Effect of Chlorhexidine Oral Spray versus Mechanical Toothbrushing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Effect of Chlorhexidine Oral Spray versus Mechanical Toothbrushing

Description:

Mini Nutritional Assessment. Oral pH. Oral Culture Score. Conclusions ... Little research exists on optimal products for oral hygiene care. Future Directions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:224
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: peggym3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effect of Chlorhexidine Oral Spray versus Mechanical Toothbrushing


1
Effect of Chlorhexidine Oral Spray versus
Mechanical Toothbrushing Chlorhexidine Gel in
Decreasing VAP in Critically Ill Adults
  • Peggy McCartt, PhD (c),CCRN, ARNP

2
Background Significance
  • Oral bacterial colonization increases in
    critically ill adult patients with poor oral
    health. (Kite Pearson, 1995, Rumbak, 2000).
  • Patients with poor oral health are at high risk
    of developing nosocomial pneumonia if
    mechanically ventilated. (Rumbak, 2000 Kollef,
    1999 Johanson, Pierce, Sanford Thomas, 1972)
  • The CDC reports that aspiration of oral
    pharyngeal pathogens places patients at high risk
    for developing ventilator associated pneumonia
    (VAP). (Munro, Grap, Sessler Carter, 2003).

3
Background Significance
  • The effectiveness of oral hygiene and the use of
    antimicrobial agents appears to be
    promising.(Fourrier, Cau-Pottier, Boutigny,
    Roussel-Delvallez, Jourdain Chopin, 2000).
  • Interventions aimed at preventing bacterial
    colonization have not been well studied. (Moore,
    1995 Walsh, 1990).
  • Research results would facilitate development of
    evidence-based standards related to oral care of
    critically ill adults at risk to develop VAP.
    (Zack, Garrison, et.al, 2002 Wardth, Hallberg,
    Berggren, Anderson Sorensen, 2000)

4
Purpose
  • The purpose of this study is to identify if
    oropharyngeal cleaning in conjunction with
    decontamination with an antiseptic agent
    decreases ventilator associated pneumonia in
    critically ill adults.

5
Specific Aims
  • Is there a difference in three study groups
    related to
    Oral Culture Scores
    Oral
    pH




    Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS)
    1-white blood cell count, 2-temperature,
    3-tracheal secretions, 4-oxygenation
    (calculated by PaO2/FiO2, 5-chest radiograph
    and 6-tracheal aspirates.(Pugin, J.,
    Auckenthaler, R., Mili, N., Janssens, J. Lew,
    P. Sutter, P. (1991 Development of
    VAP

6
Setting Recruitment
  • Patients admitted to a not for profit acute care
    facility in Northeast Florida who are orally
    intubated. Recruitment methods include nursing
    referrals and identification by this researcher.

7
SAMPLE
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Orally intubated patients 18 years of age or
    older.
  • Subjects of any ethnic group or sex.
  • N30 per group.
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Admitting diagnosis of pneumonia
  • Nasally intubated patients
  • Patients expected to be extubated in less than 24
    hours

8
Design
  • Experimental, RCT

9
Variables
  • Dependent Variables (CPIS) developed by Pugin et
    al, based on 6 clinical and laboratory variables,
    oral pH, tracheal aspirate score.
  • Independent Variables chlorhexidine spray 0.12
    or chlorhexidine gel 0.12 with mechanical
    toothbrushing.

10
Procedures
  • Screen Orally Intubated
  • Subjects
  • Obtain Consent
  • Randomize to One of
  • Three Study Groups
  • 1-Chlorhexidine Spray 0.12 every twelve hours
  • 2-Chlorhexidine gel 0.12 with toothbrushing
    every twelve hours
  • 3-Routine oral hygiene care per hospital policy
    and procedure

11
Sample Data Collection Tool

  • Comments/Results
  • Patient is Orally Intubated
  • Number of DMF Teeth Noted
  • CPIS Documented
  • Head of Bed Elevated
  • Cumulative Score on
  • Mini Nutritional Assessment
  • Oral pH
  • Oral Culture Score

12
Conclusions
  • Study in progress

13
Limitations
  • Oral assessment tools for orally intubated
    patients are limited.
  • Recruitment of subjects may be difficult since
    elective intubation is not the norm.
  • Little research exists on optimal products for
    oral hygiene care.

14
Future Directions
  • Improving and integrating knowledge of best
    practices may contribute to
  • Establishment of evidence-based oral care hygiene
    protocols
  • Education programs
  • Oral assessment tools for critically ill adult
    patients at risk to develop ventilator associated
    pneumonia.

15
Implications
  • Adult patients retain their teeth longer,
    therefore, are more susceptible to poor oral
    health.
  • Chemical prophylaxis may play a prominent role in
    decreasing nosocomial VAP in critically ill adult
    patients.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com