Title: Biodiscovery Management In Australia
1Biodiscovery ManagementIn Australia
- Legal frameworks, Contracts and Agreements for
Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing
2Scope of Presentation
- Why did Australia decide to make its genetic
resources available for commercialisation? - What is is its general approach?
- How will it work in practice?
3Drivers for InvolvementEconomic
- Harness a new potentially valuable resource
- E.g. the value of genetic resource derived drugs
to pharmaceutical industry US75 billion (1997)
or NZ150 billion. - Attract investment in burgeoning, worldwide
Biotechnology Industry - 5000 firms with US200
billion capitalisation (1999) -
4Drivers for Involvement International
- Convention on Biological Diversity including
- Article 3 - sovereign rights over natural
resources, - Article 15 facilitate access and obtain fair
and equitable benefit sharing, and - Article 8(j) - protection of Indigenous
biodiversity knowledge and benefit-sharing from
its use
5Drivers for InvolvementDomestic
- National strategy for the Conservation of
Australias Biological Diversity - Obj 2.8 Ensure that the social and economic
benefits of the use of genetic material and
products accrue to Australia - Obj 1.8.2 use and benefits of traditional
biological knowledge. - National Biotechnology Strategy
- Access to Biological Resources (page 26)
6Drivers for InvolvementDomestic
- October 2002 all Australian Governments adopted
the Nationally Consistent Approach for Access to
and the Utilisation of Australias Native Genetic
And Biochemical Resources - Support from Bailey Inquiry (House of
Representatives Standing Committee on Primary
Industries and Regional Services Report
Bioprospecting Discoveries changing the future
7Character of Australias Biodiversity
- Australia is one of 17 Mega-biodiverse countries
- it has 10 of the worlds biodiversity
- much of this is endemic - eg 85 of its marine
species - Its a developed country but its biodiversity is
rich, often unusual, ancient, rare, or
inadequately known to science
8Resulting in Australias Policy Goal
- to maximise, economic, social and environmental
benefits from the ecologically sustainable use of
genetic and biochemical resources whilst
protecting its biodiversity and natural capital
9Answer to first question
- The CBDs obligation is also an economic
opportunity
10Developing an Australian Approach
- Australian Policy Context - other factors
- Biotechnology Industry US750 million, 198
firms, 6th in the world but its companies are
small and mostly burning capital - Australias has a federal system of government
- most of the genetic resources for its agriculture
sector come from overseas - good science,but often poorly commercialised
- conservative venture capital market
11Australias comparative advantages
- its mega biodiversity
- a well established system of commercial and
intellectual property law in Common Law tradition - honest and stable public administration
- a developing, coherent, legal framework to
facilitate access, and - a strong science and research base offering
collaborative opportunities
12Achieving Australias aimsby
- Facilitating access to genetic resources
- Encouraging investment - domestic and foreign
- Encouraging collaboration with Australian science
- Building physical and intellectual infrastructure
eg bioinformatics
13Access and benefit-sharing Agreements - Past
international experiences
- high transaction costs
- complex and sometimes onerous
- focussed on monetary gains
- time consuming
- favours large companies, universities public
bodies etc - unable to successfully deal with Traditional
Knowledge
14Access and benefit-sharing Agreements - Past bad
experience
- Governments tend to have a one size fits all
approach and agreements have little regard for - the nature of the collector
- the purpose of the collection
- cost of doing business
- contract monitoring
15Developing an Australian Approach
- Central control separating permits from
Benefit-sharing Agreements - All applicants must apply to a single authority
for a permit. - Permits granted by if
- collection is ecologically sustainable and
- a benefit-sharing agreement has been reached with
resource provider - (NB delegated PIC may mean provider is a
different body to permit authority)
16Developing an Australian Approach
- Permits
- simple to apply for
- decision within set time limits
- required information defined
- usually nominal cost or fee
17Developing an Australian Approach
- Benefit-sharing agreements
- Based on normal commercial law
- Must be flexible, to suit the interests of both
parties and circumstances of the proposed
activity - Publish examples of various model conracts
18Balancing Benefits in Agreements-random collection
- Negotiation factors to take into account
- random sampling produces 1 product for 1- 10,000
to 100,000 samples - face value of samples low, but ensure royalty
provision represents market rate - focus on low cost benefits to collector, high
reward to owner eg taxonomic voucher specimens,
parallel collecting, local employment, knowledge
transfer, management intelligence
19Balancing Benefits in Agreements
- whether ownership of samples is retained
- low cost licence for specific uses -the more uses
the more valuable the licence - early milestone payments low
- milestone notification
- infrastructure investment offset against cost of
access - local partners
- intellectual property 3rd party transfer
20Focussed collection
- Factors which add value increase probability or
which reduce cost of collection, namely - traditional knowledge about location, state and
properties of biota - whole of species bioinformatics
- location taxonomic information
- recollection opportunities
- prior art about related species
21Focussed collection
- Success effect area of one discovery leads to
interest by others - eg Yellowstone National Park in US following
commercialisation of Thermus Aquitas, Great
Barrier Reef following discoveries in cone
shells, sponges and corals
22Non commercial science non application of
benefit-sharing agreements
- Science community reports increasing difficulty
obtaining access to genetic resources worldwide - solution exclude non-commercial scientific
research from benefit-sharing requirement - use permits to control activity but provide
safeguards against biopiracy
23Non-commercial scientific research - approval
criteria
- collection is ecologically sustainable
- must have the providers permission
- must provide a copy of all research outcomes to
provider or publish - offer taxonomic specimen to approved body
- must enter a benefit-sharing agreement if any
wish to commercialise - deterrent penalties
24Maximising value
- encourage race to develop discoveries ie. be
reluctant to grant exclusive rights over access
to specific species unless rewards for doing so
exceed probable gain from competition - re-collection confidence - protect collection
area - publish species data about areas have clear
rules and procedures.
25Maximising value
- Reducing transaction costs increases value
- this is particularly important to small firms
with limited capital.
26Intellectual Property
- Value of intellectual capital is traditionally
crystallised when IP is taken out, however also
consider - venture capital or development capital step when
discoverer seeks market funds - an agreed statement of provenance accompanying
but separate from IP may increase success by
reducing commercial risk to any capital provider. -
27Intellectual Property
- Ownership - some recent experience it has been
found that some companies, particularly small
companies, prefer the provider (a state
Government) to retain ownership of IP and grant
an exclusive licence - their reasoning being that the provider is better
placed to police and defend any encroachment on
the IP than its creater
28Sharing Experiences
- Over the next few months Australia will be
circulating within Australian governments draft
encyclopaedia of contractual terms and examples
of model contracts applying those terms to
various situations. - These will be later published and made available
to the WIPO IGC Data base
29Summary and conclusion
- Australia is likely to be the first
megabiodiverse OECD country to apply the Bonn
Guidelines - it faces all the policy issues arising under the
CBD as it is a user, a provider, a developed
country with unexplored biota, a country with
delegated PIC and one with Indigenous peoples
with recognised rights - it is on a learning curve and is determined to
share its experiences
30Summary and conclusion
- Australia has always been a biological laboratory
for nature - over the next few years it is going to be a
laboratory for implementing the third objective
of the CBD - Its also working to be a favoured place to
undertake research - it will only succeed if it takes a flexible
realistic approach to contracts and the
utilisation of IP.