Multi Factor Quant Market Neutral Equity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Multi Factor Quant Market Neutral Equity

Description:

Position size function of stock's rank and risk (4) Trading. Deserves its own ... Highlights Differences Between 'Quants' and Traditional Stock Pickers. Quants: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: kevinco4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multi Factor Quant Market Neutral Equity


1

2
Multi Factor Quant (Market Neutral) Equity

Kevin ColdironAlgert Coldiron Investors, LLC
3
Agenda
  • Introduction to the strategy
  • Forecasting (relative) returns
  • Building a portfolio
  • What does market neutral mean?
  • What happened in August?

4
Quant Philosophy
  • Opportunities arise because of
  • Biased decision making by investors
  • Institutional constraints
  • Risk management win by not losing
  • Recognize what youre not good at dont bet on
    those things
  • Quantitative tools
  • Identify and measure opportunity set
  • Ensure consistent decision making

5
Why Quantitative Tools Help
  • Humans
  • Smart
  • Poor communicators
  • Emotional
  • Computers
  • Dumb
  • Effective communicators
  • Even-keeled

6
Forecasting ReturnsExploit decision patterns of
other market participants
  • Under-reaction to news in the short term -
    creates momentum/trending
  • Over-reaction to news in medium term - creates
    mis-valuations
  • Anchoring on simple metrics - creates potential
    for being misled or manipulated
  • Non-investment constraints imposed by
    institutional investors or by asset manager on
    themselves

7
Investment Process Overview
  • (1) Create factors that proxy for the
    behavioural patterns you are trying to exploit
  • (2) Rank all stocks ranking becomes your
    expected return
  • (3) Design the portfolio
  • Position size function of stocks rank and risk
  • (4) Trading
  • Deserves its own presentation
  • Easy to squander good work in steps 1-3

8
Example Creating an Under-Reaction score
9
Example Creating an under-reaction score
10
Example Creating an under-reaction score
11
Example Creating an under-reaction score
12
Ranking All Stocks Together
13
Ranking All Stocks Together
14
Simple IdeaBut
  • Important questions hidden beneath the surface
  • How do you design and test the factors?
  • Do you only consider historical performance?
  • How much data do you consider?
  • Should the factors be the same in each sector?
    Region?

15
Highlights Differences Between Quants and
Traditional Stock Pickers
  • Quants
  • Use judgement/skill to answer questions on
    previous slide
  • Take emotion out of the buy sell decision
  • Lower hit rate but more coverage
  • Stock pickers
  • Apply judgement/skill to the buy sell decisions
  • Sacrifice breadth for depth

16
Portfolio ConstructionMaking It Market Neutral
  • Hedge out risks that you are not explicitly
    forecasting
  • Market, Industry, Size, Country
  • How do you do this?
  • Example
  • Cash 100m
  • Dollar Value of Shorts -100m
  • Dollar Value of Longs 100m
  • Fund Value 100m

17
Example Industry Exposure for Sample Market
Neutral Portfolio
18
Example Industry Exposure for Sample Market
Neutral Portfolio
19
Pause For Breath
  • Forecasting Relative Returns
  • Good fundamental analysis done systematically
    across large numbers of names
  • Breadth, not depth
  • Designing Portfolio
  • Most funds try to be neutral to absolute
    changes in market, industry, size, etc

20
What Happened in August 2007?
  • Negative returns across almost all quantitative
    equity strategies, particularly those focused on
    US
  • Several stories (not mutually exclusive)
  • Unwind Story
  • Banks/hedge funds suffered losses on credit
    portfolios and needed to raise cash.
  • Cash was quickly taken out of quant strategies to
    fund these losses
  • This trading triggered losses among other quant
    managers
  • These losses required managers running with very
    high leverage to post more margin
  • They did this by closing long and short positions
  • This trading further intensified and spread the
    losses
  • Ultimately a vicious cycle ensued particularly
    on August 2-9th
  • There was a very sharp bounce bank from August
    10th
  • We estimate at least 100bln of long and short
    positions were closed in 12 days

21
Why?
  • Long period of success drew in many new
    participants
  • Capacity estimates failed to account for what
    others were doing
  • Many of the newer participants
  • Using very high levels of leverage
  • Not committed to quant strategies as business -
    they were easiest to close from a business
    standpoint when capital became scarce
  • Over-crowding focused on US
  • Buy hold returns across the whole month were
    not unusual outside the US

22
The Future for Quant Equity
  • Short-term tug-of-war
  • Headwind as money flows out of the space via
    redemptions
  • Set against opportunities created by exposure
    unwinding
  • Long-term
  • Less crowded space overall
  • Far fewer (if any) participants running the
    strategy like a short-term prop trading portfolio
  • Other arbitrage strategies have experienced
    similar episodes and survived
  • Fixed Income (1998), Convertible Bond (2005)
  • MA Arbitrage and Statistical Arbitrage

23
Summary
  • Picking Stocks
  • Familiar investment themes, but executed
    systematically
  • Take emotion out of buy sell decision
  • Portfolio Design
  • Win by not losing
  • The Future
  • Smaller space, less leverage, higher returns(?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com