Yacht Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Yacht Design

Description:

Usual design requirement for foil is to maximise lift force and minimise drag. ... Region over foil & downstream in which frictional effects are important, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Gil6154
Category:
Tags: design | foil | yacht

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Yacht Design


1
Yacht Design Technology
  • Aerodynamics

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Introduction
  • Sails are examples of lifting foils, similar to
    aircraft wings, propellers, keels.
  • Usual design requirement for foil is to maximise
    lift force and minimise drag.
  • However for sails the requirement is to generate
    maximum driving force without incurring excessive
    side force or heeling moment

7
Introduction
  • Therefore sails differ from most foils since
  • they need to operate at high levels of lift i.e.
    closer to point of maximum lift.
  • they have a flexible geometry.
  • they have virtually no thickness.
  • they have a large camber.
  • usually there are two or more sails operating in
    close proximity.

8
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • Two regions
  • Outer region where fluid frictional effects
    negligible
  • Region over foil downstream in which frictional
    effects are important, boundary layer and wake.

9
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • Boundary layer is thin At trailing edge approx 3
    5 of chord.
  • Smooth, orderly, streamlined laminar flow will
    undergo transition to turbulent flow.
  • This transition is delayed with a favourable
    pressure gradient (falling pressure). In
    contrast, an adverse gradient will cause almost
    instantaneous transition.

10
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • Separation If pressure gradient is sufficiently
    adverse, boundary layer is unable to maintain
    contact with foil surface reversed flow will
    occur between boundary layer and foil surface.

11
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • Near the leading edge a much stronger adverse
    gradient is required to cause separation.
  • However a return to a favourable gradient can
    cause reattachment.
  • Separation bubbles will exist on each side of a
    sail set behind a mast.

12
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • As lift increases the pressure gradients on
    suction surface becomes more severe.
  • Separation point for trailing edge moves forward.
    Also leading edge bubble lengthens.
  • Two zones merge and entire upper surface flow
    lifts off foil.

13
Airflow Around Aerofoil
  • As this happens the lift will rise to a maximum
    and then reduce.
  • Simultaneously the drag will increase sharply.
  • This is called stalling the foil.

UPWIND Sails operate below stall CLOSE
REACHING Near point of maximum lift OFF WIND
Stalled state
14
Aerofoil Design
  • Choose pressure distribution that will lead to
    proper boundary layer growth along foil.
  • Optimise laminar flow over suction surface
    gentle favourable pressure gradient.
  • Limit adverse gradient over rear part of foil to
    delay separation point.
  • Then derive foil shape that will give required
    pressure distribution.

15
Pressure Distribution
  • Pressure distribution around foil dependent on
  • Shape of camber line
  • Distribution of thickness across chord
  • Angle of attack

16
Angle of Attack
  • Ideal angle of attack fluid flow divides
    smoothly either side of leading edge of foil.
  • High angle of attack
  • point of attachment moves to pressure face,
    giving sharp suction peak.
  • pressure rises again immediately causing adverse
    pressure gradient.
  • This adverse pressure gradient responsible for
    creating leading edge separation bubble, causing
    early transition to turbulent flow, leading to
    stalling.
  • Low angle of attack
  • point of attachment moves to suction face,
    pressure peak is on pressure surface, with
    corresponding separation effects over surface of
    foil.

17
Angle of Attack
  • Foil drag usually at minimum when operating close
    to ideal angle of attack.
  • Ideal angle of attack increases as foil camber
    increases, as does lift generated at ideal angle.
  • The range of angle of attack for satisfactory
    performance is dependent on radius of leading
    edge thicker foils are more forgiving.

18
Sails
  • Ultimate thin aerofoil, therefore need to be
    operated close to ideal angle of attack.
  • Sail camber needs adjusting as sail lift
    requirement changes. Therefore sail flattening
    devices are utilised.
  • Flexibility of cloth allows camber line to change
    shape, e.g. as suction peak develops at low
    angles of attack luff lifts to windward.
  • Wool tufts etc may be used on sails to identify
    flow states ensure correct sail settings

19
3-D Effects
  • Foil with finite span has 3-D effects associated
    with pressure equalisation around the foil tips.
  • Pressure face pressure reduces towards tips
    flow is deflected towards tips.
  • Suction face pressure lowest at mid-span flow
    drawn in towards mid-span.

Flow around tips from pressure to suction face
results in formation of tip vortices which extend
into downstream wake.
20
3-D Effects
  • The downwash flow is perpendicular to the foil
    and wake, directed from suction side to pressure
    side.
  • The downwash has the effect of rotating fluid
    flow onto the foil and rotating lift and drag
    axes.
  • This rotation reduces the effective angle of
    attack reduces lift.

21
Maximum Drive Force
Plot of total aerodynamic drag versus total lift
envelope of performance for different sheeting
angles.
  • Corresponds to maximum forward drive force
  • In practice best boat speed obtained using
    slightly less lift. Best light wind sail setting.
  • In heavy weather sail force reduced to limit
    heeling

22
Optimum Planform
  • Usually design foil to generate Lift whilst
    minimising Drag
  • Minimise induced drag
  • Since high downwash high induced drag
  • Design foil with spanwise distribution of twist
  • Transfer lift from region of high downwash to
    region of low downwash
  • Reduce downwash
  • Elliptical planform, e.g. Spitfire wing, is ideal
    since produces uniform downwash.
  • However max lift/drag is not our aim for sails

23
Optimum Planform
  • Then what is our aim for sails?
  • Maximise boat speed on given course in given wind
    strength.
  • Light weather max. driving force
  • Heavy weather max. driving force within max.
    heeling moment
  • For heavy weather therefore a sail which
    generates lift to windward at masthead can
    generate much larger driving force lower down the
    sail.
  • To achieve this sail requires considerable twist
    near masthead.

24
Optimum Spanwise Sail Loading
25
Sail Twist
26
Sail Twist
27
Sail Interactions
  • Sails in close proximity will interact in two
    ways
  • Individual sails will operate in modified
    airflow due to presence of other sails.
  • If gap between sails is sufficiently small the
    leading sail guides flow onto leading edge of
    trailing sail.
  • Ahead of sail is a region of upwash.
  • Upwash from trailing sail increases apparent wind
    angle of leading sail.
  • Rotation of lift vector on leading sail increases
    forward drive improves performance.
  • Trailing sails performance is reduced due to
    reverse effect. Therefore foresail is more
    effective than the mainsail behind it. Foresail
    carries a heavier load per unit area than the
    mainsail.

28
Sail Interactions
29
(No Transcript)
30
5 min Presentation/Activity
Tacking Gybing Boom vang Cunningham Spinaker
gybe Sail Battens Outhaul Jib sheet Main
sheet Traveller Deck winch
Backstay Man overboard! Basic sail trim Start
procedure (racing) Typical racing courses Strong
wind strategies Sailing in the Olympics Spinaker
trim Knots Crewing basics
31
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com