Targeted Assisted vs' Schoolwide Title I Programs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Targeted Assisted vs' Schoolwide Title I Programs

Description:

Focus: Identified Students & Identified Title I Teachers ... If preschool-grade 2, judgement of teacher, interviews with parents, and other ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: paeduc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Targeted Assisted vs' Schoolwide Title I Programs


1
Targeted Assisted vs. Schoolwide Title I Programs
  • Susan Popielski Regional Coordinator
  • Karl Streckewald Regional Coordinator
  • Division of Federal Programs

2
TARGETED ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
3
Targeted Assistance-Specific Resources
  • Statute
  • Section 1115
  • Regulations
  • none
  • Non-regulatory guidance
  • IASA April 1996

4
Focus Identified Students Identified Title I
Teachers
  • Must identify Title I students and provide with
    supplemental services
  • Must ensure Title I are used to benefit
    identified students
  • For schools ineligible or choose not to operate
    schoolwide

5
Who is a Title I student?
  • Students identified as failing or at risk of
    failing state standards
  • Criteria is set by the LEA
  • NOT based on poverty

6
How to identify students?
  • Students eligible
  • Multiple measures
  • Educationally related -
  • Objective criteria developed by LEA
  • If preschool-grade 2, judgement of teacher,
    interviews with parents, and other
    developmentally appropriate means

7
Automatically eligible
  • Head Start
  • Even Start
  • Early Reading First
  • Migrant
  • Neglected or Delinquent
  • Homeless

8
Components of TA Program
  • Use Title I funds to help participating students
    meet state standards grade level goals
  • Incorporate Title I plans into existing
    comprehensive school plans
  • Effective methods and instructional strategies
    based on Scientifically Based Research (SBR)
  • Extended learning time
  • Accelerated, high-quality curriculum
  • Minimize removing from classroom during regular
    hours

9
Continued
  • 4. Coordinate with regular ed program
  • Highly qualified teachers
  • Professional development
  • Parental involvement
  • Coordinate other federal, state, and local
    services and programs

10
TAS Program Design
  • pull out Program
  • USDE Guidance encourages limited use since SBR
    does not support effectiveness of pull out
    programs.
  • Current programs focus on extended learning
    time (extended school year, before- or
    after-school, summer school)

11
Record Keeping!!
  • Records must be maintained that document that
    Title I funds are spent on activities and
    services for only Title I participating students.
  • Beware of Supplanting activities supported by
    Title I must be supplemental in nature, not take
    the place of required activities

12
Incidental Inclusion
  • School may provide, on incidental basis, Title I
    services to children who have not been selected
    to participate.
  • Only if
  • Designed to meet needs of Title I students and
    focused on those students
  • Does not decrease amount, duration, or quality of
    service for Title I students
  • Does not increase cost
  • Does not result in the exclusion of children who
    would otherwise receive Title I services

13
Comprehensive Services
  • If health, nutrition, and other social services
    are not otherwise available to Title I students
  • Comprehensive needs assessment indicates needs
    for these services
  • Collaborative partnerships with community
    agencies and resources are in place
  • Funds not reasonably available from other sources
  • THEN Title I may be used for basic medical
    equipment (glasses, hearing aides), social
    service coordinator, prof development, etc.

14
Staff supported by TA Program
  • Title I-paid staff may. . . .
  • Participate in general professional development
  • Assume limited duties that are assigned to
    similar personnel, as long as in same proportion
    of time
  • Bus Duty
  • Cafeteria Duty
  • Recess/Playground Duty

15
Title I Paid-Prof Development
  • May include any teachers that serve Title I
    students at some point during the day?
  • Title I funds cannot be used to pay for
    professional development of staff who do not
    serve any Title I students at some point during
    the school day.
  • LEAs must pro-rate costs associated with PD for
    nonTitle I staff through other funding sources.

