Why There Are No BaldFaced Lies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Why There Are No BaldFaced Lies

Description:

'So when I was seventeen we understood that we were not free, that we lived in danger. ... Now I must free myself.' Seierstad (2003: 306) [date wrong in text] ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: publi70
Category:
Tags: baldfaced | lies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why There Are No BaldFaced Lies


1
Why There Are No Bald-Faced Lies
  • J. E. Mahon
  • Washington and Lee University

2
Lie vs. Deceive
  • Deceive is a success verb
  • Lie is not a success verb
  • To lie is not to deceive
  • Question Is to lie to attempt to deceive?

3
Dictionary Definitons
  • n a false statement made with the intention to
    deceive vi to make a false statement with the
    intention to deceive (Chambers Dictionary)
  •  
  • (intr) to speak untruthfully with intent to
    mislead or deceive n an untrue or deceptive
    statement deliberately used to mislead
    (Times English Dictionary)
  •  
  • n. a false statement made with deliberate intent
    to deceive v.i. to speak falsely or utter
    untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive
    (Random House Dictionary)
  •  
  • v to say something which is not true in order to
    deceive (Cambridge International Dictionary of
    English)
  •  
  • n. an intentionally false statement used
    with reference to a situation involving deception
    or founded on a mistaken impression (Oxford
    American Dictionary)
  •  
  • To utter falsehood with an intention to deceive,
    or with an immoral design (American Dictionary)
  •  
  • a false statement made with intent to deceive
    (Oxford English Dictionary)
  •  
  • n. A false statement deliberately presented as
    being true a falsehood Something meant to
    deceive or give the wrong impression. To
    present false information with the intention of
    deceiving. (American Heritage Dictionary)
  •  

4
American Heritage Dictionary
  • The American Heritage Dictionary defines
    bald-faced lie as an undisguised lie. If lying
    requires an intention to deceive, then lies must
    be disguised. If lying requires an intent to
    deceive, then lies must be disguised. Thus
    the first mystery about bald-faced lies is
    semantic Why isnt bald-faced lie a
    contradiction in terms? Why, instead, is the
    bald-faced lie the most obvious kind of lie?
  • - Sorensen, Bald-Faced Lies! Lying Without the
    Intent to Deceive, Pacific Philosophical
    Quarterly 88 (2007) 252

5
Problems with Dictionary appeal
  • If a bald-faced lie means lie without intention
    to deceive, then it contradicts Dictionarys own
    definition of lie
  • Dictionary defines bold-faced as Imprudent
    brazen, and gives as example a bold-faced lie
  • a bold-faced lie is not one without intention
    to deceive
  • Is there any difference between a bald-faced
    lie and a bold-faced lie?

6
Iraqi doctor example
  • How many soldiers have you admitted today? I
    ask a doctor.
  • There are no soldiers here, the doctor says.
  • But they are wearing uniforms?
  • I see no uniforms, he says, and pushes me out.
    You must go now, do you hear?
  • Seierstad, A Hundred and One Days A Baghdad
    Journal, trans. Ingrid Christophersen. (NY Basic
    Books, 2003) 262

7
Anton Rubinstein example
  • Once when the pianist Anton Rubinstein was
    practicing, the telephone rang inconveniently.
    His servant François picked up the phone and
    reported to the female caller that the maestro
    was not home. She objected But I hear him
    playing. You are mistaken, Madame insisted
    François I am dusting the piano keys. (253)

8
Isenberg on euphemisms
  • For example, the words She is not at home,
    delivered by a servant or relative at the door,
    have become a mere euphemism for indisposition or
    disinclination. Since the author of the message
    knows that the recipient will interpret it as a
    polite way of saying, It is inconvenient for me
    to see you now, there is no intention of making
    him believe something that she (the author) does
    not believe a polite lie is often no lie at
    all.
  • Arnold Isenberg, Deontology and the ethics of
    lying, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
    24 (1964) 473.

