Title: Nigel Paneth MD MPH
1The National Childrens StudyScientific
Potential and Scientific Challenges
- Nigel Paneth MD MPH
- Pediatric Grand Rounds
- University of Wisconsin
- Madison, WI
- April 3, 2009
2THE CHARGE FROM CONGRESS PL 106-310. Childrens
Health Act of 2000
- The Director of NICHD shall establish a
consortium from appropriate Federal agencies
(including the CDC and EPA) to - (1) plan, develop, and implement a prospective
longitudinal study, from birth to adulthood, to
evaluate the effects of both chronic and
intermittent exposures on child health and human
development and - (2) investigate basic mechanisms of developmental
disorders and environmental factors, both risk
and protective, that influence health and
developmental processes.
3THE RESPONSEThe National Childrens Study
- The NCS is a longitudinal study of a nationally
representative sample of 100,000 children, their
families, and their environment from before birth
through age 21. - It is the largest longitudinal study of
childrens health and development ever conducted
in the U.S. - It may be the largest study combining all forms
of measurement in depth (self-report, clinical
examinations, biological samples) ever conducted
on any human population.
4WHY ARE PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL STUDIES SO
VALUABLE?
- If we know what happens to people before disease
develops, we can figure out what causes disease
and how disease can be prevented. - The Framingham Heart Study followed healthy
adults for many years, and taught us that factors
such as high blood pressure, diabetes, smoking
and high cholesterol predispose to heart disease.
- Applying those lessons has led to a 60 reduction
in the heart disease death rate, a 42 reduction
in the overall death rate, and an extra 9 years
of life over the past 50 years in the US. - The US needs a Framingham for kids!
5Consequence of Framingham Incidence of Coronary
Heart Disease, USA, 1950-2000 (age-adjusted)
6WHAT IS BEING STUDIED?
7SOME STUDY QUESTIONS
- How is asthma incidence and severity influenced
by the interaction of early life infection and
air quality? - Do assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
increase the risk of fetal growth restriction,
birth defects, and developmental disabilities? - Does impaired maternal glucose metabolism during
pregnancy cause obesity in children? - How does high level exposure to media content in
infancy affect development and behavior in
children? - Does pre-and post-natal exposure to
endocrine-active environmental agents alter age
at onset, duration, and completion of puberty?
8DATA TO BE COLLECTED PRIOR TO BIRTH
- Study begins with a home visit prior to
conception (when possible) or in the first
trimester of pregnancy - Two additional clinic visits and three phone
contacts during pregnancy. - In one of the clinic visits, a third trimester
study ultrasound is obtained.
9PRE-CONCEPTIONAL OR FIRST TRIMESTER HOME VISIT
- Questionnaires Household Composition and
Demographics Perceived Stress Social Support
Family Processes Health Behaviors Diet and
Toxicant Exposure through Food Environmental
exposures - Biospecimens from both partners if available
blood, hair, urine, nail, saliva. Vaginal fluid
from woman. - Environmental samples dust, air, water, soil
- Physical measurements height, weight, skinfolds,
other anthropmetry, blood pressure
10DATA TO BE COLLECTED AT BIRTH
11DATA TO BE COLLECTED AFTER BIRTH
- Home visits at six and twelve months and frequent
phone contacts. - Further collection of biological and
environmental specimens at home visits (breast
milk, formula, baby urine) - Health surveys obtained at all visits
- Abstraction of medical records
- Continued follow-up to age 21, though full
protocol beyond age 2.5 not yet developed
12BIOLOGICAL STORAGE AND INFORMATICS
- All material collected in the study
(environmental and biological specimens) will be
stored in duplicate in two locations - After aliquotting, an estimated 32 million
specimens will be stored in the first seven years
of the study, most in vapor phase liquid nitrogen
at -150 or less. - All survey and health data collected will be
protected by the highest levels of security
13WHERE DOES THE NCS TAKE PLACE?
All Births in the Nation
4 million births in 3,141 counties
Sample of Study Locations
105 Locations
Selection of neighborhoods
Sample of Study Segments
All or a sample of households within neighborhoods
Study Households
All eligible women in the household
Study Women
147 Vanguard sites 29 Wave 1 sites 36 Wave
2 sites 15 Wave 3 sites 18 unassigned sites
TOTAL 105 SITES
15HOW ARE PARTICIPANTS ENROLLED?
- In sampled segments of counties (specific
neighborhoods selected to be representative of
the counties), all women of child-bearing age are
contacted first by mail, then phone, then in
person. - If the woman is at high risk of pregnancy or in
the first trimester, consenting and enrollment
takes place at first contact. Otherwise,
enrollment is deferred but contact is maintained
with the woman. - Surveillance of prenatal care sites is used to
detect first-trimester pregnant women from
segments. - Infants can be enrolled at birth if mother lives
in segment and was not previously enrolled.
16 WHEN DOES THE STUDY TAKE PLACE?
- Contracts for Wave 1 began September 2007, and
for Waves 2 and 3 in September 2008 - Contracts issued initially assumed a 21-month
start up period before enrollment. This has now
been stretched to 32-38 months because of three
consecutive 6-month delays. - Enrollment thus begins in 2009 in Vanguards, in
2011 2013 in the three waves. - Queens, NY and Duplin, NC Vanguard locations
began enrolling in January, 2009. Waukesha, 4
others start next month.
