Title: Folie 1
1(No Transcript)
2How to promote a healthy workforce - a
socio-economic challenge of ageing societies
- Ageing implies a growing dependence on mature
workers - The challenge ahead to raise the employment rate
of mature workers - without jeopardising productivity and economic
growth on the one hand and - without compromising the wellbeing of mature
persons on the other - The scope for raising the employability of mature
workers depends on the health of the work force,
but also on the educational attainment level, the
types of work available as well as institutional
factors - A comparison of Austria and Australia highlights
differences and similarities of the various
issues and the policy implications
3Demographic ageing and economic burden more
pronounced in Austria
- While life expectancy at birth is fairly similar
for men and women in Austria and Australia,
fertility rates have been consistenly lower in
Austria for decades (2004 1.34 vs 1.75)
contributing to a somewhat more rapid ageing
process of the population than in Australia. - Thus, the demographic burden today (population
65/population 20-64 25 vs 20) is higher as
well as the dynamics in the future. - In addition, the labour force participation rate
of mature workers is lower in Austria than in
Australia (55-64 year olds 31.7 vs 53.8, - 22
percentage points). - Thus, the economic burden of ageing is higher in
Austria due to a low activity rate of mature
workers and a generous public transfer system, in
particular old age pensions, compared to Australia
4Health issues
- The relationship between health and economic
growth deserves particular attention in the
context of an ageing society. - The challenges are to prolong the work ability
and actual employment rate of older workers and
in so doing to reduce the pressure on public
pension funds and public spending on health care.
- The percentage of people with self-assessed good
or very good health declines with age. This shows
up in a rising morbidity rate with age. - The figures for Australia are lower than the
Austrian for every age group, declining from
about 60 percent for the 25-34 year olds to just
under 50 percent and 40 percent respectively for
the 45-54 and 55-64 groups. - In spite of that, a higher proportion of mature
workers is working in Australia than in Austria.
5Decline of labour force participation with age
- The drop-off of activity rates after age 50 is
more pronounced in Austria than Australia - for men 34 percentage points vs 18
- for women 44 percentage points vs 21
- Labour force participation declines with age and
educational attainment, particularly in Austria - The main reasons for the 50-64 age group being
out of the workforce are - illness/disability,
- discouragement from further job search (age
discrimination) and insufficient further
education and training to raise employability - in Austria, an 'early retirement' culture, which
is promoted by an easy accessibility to
disability pensions as well as an
earnings-related pension system offering a high
income replacement rate at an early age
6Disability benefits how to balance social
protection against ensuring the incentive to
continue to work
- The inflow into disability benefits rises with
age, particularly in Austria. - The employment rate of prime age disabled persons
is higher in Austria than Australia, a result of
the legal requirement of employers to offer a
certain proportion of jobs to disabled persons.
However, at 50 the ratio of employment rates of
disabled over non-disabled persons rises sharply
in Austria - In Australia the ratio of the 55-59 age group
compared to the 35-44 age group is somewhat above
the OECD average of 3.1, while it is 16 in
Austria (2003) - The sharp drop of the employment rate of older
disabled workers in Austria may be attributed to
a comparatively easy access to disability
pensions, i.e., own-occupation basis of
assessment (Berufsschutz) rather than general
incapacity to work.