9
Cargiles Chicken Thief
  • One morning, a young man is leaving his
    father-in-laws chicken coop carrying two hens
    whose necks he has just wrung. He has been
    stealing from his father-in-laws coop for
    several months. This morning his father-in-law is
    waiting outside with a shot gun. There is an
    embarrassed silence, and then the young fellow
    says, I was checking to see how things were in
    the coop and I found these two hens, theyre
    still warm. My coming by must have frightened the
    thief away.
  • Since it is 5 a.m. and the son-in-law lives two
    miles away, the old man sees through the story.
    He knows his son-in-law is a chicken thief. But
    does the young man know that he has been found
    out? Well yes, he knows his father-in-law is too
    smart to fall for his shaky story. But the old
    man, for the sake of family unity, is going to
    pretend not to know. And the son-in-law is able
    to recognize this. But does the old man know that
    his son-in-law realizes that he has seen through
    his story? Yes, he can tell from the young mans
    manner. And does the son-in-law see that his
    father-in-law not only sees through his alibi but
    also sees that the son-in-law is going to try to
    face it out even though he has been caught?
    Again yes.
  • James Cargile, A Note On Iterated Knowings,
    Analysis 30 (1970) 154.

10
Lying to each other?
  • I was checking to see how things were in the
    coop and I found these two hens, theyre still
    warm. My coming by must have frightened the thief
    away.
  • Im glad you frightened him away. He probably
    wont be back here again.

11
Lying to oneself Russell (?)
  • I hated the stuffiness involved in supposing
    that space and time were only in my mind, I liked
    the starry heavens even better than the moral
    law, and could not bear Kants view that the one
    I liked best was only a subjective figment. In
    the first exuberance of liberation, I became a
    naïve realist, and rejoiced in the thought that
    grass is really green, in spite of the adverse
    opinions of all philosophers from Locke onwards.
  • Bertrand Russell, My Philosophical Development
    (London Allen Unwin, 1959) 61-2.

12
Lies to oneself Haidar (?)
  • So when I was seventeen we understood that we
    were not free, that we lived in danger. I learned
    how to behave like a good Iraqi in other words,
    to lie. Always and everywhere, I have been a liar
    ever since. The tyrant has gone and I need lie
    no longer. But for thirty years I have lived
    under the skin of a liar. Now I must free
    myself.
  • Seierstad (2003 306) date wrong in text

13
Kenyons Cynical Assertions
  • Example 1 An elected official says at a press
    conference, Our policies have improved the
    quality of life for all citizens.
  • Example 2 A corporate accountant addressing a
    public inquiry says, I had no knowledge of
    fiscal improprieties within our company.
  • Tim Kenyon, Cynical Assertion Convention,
    Pragmatics, and Saying Uncle, American
    Philosophical Quarterly 40 (2003) 242.

14
A lie?
  • Let us imagine that there is some company in
    desperate straits that cannot be bailed out by
    the government if it transpires that the
    accountants in the company carried out any fiscal
    improprieties. Imagine that everyone all
    parties involved and the general public knows
    that the accountants in the company did indeed
    carry out fiscal improprieties. However, imagine
    that everyone wants this company to be bailed out
    by the government in spite of this. Imagine that
    the only way to do this is for the accountants to
    make untruthful statements like I had no
    knowledge of fiscal improprieties within our
    company before a public inquiry, without any
    intention to be believed, and for the people
    conducting the inquiry, and the rest of the
    public, to simply say nothing. Kenyon does say
    that Such speakers are really just going
    through the motions.
  • Kenyon (2003) 242.

15
Carsons murder witness
  • Suppose that I witness a crime and clearly see
    that a particular individual committed the crime.
    Later, the same person is accused of the crime
    and, as a witness in court, I am asked whether or
    not I saw the defendant commit the crime. I make
    the false statement that I did not see the
    defendant commit the crime, for fear of being
    harmed or killed by him. It does not necessarily
    follow that I intend that my false statements
    deceive anyone. (I might hope that no one
    believes my testimony and that he is convicted in
    spite of it.) I do not intend to deceive the
    jury in this case, but it seems clear that my
    false testimony would constitute a lie.
  • Thomas L. Carson, The Definition of Lying, Noûs
    40 (2006) 289.

