
    summaries and development of judgments by
    consensus. This is to be followed by presentation
    of the statements in a public forum composed of
    the PNA fellows.

11
Disclaimer
  • The assessment and recommendations provided
    herein represent the best professional judgment
    of the working group at this time, based on
    research data gathered and on expertise currently
    available. The conclusions and recommendations
    will be regularly assessed as new information
    becomes available. The consensus statement is
    intended to be an educational guideline and is
    therefore neither rigidly prescriptive nor
    restrictive.

12
Key Clinical Issues Addressed
13
  • Should thymectomy for nonthymomatous myasthenia
    gravis be recommended?
  • What is the clinical profile of nonthymomatous
    autoimmune MG patients likely to benefit from
    thymectomy?
  • When is the ideal time to perform thymectomy?

14
  • What is the preferred thymectomy technique to
    use?
  • What is the recommended pre-operative management?
  • What is the recommended post-operative management?

15
Consensus Proper
16
QUESTION 1
  • Should thymectomy for nonthymomatous autoimmune
    myasthenia gravis be recommended?

17
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • For patients with nonthymomatous autoimmune MG,
    thymectomy is recommended as an option to
    increase the probability of remission or
    improvement (Level 2 evidence).
  • Research Recommendation
  • There is a need to conduct a well-designed,
    prospective, controlled study to evaluate
    clinical effectiveness of thymectomy in
    nonthymomatous, autoimmune myasthenia gravis
    patients that utilize comparison with
    standardized medical therapy and well-defined
    evaluation standards.

18
B. Summary of Evidence
  • To address the uncertainty of the usefulness of
    thymectomy in nonthymomatous autoimmune MG
    because of the lack of prospective and controlled
    studies, the working group utilized the
    systematic review done by the American Academy of
    Neurology.1 Their review of 28 articles (Class
    II evidence 2) published from 1953 to 1998
    describing outcome in 21 MG cohorts revealed the
    following observations

19
  • Positive associations in most studies between
    thymectomy and MG remission and improvement with
    median rates of 2.1 for medication-free
    remission, 1.6 for asymptomatic group and 1.7 for
    improvement
  • Confounding differences in baseline
    characteristics of prognostic importance between
    thymectomy and nonthymectomy groups in all
    studies

20
  • Persistent positive associations between
    thymectomy and improved outcomes after
    controlling for single confounding variables such
    as age, gender and severity of MG
  • Conflicting associations between thymectomy and
    improved MG outcomes in studies controlling for
    multiple confounding variables simultaneously.

21
  • They concluded that it cannot be determined
    from available studies whether the observed
    association between thymectomy and improved MG
    outcome was a result of thymectomy benefit or was
    merely a result of multiple differences in
    baseline characteristics. Thus, the benefit of
    thymectomy in nonthymomatous autoimmune MG has
    not been established conclusively.

22
QUESTION 2
  • What is the clinical profile of nonthymomatous
    autoimmune MG patients most likely to benefit
    from thymectomy?

23
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • The candidate most likely to benefit is the
    patient with all of the following attributes
    (Level 2 evidence)
  • generalized MG
  • age between puberty and 60 years and
  • positive titers for anti-Acetylcholine Receptor
    Antibody (anti-AChR Ab) when applicable
  • female gender

24
  • Research Recommendation
  • There is a need to conduct a well-designed
    prospective, controlled study to evaluate
    clinical outcome after thymectomy with respect to
    the disease variables (e.g. grade or severity of
    the illness, age of the patient, gender, duration
    of the disease, etc.), treating these variables
    singly or in combination.

25
B. Summary of Evidence
  • Gender
  • Women have been reported to have a better
    outcome than men after thymectomy
  • Age
  • There is general consensus that patients with
    generalized MG between puberty and 60 years will
    benefit from thymectomy.
  • Most MG experts advocate cutoff ages ranging
    between 50 to 70 years with median at 60 years.
  • Thymectomy has been performed with favorable
    results in childhood. Procedure, however,
    remains controversial in younger children with
    ages ranging from 1 year to puberty.