17WORK BEFORE ENROLLMENT
- Selection of sampling segments
- Estimating N of births to obtain 250 births per
county for each of four years - Aiming for county representativeness
- Engaging the community
- Making arrangement with hospitals and
providers - Dealing with IRBs
- Hiring and training staff
18FUNDING
- Total projected cost of study is 2.7 B - 3.1 B
over 25 y - (Human Genome 2B, WHI - 1B, over much shorter
periods) - 69 M in FY 07 budget to initiate study
- 110 M in FY 08 budget to add Wave 1 study
centers - 192 M anticipated for FY 09 to add Wave 2 study
centers - less expensive later, after pregnancy, birth
protocol is complete
19NCS AS AN INVESTMENT.CEREBAL PALSY AS AN EXAMPLE
- The prevalence of cerebral palsy has not changed
in 40 years, even though we know it has to do
with pregnancy and delivery problems. - Every year at least 8,000 children are born in
the US with CP whose lifetime medical,
rehabilitative and educational care will cost
about 10 billion dollars. - If the NCS does nothing but find a way to reduce
the prevalence of cerebral palsy by 10 it will
have paid for itself in 3 years.
20 The Michigan Alliance for the National
Childrens Study (MANCS)
21Michigans 5 NCS Study Counties
Genesee Grand Traverse Lenawee Macomb Wayne
Funded in 2008
Funded in 2007
22THE FIVE MANCS PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS
- Henry Ford Health System (HFHS)
- Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH)
- Michigan State University (MSU)
- University of Michigan (UM)
- Wayne State University (WSU) Childrens Hospital
of Michigan (CHM) - Plus the health departments of each of the
- five counties
23CHALLENGES IN CONDUCTING THE NCS
- Population-based survey research has rarely, if
ever, been combined with data collection in
clinical settings. Yet from identifying
non-pregnant women at home - Pregnancies must be identified in the first
trimester - Births must be identified when they occur in any
hospital in which a segment woman delivers - Intense, burdensome protocol
- Many IRBs to obtain consent from
- Increasing resistance to general population
medical research. Resistance from medical
providers can be a problem too.
24DIFFICULTY OF ASCERTAINING PREGNANCIES IN THE NCS
- Initial recruitment is by household recruitment
- Women aged 18 40 are stratified by risk of
pregnancy high, medium, low - High risk women have pre-conceptional visit
- Medium and low risk women telephone contact
- 50 of US pregnancies are unplanned, and will
thus emerge from the medium and low risk
categories - How will we know when a woman gets pregnant?
25PREGNANCY ASCERTAINMENT VIA PRENATAL CARE
PROVIDERS
- We cannot rely on study women contacting us to
let us know they are pregnant - Therefore, we plan surveillance in prenatal care
to identify women from the study segments - We will provide address-matching software to
clinics and providers (or an 800 number to call)
to identify women eligible for the NCS - We will then need providers to alert us to the
presence of NCS-eligible women - We also plan to provide free pregnancy testing
strips upon request, so that we can track women
as they begin to consider or to recognize
pregnancies.
26LABOR ASCERTAINMENT BY HOSPITALS
- We cannot rely on study women to let us know they
are in labor. - We will develop a system by which hospitals will
notify us if an eligible woman is admitted in
labor. - We will also develop arrangements with each
hospital to collect the required specimens - We spend a great deal of time working to bring
hospitals on board. All centers have hospital
negotiators to do this work
27HELPING WOMEN WITH THE PROTOCOL THE PARTICIPANT
ADVOCATE COORDINATOR (PAC)
- We budgeted an additional staff member, the PAC.
This is a woman from the community with
experience of pregnancy and labor issues whose
role is to assist the participant to complete the
protocol. She does not collect data (though she
may help with birth collections) - She keeps in touch with the participant reminding
her of the protocol requirements - The PAC will go with subjects to study visits,
and to LD with mother, if required - In Wayne County, we have one PAC per 30 women per
7 months (from first trimester visit to delivery)
28A MANCS IRB?
- We are trying to get a single IRB in Michigan
to review all MANCS protocols (including any
adjunct studies) - All institutions and hospitals would send
representatives to this IRB - MSUs may set this IRB up, but we are still
working out the kinks - Other four institutions have agreed to this
arrangement
29PILOT WORK WITH PREGNANT WOMEN IN GRAND RAPIDS,
MI SUMMER 2006
- Provider attitudes
- Mudd L et al MCH Journal 2008 12(6)684-91
- Attitudes of pregnant women
- Nechuta S et al Paed Perinat Epid (in press)
30PRENATAL CARE STAFF WILLINGNESS TO HELP IN NCS
31DELIVERY ROOM STAFF WILLINGNESS TO HELP IN NCS
32PRENATAL AND DELIVERY STAFF BARRIERS TO THE NCS
33PREGNANT WOMENS ACCEPTANCE OF NCS PROCEDURES
WITH AND WITHOUT COMPENSATION
34COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS KEY
- We must make sure that women know about the NCS
in our communities. - We must make sure that people women trust (health
care providers, religious and political leaders)
also know about the study. - We must make sure that women get a positive image
of the NCS. - We must make the value of the NCS to the
community is clear. - We should measure these attitudes periodically to
see how well we are doing.