Title: Family Ownership
1Family Ownership
- Empirics Bertrand, Johnson, Samphantharak
Schoar 2005 WP - Theory see Burkart, Panunzi, and Shleifer JFE
2003
2Existing empirical results
3Bertrand, Johnson, Samphantharak Schoar,
Mixing Family With Business
4Intro comments
- First look at intra-family dynamics
- Manifestation in ownership and control of family
assets - Consequences for firm performance
- Still a work in progress
- Empirics
- Difficulty in constructing maps of complex
ownership structures - Results need strengthening
- Incomplete data on births and deaths
- Theory and motivation
- Tradeoffs in inheritance decisions, see Burkart
et al. 2003 below - Cultural aspects, Brad DeLong new book chapter on
inheritance rules - Benefits and costs of family ownership
5Motivation and Contributions
- Existing
- Unique data
- First vs. greater generation owners
- Public and Private firms
- Asian crisis natural experiment
- Ingenious variables and tests
- Endogeneity problem not severe
- Potential
- Crystallize the evidence on whether family
ownership is a substitute for poor institutions
(different incentives in good and bad times)
6Anecdotes from Economist 2006
- Samsung largest, 20 of Koreas exports
- In Fall 2005 Patriarch Lee Kun-hee fled to US
over illegal political donations - Came back, publicly apologized, donated 830m
to society - Controversial transfer of control of the family
holding company to his children - HyundaiKia 75 of cars in Korea
- Patriarch Chung Ju-yung, three sons, family feud
started in 2000 - One brother Chung Mong-koo controls H. Auto
Slush finds to bribe government officials - Similar deal to transfer control to son Chung
Eui-sun - Also apologized and announced donation to
society - Second brother Mong-jun, heavy industry arm
- Third brother Mong-hun, marine and tourism arm,
suicide over passing money to North Korea
7Business group data Table 1
8Family data Table 2
9Family involvement in business 1996 excerpt of
Table 3
10Family involvement in ownership 1996 Table 4
Panel A
11Family involvement in boards 1996 Table 4 Panel B
12Firm Performance 1996 Table 5 Panel A
13Firm Performance, private vs. public, 1996 Table
5 Panel B
14Firm Performance, own. vs. control, 1996 Table 6
15Firm Performance, own. vs. control, private vs.
public, 1996 Table 7
16Excess control and family structure, 1996 Table 8
17Family Size, Group Size and Group Structure, 1996
Table 9
18Exit (by 2001) and Structure of Family Ownership
Table 10
19Exit (by 2001) and Leverage (1996) Table 11
20Firm Performance (2001) and Leverage (1996)
Table 12