26
  • Clinical Severity
  • Patient subgroup analysis in one study indicated
    that only those patients with MG with moderate
    weakness or greater (Osserman 2B3 / MGFNA4 )
    showed significant improvement after thymectomy
    compared with control subjects. Results, however,
    were confounded by baseline patient differences
    across groups.
  • The studies reviewed did not include patients
    with pure ocular MG.
  • Severe patients who underwent thymectomy had
    better prognosis compared with severe patients
    who did not.

27
  • Duration of Disease
  • No data have been gathered as yet regarding
    measurement of outcome after controlling for
    single confounding variable like duration of
    disease (whether within 1-2 years from onset or
    beyond 2 years from onset).
  • No conclusive data likewise are available
    associating improved MG outcome with thymectomy
    after controlling for multiple confounding
    variables.

28
QUESTION 3
  • When is the ideal time to perform thymectomy?

29
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • Thymectomy is best performed within 1 to 2
    years from the time of diagnosis provided that
    the patient has achieved
  • optimal muscle strength and
  • optimal medical condition
  • adequate cardio-pulmonary functions (Level 2
    evidence)

30
  • Research Recommendation
  • There is a need to conduct a well-designed
    prospective, controlled study to evaluate
    clinical outcome after thymectomy with respect to
    the timing of surgery.

31
B. Summary of Evidence
  • Some authors suggested that benefits from
    thymectomy were achieved more readily the earlier
    the surgery was done, with larger remission rates
    per unit time (Class III evidence). However, it
    has been postulated that this may be solely due
    to non-linear rate at which MG patients achieve
    remission after diagnosis. This means that for a
    given duration of time, MG patients are more
    likely to remit earlier than later.

32
QUESTION 4
  • What is the preferred thymectomy technique to
    use?

33
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • Properly performed total thymectomy using the
    Extended Transsternal Approach may provide the
    greatest resection with low morbidity and less
    risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (Level
    2 evidence).
  • Research Recommendation
  • There is a need to conduct a well-designed
    prospective, controlled study to evaluate
    clinical outcome after thymectomy with respect to
    the different thymectomy technique.

34
B. Summary of Evidence
  • The report of the Quality Standards Committee
    of the American Academy of Neurology1 concluded
    that the outcome comparisons between uncontrolled
    studies do not provide conclusive evidence of the
    superiority of one technique over another. This
    was due to the numerous confounding differences
    in patients baseline characteristics and new
    confounders (institutional, geographic and
    historical differences).

35
  • Likewise, controlled trials reviewed failed to
    provide convincing evidences that one technique
    was superior, again due to the confounding
    differences and inconsistent results. Moreover,
    operative techniques employed were either not
    identified or limited to standard transsternal
    and basic transcervical thymectomy.

36
  • The review of the retrospective studies3 that
    was published after the AAN Guidelines
    publication concluded that the studies had
    conflicting results and had many confounding
    variables such as patient population,
    accompanying therapy, details of evaluation,
    extreme variability and unpredictability of MG,
    variability of selection of patients for
    thymectomy and immunesuppressives drugs after
    surgery. The need for properly designed
    prospective trials or a non-randomized
    prospective study of two or more techniques
    remains.

37
  • In a separate article4 ,Jaretzski had written
    that the more complete the thymic resection, the
    better the outcome.
  • A retrospective trial comparing the late
    results of basic transsternal and extended
    transsternal thymectomies5 revealed that complete
    remission rates were significantly higher in the
    extended group at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years follow-up
    (Level 2 evidence). Negative results (no
    improvement, deterioration or death from MG) were
    significantly lower in the extended thymectomy
    group. The difference was postulated to be due to
    the removal of ectopic foci of thymic tissue from
    the neck and mediastinum.

38
  • Mantegazza et.al. performed a prospective,
    uncontrolled trial comparing video-assisted
    thoracoscopic extended thymectomy (VATET) and
    T3-B operative techniques6 and concluded that
    VATET seems to be effective in inducing complete
    stable remission similar to T-3B TS approach
    (Level _ evidence). VATET had the advantage of
    being easier to perform and having lower
    morbidity and negligible esthetic sequelae.