7Higher work-related accidents in Australia
- Overall, the rate of work-related accidents
involving more than three days absence from work
is substantially higher for Australia than
Austria. - The rate is slightly higher for older than
younger persons in Austria while the reverse was
true for Australia - In the case of Austria, this may be because older
workers are more accident-prone than younger ones
and/or because a larger proportion of older
workers are concentrated in occupations with
higher accident risks. It may also be linked to
the lower skill level of older workers and the
high proportion in manual jobs - In terms of compensation cases in Australia,
there is a substantial increase in the incidence
and frequency of cases affecting older workers,
especially those over 50. This suggests that
older workers have more serious work accidents
than younger ones and/or it takes them longer to
recuperate
8Work accidents with more than 3 days absence
per 1000 employees, 2000
S. Eurostat European statistics on accidents
at work (ESAW). For Australia ABS -Work related
injuries (6324)
9Investment in a healthy workplace raises
productivity and employability of mature workers
- Better health can make a distinct difference to
the employability and longer participation in
work of older workers. - Moreover, prolonged unemployment of older workers
also aggravates their health problems. - As with morbidity and mortality rates, the
proportion of persons with bad health is highest
amongst persons with low educational attainment
level and lowest for persons with tertiary
education - The relatively higher incidence of workplace
injuries affecting older workers, the greater
extent of morbidity among older persons of
working age and the large proportion on
disability pensions in both countries, indicate
the importance of dealing with health and safety
issues. - They suggest the need to tailor the nature of
work to the capacity of older workers as a
counter to the ageing of the workforce.
10Exit versus move out of career jobs into
secondary jobs
- In Australia, a large proportion of mature
persons continues to work after losing their
career jobs they tend to move into jobs with
somewhat lower wages and working conditions,
often combining work and welfare benefits. - In contrast, Austrian workers tend to exit the
labour market after losing their first career job
(tenure more important in Austria than
Australia), due to - less labour market flexibility in Austria,
- partly resulting from seniority wages and
- the greater strictness of employment protection
compared to Australia - which suggests that when
the employment of mature workers can be
terminated more easily (the Australian case)
there is less resistance from employers to the
hiring of older workers - Lower occupational, industrial and regional
mobility of workers in Austria
11Australian labour market is more flexible than
the Austrian
- Australia has
- more part-time work particularly of older workers
- higher proportion of casual employees in total
employment, many of them part-time workers. While
15.7 percent of male employment in Australia is
casual, and 26.3 percent in the case of females,
the proportions are 5 percent and 12 percent
respectively in Austria - a larger proportion of older workers are
self-employed (39 of mature men vs 29 24 of
mature women vs 18 in Austria - Austrians are working to a larger extent
overtime, particularly older workers
12Employment rate of 50-64 age group unadjusted for
hours worked overestimates Australian true
employment rate
13Seniority wages raise age-earnings curve
- Seniority wages are at least partly responsible
for the steep age-earnings curve in Austria.
Somewhat more than 60 of wage and salary earners
(including civil servants) have seniority wage
schedules, strongly linked to union density. - In contrast, age-related ladders are less common
in Australia, particularly in the private sector. - Seniority wages reduce the employment retention
rate of workers whose productivity at work
declines from a certain mature age onwards - The incentive to work of older workers may be
negatively affected by low wage rates, unless the
opportunity cost of work, i.e., welfare benefits,
are significantly lower and subject to means
testing. This is the case in Australia, thus
making work also in mature age pay, quite in
contrast to Austria, where work beyond a certain
age does not raise current and retirement income.
14Age-earnings profiles in Austria, Australia and
other OECD countries, 2000
Men
Women
a) 2001 for Austria Source Austria Microcensus
and Wage Tax Statistics (MZ Lst Data) France
DADS Germany German socio-economic panel
Netherlands Statistics Netherlands
SwedenStatistics Sweden United Kingdom Labour
Force Survey.
15The key role of the retirement system in
determining the employment rate of mature workers
- The age pension schemes in the two countries
differ markedly - The Australian system aims to alleviate poverty
on a flat rate basis and is subject to an
income/assets test. - The Austrian system is a contributory scheme and
is earnings-related. - The income replacement rate is around 80 percent
for men compared to about 32 percent in
Australia. - But both have employment disincentives in
Australia, the high effective marginal income
tax in Austria, the offset of pension benefits
from any employment income during the period of
early retirement.