16
SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS
17
Schoolwide Important Resources
  • Designing Schoolwide Programs Guidance March
    2006
  • www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/ designingswpguid.doc
  • Title I Fiscal Issues February 2008
  • www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/fiscalguid.doc

18
Schoolwide Programs Basic Requirements
  • Consolidate federal, state, and local funds to
    upgrade the entire educational program
  • Except Reading First
  • Ensure all children meet standards, particularly
    those most at risk
  • Requirement
  • 40 poverty
  • Schoolwide plan (including one year of planning)

19
Consolidated Programs
  • All formula (non-competitive)
  • Except Reading First
  • Includes IDEA, up to cap (but not exempt from
    programmatic requirements)
  • All discretionary (competitive)
  • Still must comply with application
  • Need not account separately for specific
    expenditures

20
Schoolwide Flexibility
  • Must meet intents and purposes of program
  • Not required to identify particular children all
    children
  • Not required to provide supplemental services
    can use all resources of the school

21
Recordkeeping in SWP
  • Consolidating Funds
  • DO NOT have to distinguish between funds or
    maintain separate accounting records
  • DO have to assure the intents and purposes of the
    combined programs are being met

22
Time and Effort Rules
  • February, 2008 guidance
  • If a school does not consolidate its funds into a
    single account, it must follow the normal rules
  • Single cost objective semi-annual certification
  • Multiple cost objective Personnel Activity
    Reports (time/effort logs)

23
RecommendationTake Conservative Approach
  • Assume SWP plan is a single cost objective
  • If work 100 on SWP, keep semi-annual
  • If work part on SWP and part other, keep monthly
    PARs

24
Reporting Expenditures in SWP
  • Proportional basis
  • Example If 25 of combined funds are from Title
    I, then report 25 of expenditures as Title I
    expenditures
  • Not required to track to activity allowable under
    program only show allowable under SWP plan

25
Proportional Reporting LEA
26
Sequential Reporting
  • Use up funds in order based on source
  • State and local first then Title I, Part A and
    other Federal funds
  • Show expenditures until funds are spent in
    entirety or until maximum carryover remains

27
Sequential Reporting
28
Supplement not Supplant in SWP
  • Use Title I funds only to supplement the amount
    of funds that would, in the absence of federal
    funds, be made available from non-federal sources
    for the school

29
Fiscal Requirements in SWP
  • Set-Asides
  • 10 for School Improvement
  • Portion of 1 for parent involvement
  • An amount equal to Need not come from Title I
  • Carryover
  • 15 cap still applies on LEA level, regardless of
    whether allocation from SWP or TAS

30
Common Monitoring Finding
  • SWP Plan missing elements

31
Heightened Federal Monitoring on SWP
  • OIG monitoring
  • SEA guidance on consolidating funds
  • Description of how school implement components
  • Description of how school will use resources to
    implement
  • List of SEA and LEA programs and other federal
    programs that will be consolidated

32
Components of SWP
  • One year planning period
  • 1. Needs assessment
  • 2. Schoolwide reform strategies that
  • a. Increase the amount quality of learning time
    (extended year, before- and after-school)
  • b. Address needs of all, but particularly
    low-achieving

33
Components of SWP (cont.)
  • 3. Instruction by highly qualified teachers
  • 4. Professional development
  • 5. Strategies to attract high quality teachers
  • 6. Parental involvement
  • 7. Transition from pre-school
  • 8. Include teachers in assessment decisions
  • 9. Timely, effective additional assistance
  • 10. Coordination and integration

34
Needs Assessment Process
  • Needs Assessment clearer focus in guidance
    March 2006 has 5 step process
  • Establishing SW planning team
  • Clarifying the vision for reform
  • Creating the school profile
  • Identifying data sources
  • Analyzing data

35
  • Close attention to plan development requirements
  • Developing over one-year period
  • Developed with involvement of parents and other
    members of the community, including teachers,
    principals, administrators, etc
  • In effect for duration of schools participation
  • Available to LEA, parents, and the public in
    understandable and uniform format
  • If appropriate developed in coordination with RF,
    ERF, Even Start, Perkins, and Head Start

36
Paraprofessional Qualifications
  • TAS Applies only to instructional
    paraprofessionals working in a Title I program
  • i.e., paid with Title I funds
  • SWP All instructional paraprofessionals

37
Thank you
  • QUESTIONS???
  • Contact info
  • Susan Popielski
  • Spopielski_at_state.pa.us
  • Karl Streckewald
  • kstreckewa_at_state.pa.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com