39
QUESTION 5
  • What is the recommended pre-operative management?

40
A. Consensus Statement
  • The objective of a pre-operative management is
    to ensure that there will be careful selection of
    patients for thymectomy to optimize its long term
    benefits. The patients must be in optimum
    medical condition prior to surgery to avoid or
    minimize intraoperative and post-operative
    complications.
  • Management in the peri-operative period
    requires a concerted effort among the
    neurologist, thoracic surgeon, pulmonologist and
    other internists, the anesthesiologist and the
    physiatrist.

41
Practice Recommendation
  • 5.1 What are the steps to follow during
    pre-operative management?
  • 1. Perform a thorough neurologic evaluation and
    clearance Ensure that the patient has optimum
    muscle power. When appropriate, correct
    oropharyngeal, bulbar and respiratory muscle
    weakness using the following regimen
  • anti-cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine,
    neostigmine) and/or any of the following
  • corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone)

42
  • c) other immunosuppressants when these become
    necessary. Use of these, however, may require
    several weeks to a several months before optimum
    therapeutic benefit is obtained.
  • d) plasmapheresis or intravenous immune-globulin,
    when applicable, in patients with moderate to
    severe bulbar and respiratory muscle weakness or
    in patients with a high titer of
    anti-Acetylcholine Receptor antibodies.

43
5.1
  • 2. Acquire adequate pulmonary evaluation and
    clearance to assure presence of patent airways,
    optimum respiratory muscle power, adequate
    clearing of secretions and absence of respiratory
    infection.The following pre-operative tests are
    recommended
  • a) chest x-ray
  • b) arterial blood gases

44
  • c) pulmonary function test (including VC, FEV,
    MEF, flow-volume loop) and exercise testing (with
    6-8 hours off anticholinesterase inhibitor e.g.
    Mestinon)
  • d) sputum G/S, C/S when necessary
  • e) chest CT scan when necessary
  • f) perfusion studies when necessary

45
5.1
  • Perform cardiac evaluation as follows
  • a) basic tests ECG, chest x-ray
  • b) complete cardiology evaluation and
    clearance if
  • - the patient is 40 years old or above
  • - if patient has history of ischemic
    heart disease or other cardiac problems or
    risks for developing cardiac problems.

46
  • c) 2D echocardiography when
    necessary
  • d) stress test when necessary
  • e) nuclear medical tests when
    necessary

47
5.1
  • Search for and adequately treat concomitant
    medical conditions
  • a) Infection
  • b) Disorders associated with MG. Do the
    following tests
  • - ESR
  • - thyroid function tests
  • - blood sugar
  • - ANA
  • - rheumatoid factor
  • c) Disturbance in nutrition, fluids and
    electrolytes

48
5.1
  • 5. Check CBC and bleeding parameters (CT, BT,
    PT, PTT).
  • 6. Refer to Rehabilitation Medicine specialist
    to assure good pulmonary capacity and adequate
    muscle tone.
  • 7. Consider drug effects and drug interactions.
  • If the patient is on medications, ensure that
    there are no side effects of these drugs or
    adverse drug reactions that may interfere with or
    complicate the intra- and post-operative course
    of the patient (Refer to Table on Drug Effects
    and Interactions ).

49
Practice Recommendation
  • 5.2 What is the recommended anesthetic
    management?
  • 1. Anesthesiologists must consider the patients
    disease severity including
  • - voluntary and respiratory muscle strength
  • - ability to protect and maintain patent airway
    post-operatively
  • - the type of surgical procedure and the
    surgeons preferences
  • - patients ongoing medication (e.g. Mestinon
    and steroids).

50
5.2
  • 2. For pre-operative medications
  • Generally, anxiolytics, sedatives and
    opioids are rarely given to patients with
    little respiratory reserve.
  • Small dose benzodiazepines, when necessary,
    may be given to patients with good respiratory
    reserve.