16Increasing equality promotes good health
- The extent of inequality reflected in the social
hierarchy, distribution of incomes, the level of
education, skill and occupation has an impact on
health and longevity. - The last 20 years have seen a widening of
differences in income and wealth in Australia and
Austria, having a negative impact on the health
of persons at the lower end of the education and
income scale
17The complexity of the issues calls for a complex
set of measures
- This paper is concerned with health issues that
arise from the work environment. - These relate to the effects on the health from
- inadequate attention to health and safety at the
workplace, - a harsh and/or stressful work environment,
- wide dispersion in pay,
- protracted unemployment and employment
insecurity, both aggravated by inadequate skills
and by age discrimination, - and to disincentives to remain in the workforce.
- These issues call for concerted action in a
number of ways
18Policy response Systematic Occupational Health
and Safety Management
- Implementation of a comprehensive system of
Systematic Occupational Health and Safety
Management (SOHSM) which in essence involves - management planning and allocated
responsibilities - employee consultation
- specific programme elements (including the
specification of rules and procedures, training,
inspection, incident reporting and investigation,
hazard identification and prevention, data
analysis and system monitoring and evaluation) - This is a demanding concept, calling for a high
level of management commitment to the procedural
requirements and acceptance of formal employee
participation in OHS committees. - The self-regulation has to be complemented by an
active monitoring system.
19Policy response Human resource management
- While labour market flexibility is inherently
neither good nor bad, it has to be judged in
relation to its effects on employer
profitability, workers' security and the health
and employment of older workers. - As more mature workers move into a more flexible
employment environment, particularly after
exiting from their original career jobs, their
working conditions have a tendency to
deteriorate. This has a negative impact on
health, aggravated by the reduction of investment
in further education and training. - In order to promote the employability of workers
beyond a certain age, enterprises are
increasingly turning to age-management, which
entails - the establishment of an age-balanced work force,
- age-appropriate job design,
- preventive occupational health measures,
- implementation of life-long learning and
- broad-banding of skills,
- Promotion of intergenerational knowledge transfer
and - systematic integration of older workers into
innovation processes.
20Policy response industrial relations
- Industrial relations based on unions and
collective bargaining operate differently in the
two countries. - In Australia, industrial tribunals have played an
increasingly smaller part in determining the
terms of employment while union power has been
reduced considerably and individual bargaining
has been encouraged at the expense of collective
bargaining, resulting in widening of pay
differences with implication for the health of
those at the bottom end - In contrast, in Austria the social partnership
concept still applies and the social partners
rather than government have increasingly
established themselves as the national platform
on matters of employment of an ageing work force.
- Further, at the workplace level, worker
participation either directly or via union
representatives in the form of works councils, is
an important element in ensuring a healthy work
environment
21Policy response public policy
- Government together with collective bargaining
institutions has to see to it that the tendency
for increased inequality of pay is being reversed - In Australia, this requires a return to a more
collective bargaining oriented labour market with
less restrictions on union power to make
collective bargaining meaningful, together with a
restoration of the authority of industrial
tribunals in determining the safety net in pay
and conditions for those unable to bargain
effectively. - In Austria, the onus on public policy is more on
developing a comprehensive system of continued
learning, promoting the employability of mature
workers and finding a balance between social
protection and the incentive to continue to work
up to and possibly beyond the legal retirement
age.
22Concluding Observation
- The comparison of Austria and Australia indicates
that different models of socio-economic
organisation, in particular different industrial
relations systems, result in different priorities
as countries strive to preserve the internal
consistency of their national socio-economic
institutional framework. - The Australians follow the Anglo-Saxon 'market'
model, which is increasingly based on
individualisation and union exclusion, while
Austria continues to have strong corporatist
institutions, which are trusted to serve the
interests of society best. - While Australia has tended to be more concerned
with creating an economic environment which
promotes economic growth, Austria has been more
concerned with preserving social cohesion. - The test is whether the corporatist model with
its concern for social cohesion will be able to
deal effectively with the ageing problem, or
whether something like the Anglo-Saxon more
market driven model will prove to be a more
appropriate approach to the economic and social
problems of an ageing society.