No name

1
  --gt
2
Welcome to CCSSO/SCASS HEAP!
Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware,
DoDEA, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland,
Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North
Carolina Pennsylvania, Philadelphia School
District, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont,
Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Great Big THANKS to ACT!
THANKS
6
The State of the HEAP

• SRT Meeting
• Iowa City, IA
• September 22-24, 2004

7
A Look Back

• Phase 1 Foundation Phase 1993-95
• Built a foundation for developing an assessment
  system
• Phase II Development Phase 1995-00
• Developed assessment items based on the National
  Health Education Standards
• Phase III Implementation Phase 2000-05
• Supporting implementation in the states

8
HEAP Phase IIIImplementation Phase 2000-05

• Funded by
• Contract with Centers for Disease Control and
  Prevention (CDC), Division of Adolescent and
  School Health (DASH) to support and expand the
  HEAP
• Member states participation fees

9
September 11, 2001

• Philadelphia SRT Meeting
• HEAP mission reviewed and revised to emphasize
  alignment of curriculum, instruction,
  assessment
• Increased focus on Professional Development
• SRT requested assistance in designing state
  training implementation plans
• Decreased focus on developing new Assessment
  Items

10
HEAP mission (2001)

• To develop effective health education assessment
  resources through a collaborative process, and to
  increase members capacity to align curriculum,
  instruction, and assessment to improve student
  health literacy through improved health education
  instruction.

11
Gallery Walk A HEAP of Stuff
12
A HEAP of Action

• Putting Action Research Into

ACTION
13
Plan Implement
Reflect
Revise
14
Charleston Post SRT Results
15
What did you find most helpful during Charleston
SRT meeting?

• Pre-SRT training day
• Hands-on experiences with products
• Distance learning discussions

16
Charleston SRT Meeting Feedback

• MOST Useful
• Opportunity for networking and sharing ideas
• Time for networking with state team
• PPT presentations Cognitive complexity,
  assessment

• LEAST Useful
• Round table/sharing tables
• Insufficient time to meet with state teams
• Lack of best practices for adult learners, e.g.,
  too much time talking at us.

17
Suggestions for Future Meetings

• More on distance learning
• Tuesday (1015) Updated on HEAP/EDC Distance
  Learning Initiative
• Tuesday (1200) Planning next steps/Discussion
• More on cognitive complexity/depth of knowledge
  for assessment items
• Thursday (845) Analyzing Developing Prompts
  for Cognitive Complexity

18
Suggestions for Future Meetings

• More contact with state people
• State Planning Time
• Tuesday (330 415 pm)
• Wednesday (400 445 pm)
• Model of training day implemented in other
  states
• Wednesday (100) Training Tips from South
  Dakota

19
Suggestions for Future Meetings

• More on searchable database
• Wednesday (845 1030) Make your own test!
• Active learning strategies other states are using
• Wednesday (1030 245) Teaching the essence
  of the skill and the student work that results
• More hands-on/scoring student work/writing
  commentary
• Tuesday (100) Small Working Groups Scoring
  practice papers and writing commentary
• More on assessment

20
Finishing Phase III

• Planning for Phase IV

21
To support and expand the HEAP
Assessment Items (hard copy and searchable
database)
22
To support and expand the HEAP
Professional Development CD-ROM Modules
Anchor Practice Papers
23
To support and expand the HEAP
24
To support and expand the HEAP
Human Resources
25
Finishing Phase III

• Searchable database
• Final quality assurance steps for current draft
  database (Phase II items)
• Cleaned up Exemplars
• Anchor and practice papers are ready for
  inclusion
• Commentary to be added to practice paper key
• Aligned 600 Phase I Selected Responses to HEAP
  Descriptors
• Issues to resolve items stats for Phase I
  Selected Responses

26
Finishing Phase III

• Curriculum and Assessment Framework
• Introduction revised to include rationale of
  health education, school reform, character
  education, and Safe and Drug Free School
  information.
• Ready for CDC review by the end of the year.
• Professional Development Modules 2
• Final CDC review
• Expect delivery soon

27
Finishing Phase III

• Submitting Manuscripts for Publication
• Contractor Eva Marx
• Article about development of the HEAP sent to CDC
  for review
• Currently collecting data on the impact of the
  HEAP via telephone surveying
• Future manuscript will focus on HEAP state
  members efforts to align pre-service and
  in-service

28
Finishing Phase III

• Aligning Health and Reading with a HEAP of Books
• Submitted to CCSSO in manuscript form
• CCSSO review
• ToucanEd moves manuscript to design
• Aligning Research Based Curricula
• Consultants Nancy Emberley Kris McNally
• Determine quality assurance process

29
Finishing Phase III

• Pilot for HEAP Distance Learning Initiative
• Baltimore County Public Schools
• N16 participants
• Facilitator Nancy Hudson
• Great Big THANKS to Barb Sullivan!
• More information to come from Paul
• HEAP Distance Learning Initiative Year 2
• Providing technical assistance

30
Preparing for Phase IV
31
Planning for the TAG
32
Technical Advisory Group

• Washington DC
• July 26-27, 2004
• 31 participants
• Task
• Review Assessment Framework make
  recommendations for revisions for Phase IV

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
Needs for Assessment Development in Phase IV
Source 2003 HEAP Strategic Planning Survey
36
Steps in Assessment Development
Preparing for Phase IV

• Develop assessment framework
• Develop items and tests
• Administer tests
• Score tests
• Report results

37
Workshops that Address Assessment Development

• 1. Develop framework (TAG Recommendations)
• 2. Develop items and tests
• Performance Assessment and Rubric Development
  (Wednesday, 845 1030)
• Analyzing and Developing Prompts for Cognitive
  Complexity (Thursday, 845)
• 3. Administer tests
• 4. Score tests
• Rangefinding and Anchor Selection for Performance
  Tasks (Wednesday, 245)
• 5. Report results
• Standard Setting (Wednesday, 245)

38
Preparing for Phase IV

• Exploring web-based opportunities for database
• Building capacity for item development review
• Building capacity for on-line testing
• Building the foundation for research-based
  teaching and assessing
• Steering Committee Meeting
• Presentation by Sarah Moshman
• Plan to attend

39
Preparing for Phase IV

• Funding and Proposal Writing
• Specific funding streams vs. funding for
  comprehensive health education
• Preparing for scenario of reduced funding
• Reduced support staff
• Increased SRT involvement
• Reduced number of products and services slower
  production time
• Fewer benefits (e.g., extra SRT guest)

40
A Look Ahead
Changing the face of health education
41
(No Transcript)