51
5.2
  • 3. Choice of anesthetic agents
  • The anesthesiologist must confer with the
    neurologist and the surgeon and other
    specialists when needed.
  • There are several anesthetic agents that can be
    used (see Table on Anesthetic Agents).
  • There is no anesthetic technique that is
    superior to others. Choice depends on preference
    of the doctors. These techniques have included

52
  • Avoidance of muscle relaxants and use of potent
    inhaled anesthetics both for facilitating
    tracheal intubation and providing relaxation for
    surgery.
  • Titration of small doses of intermediate acting
    relaxants to the evoked EMG.
  • Use of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).
  • Use of local or regional anesthetic techniques.
  • The decision whether to reverse residual NM
    blockade at the end of surgery or to wait for
    spontaneous recovery and extubate when patient
    demonstrates adequate parameters for extubation
    remains controversial.

53
5.2
  • There is need to monitor patients especially
    noting interactions of the anesthetic agents
    with other drugs and keeping in mind the
    variable responses the myasthenic patients may
    have to the anesthetic drugs.

54
Practice Recommendation
  • 5.3 Should pyridostigmine be continued or
    discontinued pre-operatively?

55
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • Pyridostigmine or other anticholinesterase may
    be continued pre-operatively if the patient
    derives improved muscle strength with its use.
    The following guidelines are recommended
  • 1. To allow a decrease in the blood level
    pre-operatively, give pyridostigmine or
    anticholinesterase 4 to 6 hours pre-operatively.
    In this way, it will not interfere with the
    anesthetic. Pyridostigmine may be resumed
    post-operatively.
  • 2. Pyridostigmine may cause increase in oral
    and tracheal secretions especially in intubated
    patients. This can be titrated to avoid or
    minimize problems in post-operative pulmonary
    toilet.

56
B. Summary of Evidence
  • Omitting pyridostigmine pre-operatively may
    reduce the need for muscle relaxant as well as
    lessen the effect of ester anesthetic agents.
    However, the omission of the pyridostigmine on
    the day of surgery predisposed myasthenic
    patients to the possibility of respiratory
    discomfort and sensitivity to vecuronium.7 (Class
    I evidence)

57
Practice Recommendation
  • 5.4 Should corticosteroids be continued or
    discontinued pre- and peri- operatively?

58
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • Steroids should be continued pre-operatively in
    steroid-dependent patients.

59
B. Summary of Evidence
  • Steroid-dependent patients have the possibility
    of developing post-operative deterioration or
    crisis so that they will require pre- and
    peri-operative coverage.8 (Level 2 evidence)
  • Steroids also decrease dose of non-depolarizing
    relaxants to which myasthenic patients are highly
    sensitive.

60
QUESTION 6
  • What is the recommended post-operative
    management?

61
A. Consensus Statement
  • Practice Recommendation
  • 6.1 Closely monitor at Post-Anesthesia Care Unit
    or Surgical Intensive Care Unit
    Respiratory support can be immediately
    instituted
  • 6.2 Predict as accurately as possible the best
    time to extubate based on
  • - Pre-operative condition of the patient
  • - Surgical technique used

62
6.2
  • - Residual anesthetic effect
  • - Parameters for weaning include absence of
    crisis triggers, objective findings showing
    adequate muscle power, vital capacity 10
    ml/kg, negative inspiratory force 20 cm
    water, positive expiratory force 40 cm
    water.

63
Practice Recommendation
  • 6.3 Predict as accurately as possible the need
    for post-operative mechanical ventilation based
    on
  • - Pre-operative condition of the patient
  • - Surgical technique used
  • - Residual anesthetic effect
  • - Parameters Kaneda 1995/Eisenkraft
    1986/or Leventhal 1980

64
Practice Recommendation
  • 6.4 Maintain adequate post-operative pain
    control.
  • Avoid muscle relaxants and tranquilizing drugs.
  • 6.5 Maintain adequate pulmonary toilet and
    physical therapy
  • 6.6 Avoid or use very cautiously drugs
    interfering with neuro-muscular transmission
    (Refer to Table on Drugs Acting on NM Junction))

65
Practice Recommendation
  • 6.7 Determine the best time to resume
    pyridostigmine/anticholinesterase and
    steroids/immunesuppressants and the appropriate
    dose, considering that
  • - Anticholinesterases can keep muscle power
    at adequate levels.
  • - Anticholinesterases can increase oral and
    tracheal secretions.
  • - Steroid-dependent patients will need
    immediate post-operative coverage.

66
Thank you very much!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com