Title: Clark R. Chapman SwRI, R.G. Strom Univ. Ariz.,
1 MESSENGER Perspectives on Mercurys Cratering
- Clark R. Chapman (SwRI), R.G. Strom (Univ.
Ariz.), - S.C. Solomon (DTM, Carnegie Institution),
J.W. Head III (Brown Univ.), and W.J. Merline
(SwRI)
with thanks to the whole MESSENGER Team
AAS Division for Planetary Sciences Cornell
University, Ithaca NY 14 October 2008
2Mariner 10 Imaged 45 of Surface. Vivaldi
Crater Then and Now
Mariner 10 Image Shaded Relief
MESSENGER image
3Vivaldi Crater at Sunset Sunrise
M1
M2
4Long, Linear Secondary Crater Chains
- Prominence of secondary craters recognized from
M10 images - Long, linear chains of craters radiate from large
peak-ring crater Eminescu - they are obviously not SL9-like
- could they be pit craters from crustal fractures?
- how are ejecta launched in such a co-linear
fashion? - Note unusual orientation of some chains one
curves!
5Long, Linear Rays (M2 Flyby)
- Rays seen by Mariner 10 now understood to be a
global system of long, narrow rays emanating from
a never-before-seen 110 km diameter fresh crater
6Basins on Mercury
Caloris Basin, MSGR M1 Mariner 10
New Basin, MSGR M2 M1
7Double-Ring Basin Raditladi
8Questions about Cratering on Mercury
- Relationship of Mercurys basins to lunar basins
and the Late Heavy Bombardment - Raditladi basin could it have formed quite
recently? - Early Population 1 highlands cratering is the
relative lack of craters lt40 km diameter related
to formation of intercrater plains? If so,
how? - Stratigraphy of Caloris basin (by crater
densities, SFDs) - Are interior plains impact melt or subsequent
volcanics? - Are exterior plains due to Caloris ejecta (e.g.
Cayley plains) or the result of volcanism? - If plains are volcanic, did interior and exterior
volcanism end at the same time or different
times? - Secondary cratering on Mercury how does it
compare with secondary cratering on the Moon? - Absolute chronology for basin formation,
cratering, darkening of fresh-crater rays by
space-weathering, etc.
9- Study regions for statistics of small craters
- Smooth plains west of Caloris
- Fresh double-ring basin Raditladi
- Ejecta blanket
- Flooded floor
- Secondary crater field from several fresh, large
primary craters - Heavily cratered terrain
- Coverage key
- Yellow area studied
- Orange focus on small craters
Caloris
Raditladi
10Double-Ring Basin Flooded Floor and Ejecta
Blanket
- Segment above excluded region is on ejecta
deposits - Segment below is floor of basin
- Craters on rare non-flooded regions ex-cluded
from analysis of floor - Note the very fresh, crater-free terrains
11Summary Small Craters in Diverse Terrains
- Slopes of SFDs for craters lt10 km in different
regions vary they may reflect varying
contributions by the generally very steep SFD for
secondaries shown in pink - Craters reach empirical saturation densities at
large diameters in heavily cratered terrain and
at diameters lt a few km in the heavily cratered
terrain and in the secondary crater field - If smooth plains are post-LHB, then the
straightforward conclusion is that Raditladi
(both ejecta and interior plains) is lt 1 Gy in
age, but depends on stochastics of secondaries
12Caloris Interior and Exterior Plains
MESSENGER M1
- Counts of craters gt8 km diameter within plains
units, both inside and exterior to Caloris - New counts from best images from Mariner 10 and
first MESSENGER flyby
Exterior Plains
Interior Plains
Exterior Plains
Mariner 10
13Caloris Interior Plains 25 Older than Exterior
Plains
14Caloris Basin Cratering Stratigraphy
Important issue raised by these results If
exterior plains are volcanic, then interpretation
of knobby texture of Odin Formation as
Cayley-Plains-like Caloris ejecta may be wrong
- Caloris mountains on rim (measured by Caleb
Fassett) show old, Pop. 1 signature - Crater density much higher than on plains
- SFD shape resembles that of highlands on Moon and
Mercury - Hence interior plains must have volcanic origin,
cannot be contemporaneous impact melt - Interior and exterior plains have low density,
and flat Pop. 2 signa-tureso they formed mainly
after the LHB had ended
15Cratering Components
- New data consistent with M10 view Pop. 1
(LHB), Pop. 2 (recent NEAs) - Secondary branch upturn near 8 km (vs 2 km on
Moon) - Variations in R near 2 km due to proportions of
Pop. 1, chains, clusters - Smooth plains are 25 younger than plains on
floor of Caloris both post-date rim
Population 1
Sample of MSGR cratered terrains more densely
cratered than Mar. 10 avg.
25 older than
Caloris plains
the smooth exterior plains
Population 2
Secondaries
Deficit w.r.t. Pop. 1 due to intercrater plains?