Data Analysis Document Status for LISA Pathfinder

1
Data AnalysisDocument Statusfor LISA Pathfinder
N. Tateo 20/02/2007
2
Current status

• The current status of document writingis
  consistent with theLTP Science Implementation
  Plan (SIP)

3
Time planning

• The time planning is
• similarly consistent

4
DA Requirement Document

• The DA Requirement Document has been delivered
  (Iss.1.0).
• Latest evolvement in DA, including consequences
  of previous meetings,can be implemented in a
  revised issue.

5
DA Design Document

• The DA Design Document,not issued yet, is ready
  and contains the S/W architecture as stated in
  the LTP SIP.
• Its a review of the DA topics discussed so far,
  plus the definition of science data channels to
  be analyzed.

6
Da Design Document

• While it contains a preliminary definition ofthe
  Quick-Look Analysis tool (QLA) andthe definition
  of the GUI to be implemented,
• its still lacking the summary elements
  description,i.e. the concise and defined
  examination of algorithmsand functions to be
  enclosed into each package.
• This part is now intended to be included in
  theSoftware Requirement Document.

7
How many documents?

• In the latest meetings and following
  communications different documents were
  mentioned
• User Requirement Document (URD).
• Software Requirement Document (SRD).
• Implementation Plan (IP).
• Architecture Document (AD).
• Given that the DA Architecture is already
  covered bythe DA Design Document, remains to be
  clarifiedthe content of the AD.

8
User Requirement Document

• About the URD, the LISA Pathfinder Science
  Implementation Plan (LPF SIP) states
• Is there another URD?

9
Software Requirement Document

• Its also stated that the Operations Scientist
  (ESA) willsupport the writing of Software
  Requirement Document

10
Software Requirement Document

• Supporting who?The definition of the necessary
  tools to be developed,now intended to converge
  in the SRD,according to the LPF SIP should be
  issuedby the Project Scientist
• What kind of inputs from the LTP PI Team?

11
Software Requirement Document

• In the LPF SIP there is also
• What exactly are the STOC Work Packages?

12
Implementation Plan

• The Implementation Plan (IP) should
  describehow, by whom and when this S/W
  developmentis going to take place.
• Whos responsible for its writing,and by when
  its intended to be delivered?

13
Documents summary
14
Questions to be solved

• What kind of document, and which contents
  mustprecisely have the Software Requirement
  Document?
• Whos going to write the summary analysis
  elements description, i.e. the precise definition
  of sub-functions and algorithms to be included in
  each package?
• If the SRD is responsibility of ESA with inputs
  from LTP PI Team, which kind of inputs?
• By when is intended to be delivered the SRD?

15
Questions to be solved

• The Implementation Plan must be a standalone
  document, or can be incorporated into the DA
  Design Document? And the Architecture Document?
• By when are to be delivered the IP and the AD?
• How to distribute the future work, among actual
  analysis functions programming and document
  writing?
• The last mail (Texier, 09/02/2007) noted
  thatthe URD is already in good shape, against
  what stated by the LPF SIP (no URD will be
  written).