16
Carsons cheating student
  • a college Dean has a firm, but unofficial,
    policy of never upholding a professors charge
    that a student cheated on an exam unless the
    student confesses in writing to having cheated.
    The Dean is very cynical about this and believes
    that students are guilty whenever they are
    charged. A student is caught in the act of
    cheating on an exam by copying from a crib sheet.
    The professor fails the student for the course
    and the student appeals the professors decision
    to the Dean who has the ultimate authority to
    assign the grade. The student is privy to
    information about the Deans de facto policy and,
    when called before the Dean, he (the student)
    affirms that he didnt cheat on the exam. He
    claims that he was not copying from the copy
    sheet. He claims that he inadvertently forgot to
    put his review sheet away when the exam began
    and that he never looked at it during the exam.
    The student says this on the record in an
    official proceeding and thereby warrants the
    truth of the statements he knows to be false. He
    intends to avoid punishment by doing this. He may
    have no intention of deceiving the Dean that he
    didnt cheat.
  • Carson (2006) 290.

17
Sorensens definition
  • Sorensen defines lying as follows
  • Lying is just asserting what one does not
    believe. (256)
  • This definition stands in need of a definition of
    assertion.

18
Chisholm and Feehan
  • L lies to D df.There is a proposition p such
    that (i) either L believes that p is not true or
    L believes that p is false and (ii) L asserts p
    to D.
  •  
  • The definition of assertion that Chisholm and
    Feehan provide is as follows
  •  
  • L asserts p to D df.L states p to D and does
    so under conditions which, he believes, justify D
    in believing that he, L, not only accepts p, but
    also intends to contribute causally to Ds
    believing that he, L, accepts p.
  • Roderick M. Chisholm and Thomas D. Feehan, The
    Intent to Deceive, Journal of Philosophy, 74
    (1977) 152.

19
Charles Fried
  • A person lies when he asserts a proposition he
    believes to be false.
  • to assert X is to utter X in a context such that
    the utterance is intended to cause belief
  • To make an assertion is to give an assurance
    that the statement is true.
  • Charles Fried, Right and Wrong (Cambridge, Mass.
    Harvard University Press, 1978) 55-7.

20
Sorensen on assertion
  • All assertions must at least have narrow
    plausibility, because we need to figure out what
    the speaker means. What would it be like for the
    assertor to be speaking from knowledge? Once we
    have the meaning of the assertion in the
    foreground, we can test it against our background
    knowledge and against future evidence.
  • To qualify as an assertion, a lie must have
    narrow plausibility. Thus, someone who only had
    access to the assertion might believe it. This is
    the grain of truth behind Lying requires the
    intention to deceive. Bald-faced lies show that
    assertions do not need to meet a requirement of
    wide plausibility, that is, credibility relative
    to ones total evidence. (255)

21
Assertive force?
  • Much of what we say does not constitute
    assertion. We signal lack of assertive force by
    clear falsity (as with metaphor) or by
    implausibility. When there is doubt about whether
    we are asserting, we can clarify the
    illocutionary force of the remark I am not
    kidding, I was describing the consequences, not
    threatening, and by adopting a straight face and
    sober tone to evince sincerity.
  • Bald-faced liars will clarify the assertive
    status of their remarks. There will be no nod
    or wink to show that this is a game. Only
    assertion will do the trick. (256)

22
Williams on assertion
  • A utters a sentence S, where S means that P,
    in doing which either he expresses his belief
    that P, or he intends the person addressed to
    take it that he believes that P.
  •  
  • Bernard Williams, Truth and Truthfulness An
    Essay in Genealogy (Princeton, NJ Princeton
    University Press, 2002) 96.

23
statement vs. assertion
  • Lie df.conscious expression of other than what
    we believe.
  • Warren Shibles, Lying A Critical Analysis
    (Whitewater, WI The Language Press, 1985) 33.
  • Shibless definition allows for lying to
    absolutely no one.
  • Can I make an assertion, according to Sorensens
    account of assertion, to no one (not even to
    myself)?
  • If so, then I may lie to no one (not even
    oneself). However, surely one may not lie to no
    one (not even oneself).
  • If not, then why not? What does it mean to make
    an assertion to a person, as opposed to (merely)
    making a statement to a person?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com